Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I came.

Yes, because something that happened last week is the same situation as something that happened 140 years ago.

Israel's situation =/= Black People's situation

thanks.

You should hear what happened the night I lost my virginity to a Dyson telescope.

At 7/14/06 11:39 PM, -Gendo- wrote: For a Wednesday, that was pretty cool.

All of my days are like this

At 7/14/06 02:57 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:
Sir, once you have quelled the Germans, will you take out the Commies?

What food do they steal?

At 7/14/06 11:28 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: Never played it…much of an improvement of number 2?

Definitely.

And guess what, had they restricted guns THEN, you would have been overrun by the gun-carrying enemy.

Yay Age of Empires III.

At 7/14/06 10:25 PM, Elfer wrote:
Let me tell you something, a fence isn't going to keep people out of the country, because you only need to damage a little bit of a fence to get through.

The fence is more than just a chain-link, you know.

You come at a criminal that has a handgun with your baseball bat, we'll see who wins.

The subject seems to have veered off course.

They're venomous, and shouldn't own guns.

15 will get you 20.

And that's all I have to say about that.

Like I said, the AWB was a tremendous waste of time.

At 7/14/06 08:16 PM, Elfer wrote: Uhh, yeah, guys, I think I should make you aware of something important at this point.

This topic was started by RED PANDA.

DAMN you got me.

At 7/14/06 07:52 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:

At 7/14/06 07:30 PM, The_Pandar wrote: If you are going to vote en-masse to support something, at least do it all the way through, no cut-and-run politics concerning things that are voted for and then not funded.

So you're criticizing Republicans for voting for a wall and refusing to fund it, even though you opposed the wall in the first place?

I had personal misgivings about the wall, but since it has been voted on, there is a responsibility to not just leave it to languish, along with jobs that are not going to materialize because the project has been abandoned by its parents.

If you are going to vote en-masse to support something, at least do it all the way through, no cut-and-run politics concerning things that are voted for and then not funded.

At 7/14/06 06:14 PM, pretentious_asshat wrote:

At 7/14/06 04:49 PM, The_Pandar wrote:

At 7/14/06 04:48 PM, pretentious_asshat wrote:

I couldn't give two shits about the constitution, and nor do I care that my opinion of it has been noted. I am not a resident of the United States.

Then you really have no place in this discussion.

At 7/14/06 04:51 PM, Goliath- wrote:

At 7/13/06 06:56 PM, VigilanteNighthawk wrote: Tell that to Vietanamese. I'm sure they'll find that to be very funny.

You know nothing of the Vietnam war besides we pulled out huh?

I thought that was all anyone needed to know.

At 7/14/06 04:48 PM, pretentious_asshat wrote: Who gives a shit if it's in the constitution? There is no practical use of guns other than to kill or injure yourself or somebody else.

Except for sport, target, hunting, self defense and hobby collecting, but your vote against the Constitution has been noted.

The 370-mile wall was supposed to be the first step in the long wall that Republican leaders like Ted Stevens were calling for. No surprise then, that after various polls and surveys showed Americans more supportive of President Bush's view of immigration than the Stevens view, Republicans cut and ran on the issue, refusing to fund what they had voted on.

At 7/14/06 04:07 PM, JadedSoB wrote:

At 7/13/06 01:27 PM, Ravariel wrote:

At 7/13/06 01:20 PM, JadedSoB wrote: Clinton getting eight years in office. = Greatest American fail.

Yeah, that booming economy and the decent foreign relations really sucked!

The funniest thing here is that you probably think Clinton actually had a hand in it.

Like I said, the economic and domestic/foreign policy decisions of a president have immediate and ripple effects on the national and, increasingly, international economy.

Thought Shower makes me giggle.

At 7/14/06 03:04 PM, DarthTomato wrote:

At 7/14/06 03:02 PM, The_Pandar wrote:

No nation in the world has such an ingrained history of personal gun ownership as the United States - the effect would certainly be different here than in a place like Finland.

actually, not to disagree, but Switzerland has such an ingrained gun history. just pointing it out.

That's true - there are actually military grade weapons in the home there because of military service.

At 7/14/06 03:12 PM, Luxury_Yacht wrote:

At 7/14/06 03:34 AM, The_Pandar wrote: boosted by the weight of his wooden shoes.

You're thinking Dutch.

This is MY STORY

At 7/14/06 02:59 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 7/14/06 12:46 PM, DarthTomato wrote: you can SAY they won't, but once they take 1 right away from people, they will see that it is possible to take away the rights, then they move on to the next right.

Has this happened in other nations with a ban on guns? No. And why would it happen in the US? Wether or not the citizens are armed, the government can NOT do whatever the hell it wants.

No nation in the world has such an ingrained history of personal gun ownership as the United States - the effect would certainly be different here than in a place like Finland.

At 7/14/06 11:47 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: He ANNEXXED your waffle. The German ANNEXXED your waffle.

I will build a line of waffles facing them so that they will no longer make attempts on the sovereignty of my waffles.

And a president doesn't really do much about the economy. He just rides the wave.

A president's policies can have a profound immediate and ripple-effect on the economy, especially since government is so entangled in the private sector in this day and age.

At 7/14/06 01:33 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:

At 7/14/06 11:42 AM, The_Pandar wrote:

Wait a sec...since when do you believe that a border-long fence would be the best way to control illegal immigration, and since when did all Republicans agree with building a fence?

Where did they agree they were building a fence?

When they voted for it.

At 7/14/06 12:32 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 7/14/06 04:21 AM, The_Pandar wrote: So then why not get rid of the entire Constitution, if we're going to strictly interpret it based on the time in which it was written?

Because the rest of the constitution DOES still have a purpose. There is no debate on getting rid of any other amendment, at least not nowadays.

Actually, the vast majority of Americans strongly support the private ownership of guns. The very vocal minority of anti-gun lobbyists are the ones who are making a big stink.