3,511 Forum Posts by "JudgeDredd"
Best Poster - ..uh, yeah, congratz Elfer. sry there lapis ; )
Worst Poster - Memorize
Most Underrated Poster - Imperator
Most Overrated User - Cellarduh!
Most Helpful Poster - TheMason
Least Helpful Poster - Cellardum
Pontificate Award - lapis
Charles Darwin Award - Elfer
Steven Hawking Award for the Sciences - EndGameOmega
Troll Award - Memorize
Chris Hansen Mediator Award - SevenSeize
Best Newcomer - tony4moroney
Most Improved Poster - Dre-Man
Gen. George S. Patton Award - TheMason
Gen. Michael Hayden Award - TheMason
Thomas Ewing Award - pass (~thnx JoS ; )
John Roberts Award - MortifiedPenguins
Alan Greenspan Award - Der-Löwe
"I, Lewis 'Scooter' Libby" Award for Perjury - Cellardick
Robert Novak Award for Integrity - hmm... difficult... Cellard-knob
Court Jester Award - poxpower
Overzealous Mod Award - SevenSeize
Richard Dawkins Award - Drakim
Keith Olbermann Award for Liberalism - BEGONER! (gee. who would have thunk it!)
Bill O'Reilly Award for Conservatism - WolvenBear
Ron Paul Award for Liberatarianism - Imperator
Theodore Roosevelt award for Environmentalism - Earfetish
Vote for all categories, thank you.
Voting ends at 2008.
Cheers!
At 12/30/07 08:28 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:At 12/30/07 08:09 PM, LadyGrace wrote:You're right, I'm sorry.At 12/29/07 04:29 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: It's too inconvenient for you, it compromises your attempt at a conspiracy theory.lol wait... Did you just look at the symbol and confuse me for Dredd?
..i don't know, it did sound like a conspiracy to me. Either that, or my attempt to make you look foolish, which isn't any actual effort.
so I pounced without noticing who I was pouncing on, lol.
^Indicitive of American foreign policy as a matter of fact.
Yeah I'm a dick, but I'm not that big of a dick.
how tiny? (..but you've got a BIG car am i right!?)
At 12/30/07 05:50 PM, chocolate-penguin wrote: We pull out, the Iraqi army is overthrown, and we basically have the state of Alqaedistan.
Firstly, America doesn't pull out of anywhere, unless it's overthrown. Every island or country America has involved in still has US bases (..hey, but I'm no expert, so i await The Mason's confirmation on this point, otherwise i'll have to make my own list.. which is kinda... um... "terrorist behavior").
Secondly, 9-11 has NOTHING to do with IRAQ, other than Bush convincing young and old that "The Rules Have Changed!".
What that means exactly is that America is not going to only worry about defending it's own borders, but is going to actively seek out all and any potential enemies, even if that's highly antagonistic. It's a wholely self-fulfilling stance to take.
Every single country has some crazy shit going on or is fucking us up in some aspect.
The US is perfect. Everyone else is wrong.
If the US government actually did control everything, we'd be safer.
Like Iraq.
So lets all get it together, have an intelligent conversation without any blatant insults, no smart ass comments..
How about you just go dig a hole and hide there in the middle of a desert screaming they'll never control you, rocking back in a fetal position and surviving on Ramen noodles with your tin foil hat, clutching a cheap DVD of some endless bullshit by Alex Jones or David Icke on how "9/11 WUTH TEH CONSPURETHAR!!!!!!1 LUL IM TEH ONLEH 1 DAT NOEZ TEH TRUF!!!!!!1"
LOL. Best Stereotypical Putdown of teh year !!!!1
.
At 12/29/07 06:57 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Could be a user who just got banned and is using alts to get around it.
Yep. Easy answer is to look up who was banned on that day, or perhaps day before.
At 12/29/07 05:41 AM, bypassingsumshit3 wrote: I forgot the password to bypassingsumshit2 and didn't wanna bother retrieving it, and the first account's still there.
