Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Or maybe 2 movies blammed with a score of 0.20 or lower in a 30-day period, that sounds fair. If it has some effort it will in all likeness have a score higher than that at blammination.

Post it in the news thread, you'll more likely be heard, er read.

At 6/24/04 04:56 PM, WadeFulp wrote:
Maybe if a user has 2 entries blammed in a 30 day period they get a 15 day portal ban, or something along those lines.

Isn't that a little harsh? I don't think 2 in 30 days is anything big, if they get 14 blammed in a week on the other hand, yeah that's pretty blatant.

At 6/24/04 08:07 PM, carnifderome wrote:
Doesn't intent also matter when the author submits something decent (I don't know if it was stolen, but I did see the original and gave a 2) and then changes the submission twice so now he has a protected flash of 3 frames of color and proceeds to taunt viewers in the description?

Well no, that's not breaking the rules, just being an ass. In someways it's nice that they taunt you so you can know not to veiw the movie.

Yeah that's nice, feel free to express your opinions again when you're done kissing his ass.

I got the wolf, not really familiar with the movie though.

At 6/24/04 01:03 AM, carnifderome wrote:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/177101

It's not breaking the rules so no.

I like them both. I think they both hate legendary frog too, any legendary frog hater is a good person if you ask me.

40. Impersonate an admin.
39. Post 30 topics in 2 minutes, I've actually seen this done at another forum.

At 6/22/04 10:08 PM, Krack_R0ck wrote: cuz i relized hes 21 now and he must party like a mofo :D im just curious

Yeah right, don't bet on it. He's too busy looking at hentai.

Will you suck-ups please stop kissing wade's ass? There's no way you're going to tell me you like the idea of 2 blams in a month = ban. He probably doesn't intend to make it that harsh anyway, but still......

I agree with the 2 within 48 hours or 48 hours till you can submit another if 1 gets blammed. They seem fair enough.

Hell yeah, I hate windows XP too. I think punishing people for getting a couple movies blammed in a month is way overboard. What if those 2 were blammed unfairly?

What if they have 14 in a week instead of 2 in 30 days? I don't think having 2 blammed in 30 days would be intentional but if they have 14 in a week it's pretty obvious.

They're just kissing tom fulp's ass that's all.

I geuss anyone who calls me a white person must be racist then.

I respect anyone who hates legendary frog.

You guys should stop kissing all the mod's asses, this is between him and shrapnel. It is not between him and you guys.

Yeah, you get banned if it continues. It's only for extreme cases like the one who said he always votes 0 though. I'm geussing it's also done now when they vote based on batting average. Also it only applies to under judgement movies, you can vote however you want on ones past judgement.

Looks count, and it really helps if shee's not reatrded. So both, but mostly I just want a nice girl I can easily live with.

Blinding flash of the obvious, nuff said.

At 5/31/04 11:53 PM, LetsKnife wrote: i vote 0 on everything because im a bitter person, i suck at flash and cant accept the fact that new authors are trying and actually doing some good stuff, so i want everything that is not from LF, Knox or IWP blammed

I strongly suspect you'll be level 1 before long.

At 5/31/04 07:59 PM, kyledude wrote:
that happens a lot i know, but i at least watch the movie to find out if its good or not. yeah, i admit its hard not to want to vote according to the authors past record and film count, but you have to be real careful with new authors because often they have talent. even so, i might end up voting low even if i like the thing just because im experienced enough at it to know whether other people are going to save it or not. it may be wrong, but im not going to lose a point to vote high on a movie i know is going to be blammed. luckily, that doesnt happen so much so i do try to vote as fairly as possible on movies by new authors.

Then you make the problem that much worse, I've talked with another guy who said the same thing. Like you he's not a dumbass, he just wants to get the points if it's going to be blammed anyway. It sucks missing out but if you vote fairly instead, you make it that much easier on new authors. Plus I think the admins have been doing stuff about batting average based voting because I've seen a lot of new authors get their flash passed lately. So that style may even get you in trouble.

At 5/30/04 12:32 PM, _altr_ wrote:

At 5/30/04 11:28 AM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score to 1.81!

You gave this entry a 5, raising its score to 1.82!

Sorry to double post(wish we had an edit feature), but that was classic. It's up to 1.85 now and will probably have a decent score in the long run. B has a high score as is.

Yeah they're going to ban him just because a stupid LF fanboy said so. Don't delude yourself kid.

At 5/30/04 04:33 PM, AntiClock wrote: to enjoy and post on newgrounds? im turning 21 in two months, and my dad tells me i should quit playing games online and "act like an adult". i told him to go fuck himself. but really, is he right? :/

Heh, got tired of him fucking you huh? Well I doubt you're actually turning 21 giving the idiotic immaturity of anticlocks, but then you are a retard.

At 5/31/04 12:08 PM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote:
But do you know how long its gonna take for you to get to level 29 ??? I predict about ten years at this rate, the more and more HT deposits and the other users deposit then its gonna take a damn long time.

Try 75 years, you gain about 0.5 experience per day towards it if you never stop depositing. He's about 12,500 experience away from it, meaning he needs about 25,000 days to get to level 29. That's well over 70 years.

At 5/29/04 11:06 PM, FlGMENT wrote:
The only thing the admins reset for mass blammage is blam/protect points. EXP (so far) has remained intact. HT would still have his 10 VP if he lost all his bp points, and it wouldn't be very hard to get that 10% boost back anyway.

It used to be that way, but it hasn't been for a long time.

Knox of course, by asking that you're implying the LF is actually funny, and he isn't.

At 5/29/04 09:08 AM, Dark_Penguin wrote:
Yep. When he cant depsoit he has people deposit for him.

I'm going to laugh at him if one of those people decided to vote 0 on all the new movie while he goes on vacation, then comes back to find his account reset. I say ir's better to just deal with not deposting than to risk that.