At 7/16/07 05:59 AM, Elamdri wrote: I dunno, he has no leg muscles to tire, so that might be an advantage.

Of course he has. How else could he move his legs if he didn't have muscles there? He's still got his hams to worry about.

I'd be skeptical about letting him in compete in major sporting events such as the olympics to be honest. Although I think personally he should be allowed to compete, like that one official said, that would be grounds to allow people with other enhancements.

No but really Im just kididng and I like the idea of enjoying the little things. It makes people seem all philosophical and chilled to the bone when they can enjoy a ray of sunlight or the sound of birds in the morning. I need to learn to relax again. Had some pretty stressful exams in June so Im winding down again till October. I think I need to get off the computer for a start.

Me personally I just like feeling comfortable with friends where people aren't competing to be humorous or the most fun. Everyone being exactly who they are and all of us accepting it. I enjoy those moments. I enjoy the smiles of people as well. Some people have infectious smiles and when I see them smile I cant help but feel good.

Haha someones got a tiny dick!

At 7/15/07 12:55 AM, g0t wrote: I don't think we have any of those yet. However, it's the one I'm waiting for :D.

"Supermassive black holes can have initial mass millions of times that of the Sun. It is believed that these massive holes lurk in the center of every galaxy and be integral to the way galaxies evolve." From that link I posted earlier.

Also, do you think that once we're inside the black hole, if we'll even feel pain since our bodies will be stretched out indefinately but time will be so slow that our nerves won't reach our brain fast enough for us to feel it. We probably won't even realize we're being sucked into a black hole.

Yeh lol I figure from our relative point of view if we were being sucked in, it would last an eternity. So basically we would never reach the center we'd just find ourselves stretching. Id hate to be concious for that though lol

At 7/14/07 11:57 PM, g0t wrote: Stephen Hawking? All I know about his theory's was that time was like a rubber band or some shit. The Big Crunch you're talking about? That's something different from my theory. However as I said in my earlier post, this is just a theory. I have solved it for myself thus far.

Its different by like a tiny amount. Instead of saying that all the matter in the universe causes an end to the expansion, you're saying a black hole does it.

And that way brings in even more questions. Obviously this black hole wont be at the center of the universe. So here it is 'sucking' everything up, but because its 'to one side' of the universe, its going to suck everything up on that side faster than it will do the other sides. So is it just going to stop sucking on the side where theres nothing to suck, or is it going to start doing crazy shit?

At 7/14/07 11:59 PM, g0t wrote: This is talking about the mini black holes I was talking about. They say some stars have the potential for "infinite" gravity. Thus a super Black Hole.

Supermassive blackholes not big enough for you?!???

Also, I thought I remembered something about Stevey realising his past theories were a bit awry.

And so from Stephen Hawkings himself:

The professor claimed saying, “… some time ago I discovered that black holes are not that black after all. They give off what has been called ‘Hawking radiation’. Because of this emission black holes will lose mass and eventually evaporates completely. The Hawking radiation seemed to be random and featureless so it appeared that all information about what fell into a black hole was lost.”

source

So basically when it reaches 0 volume, it doesn't explode, but just dissapears.

Well done on reading Robot Voice Wheelchair man's ideas. If I do recall thats pretty much what he said way back when he first started this. I remember watching a documentary of his life and this was pretty much his theory that it would all collapse in on itself.

Also, L M A O. Solved the Big Bang Theory? You haven't solved shit. Even if this theory was your own, thats all it is, a theory. To "solve" the big bang theory you'd need to solve how the big bang started, how it all begun.

At 7/14/07 05:46 AM, Rabid-Echidna wrote: The other complication I factor into my view of this is little more than a speculation and is based on all the purely theoretical ideas of string theory and alternate dimensions. That each dimension is little more than a series of stretched out energy planes, and that a big bang could be a collision between two of them. The problem is that it's not even close to being observable, and nobody even knows if branes or alternate dimensions even exist, and there's no way to observe either of them. I think I read about the idea in a Hawking book a while ago, but it's certainly relevant. The thought of a bunch of p-branes drifting around in the bulk, then running into each other occasionally and producing all matter in a given universe is certainly an interesting concept.

Yeh boy. I carried out some research for my Physics project on String theory. Theres like a few floating around.

The problem is that it's not even close to being observable, and nobody even knows if branes or alternate dimensions even exist, and there's no way to observe either of them.

Although thats true, there are certain tests they can do when that big ass particle accelerator is built at CERN that can sort of validate string theory.

From what I can remember, the one theory of why the gravitational force is the weakest of the four known forces is that instead of staying on our plane/brane type thing, it dissapates onto other parallel dimensions and shit. And the thing were hoping to try and do is catch a glimpse of the moment the gravitational particle, called a graviton I think, passes through our little membrane into other dimensions. And I think they had some way of doing it, involving quarks and all sorts of crap.

If they can prove super symmetry as well, it'll provide more evidence of string theory.

I cant remember most of it to be honest, but you should check out these videos on string theory as they're jam packed with goodness and it is conveyed in an easy enough way to understand. The visuals help in a way a book might not, although the book would most likely be more theorough.

Tigger st- had sex with my bike

Science Fiction.

We, no matter how we'd hate to admit it, love happy endings. We love it when good people triumph over bad. Who best to have as the good people? None other than our very own species, humans. And we cant really be considered good if we're invading them.

We also love underdogs. That person who had no chance of winning the struggle at the beginning, but fought hard, brave and strong and persevered to the goal of winning whatever. Humans being underpowered against a much more advanced race, and coming out trumps because of our sheer will and determination.