So you made 3 alts on same day, yet you forgot #2's password and made #3.. meaning you forgot #2's password in just matter of hours, but not #1 or #3.
I find that rather interesting..
At 12/29/07 11:59 AM, Christopherr wrote: And Blockbuster's always telling me to rewind my movies, anyways.
Speaking of which, with the newly announced online movie rental system, wonder if we'll have to rewind those rentals before we reupload them?
At 12/28/07 12:25 PM, poxpower wrote: At 12/28/07 12:11 PM, Christopherr wrote:This is possibly the most inventive gadget I've seen all year.win
Ye of little faith : )
|
Just in time for the silly season..
.
At 12/29/07 12:58 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: 1) Prove that he is arresting them simply because they are opposition leaders
Pffft.. You don't even know how stupid you sound!
With the new year rolling around, and tech-gadgetry advancing in leaps and bounds.. what gadget do you think will have the biggest legal or lifestyle impact during the year of 2008?
How about the street-smart Ez-Dupe?
.
At 12/28/07 05:58 AM, LazyDrunk wrote: Does he believe in "whatever means necessary", or does he have faith that Pakistan can progress without him?
Tough questions.
Likewise, is anyone caught trying to overthrow Musharraf an insurgant (terrorist) or a freedom fighter?
At 12/28/07 04:54 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: As I said before, you're exploiting Bhutto's death in order to perpetuate your bias, which is sick and pathetic.
^You're the sickest fuck on NG for even suggesting that.
You throw more shit the more you get cornered.
At 12/28/07 03:53 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: JUST because you're trying to pretend that the US supporting Musharraf is somehow worse than simply doing nothing.
No pretending needed. Hindsight is 20-20. The rest will history..
Musharaf is a western-friendly, secular leader who..
..who will as likely reside over a Pakistan civil-war, than step down.
Your goal is to demonize the US even further. You've made this clear.
Your goal is to continually exaggerate the terrorist threat. Then throw nukes into the issue if that's not enough of an agrument.
You believe it's your right to point question to Musharaf's involvement in Bhutto's death, but if anyone else does that then it's a 'wack-job conspiracy'.
Double standards indeed!
At 12/28/07 03:37 AM, Gunter45 wrote:At 12/28/07 03:31 AM, JudgeDredd wrote: Look, Terrorists DONT have nukes.Well, if this goes down badly enough then that might not be the case anymore.
Listen. If it goes down ^THAT badly then Musharraf is just as likely to use them on his own people, or India for eternal posterity.
We already have a leader who is prepared to do 'whatever is required' to retain power. Why is some alternative terrorist scenario MUCH worse? What hasn't happened already to make you feel better about Musharraf? ..except perhaps him doing deals with terrorists, or shooting any opposition?
Oh wait.. I'm alluding to something I can't prove. Strike that part!
:-P
At 12/28/07 02:49 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: If the US didn't deal with Musharraf, things would be worse.
Things ARE bloody WORSE! Getting worse. . . and could not BE worse!
Ohh fuck wait! Terrorists with NUKES?? Ok. You've played the NUKE card already. Sheez..
Gee, you've found something worse!! Listen everybody, we feel much better now about US invasions and shit. Keep up the good work!
You never made that point clear that you were turning this into a moral referendum on US support for Musharraf.
I quoted your OWN comment about Musharraf being involved.. How is that NOT clear?
Why is Musharraf a TOTAL FUCKEN ANGEL to deal with compared to your hollywood movie concept of RADICAL TERRORISTS?!
Look, Terrorists DONT have nukes. Musharraf HAS nukes!
Who does the US do deals with? Yes, that guy with the nukes! Some dodgy dictator with nukes!
Clear now?!?
You're trying to blame the US for Bhutto's death.
At 12/28/07 02:04 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:I'm not even sure whether or not Musharraf had something to do with it..
..a FRIENDLY ALLY of the US of A who imposed martial law, arrested opposition leaders and lawyers and fired a supreme court judge only weeks ago only to PROTECT his continued reign in office.Prove that Musharraf caused the death of Benazir Bhutto.
