Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/29/04 10:33 PM, BarferPro wrote:
Be... cause... we... haven't... found... them... and... we... occupy... the... country.

Even Saddam thought he had them, his WMD teams sent him documents basically saying so. However they were lying. Think about it, why wouldn't he give in to 1441 unless he at least thought he had WMD? He could have averted the war, no?

At 10/30/04 02:52 PM, CrazytheClown wrote:
Eat me, Blackmagic! So what if we haven't found any weapons, yet? There's no excuse for your sarcasm, dickhead! If you're going to waste your fucking time arguing with me, then I'm going to say, "Make like a Thanksgiving turkey, and stuff it, bitch!"

You realise the whole reason he's posting in here is to provoke those kind of responces from people right? Just ignore him.

At 10/29/04 06:57 PM, BarferPro wrote:
Testosterone just went up three points!

What a geeky thing to say.

At 10/27/04 05:08 AM, Blackmagic wrote:

Another fail

Are you ever going to prove your case or are you just going to keep saying,"you people are proof that you're stupid"? I mean come on, that's obviously you compensating for your own lack of intelligence, it certainly doesn't prove your case.

At 10/26/04 11:40 PM, Soul_Spectre wrote:
But if he took it away, then people (mostly democrats) would accuse bush of being a lyer for not letting michael moore show it anymore. then those same people would say, "whats Bush trying to hide".

You give him proof and he says it's BS in one way or another. Give it a rest, he's an idiot. He tried to say the people in farenhype are "covering their asses" despite the fact that many people "himself included" should also need to cover their asses or they'd be in jail by his own logic. Yes that's right master unlucky, by your own logic Bush would have thrown you in jail by now. The farenhype people aren't covering their asses, get over it.

At 10/26/04 11:32 PM, -TheFrenchSuck- wrote:
No, thats sterotype. Alot of Americans are smart. What they lack is common sense. Which does not make them stupid.

He's obviously as stupid and close minded as Moore himself, so it's pointless to argue with him.

At 10/26/04 11:27 PM, Hermannator wrote:
Oh I didn't know that. I didn't really expect the Japanese fought like that. I figured that they fought similarly like other countries during WW2, since WW2 was very large scale war. I wouldn't think that small ambushes wouldn't work well against large scale armies. But I guess warfare wasn't fought in a large scale manner in the Pacific. I guess we mostly concentrated on Europe and Germany.

There were battlefronts in vietnam too, it wasn't ALL geurilla(sp?) war. So you the pacific part was indeed a lot like vietnam itself. Of course that's not counting the sea battles.

At 10/26/04 06:36 AM, TerryG_7 wrote: Effort yea. But they lack quality, and that's what most of us look for. Just because they're new? Nah, it's not because of that

Carmelhadinosaur actually admitted to it though. Sure I don't think everyone does it, but it's still wrong that some do.

At 10/26/04 12:57 AM, D0GMA wrote: Your original comment was that new authors should not be discriminated against. I stated the only situation in which I have any prejudice against a new author. WHERE in that comment did I say anything about what score I give it?

I didn't say you voted 0 on anything new authors submit, but I know carmelhaddinosaur does.

If you've bothered to read the message you get when you flag something as stolen, you'd know how I vote.

So I'm supposed to have read that and then have assumed by default that's how you vote without you first telling me?

We're all aware of this crap, and idiot authors continuously annoy those of us who actually watch their shitty submissions as they try to "prove" this point ... like it hasn't been done a hundred times already.

I wasn't aware of it. Stop acting like everyone knows what you do.

At 10/25/04 11:38 PM, D0GMA wrote:

I admitted nothing of the sort, and I could care less about the flash switching. He only hurts his BA and will never get TotW that way. My issue is with all the fucking sheep who vote to let garbage pass judgment simply because they think everyone else will. I bother to watch what get submitted, so I know when it his usual round of crap of if it's something worth saving. They simply vote without bothering to watch.

It may suck but it's not as big of a deal as good stuff getting blammed.

They did, but now they, and all these affiliates listing them as co-authors, are playing TotW games, multi-voting to ensure their shit passes, then multi-0 the rest of the week for TotW. Same as above, the fucking sheep go along with it and they "are part of the problem."

Then just let them have it, it's no big deal. They want to harm their own batting averages and give themselves the douchebag of the week award? Then more power to them I say.

The only discrimination I have against new authors is when someone brand new shows up with something really good (yes, I do actually watch the flash unlike the sheep). I get suspicious. Sometimes it's really the author submitting the work, having just discovered NG. Most of the time it's a random twit stealing someone else's hard work.

You shouldn't vote 0 unless you know for a fact it's stolen. Plus if it's not really good what then? It's blammed anyway, right?

I've yet to hear you complain about the sheep who throw 5 at utter crap from "established authors" hoping to try to save it. It's exactly the same context .

I haven't personally seen anything truly bad get passed in a while, if you go through my reviews though, you'll notice a few that I have complained about. So don't think it isn't so.

At 10/25/04 11:24 PM, westtig wrote: get over it dude, most stuff gets blammed because it is shit, not just because they are a new author, seems to me yr upset that uve had a few things blammed and cant get over it

As I've said earlier I haven't been submitting myself. I did have a couple non-serious entries, but they were meant as nothing more than a joke. I don't have time to make anything serious as of yet, so no, it's not about me.

At 10/25/04 11:21 PM, JerkClock wrote: I can't possibly deserve a score that low

"It" sorry to double post, but it's not my movie.

