Be a Supporter!
Response to: Leftist Hypocrisy Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/27/07 06:49 PM, public-enemy1 wrote: Regardless...its redundant to note leftist hypocrisies (acts or mentality) when you mention the names of known right wing hypocrites .

And "Right Wing hypocrisy" isn't the name of this thread. If you want to make your own topic on it fee; free. I'll tell you what I told Sigma, if you don't like what my thread's about then don't read it.

Response to: Leftist Hypocrisy Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/27/07 06:40 PM, public-enemy1 wrote:
At 12/17/06 02:06 PM, JakeHero wrote: #12. Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot, but Bill Maher is clever and not an asshole like that Rush Limbaugh.
Well..Maher didn't condemn illegal drug use and then get caught.

Funny you mention leftist hypocrisy, then include a right wing hypocrite.

I'm making fun of hypocritical mentality of leftwingers. Not the pundits themselves, but thanks for the attempted ownage.

Response to: Leftist Hypocrisy Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

#51 People who tried to get death metal off the shelves are fascists! Just because they contain anti-catholic themes doesn't mean people have the right to censore it!

a few years later

Death metal should be taken off the shelves! We can't stand for these themes of the master race and nazi propaganda!

#52 It isn't the government's right what a woman does with her body, but it is the government's business what a man does with his private business.

#53 When Clinton committed perjury it was excusable because people shouldn't of even been questioning him. When Libby committed perjury he should be in prison for life, despite no one was even found guality of ousting Valerie Lame.

#54 When a fundamentalist blows up an abortion clinic, it's an act of terrorism. When an islamofascists crashes a plane into a building, it's retribution for the evils of the US.

#55 Bush and the Attourney General should be investigated for the firing of a handful of judges, Clinton's firing of over a hudred is okay, because the executive branch reserves that right.

#56 The reason why African-americans are living in such poor conditions is because those greedy, conservative, white men won't give any money to them and instead spend it on luxuries. Now if you'll excuse me I have to purchase my multi-million dollar house up in the Hamtons.

#57 When rogue states like North Korea and Iran develop their military it's self-defense. When the US develops its military it's imperialism.

#58 Castro is a great man because he oppresses his people, kills thousands of political rivals, and deals with tyrannical leaders. Pinochet is an evil man for the above reasons.

#59 I'll preach tolerance and acceptance when it's convenient for me, but will advocate bringing back the feeding of christians to lions on AOL message boards.

#60 Conservatives are racist because they oppose black, socialist nations. We're not because we oppose Israel.

Response to: Are you a patriot? Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/27/07 01:58 AM, tony4moroney wrote:
At 7/27/07 01:23 AM, JakeHero wrote:
Osama Bin Laden didn't organize attacks on America in the interests of Islam.

Yeah he did. Just an example of why Islam is such a dangerous religion.

Response to: Pick a Government type. Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

Inoffensive centrist government with hardly any entitlement programs.

Response to: Are you a patriot? Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

To those in this thread: there's a difference between patriotism and religious fanaticism.

Response to: Your taxes are wasted. Posted July 27th, 2007 in Politics

No shit our taxes are wasted. 51% of what the government gets is spent on entitlements.

Response to: Rich Socailists Posted July 24th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/24/07 08:13 PM, tony4moroney wrote: Obviously you need to learn how to read.

Obviously you're still butthurt from that last thread I made about animal fights.

Point to where I bullshitted dickface.

Everything in your first post was bullshit, with exception of socialism not beuing the same as communism and movie stars are vane.

Response to: I Don't Owe Minorities Anything Posted July 24th, 2007 in Politics

Immigrants that came in the 1920s had it much worse than blacks today. Don't expect me to pity them because they hold themselves back.

Response to: Rich Socailists Posted July 24th, 2007 in Politics

Despite Tony's bullshitting, alot of these asshole, leftwing(redundant) stars advocate these tax robberies because they're cognizant of the fact they can deposit their wealth and assets in of-shore accouns. Sort of like George Sorros and Ted Turner.

Response to: Socialism vs. liberalism? Posted July 24th, 2007 in Politics

We have over twenty political parties in the States, but I can't elude the feeling liberals are progressing trying to turn the US into a socialist state, given' some of the bullshit legislature they're trying to pass.

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 23rd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/23/07 01:50 AM, tony4moroney wrote: Psychopaths normally start out killing small animals, or finding pleasure in sadistic activities.

Well I can't say what the future will bring, but I can safely say I've never had homocidal urges.

ZING!
I could also say, that makes you more pathetic then even average joe. ZING!

Seems to me you're losing your wit. I didn't know my words would have such an effect.

The only people in opposition to it are little kiddy sadists

And people who believe in smaller government not stroking a gnarled cock of morality.