^LOL
NO-ONE can proove someone in his army orchestrated it cuz they wash the streets clean barely an hour after the event.
But that wasn't the point. The POINT was simple. The POINT is that he isn't someone America should be dealing with. Musharraf is a dodgy Dictator whom America shouldn't be " pulled strings with", funding or arming. Plain and simple. ^THAT IS THE POINT ^right there ^as i've stated it above.
..and totally ignored as usual.
At 12/28/07 01:11 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:I'm not even sure whether or not Musharraf had something to do with it..Or by inaction, let it happen, thus committing the perfect crime.
Your continued doubt over whether Musharraf has something to do with it makes a mockery of US involvement PERIOD!
And if the US DIDN'T push for her return and DIDN'T encourage Musharraf to give her amnesty,
^involvement PERIOD.
The US didn't force her to return to Pakistan, the US simply pulled strings with Musharraf..
..a FRIENDLY ALLY of the US of A who imposed martial law, arrested opposition leaders and lawyers and fired a supreme court judge only weeks ago only to PROTECT his continued reign in office.
The US didn't cause her death, if anyone did (...) then it was her.
Or by inaction, let it happen to herself, thus committing the perfect martyrdom for her beloved country.
Anyone who blames the US for her death is LOOKING for something to blame the US on.
Everything you touch, you break. Some would call it jinxed, hey, but who knows?! **conspiracy**
Perhaps the finest-yet example of damned-if-you-do-&-damned-if-you-don't syndrome.You should think well and hard about it..
^Yup. I said it, and yet you still feel the need ignore my conclusion, and dissect every last word.
..word.
....word!
At 12/28/07 12:20 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: I'm not even sure whether or not Musharraf had something to do with it..
Or by inaction, let it happen, thus committing the perfect crime.
Now dare i say it, the Bush Admin were instrumental in brokering her return, and as much as everyone is saying that this was totally inevitable, then the deteriorating situation following from her death is partly attributable to yet further meddling in the politics of the middle east by US interests belatedly pushing 'Freedom and Democracy' behind the backdrop of years of funding and support for a Military Dictator.
Perhaps the finest-yet example of damned-if-you-do-&-damned-if-you-don't syndrome.
.
At 12/27/07 07:34 PM, reviewer-general wrote: After reading through the 4 pages I missed I now have no faith left in the human race.
;
Haha.. Lmfao..
At 12/27/07 11:48 AM, Zeistro wrote: I can't see why everyone's getting teary-eyed, considering Bhutto was no friend of the West. Did anyone give a shit when Jerry Falwell went?
Would you like some chalk with those crackers?
At 12/22/07 04:48 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: You drive a car? You ride in a car? You ride in a diesel bus? You ride in a diesel train? IT'S YOUR FUCKING WAR. Quit trying to fuck up the world and blame someone else.
False in that not all US oil comes from a war-torn region such as Iraq.
But true in that the multitude of weapons that have flooded into the middle east for decades from western and eastern interests were mainly bargaining chips for oil contracts. Those weapons in turn emboldened a leader like Saddam to invade Iran and Kuwait over oil-field ownership, meaning that one way or another, oil is at the very heart of the reason for America's continued involvement in the region.
I mean who else is winning over 90% support in elections nowadays? '<' ~ '>'
At 12/20/07 11:47 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Putin will cut out tongue in your mouth.
That's KGB you're fucking with.
"I vill crush a-you"
Lol. **russian-fudge cookie for cellar**
At 12/21/07 12:24 AM, JoS wrote: I have to get and maintain Top Secret Security Clearance as part of my employment and even do a poly-graph.
MRI interrogation also??
So the upshot is you can't post on NG anymore, and i score your Mods position, am i right?!
At 12/21/07 12:15 AM, Elfer wrote: I'm winning in the economics category and I'm not fully sure why.
perhaps as i've intimated, it has that word 'legal' in it's description.. *coughs*
Popular vote, as it was started.
hey, could include those votes made in JoS thread if those users don't notice to vote again. There's some more cross-checking work to do =)
At 12/20/07 04:53 PM, reviewer-general wrote: Brownie points to anyone who knows where I came up with the names for the various awards.
