233 Forum Posts by "Jesus"
At 1/21/07 04:31 PM, Kart-Man wrote:P.S. Cybex, have you been hacked?
Yep.
At 1/21/07 04:03 PM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: Check out "your" posts in general.
I've seen.
At 1/21/07 04:13 PM, Cybex wrote: cHROME AND nETCAT,,, TWO NIGGURS ON TOP OF THEY GAME
yeek yeek w00p w00p
I pitty you. All it takes is one real life friend, and you'd have something better to do. Start dieting. You'll become less fugly and it will give real people less of a reason to make fun of you. Then you could find yourself a friend.
At 1/21/07 04:06 PM, manekineko1 wrote: Good or Bad?
What do you think of them? D:
I'm personally glad they're here. The people in it are funny and I like them. And also they hacked Wonchop.
&you?
I'm glad they're here. They've given me multiple laughs today alone.
At 1/21/07 03:58 PM, TurtleJuice wrote: Horrible spelling , but nice job on the BA
Thanks. It took me 2 years to get it, but its always nice to find my account hacked.
At 1/21/07 03:32 PM, Toast wrote: but liek ur jezuz!!!
I know. Wait til i tell daddy about this!
RE: Stolen account
At 1/21/07 03:28 PM, ImpotentBoy2 wrote: huh how do these keep getting stolen.
Turns out i've been yeek'd. I'll have words with ADM. My FTP info has been changed.
Bye Bye Cybex
Lawl. Account stolen. Round up all the suspects.
At 1/13/07 02:13 PM, thepieface wrote: does anyone knoiw where i can get a free lipsync tool
This is the closest you'll get to doing no work and end up with somwthing good.
At 1/13/07 03:12 PM, Mogly wrote:At 1/13/07 03:02 PM, Jesus wrote: Me. Not completely finished yet.Ah that's looking alot nicer since I last saw it. Rather than just having the google ad box to the right why not have something there? Even just a picture. It looks very.. 'text' at the moment. I notice this on the other pages too, like the games page. You give up more space for your adverts than you do for your GAMES. :)
Yeah, but i'll be shitting out a whole load of games to take up more space.
The box on the right will have newest and best games and also affiliates. I just haven't got round to that yet.
Me. Not completely finished yet.
At 1/10/07 05:56 PM, Madknt wrote: also, why would we write 2 in base 2?
Well if the question was written in base 2, it's only logical that the answer should be too. Thereofore 10 would be the accepted answer if the question was in base 2.
At 1/10/07 05:00 PM, DigDugz wrote: So, Newgrounds, yes or no?
Yes. I like the way it's on a descrete part of the body so if you don't like it, you can just ignore it.
At 1/10/07 05:50 PM, Madknt wrote: no, either way its 2.
in binary..
it would the same as 000001 + 000001 = 000010
which in decimal is 2.
Ah, but when he said 10, maybe he was actually writing 2 in binary.
At 1/10/07 05:36 PM, RageOfOrder wrote: Similarly, 4 * x / x = 4, regardless of X's value.
Thats not true. Dividing by 0 is not allowed in algebra. Otherwise:
if a=b,
ab=a^2
ab-b^2=a^2-b^2
b(a-b)=(a+b)(a-b)
b=a+b
b=2b
1=2.
Thats obviously incorrect, and the incorrectness is due to dividing by 0.
At 1/9/07 05:15 PM, Denvish wrote: Well, to me that sounds like a big ol' lump of bullshit. Most of the terms in that article are completely made-up. Whoever wrote that article was laughing at anybody who actually believed it.
It's not as if it's one article that says about this. I was told about it by my maths teacher. I only found that article after ages of searching. It's an accepted theory, not just some bullshit that someones made up.
At 1/9/07 05:11 PM, CrimsonEdge wrote: Not only did you give the wrong equation, but you gave the wrong answer for the equation you gave. Not only that, but you put up a link to shit about the string theory (which is a theory and has little to nothing to do with mathematical theories). Of course, in other dimensions 2+2=1/3, this doesn't make it true.
Hence the absolute flaw with everything you've said. You're an idiot.
