Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/15/09 03:47 PM, The-Omnipresence wrote: I doubt a lot of people have the patience to play an isometric turn based RPG.

I know I don't.
Are you guys making a big deal out of this, If you're all such big Fallout fans you should already have 1 & 2

Everyone that isn't Sonic Tails and knuckles and Robotnick Suck in the Sonic universe

At 4/11/10 12:38 PM, KeroKeroMario wrote:

At 4/11/10 01:31 AM, ThePhantomGamer wrote: I still like them.

If you don't like them, don't play them and stop complaining.

Agreed.

It seems that you all completely missed the point here, I don't buy them, This isn't a complaint thread this is a wouldn't it be cool if thread.

As we all know these two franchises are being milked to the bone what with The pretty much unnecessary GH 5 and Van Halen stacked on Aerosmith and Metallica. And then Rock Band 2 which was pretty much adding Instruments that don't break after a month or less of use and the Beatles Rockband which I guess was cool if you're into them but that's not what I want to talk about.
I would be fine that these franchises are being milked because that means more songs to play and shit but I think that the way that EA & Activision are going about doing this is shitty, Making Band Exclusive Games such as the aforementioned GH: Aerosmith, Metallica and Van Halen. and Now Rockband Greenday/ The Beatles. Those band Specififcs make the games pretty much useless at parties no one wants to play Metallica all night or at least the people who through GH parties don't and it excludes a lot of non-megafans.
What I would prefer to see is more like the first of the non number Guitar Heroes GH: Rocks the 80's which featured hits from the 80's and an 80's theme. They should Do downloadable GH or RB Decades like 60's 70's and so on or Even better do Genres Like PunkBand or Reggae Hero or shit like that, that I'd be interested in What Are your guys' thoughts on how Guitar Hero and RockBand should have been continued other than "Die"?

At 4/10/10 07:35 PM, Madnath75 wrote:

At 4/10/10 06:24 PM, CompleteDouche wrote: Don't be such a dick, you know what he meant.
He said GoW, not GOW.
Gears of War
God Of War

Yeah, but most people just say Gears instead of GOW, the God Of War franchise was before, so it took GOW.

Thank You!

At 4/10/10 06:37 PM, rorypearce94 wrote: *Shoots self*

If you don't mind me asking Why?

At 4/10/10 01:56 AM, Brelm wrote: You'd be better off just getting a ps2, the emulation on the ps3 is a little buggy, and in the event that your ps3 goes out, you'll still have a ps2 and won't have to buy a brand new backwards compatible ps3 (which cost $100 more than the 250gig)

Actually they're the same price, they're just being phased out so they're hard to get now which may result in some small businesses marking them up.

At 4/10/10 06:24 PM, CompleteDouche wrote:

At 4/10/10 06:14 PM, JackDGreatest wrote: There's one Gow trilogy, then there's the Gears trilogy.

Don't be such a dick, you know what he meant.
He said GoW, not GOW.
Gears of War
God Of War

I'm not trying to be a dick just enforcing my very slight Sony Fanboyism and what is right, and That's not how it works man it goes:
GOW GoW Gow gow, gOW, gOw all= God of War, Gears= Gears of War Thats fact

At 4/10/10 04:42 AM, ZOMGALIENS wrote:

At 3/13/10 04:22 AM, JackDGreatest wrote:

2. Its Green Day, one of the worst bands since... well green day.

Your the biggest pile of shit to ever walk this Earth.

Woah Dude you need to take a Chill Pill Like big time. You know seeing as how you got so worked up about that must mean you really love Green Day, BUT, any normal person would argue their old stuff is good, or that that is my opinion and would not have cared but since you got so worked up about it I think that maybe you started out liking them a lot but then after American Idiot deep down inside you were disappointed in them but you fooled yourself into believing it was amazing and great music[which its not]. But whenever people say that Green Day is a bad band you are reminded for a second that you were disappointed by them, But to you this is simply impossible because you loved them SOOO much, so that disappointed is turned into anger and you lash out like that..... OR your just some 11 year-old who just discovered them and is going through that phase, don't worry it is fine you'll become a grown up some day and maybe they'll let you take your helmet off if you're extra nice.

At 4/10/10 10:36 AM, Jackho wrote: All of our GoW trilogies are ending

There's one Gow trilogy, then there's the Gears trilogy.

Ratchet & Clank, Messing with my friends in LBP the bitch slap is great

At 4/8/10 11:28 PM, Maverick-Alex wrote:

At 4/7/10 01:29 AM, Jezuz wrote: Gamers tend to take what they want a game to be, or what a previous game in the series was, and compare it to the game that was released. That doesn't make the game bad, or disappointing, it means that we're setting our standards to an unreasonably high point that we're bound to be let down by simple comparison.

The single greatest piece of a post ever posted in this forsaked BBS.

I agree like nothing I have ever agreed to with someone over the internet.

