Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Haha! That would be awesome! It would have to include Link as a kid getting pushed out of the way by Ganon, followed by Link as a kid getting pushed out of the way by a random message carrier, a peasant, a sick little boy, and finally knocked over by the wind into a likelike.
Then Mario would have to get shroomed and start beating Luigi.
Leon would try to shoot himself with the gunsword, but it's way to long to fit under his chin.
Yuna would summon Valefor but it would fall out of the sky and crush Wakka...... His blitzball would fly out from under him and knock over all the besaid tents.....
And of course Cloud would go to attack some 40 foot tall behemoth and his sword would be equiped with an elemental materia the thing would absorb.....
It would be EPIC!

Hmmmm.... I could see Dawn from the Buffy series (I don't know the actresses name sadly) playing Aeris. I don't think they'll do it though. The game was massive, and making a movie out of it would entirely ruin it. A miniseries starting from CC all the way to DOC and going EXACTLY the way the games/movie went could work, but it would be way to long for a movie because there's too much detail to go into. I would really think they would use the same program they used in the movie rather than moving on to live actors, since it's difficult to get the graphics to mesh between real and animated.

At 11/13/08 12:09 PM, JohnnyWang wrote: As for the theory, as much as I understood, it's just the old multiple universes theory in a new package.

Well, there are similarities, but the major difference is I look at it from a viewpoint outside of the 3 dimensions we see. It helps to take a step back from the problem, and I took the biggest step I could by looking at it from the point of view of a being capable of seeing all possible dimensions and existing outside of reality.

Nobody even wants to debate my Frame Theory? You know, the one where paradoxes can't be made by time travel because they already exist in other frames? I have a genuine theory here that answers all the problems, and nobody even thinks to read it? Or is it just that far above this topic?

At 11/12/08 06:13 PM, tsdeath1 wrote: HERES PROOF, i mean if they have the same tattoo THE have to be the same person. and if u look in the background THERES FLYING CARS HOLY FUCK fuckin

Please, ever hear of photoshop? Or gimp? Not to mention I've seen people who got the same tatoo as each other because it meant something to them, or because it was something the tatoo artist had posted in his store and more than one person asked for it. No photo will ever be proof. Not until we have video of something occuring long before it actually happens, will time travel ever be truly proven.

Not because my image is good, but because we need something similar to this....
<img src="http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i 1/jeremiecompnerd/faicquestioning.jpg" border="0" alt="Faic">
I give you "questioning"

At the age of 14???? Can you say sociopath?

At 11/12/08 05:09 PM, Guillemet wrote:

At 11/12/08 04:37 PM, XeanTheGreat wrote: Coast Guard is for fags!

No, not being in the military at all is for fags.

You're both wrong, getting shot at for no reason in Iraq is retarded.

Anyway, I wouldn't use the military as a starting point for computer work...... I'd go government. The pentagon has the best toys, so a codebreaker or hacker would have a field day with them. Good luck!

Your not going to give any reason why? What makes cs3 more effective? Did they include any new features in 4? Really, just saying you won't get something is kind of silly if you don't point out some reason why.

At 11/12/08 01:30 PM, JackTipper wrote: JerermieCompNerd you do realize you're talking about eugenics, and if thats something you truly support cut your balls off and go sterilize your family. In my opinion any form of eugenics is horrible and it means very bad things if people ever condone that type of ideology. But hey it can't be that bad, Hitler and the Nazi's thought it was a good idea.

What the hell man? I'm talking about BIRTH CONTROL. Reversible vasectomies, tax breaks for families with fewer than 3 kids, anything to get people to WILLINGLY reduce the total global population. I'm not saying to do it to any one group of people, but everyone. Just offer incentives and hope that zpg picks up popularity. Most teenage boys don't want kids anyways, they just make a mistake that wouldn't happen if they had decided to get fixed for a new xbox. Don't go around comparing people to Hitler, especially if you don't understand what the person is saying.

Puhlease. If you had 700,000 to lose then you had more than enough money to spare. Don't think you've got it rough because you can't buy your new whirlpool. I know people who would kill to have 700,000 to lose in stocks, because they could stretch 700,000 into many years of comfortable living for their family. Stock markets are a gamble, you win some you lose some, so don't cry to us when you don't hit 21.