I'm beginning to think the same about you. You obviously know nothing about the importance of infinity (i'm not trying to say i do). Mathematicicans wouldn't devote their lives to it and peple wouldn't use it so much in math, in equations and stuff if it wasn't important. It's like the number i (square root of -1). It's not a real number, it's an imaginary number. But it's used a lot in maths.
There's nothing wrong with the link i gave, yes it's just a theory, but so is everything. Maths isn't about rejecting all theories. It uses the most logical theories. Everything has to be a theory because there's no way of proving anything. Even 1+1=2 is a theory.
And i'm afraid the string theory is one which is the most logical, and accepted by society, and in order for that to work, the sum of all positive integers has to equal -1/12. Sure, it's difficult to imagine, but thats the most logical theory.
Stop being so closed minded and try to accept that just maybe, there might be something that is correct that you don't understand and have no idea how it could be true.
Maths is full of unexplained things like this, hopefully one day it will all be properly explained and be a lot clearer, but for now you'll just have to accept that your brain isn't good enough to understand everything.
At 1/9/07 04:33 PM, CrimsonEdge wrote: I'll put it to you like this. You are giving no proof, no theories, no formulas, no evidence, nothing, as to how or why you got that answer. Give them or you're a kid who had a really shitty math teacher.
I can give you proof, but you'd be no less confused than you are now.
At 1/9/07 04:13 PM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote: 42, because it answers everything and is completley original.
Wrong.
At 1/9/07 04:14 PM, Paranoia wrote: Does it have anything to do with Pascal's triangle?
No more clues apart from it being a negative number close to 0.
At 1/9/07 04:15 PM, Arby wrote: That makes more sense. the answer is obviously "?"
What is "?" equal to as a number?
At 1/9/07 04:15 PM, Paranoia wrote: Oh, and therefore the answer would be infinity / infinity, which is either 0, 1, infinity or undefined. That pretty much leaves us more confused than we were to begin with >.<
None of the above.
At 1/9/07 04:16 PM, disingenuous wrote: This has gone on far too long.
Out with it.
You don't want me to tell you, but if you really really do, i will.
At 1/9/07 04:16 PM, snow-templar wrote: Since you started at 1 and went to 2 and so on my answer will be....
all integers!
If that is wrong, then all real numbers.
Both wrong.
At 1/9/07 04:16 PM, Claxor wrote: I fail to see how the sum of a bunch of positive numbers suddenly becomes negative
You won't like the answer.
This is cybex
I wrote the question slightly wqrong. I meant this:
1+2+3+4+5.....+(infinity-2)+(infinity-1)+(inf inity)=?
It's meant to be like that. So in words, what is the sum of all integers from 1 to infinity? There is a real number which is the answer to this question.
And we said we'd kill you if you told anyone about it. See you later >:(
At 12/7/06 01:39 PM, EvilJesus wrote: I'm more jesusy than you XD
No you're not
Lots of love, Cybex's ALT.
P
At 12/7/06 01:31 PM, ShinDenjin wrote: Jesus is the Mexican guy that lives down the street from me and runs the local laundrymat.
Are you stalking me?
At 12/6/06 01:07 PM, Mind-Edge wrote: POST WITH JESUS, POST WITH JESUS.
No.
At 11/26/06 03:18 PM, killerjeff wrote: or a herpy infested communist
Nah, it's too hard being a plummer and a hero!
At 11/26/06 03:19 PM, Crrazy-flash-man wrote: stop trying to get popular by insulting other people noob
Seemed to do the trick for you(!)
At 11/26/06 03:16 PM, kylexthexpostman wrote: lol actually it is
he calle dme a name anyways, he call ed me an immature faggot
i do believe i am older than him
I do believe the correllation between age and maturity is not that high. I'd say r = about 0.3 in teenage years and pretty much 0 after that.
At 11/26/06 03:12 PM, kylexthexpostman wrote: I just wanted to get to the bottom of why people are such assholes
A majority of the assholes on th BBS are so because they get beat up if they try to be assholes on the BBS. The otehr assholes just do it because it's funny to take the piss out of people who moan about stupid things.