Your sadistic lusts are childish. Clarified?

Sounds more like that's an afterthought to avoid answering my question of how old you are.

In this case the desire of the general populous is to be humane to that animal

You got me there, but you reinforced my previous point of how human desire is more important than animal lives.

Why would I want to go around killing christians? Why would you even think that?

I was poking fun at your bigotry.

Thanks for that insight into your deluded fucked up mind,

You actually just reacted to what I said the same way a closet homosexual would after being called gay "What?! Fuck you! I ain't gay! What would give you that idea?!"

now go masturbate to animal corpses and dead Iraqi's you sick fuck.

What I want to know how your train of thought carried you from animal fights to me masturbating. I gotta say you have some odd sexual fetishes.

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 23rd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/23/07 01:17 AM, tony4moroney wrote: Laws prohibiting animal fighting are emotionally, ethically, politically driven and accepted by the general consensus.

This is true, but then again the brunt of the public can't find Kuwait on a map.

The only people in opposition to it are little kiddy sadists

And how old are you?

like yourself which consider your own selfish entertainment above ethics and the humane treatment of a living, thinking animal.

Human desire supercedes the insignificant life of an animal.

Doesn't surprise me that youre a Republican Christian, bunch of pretentious immoral dimwits. National Review Cruise? We have another one that wants to come aboard.

I haven't hidden me being republican, but I never said anything about professing the Christian faith. Since you seem to brand me with the christian label(with contempt, I might add) I'm going to assume you're a prejudiced little atheist cunt. :) You can go to a Marxist country and kill all those immoral, dimwitted christians you want, you'll find you have much in common with the pinkos.

Response to: I'm Making my Attack Posted July 23rd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 11:43 PM, Chorkles wrote: Tell me. What does that have to do with anything? Oh, and not really.

Answer the question, do you or do you not use your computer for pleasure as well as lodging misinformed opinions on the interweb?

just throwing it out there.

I s'pose that's the only option when you have nothing else to say.

Actually, I do have some grasp of the world around me.

Everything you said sounds like it came out of a Noam Chomksy book or ELF logo. You have NO idea what you're talking about spew stupidass views no one takes seriously because, fortunately, most people are idiotic enough to believe it.

Its full of greedy, prejudiced, propaganda-swallowing assholes like yourself.

Okay, give me evidence of when I've been greedy or prejudiced toward anyone? Oh that's right, you can't! You're just firing off your shit cannon hoping to hit something, but you haven't and never will because your generic insults (aimed that someone whom you disagree with) won't work on me.

JakeHero, it is YOU who sits atop his high horse giving his ego a handjob while you tell us how you see the truth of how left-wingers can't see the truth

For starters, fool, I haven't made a topic about how leftwingers don't know shit, and then on the other hand, commit the same folly. You have nothing and me and you know it. Now you're just being pathetic. I don't tell people to do one thing and not follow throug.

and how we are bad people who sympathize for non-existent terrorists.

Are you so much of a dumbshit that you don't realize there was foiled terrorist attacks on UK and many other countries. Here's what I think, you're such an utterly pathetic individual you're willing to say something doesn't exist because you don't personally find it expedient or palpable for you idiotic political tendencies of anarchism and anti-establishment. There are people out there that would love nothing more than to slit your throat, kill you family, and destroy everything you hold dear and your pitiful, little mind.

You know what? I'm going to hope that there is another terrorist attack and your immediate family gets killed as a result, then come back and tell me they don't exist.

The only way you didn't describe yourself (minus the polluting heathens thing) was by saying that you didn't live a lie.

Now you just sound like a crazy hippi douchebah, which probably isn't that much off.

I'm not telling you "polluting heathens" your "hedonistic and otherwise wasteful life styles", I'm saying that these things around us cannot be tolerated and must be stopped! I'm saying that it is a necessity that we don't go on living like this.

Then by all means stop it by using all modern day convenience, oh but you wouldn't because it would put a damper on all your eletronic delights. Can't play video games and drive to Hot Topic to buy Che and Anarchy tvshirts without fossil fuels and electricity, can you?

Well, if I could make my own water system, I would. If I could afford a solar-powered home, I would.

Unless it would be detrimental to your modern joys, of course.

I try as hard as I can to conserve energy (which is more then you could say).

I never made a topic condeming others for something I'm as duly guilty of, asshole.

The only problem is that little thing called money. Solar panels are a little expensive.

It doesn't cost money not to use toilets and electronics. Just come out and admit you're not willing to give up these things and stop pretending to give a shit in the environment, because in all truth you'd rather everyone make sacrifices instead of yourself.

I love how you don't include yourself in that comment.

I did say hundreds of millions.

Also, you're wrong. Those companies and many more are the ones who destroy the land.

