5,911 Forum Posts by "Jimsween"
i didnt mean it to be a joke i was just pointing it out
this isnt really taht realated to politics but ahs anyone noticed that U.S. is ruled by a Bush, a Dick, and a Colon.
hmmm... a lounge thread interesting. How about one on jessie ventura hes always good for a larf.
no, but i think if we only changed asbestos when we needed to we would save alot of money, and like i said before even in buildings with damaged asbestos tehre is more asbestos outside that there is inside.
At 3/12/03 09:08 PM, thenark wrote:
And in the news, all anti war protesters are shown as crazy, left wing radicals, I thought the news was supposed to be unbiased, but it has been very biased of late
The news is like any other TV show, it puts on what sells. Nobody wants to hear about mild mannered people protesting they want to hear about people making the peace sign nude and men dressing up as women with rockets on thier crotches talking about oil plants (yes that happened) they nees to catch the attention of the people fast or else they will lose it.
So much for freedom of choice when no matter what you watch, its about the war.
theres freedom of speech too but you still have to pay to use the telephone because its a business and businesses need to make money or else there wouldnt be one. MY advice to you, get a dish.
"the problem with a smoking gun is that you dont see the smoke" donald rumsfeld. All this time and he still hasnt gotten the smoking gun metaphor right.
but in order to safely remove it you have to shut down the building for quite some time and some places where asbestos is placed are inaccesible without removing parts of the biulding, i.e. wall, plus you have to pay to install the new stuff when the old stuff wasnt hurting anyone (just yet).
they ARE in serbia? so where arent they any more?
jsut out of curiosity were you thinking of syria because that whole alqaeda thing you said coonfused me
Turkey recently declined to help us so shouldnt we boycott thier name too? I for one would love to have Liberty for thanksgiving or see libery in a lunchmeant packet. and dont think chile is getting off easy either thier on the security council too and they havent voted for us.
More problems is not what eastern europe needs right now espescially in serbia with montenegro threatening to leave.
its not to murder people its to defend your country, or attack under your countries orders. but nevertheless they do it so you dont have to if people didnt sign up we would have to draft people.
At 3/10/03 12:02 PM, mysecondstar wrote:
because let's be honest. first, the US will not target these locations due to the fact that they need their smoking gun. second, iraq will, more likely than not, destroy their stock piles before the Americans reach them. therefore there will be no smoking gun and the US invasion will not be justified.
Thats not neccesarily true because saddam has nothing to lose. To me it seems like he doesnt actually hate america but he either hates mankind or wants attention. So its probable that hell use all his weapons either on the troops or his people and then use his biological defense strategy to make the land inhabitable. Think of it this way would you rather be forgotten or hatefully remembered by most people.
Like i said before though if removing it werent a problem i'd gladly go for it but when you remove it it becomes mixed in the air.
if i have to though. dogmatic law, jesus said to peter, "what you hold true on earth i shall hold true in heaven." which basically means we make the laws to get into heaven, whatever we feel are the rules for an acceptable society are the rules to get into heaven.
you must believe in genesis then, i dont so we could possibly agree on that
it never mentions bacteria or protozoa in the bible so he very well could have made them in his image. In the bible god can take any form so what is his image?
so a single celled human has a soul but a single celled bacterium doesnt?
you just said that if it was an issue of terrorism its ok to censor but isnt killing abortionist terrorism?
what the difference between a 10 celled baby and a 1000 baby, in other words when does the baby become unabortable if indeed you are against abortion.
Some people use the internet to give addresses of abortion doctors, Probably to get people to either terrorise or kill them. This isnt the only case of the net being used to do things of the sort so shouldnt that be just as illegal as the net being used to relay terrorist imformation and to plan terrorist attacks?
This isn't that hot of a topic but it wont seem to go away. Asbestos is a substance that is fairly fire proof and doesn't conduct heat well and its used to fireproof wires and other plases that are fire prone. This substance however can get lodged in your lungs and cause lung cancer. However it only is spread into the air when it is removed or damaged and only the strait kind gets lodged in your lungs, there is another kind which is curled and rarely does it cause lung cancer. Many places still use asbestos and politicians are considering removing it from all places even though there is usually more asbestos in the air outside than there is inside and removing it would only cause more asbestos to be spread into the air. Whats your opinion on this?
Your probbly right but i thought they hadn't perfected it yet and thats why they cant unfreeze people yet because they have to wait until they have the technology to unfreeze them properly.
im not sure if i understand a word you just said but this lil johnny seems cocky
You hear alot of people talk about this war being for oil but its not, certainly oil is a factor and we wouldnt be handling this in the way we are(not jsut yet anyway) if iraq's economy was cabbage based(you laugh but thats just about it for some countries). Plus this oil isnt really going to last much longer, it has maybe 20 to 40 years left and we certainly wouldnt be getting it for free, in fact we might be paying more considering how much it will take to rebuild iraq. Also people say that U.S. is a big bullie that says only we can have nuclear weapons which isnt true. We have been trying to eliminate all nuclear eapons in fact we recently eliminated either 2/3 or 1/3 of our nuclear arsenal(i cant quite remember how much it was). We tend not to mess around with countries that already have nukes even if in small supply, i.e. india and pakistan, but we certainly dont want anyone else to start having nuclear weapons. I think everyone will agree with that exept for the country trying to make the weapons, so its not like what were doing is unjustified or cruel. As for civilian casualties Saddam has used civilians as "shields" when it comes to bombings and even our own prisoners so we cant trust him for information on how many civilians died. I have a question too, does anyone know if we still have prisoners over there or did we get them all back?
At 3/11/03 08:08 PM, Commander-K25 wrote: Unbelieveable....
That's like the erasing of the WTC out of pictures that occured after 9/11.
yeah that was pretty dumb and when they took that sienfield episode out because the woman died from licking envelopes
At 3/11/03 07:39 PM, jonfandal wrote: I think that stem cells should be harvested from the afterbirth and umbilical cord of babies and frozen for the individual, should the need arise. I don't think stem cells should be taken from the Babies themselves though.
that'd be nice but how long do cells last when they're frozen i thought the ice crystals killed them.
At 3/11/03 07:44 PM, TheEvilOne wrote: And to clarify: French toast is from Belgium, and French fries are from Britain.
youre right i had it mixed up
