8,352 Forum Posts by "JMHX"
Your argument hinges on the idea that homosexuality is a choice. Science has again proved a senseless point wrong.
His white house with the white picket fence, white walkway, white roses...
Dry cleaning the hood is going to cost an extra $2, Mr. Lott.
Starch or no?
I are the leet fotoshopor.
Wait, that's MS Paint.
MY AMP GOES TO ELEVEN.
Mmm, infighting. Is that like inbreeding? Let's find Trent Lott.
I never said that all things should be in the public arena. However, I do believe there should be a limit as to how much one man can classify as secret. Political weaknesses, cover-ups and blatant misleadings must not be shuffled under the rug.
At 5/20/04 09:51 PM, RedSkvnk wrote: It's an economic contract.
He gets a cookie.
Freak, you state the point eloquently. Well done.
The fact that so many have replied makes me laugh and cry.
Just because you're homosexual doesn't exactly mean your sex drive is like that of an animal and you lack all self control. Wow.
At 5/19/04 10:48 PM, Izuamoto wrote: i don't see how you justify comparing gay divorce rates in a country that already has an enourmous divorce rate and not justify the very similar legal struggle of two minority groups. you astound me
Well spoken, Izu.
At 5/19/04 10:04 PM, NoHitHair wrote:
Secondly, I think using Sweden as an example is perfectly valid. You believe that Sweden's tolerance for homosexuality is worse than ours? Bullshit.
I do not see Sweden as being valid as there is a wide cultural difference between the Swedes and a New Yorker, for example.
"God damnit I can't keep doing things to keep peace if you keep firing missiles into GAZA!" - President Bartlett to the Israeli emissary
The West Wing is leet.
The idea that this is satire may not strike some.
Sweden is hardly comparable to the United States in any rational way. U.S. studies have shown that, on average, homosexual female couples stay together 51% longer than heterosexual couples, and males remain together 42% longer.
I'm currently digging for my source on this. Three years of favorites certainly build up on IE.
At 5/19/04 09:18 PM, TIMMYRULESU wrote:At 4/26/04 05:53 PM, Zeratul86 wrote: Straight up: what is your opinion on same-sex marriag arrangements?Yuck, I think those are TOTALLY freaky. I mean man with man in bed.I think im gonna faint at just imagining the sight
Mmm...cuddle a little closer, baby.
At 5/19/04 09:15 PM, NoHitHair wrote: Yes, I agree - terrible. Obviously, I'm not for the rampant killing and maiming of gays. The examples you bring up still are of a few compared to the mass atrocities committed against blacks - bottom line.
I do not contest the fact that gays have not suffered the sheer amount of atrocities that blacks did throughout their time in North America. However, I also do not think that, because of that, homosexuals should not have the opportunity to gain the freedoms so many blacks desired. Is there a boundary where we say "You must have this much torture for the right to marry?"
It pleases me when certain GOP leaders speak out against Gay Marriage, screaming that it will destroy the integrity of marriage, only to have news come out that they have had an affair on their beloved wife, and it was only discovered when the woman in question began to talk to the media.
Oh yes, defend marriage indeed. That kind of rhetoric is only backed up if it starts withing your own sexuality.
Simply because their oppression, and yes, it is oppression when you have the entire Westboro Baptist Church, led by raging anti-gay crusader Fred Phelps, staging local and national marches against homosexuals. Now, it can be argued that this is only one church, but in reference to WBC, I only speak of them staging the marches and anti-gay rallies in their area. There are other churches to handle other states and cities, I choose to single this one out as it is the best known.
When a man like Mr. Phelps (I decline to use his proper title, Reverend, because I do not believe that is the correct word to describe him) can collect money to build a statue commemorating the day Matthew Shepard, a teenager killed for being gay, a teenager tortured, beaten, and tied to a fence, "entered into Hell," as he so likes to say, that is oppression by fear. That is saying that, as he has said many times, "Gays are not welcome in this city or this state."
The fact that the oppression exists and is allowed to go on is disturbing. I understand and regrettably respect Mr. Phelps' use of free speech, but it does not stop me from declaring myself that his speech is disgusting in every way, and serves only to stir the hatreds and prejudices of the people of the United States. It's a depressing thing to look at.
At 5/19/04 09:00 PM, RandomFreak wrote:
Oh and something to say to those who claim that questioning the President is traitorous, horrific or otherwise wrong, most of you couldn't spit out your dissent fast enough when Clinton did things you didn't like. Hypocracy is an ugly thing.
You, my friend, receive a shiny quarter!
Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring, Bananaphone...
A pagan and a lesbian. There's a comic strip in the making.
As Johnny so eloquently told me, "Gays are getting married, but I still have no urge to sleep with men."
At 5/19/04 08:54 PM, NoHitHair wrote:Okay... Can you expand on that? Are you talking about showing homosexual affection in public? Again - that goes directly to hiding your sexual affinity. Blacks can not.
Until recently there were laws in Texas that allowed officers to imprison people for being gay.
Texas anti-sodomy laws were also, until the Supreme Court voiced otherwise, valid in the privacy of homes as well. The question here is raised: should you have to hide who you are simply because no one likes it? Should you have to give up that part of yourself and accept the lack of civil liberty that comes with it?
Homosexuals have done this since the beginning. They are tired of it and will not do it anymore. The Supreme Court, by refusing to intervene in Massachusetts, has established a precedent of "Yellow Light," or check with the courts before moving forward in gay marriage cases. The Supreme Court, by not acting, has acted.
At 5/18/04 01:11 AM, Damien3003 wrote:At 5/17/04 05:46 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:Does that mean you have no actual retort to what i said? Or does that mean that you have one, and just choose not to voice it?At 5/17/04 04:00 PM, Damien3003 wrote:At 5/16/04 10:36 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:Yea, and if you had your way...NOTHING would be covered by national security...you'd have ABC news read the list of all intelligence matters nightly.That one makes me giggle.
It means that the idea of someone who works in government (myself) not caring for the security of the country was kind of funny from my perspective.
At 5/18/04 07:44 PM, US_BOMBS wrote: wish gay be gon was real...CLICK ON MY SIG PIC PLZ!!!
You may be the first casualty.
At 5/19/04 03:52 PM, imdisturbed wrote: Ok bottom line is its equal popularity to make gay marrige leagal as it is not to gays suck conversation over
Ignorance seems to rule in some areas.
I think Spanishfli provides a very valid and unique view of things. You really need to experience the lifestyle to truly be able to speak on it. The best I can do, as a straight man, is withdraw information from my personal views and documented fact and transcript.
As Hans Blix and David Kay have said, one shell is hardly proof that there is a program, and was most likely scavenged by Al Qaida cells within Iraq.