Riddle me this, batman. Do you or do not buy and use products that are dangerous to the environment?

You don't see me clear cutting forests or strip mining the earth or torturing animals do you dumbass, but you do see me buying into the culture and the products of the corporation I claim to detest

Fixed for accuracy. :)

You just don't want to admit that they are the murderers of nature because they're the ones who give you all those little conveniences in life.

I admit they do alot of nature marauding, but at least I'm not some self important little cunt that whines about it and enables it at the same time.

Oh and I would gladly live in the wilderness if there was any left.

Then go find some. Last time I checked there were millions of acres of wilderness in Canada. Then again, you not living there doesn't surprise me.

No, actually, I don't buy from any of those companies.

Then who do you buy from? That's right, a private company!

Okay, I can't even argue with that because it made absolutely no sense! Learn proper English.

If you don't have the intellect to insert a word I forgot to put in then you are obviously in the wrong forum.

NATURE CREATED MAN KIND! YOU DON'T HAVE TO BELIEVE IT BUT THE EVIDENCE STARES YOU IN THE FACE!

Remember what you said, not everyone believes in the samething. Stick that in your self-righteous pipe and smoke it, jackass. But hey, I believe men was spawn from nature, and through gradual conquest man has gained supremacy over it, therefore, if we so desire it we can do whatever the hell we want with it.

Well, that thing wasn't man back then, was it?

Now there wasn't nature during the early years of the universe, was there?

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 06:38 PM, d3c0y2 wrote: Lastly, what person would find entertainment in such an event, I know I wouldn't.

Me. I'd love to see animals fighting to the death. So far all I've deduced is that these laws prohibiting animal fights is emotionally driven.

Response to: War On Drugs Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 09:57 PM, tony4moroney wrote: Clinton never outlawed guns.

*Ahem* You were saying? But, I'll leave it at that and not reply in this topic further on gun control.

Response to: I'm Making my Attack Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 02:57 PM, Chorkles wrote: Yes, I realize the irony of posting this on my computer.

Irony you say? Hmmmmmmm....I believe there's a better word, oh yeah - hypocrisy.

I don't enjoy using my computer to send out a message like this but it seems to be practically the only way to get my voice out right now.

So you're saying you don't use your computer for any other recreational purposes?

also, jakehero, its PRACTICE what you preach, not follow what you preach, but I guess you could say it either way.

I wasn't aiming to use a cliche.

This is when a bunch of you are probably gonna pull out the "Well, you're just a stupid fourteen-year old kid who thinks he's "revolutionary" what with all his corporate/government/whatever ideas. GO DRINK BLEACH" card so if I get all pissy without acknowledging the fact that I brought all that garbage upon myself, sorry.

No, I just think you're a stupid kid with a whole bunch of flowery ideas with no real idea of the world around them.

Many people say 'If you want something done, do it your self! Go live in a solar-powered house!

Well at least you wouldn't be living a lie, while stroking your ego from your high horse telling us polluting heathens our hedonistic and otherwise wasteful life styles..

Make your own water system! Conserve your energy!" and, yes, you should conserve your energy,

Do you do these things? Of course not! But here's a tip, free of charge, don't use any household appliance, tranportation or flush toilets. That way, you're carbon foot print will leave a lot less of a severe imprint into the environment.

turn off any electronics when finished using them. But the true destroyers of the world are the corporations and industries such as Monsanto, Haliburton, Exon, Weyerhauser, Esso Oil and Coca Cola.

No, the true destroyers of the world are the hundred million idiots like you that won't be bothered to conserve energy because it'll inconvenience your life.

It is industries and corporations such as these who are the true murderers of Nature.

And you. Guess who buys the products these corporations sell? If they can't sell what will happen to them? I'll wager you own a few anarchy log products, courtesy of these private companies.

They are the ones who show no morals, no regard to what they do. These corporations are the true evils.

In all actuality, they show more morals than you do. Why? Because they deceitful of how murderous they are toward the environment, you are.

To those of you who said that Nature is a tool made for man, well you're wrong.

And I'm afraid you don't quite understand the position mankind is in.

Man was made billions of years AFTER nature. Nature was there since the beginning of the universe.

You belief mankind spontaneous evovled from simple proteins to the complex being it is today? No, in a sense, man was always there because every organic being came from the samething.

And to you religious folks who say that god made nature for man and that I am completely and obviously wrong I have only this to say. Did you know that there is the remote possibility that I might believe something OTHER then you? Stop trying to shove your religion down my throat!