Google?
Hot Diggity! Here she goes...
Best Poster -
EndGameOmega (could have scored 'most improved newcomer' if there was such a thing, but equally deserving of this award)
Most Underrated Poster -
Bolo (woot! i'm not even on his hate list - yet! ; )
Most Helpful Poster
The Mason (i've finally learnt his *secret handshake*)
Least Helpful Poster - This jackass revels in making the other users feel like shite.
cellardoor6 (flame king of the year, although by the most extrordinary efforts nonetheless)
Pontificate Award -
SolInvictus (hmm.. could be someone more deserving, but theological head-banging ain't my thing)
Charles Darwin Award -
morefngdbs (actually deserves Most Helpful Award imho, but this'll do just fine)
Steven Hawking Award for the Sciences -
EndGameOmega (person most likely to invent the Bambleweeny-57 Sub-Meson Brain, fo' real)
Keith Olbermann Award for Liberalism -
Elfer (a country run by Elfer would be a country i'd be proud to live in!)
Bill O'Reilly Award for Conservatism -
cellardoor6 (a country run by cellarduh would look almost exactly like America looks today, with a few more dead hippies)
Troll Award -
Memorize (played for again, and got.. again?)
Chris Hansen Mediator Award - this user keeps the thread in one piece after the trolls come rolling through. Fair and balanced..
Proteas (filling Funks shoes is no mean feat - feat get it?)
Best Newcomer -
tony4moroney (..hey, just don't read his profile whatever you do!)
Most Improved Poster -
Grammer (even his grammer is improving : )
Gen. George S. Patton Award - this user is most knowledgeable in matters pertaining to the Armed Forces.
The Mason .. (hey, no contest!)
Gen. Michael Hayden Award - user most knowledgeable in foreign affairs.
Imperator (insights into modern conflicts, something America most lacks)
Thomas Ewing Award - user most informed of domestic issues.
D2Kvirus (Britain, will it ever be Great again?)
John Roberts Award - user most knowledgeable in legal affairs
Elfer (legalize it!)
Alan Greenspan Award - user most knowledgeable on economic matters.
Demosthenez (hey, where have all our tax dollars gone now?)
"I, Lewis 'Scooter' Libby" Award for Perjury - Award for whoever makes up the most bullshit.
cellardoor6 (.."i've seen the moon landing site through a telescope" <-- note: would require a mirror about 100 meters in diameter ; )
Robert Novak Award for Integrity -
Demosthenez (still pushing all the right buttons a least)
Court Jester Award - funniest, goofiest, zaniest, <insert adjective here> user.
poxpower (omg, cellar and i actually agree on something!)
Most Overzealous Mod Award
SevenSeize (meant in the nicest possibly way, mom) : P
Hawt Chick Award
Leeloo-Minai .. (missin' joo hun!)
.
At 12/19/07 10:47 PM, reviewer-general wrote: English Lit. test tommorow. Instead of studying I made the Awards Thread. I am a bad boy! ^_^
Well deserving of external credits for a job well done i'm certain of it.
Play a bit of Freerice.com to get your vocab upto scratch : )
Good luck trouncing that test amigo.
Awesome. 10 / 10 !! Let the games begin..
At 12/19/07 04:30 PM, reviewer-general wrote: I also have suggestions and would be willing to redo this.
Excellent.
If he gives me the go-ahead, I will take suggestions by PM for one day. I have the power to decide what makes it though, so no conplaining.
I was even planning to do it publicly this year, but you have the right approach and people's trust.
My expressed concern... "a problem arose because original design was just an Achievement Awards with golden trophies and stuff, not political representative positions .."el Presidente" ..it sounded funney at the time, but last year it went too far with JMHX winning near every position in the senate/cabinate (including suspect voting). Time to return it to an awards ceremony footing".
Point being.. This is not an election anyway. It's an awards ceremony!
-Dredd