Try niether. Make a sandwich or a bowl of cereal. A roast beef sandwich with cheese, lettuce, tomatoes, wheat bread, that hits meat, dairy, vegetable, fruit, and grains all in one meal. Paper plate or napkin, the plastic knife you spread your mayo on with, means absolutely nothing to clean up for a perfect and well rounded meal. Cereal is just as cheap, even faster to make, has only the bowl and spoon to clean up, and some of them are very healthy with dried fruits and nuts.

I personally like the idea of them working for the state. They should work for their food inside just like we do outside.
Of course, if we implemented birth control incentives like paying teens to get fixed then we wouldn't have as much trouble with people doing stupid stuff just because they can't afford to live like humans...... Majorly reduced global population would reduce the crime rate drastically, and very likely also reduce the crime rate per person. A smaller percentage of the population would commit crimes because standard of living would improve.

I have two things to say on the subject of time travel.
First, there may or may not be wormholes that can send you through time and you may or may not be able to survive in them, but as far as we are able to deduce a wormhole ends in a black hole on BOTH SIDES, so you would need to be able to move faster than light to escape the black hole at either end, which as we know it would cause time travel anyways so it is irrelevant.
Second, I believe the universe could be better looked at as frames than as a constant flow of water. We see the universe constantly moving so that is how we choose to view the concept of time. Imagine if the universe was a collection of frames, each one slightly different than the one before. There are an infinite number of frames, and each contains an infinitly large area. There exists a frame for each possible combination of subatomic particle/energy/wave/etc. and therefor each possible combination of matter already exists. Like having a line of rubix cubes and each one is set differently, so that every combination is represented in the row of cubes. In this case, then, we are not moving through time but rather each frame of our existance already exists and has the memories and thoughts that it would have had if it had existed through previous frames. So we aren't moving through time but rather you are not the same person you were a few seconds ago you just have the same memories plus 5 seconds more. It's difficult to wrap your head around but it's like having a trillion computers and starting each one to do the same thing, but starting each one a nanosecond later than the one before it. Each of these computers is like a frame in the universe and if you then paused them all you would have a series of computers all representing what the first computer went through to get where it is. If this could be a way of looking at the universe, which I believe it would if had the ability to see and interact with higher dimensions, then time travel is actually only the existance of a frame that includes your memories as being different than the memories you have in the series of frames that include you reading this. Time travel would be equivilant to drawing a three dimensional frame by frame animation and taking a character from the last scene, and copy pasting him into the first scene. It's a very odd concept, but there is currently a frame in which each and every one of us is a time traveler. There's also a frame in which you were born on another planet, one where I live under the sea, and one in which the sun has just exploded. And one exactly like this except there is a single molecule of gold floating in the air above my left ear. Confused yet?

I'm against book burning, but I'm certainly not above pooling our money to buy the publisher he uses and refusing to print him. It's not technically book-murder if the book isn't printed yet.

While I think that the generalization you made about pessimism and optimism is inaccurate, I do think there is a difference in world view between the two organizations. Namely, tradition. I feel as a Dem. that tradition for tradition's sake prevents the world from advancing. My Rep. uncle feels that without tradition we wouldn't have gotten here today, which is true, and that we should honor old traditions for that reason, which is where we disagree.

I'd be careful about that, I wouldn't expect the family health care plan to cover preexisting conditions. It's a grand gesture of friendship and trust though.

At 11/11/08 02:00 PM, poxpower wrote:
I bet you 100 bucks that you wouldn't date a 400 pound woman, no matter what. Don't be a hypocrite, you do care about looks.

Just because you have no concept of humanity doesn't mean nobody else does. If she gained 800 pounds between now and when I next see her, she would still be my best friend, and if I moved back I'd still want to go out with her, although I'd want her to diet for her health so she would live longer. People like you make me sick. Now if you want to debate this further, do so on my userpage. I won't consider another post in this thread as a valid and sane arguement.

I already established you can talk about me all you want. Doesn't really bother me since you're right, I have no opinion of myself. Anyways, I'm not about to send you a picture because the entire point of my post was to point out that we SHOULDN'T judge people on looks. That, and all my photo's are hardcopy and I don't have a scanner. Regardless, if you really have to continue this I welcome everybody to my userpage where I will have a space dedicated to continueing this arguement. No sense spamming a topic with a mod helping.