Firs you rant about how wasteful people are, then you bitching about corporation, now you're moaning about religious people. Please, just shut the fuck up I can't take reading this anymore. We all know you're just an angst-stricken little kiddy that needs some place to vent his prepubescent complaints on. We all get it and have all heard it hundreds of times, everything you've stated has been said over and over again. We know what you're selling and no one's buying it. You wanna know why? Becauseit's been said so many times that people don't take it seriously. The fact some fourteen year is echoing it kinda has it lose credibility.

Response to: War On Drugs Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

Ironically, the same people who want to decriminalize drugs because statiscs show people are still getting them are the same type of people that want to ban assault rifles, despite statiscs showing criminals still used them during the Clinton Era.

leftard logic, I s'pose.
Response to: Voluntary Human Extinction Movement Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 07:36 PM, tony4moroney wrote: I nominate fundamentalists, bigots, racists, elitist pigs, cronies and retarded Fox, O'Reilly, Limbaugh fanboys that think they're credible news sources as populations to go towards the cause.

Woops there goes the entire Republican party

I nominate communists, drug-addicts, anarchists, 70% of the elite rich, welfare collectors, social parasites, MSNBC and Air America idiots, Keith Olberman, Al Franken cocksuckers that think they're witty and original.

Whoops, looks like the democrat party become a museum oddity.

Response to: Voluntary Human Extinction Movement Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 07:17 PM, d3c0y2 wrote: I nominate spoilt brats, and Paris hilton-alikes to be killed, oh wait now all the righties are gone...

Little does your sorry ass know, all the spoiled brats are Malibou-dwelling LA kids that have leftist parents.

See, generalising is easy, and not always a good idea.

It's easy if you can accurately apply labels, which you don't seem to.

Response to: Voluntary Human Extinction Movement Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

I nominate, preps, airheads, emos, fools, depressed, ego-centric. Oh wait, then every female democrat will become exstinct in that case. :/

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 22nd, 2007 in Politics

At 7/22/07 05:03 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote: Don't mind me, I just have a severe allergy to morons.

*Takes his que, moves a distance away from Skunky.*

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 21st, 2007 in Politics

If I had my way animal fighting would be government funded. Let's bee honest here, it'll be alot more entertaining than golf or tennis.

Response to: P.e.t.a Protests Nfl. Posted July 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 7/21/07 09:27 PM, Bolo wrote: JakeHero should be chained up and forced to fight other humans. Then, if he loses, he should be smashed into the ground, and beaten to death.

That doesn't sound half bad. If it'll between that and slowly withering with old age, just to be left in a home by estranged kids that never visit, then give me the brawling pit anyday.

Plus, at least it'll be an entertaining death.

Response to: P.e.t.a Protests Nfl. Posted July 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 7/21/07 04:51 PM, Bolo wrote: Vick should get life imprisonment.

Bolo should get life imprisonment.

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 21st, 2007 in Politics

At 7/21/07 12:31 AM, stafffighter wrote: In nature animals fight to eat or not be eaten, not for competion.

Natural selection is a big competition.

Response to: Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 20th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/20/07 11:47 PM, Me-Patch wrote: Your a heartless bastard if you think it's ok to torture innocent animals until they become mindlessly violant and than fight them to the death for money.

Why? Because I disagree with your sense of absolute morality. Isn't philosphy the field of sitting down and discussing the credibility of other's morality?

Response to: I'm Making my Attack Posted July 20th, 2007 in Politics

Tell you what, Chorkles, we'll consider what you have to say when you follow what you preach and not buy computers that were made from composite materials harvested at the expense of the environment.

Amimals Fights - Why is it Illegal? Posted July 20th, 2007 in Politics

I'm pretty sure most of you have heard the news of Michael Vick, quarterback for the Atlanta Falcons, being federally indicted for involvement in dog fighting. My first question is, why is this illegal? Dogs naturally fight, yet we don't see the government arresting animals in the environment. I know the last sentence was a bad argument, so I'll open up with a new one. Should it be the government's job on either the state or federal level to try and enforce these altruism laws regarding animals? Last time I checked, a government's job was to ensure the rights of its people. Someone explain to me since when animals are guaranteed protection from the government. I just don't buy this "They're defenseless creatures and need our help, yada yada" point. A little kid can get away with ripping off a crab's claws and allowing it to starve to death, yet someone can't attach metallic claws to roosters and let them kill eachother alot more expediently.

I honestly can't see what's so morally reprehensible by cock, dog, hog or any other animal fights to the death. Maybe it's just my belief there's really no such thing as animal cruelty.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted July 19th, 2007 in Politics

At 7/19/07 05:40 PM, Grammer wrote: Well, I wanted to start investing in the stock market, but apparently it costs $1,000 just to set up an account, or so I understand it =/

Well, my dreams are dashed

Thanks for generating many lulz in me, Grammer. Oh shit, now my dreams of stock brokering are crushed.