Now why not make humans the good underdog people. Got yourself a book/movie right there.

At 7/14/07 06:46 PM, N-Antichrist wrote: Insulting Islam is lame

Islame*

Hahaha OH MAN AM I RIGHT OR AM I RIGHT GUYS?!?! HIGH FIVE (5)

Also, originally the public internet was for pasty white kids and their startrek fan sites, then porn got hold of it and made it what it is today.

At 7/14/07 03:55 PM, H-h-h-heliopios wrote: Saying "Bye Bye Plane" is not the same as a kid flying off the fucking handle screaming, kicking, and being a dickhead.

You're saying that, when a toddlers says an innocent sentence that he's no better than a spoiled child at walmart that throws shit and has tempter tantrums over a toy?

He repeated it over and over while the flight attendant was giving a safety speech. Theres also the chance it gets worse. The attendant could either have an angry mother on this end, or a load of angry passengers on the other end. She made a call and stuck with it.

Also we've only heard the mother's side. She says the child was just "saying it", but Im sure there was more than that. The media giving us the one sided view of the situation doesn't help really.

At 7/14/07 03:36 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Depends.

I see what you're doing.

At 7/14/07 03:31 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Too see how you guys discuss.

But thats all you do.

In real life do you just sit around and watch your friends talk?

I like how Idiot-Finder makes the topic then adds nothing to the discussion.

At 7/14/07 02:58 PM, H-h-h-heliopios wrote: No, sir, you are the idiot if you think a toddler just learning sentence, saying "Bye bye plane" is acting up.

He obviously repeated. It happened throughout the flight attendants speech for starters.

He's Nineteen months old for christ's sake, not Seven or Eight years old.

Im not having a go at the kid. The mother needs to get a better handle on things.

Oh and all these sarcastic "Oh wow and you were a perfect child werent you?" posters are idiots. Of course people weren't perfect kids, but the difference is we weren't taken on public planes while acting up.

I lol'd.

"Penland said other passengers began speaking up on her behalf"

Yeh right. I bet after 20 minutes of it they would be writhing in frustration and woul want to throw the baby off the plane, let alone walk it out.

Also from the interview it seems the kid is faitly active and I bet could be quite a nuisance.

She sounds incredibly high maintenance.

My dad hit me with a short rod when I was little. He bent me and my brother over and one after the other smacked us leaving a pencil-wide line across both our asses. Obviously it stung like hell and I cried, I dont think my brother did though. He was 3 years older though I guess

I cant remember what we did. We were just being naughty I guess. Then whenever we were bad he would just threaten us with it. It worked to be fair. Me and my brother can be fairly polite people so its all good.

Also, Im guessing you mean beating as in smacking your child type thing.

I heard they kill men by the hundreds by shooting fireballs from their eyes and bolts of lightning from their arses.

I always thought snuff films were porn :S

At 7/13/07 09:26 AM, Lost-Chances wrote:

At 7/13/07 09:18 AM, Jewmanji wrote: But its so surreal I wonder whether there is a definitive message, or if its just meant to leave the watcher with a mindfuck moment.

The second one. You're meant to draw your own conclusions.

I disagree. We're meant to draw our own conclusions? I dont think we're meant to do anything. I think we're allowed to do what we want with the movie in my opinion. Most movies/stories/plots are meant to have a point, a morale, a conclusion, but DD doesn't. So why should the viewer be meant to decipher it themselves.

Would you think less of someone if they just decided to leave the film as it is to them, a mindfuck moment instead of trying to like decode that shit?

Donnie Darko makes no sense. Most people I talk to either admit they dont understand what the point of the movie is, or they try and decipher what it was supposed to mean. Thus people come out with different ideas on what the film is trying to convey. But its so surreal I wonder whether there is a definitive message, or if its just meant to leave the watcher with a mindfuck moment.

Who knows.

That Thriller copy is shit. GOOOOLLLY MAAAHG

Also Im more racist to Middle Easterns than Blacks. I have a bad mental brickwall when it comes to them. Loads of reasons really. I just see them as much more conniving and sly people.

Last place is the best at being worst.

At 7/12/07 10:37 PM, snow-templar wrote: some English horror flick with a lot of black comedy involving some group of people at a retreat for a company called Palisade being hunted down by Russian serial killers, but I forgot the name.

Severance

Faggotry

Tigger stole your bike.

Tell him hes talking bullshit. Straight out and say it. I wouldn't be able to talk to someone if I know they were bullshitting. I know this kid in my school who I think bullshits every second chance he gets. Some of the stuff he comes up with is so outrageous it amazes me how some people believe the shit.

One story, is that a guy (Call him John) had a couple of his friends over at his house including this bullshitter. So apparently everyone was upstairs and this John kid decided to go down stairs and start cleaning with the hoover. A while later bullshitter decides to go check on him and finds him in the corner with the hoover round his dick.

Some of the problems I have with this story is that John didn't seem like a weird enough kid to get a hooverjob. Two, these kids weren't exactly close I dont know what he was doing round there. Three, why would he start cleaning when friends are around? Four, even if he is a fan of hooverjobs why would he do it WHILE his friends are around. Five, its the bullshitter who is spreading the story and because of his track record anything he says to me is bullshit from the get go.

Seriously I remember him telling the story once and I was just like "Whatever, sounds like bullshit to me". I dont talk to the faggot which is good.

Tom and Jerry