You think that's bad, I stuck up for the rights of women to be comfortable with thier body regardless of social standards, using my best friend as an example, and PoxPower had the nerve to call her fat. I swear I could hit something........

At 11/11/08 01:23 PM, poxpower wrote:

Only the lowest troglodytes pick fights with people who insult their moms, their girl or their god. Congratulations, you are one step bellow a monkey.

Which is still a step above self obsessed jackass.

At 11/11/08 01:17 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 11/11/08 01:15 PM, JeremieCompNerd wrote:

It wasn't me I was offended for.

You can't get offended for other people, dumbass.

Bet on that? I've never once gotten in a fight over people messing with me. I've had more than my fair share of fights. Do the math.

At 11/11/08 01:11 PM, Drakim wrote:

You need to learn how to internets. If you are offended what anybody on some forum says, then you are as doomed as the angry Muslims who somehow thinks it matters when somebody draws a picture on the other side of the planet.

It wasn't me I was offended for. He can say whatever he wants to about me. Just as long as he leaves my friends out of it. /endspam

Friends every time. My friends are like family to me.

.... I'm sorry I exploded. I just don't get how someone can make snap judgements like that on somebody they've never met, don't know anything about, etc. Especially when the person in question isn't there to defend themselves. It's a vile and repulsive thing to judge someone like you did, and I hope you know just how sick it should make you feel.

At 11/11/08 12:03 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 11/11/08 11:17 AM, JeremieCompNerd wrote: My closest freind can't feel comfortable with the way she looks because she isn't vomiting in a toilet and wearing size 0 bluejeans

Why don't you date her then you douche?

Hint: she's totally fat.

Being fat is a sign of many things. Laziness, lack of self-control, lack of determination, aversion to the outdoors, bad diet and eating habits.
AND SO ON.

Why girls would date fat guys? I can't imagine. How fat people have children? I can't imagine either.

You fucking son of a bitch. Pucker up and kiss my fucking ass. I don't date her because I live 5 hours away you dick. I don't care if I get banned for saying it, you hateful bastard. And she's not fat, she just isn't UNHEALTHILY SKINNY and doesn't have expensive and pointless implants. Keep talking, I know people who can find people.

I would dissagree. I think a cult classic should be defined as any movie with a large, cult-like following. Personally, I like Tim Burton's works. TNBC rocked out loud, and Sweeney Todd was epic.

I've always favored the House approach. Not to compare reality with television, but if you become incredibly desperate you can always look online for a medicine that will pose similar effects to what would happen if your heart became an emergency situation, be near a hospital and hope they misdiagnose and treat your real problem. Most of the time it won't be like TV. If you have a precondition of your heart and there's some way for them to know about it, and your heart is the problem when you arrive, they likely won't know what you did till afterwards. I don't really recommend this as more than a last ditch effort, since it's very easy to kill yourself fooling around with the kind of meds that would do that, but if you absolutely have to have surgery there are always ways to make it their problem. Good luck, and I hope you are able to find a safe way to improve your condition.

I personally believe the pardon should belong to the people. The crime was commited against the public, or against the government which in turn affects the public, so the public should be the ones to decide when a punishment is over. I know this sounds like it would take way too much time to hold nationwide votes on pardons, but I also think we should have greek democracy. We need to have a small body of people to make snap decisions in times of crisis, and booths on every corner to allow people to vote with their social on any issue they feel is important. The people should be allowed to vote on the issues themselves, not have to vote on people who vote on issues regardless of how the people who voted them in want them to vote. Once booths are set up to vote on laws and courses of long term action, then we can also vote on pardons for people the public believes have served their time.

I don't see how pressuring a girl who looks slutty to act slutty is any less perverted and abusive than pressuring a girl to look slutty in the first place. People in this country, and even in other cultures, expect girls to dress up, then mock them when they finally do. My closest freind can't feel comfortable with the way she looks because she isn't vomiting in a toilet and wearing size 0 bluejeans, and no matter how beautiful she is she won't be considered as such in public because she isn't unhealthy. Worse still, if she ever does cave in and try to look like the cheerleaders, people will still mock her for being attractive. There is no middle ground. She deserves to be in a place where people accept her, but that won't happen because of our current social standards. It's not right, and people should be ashamed of how they treat her.