I wouldn't be complaining if everyone was voting 1, but they were voting 0. When I voted it's score was 0.44, I was like what the fuck? I can't possibly deserve a score that low, I agree that it's not that great, but I certainly don't think it deserved a 0. That's just fucked up.

Blatant example:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/199464

This was more than decent enough for protection, not worthy of top 5 by any means, but more than worthy of protection non the less. It clearly involved some effort and was a far cry from those DBZ stick movies, so it should at least pass.

At 10/25/04 09:32 PM, D0GMA wrote:

It was his second, the first I ignored for the garbage it was. The second he was in the LUL campaigning to get it passed. Both were crap, but I blew a fuse on the second one because the people I know were responsible for that trash making it through.

No I distinctly remember it being his first, you may have pitched a fit over both meaning it was the second as well, but the one I remember was definitely the first. At any rate you didn't help yourself by admitting to being part of the problem. If error changes his entries after they pass judgement, that's the concern of the admins, not you. Maybe he'll decide to stop, and if the SS's mostly submits bad flash, then they still submit good stuff some of the time and so they're stuff should get a fair chance. I know for a fact they do sometimes make good stuff. And new authors certainly shouldn't be discriminated against.

At 10/25/04 09:01 PM, D0GMA wrote: a temper similar to the one he threw when joobie's first submission passed.

Speaking of whining.......

At 10/25/04 08:04 PM, scrap_head wrote: i don't want to be the master of this but if you guys are whit me im in for sure !!!!

I'll be in if the thread in C&C doesn't get locked.

At 10/25/04 07:19 PM, Nintendoclock wrote:
whatever. Ur movies blammed because it sucked. Doesnt matter if it had effort in it.. Its gonna get blammed if it looks like shit and ur movie obviously did, so quit bitching and sit down like a good 12 year old.

I haven't been submitting actually. But if you want to talk about clock logos I can at least say mine wasn't a stolen nintendo seal of approval with a clock drawn on it.

At 10/25/04 07:11 PM, -STD- wrote: Your whole argumnet is untrue anyway. Walk-Smash-Walk was Sakupen's first ever submission and it's now number 8 in the top 50.

It depends on who's judging portal entries at the time, if it's only or mostly those of us who find batting average based voting appalling, then the movie will get a fair chance. If it's mostly or only those who like to vote based on batting average then it simply won't.

And no Choasfoot I didn't say you did, but if you look back you may notice you initially weren't being addressed on that matter.

At 10/25/04 07:11 PM, ChaosFoot wrote:

Uh-huh, so your saying that every movie you ever voted to protect was worthy of being let in? I'm pretty sure that's not the case, just don't complain, since there's nothing you can do about it.

The point is the fact that I have more blams doesn't mean I vote to blam more than protect. FYI people aren't supposed to vote 0 on anything even half-decent, Wade himself has stated he doesn't want people doing it.

PS. No "Jerk"Clock will never be light aura.

At 10/25/04 07:04 PM, -STD- wrote:
Says the guy with over 2400 blam points.

If I got all the protection points I tried for, I'd have over 4000, If I had all the Blams I tried for, I'd have maybe 2700-2800. People are idiots however, thus I don't.

At 10/25/04 07:01 PM, king-o-games1 wrote:
But you are right. Some people don't consider that these authors are new, and can't make the perfect flash.

What I mean is that they purposely blam because the author is new, even if it is good. Carmelhaddinosaur admitted to this, yet sickeningly his voting power continues to grow. Of course the one we have to thank is Jesuscyborg, who started the whole batting average based voting mess(which includes voting 0 on anything by "NEW" authors). I've purposely stopped blamming for a while because I got sick of watching my blam-protect ratio grow. So for now I'm only protecting. I know Wade dislikes this shit, I just wonder why more people haven't had their experience and b/p's set to 0.

Hey did you know it's okay to vote for protection when a flash has some effort in it? Wade why aren't these people getting reset? I'm seeing plenty of ok stuff get blammed(quite often because the author is new) and missing out on protection points because of it.

At 10/20/04 10:33 PM, TheJoe324 wrote:
If you see someone going 60 mph in a 30 mph zone and there are no police around to see them doing it, it doesn't mean it's ok for you to do it.

But it's fun to go 60 in a 30 :(. Of course, there's nothing fun about leaving a lame, heated review.

At 10/19/04 06:19 AM, Coolboyman wrote: if kerry doesnt win im moving to australia.

Sorry to hear that, but I'll remember you saying that if Bush wins.

At 10/20/04 07:25 AM, BonusStage wrote:

being redudant < not ):<

Defending Bedn < Being a retard < Not defending Bedn

At 10/20/04 12:26 AM, JmBd wrote: 23 > anything lower than 23. :0)

Anyone who's not Bedn>greater than Bedn

At 10/19/04 10:32 PM, _stem_ wrote: i wish it could be changed :/ at least the ability to pic the ethnic race of the hand...

So you hate black people then?

At 10/19/04 12:34 AM, DanPaladin wrote: take some of those previews with a grain of salt, the Xbox version is underway.

Please tell me you're kidding.

At 10/19/04 12:05 AM, JmBd wrote:
I guess your sarcasm detector broke for you.

I'd buy you a new one, but you been through about six of them.

So you're saying that you're so fond of joe that you'd welcome him to your site? Come on bend you don't think people are that gullible do you?