You and I don't exactly see eye to eye then, That was a borderline retarded statement.
Games can be disappointing (Haze was) Movies can be disappointing (Ghost Rider Was) Music can be Disappointing (Everything Metalica Did past the Black album is/was).
Its not that disappointment does not exist, its that disappointment is relative. If I expected something to be absolute shit and it was (like that new Alice in wonderland movie) then you get the smug satisfaction of being right. But if you expect something to be awesome and amazing (Like My friend with that New Alice in Wonderland movie) and find that it is in fact shit and that you should have listened to your friend Jack who said it was gonna be shit Then You WILL BE DISAPPOINTED. saying that disappointments don't technically exist is retarded and you don't deserve a keyboard if you honestly think that.

At 4/10/10 01:33 AM, I-Love-Caitlyn wrote: Can't wait for GOW 3 cause it's going to be a badass game for sure. Along with the other's which haven't really heard much about but will read up on them and if they seem intresting enough will probably will check them out upon release.

GOW 3's been out for like a month dude.
Gears 3 should be cool, No gameplay of any sort but it'd be hard to fuck up the formula. Though they could get out on the issue of putting some sort of not brown color in there maybe... just a thought....you know.

At 4/6/10 06:18 PM, CFNstudios wrote: Dude... I totally forgot about Crash Bandicoot! Plus, what I tellz U!? I said one pair of people per post!

dude chill,
God Of War: Kratos & Hercules
Gears Of War: The Carmines

At 4/9/10 08:38 PM, CFNstudios wrote:

At 4/9/10 08:28 PM, RuinedMartyr wrote: Just finished Bioshock 2 earlier this morning for the first time. Definitely not as memorable as the first, but overall wasn't too bad. Had a slow start, but near the end picked up rather nicely.

I would recommend playing it, but I would also consider it a disappointment after playing the original.

Hey, I don't mean to burst your bubble, but I meant for this thread to be for flat-out AWFUL games. I understand that you want to make your contributions and all, but make it a game that really pissed you the hell off, okay?

This is the disappointing games thread, not the Awful games thread. The game disappointed him it belongs in this thread.

At 4/8/10 06:15 PM, letiger wrote: I call shotgun!

I guess I've got Shotgun.

At 4/7/10 10:11 PM, Gobblemeister wrote: I have backwards compatibility

Suck on that

I don't have to, So do I.

Choke on that.

Jezus, You're an idiot man just gonna say it. If you honestly believe that I agreed With Im-A-Pirate because of his post count its because I, like him I agree that you're statement was really stupid. You think that disappointing games don't exist even if its technically you're still wrong because they do disappointed. And you're a douchebag talking down on other users because they noticed that you're talking straight out of your ass.

I think He means through the PSN store, like the PSONE classics and the answer is no.

At 4/7/10 01:37 AM, Im-A-Pirate wrote:

At 4/7/10 01:29 AM, Jezuz wrote: No game is overrated or disappointing,

That's a retarded statement. Stop trying to look smart.

I agree with the pirate that wasn't in anyway a smart statement, Haze was marketted to be super badass, they barely showed any gameplay and I believed that it had super awesome graphics and I buy it and I was excited only to find its an incredibly Average game but because of how I was disappointed I was I hated it.

At 4/7/10 12:02 AM, Slosha69 wrote:

At 4/6/10 11:07 PM, Oliver wrote: inb4MW2.

But, but. It really is the most disappointing game ever!

diakatana is calling

At 4/6/10 07:18 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: To an extent, video games can be considered art. However, this doesn't give developers an excuse to forego gameplay in favor of snooty artsiness, like we've seen with WET and Heavy Rain.

I've noticed that you seem to have something against Heavy Rain and WET, While WET was in fact shit Heavy Rain is a different type of game, its not even really artsy its hardly classifiable as a game, its more of an interactive story where your actions effect the story's outcome. Its something that tries something completely different and its lame that people like you bash it for it, same with the game flower its not quite a game its some other form of interactive media. And Yes most games are art, if there is a team of guys who are passionate about what they're making it is in my book art. But if its shovelware that a team threw out to cash in on then not so much

At 4/5/10 07:13 PM, Tobi wrote: 3/10 males I know have a gaming system. I guess you could call that "every male".

That Statement holds about as much relevance as I've talked to 10/10 of the people I've talked to.

Don't really like either, I think the all time greatest comedian is Mitch Hedburg

At 4/6/10 02:58 AM, DreamingToast wrote:

Heres a list of must-haves right now.

Left for Dead 2
Bad Company 2
Modern Warfare 2 (If you live under a rock and haven't got it already)
Bioshock 2
Just Cause 2
Assassins Creed 2
Red Faction: Guerilla. That game was epic even though it wasn't outrageously popular
Borderlands

I'm just posting all the recent games that have been very epic.

Guessing You don't own a Ps3 or Wii; God Of War III, Red Steel 2, Heavy Rain, Uncharted 2,.

At 4/6/10 02:21 AM, brooksyM wrote:

At 4/6/10 12:52 AM, Im-A-Pirate wrote: Are you fucking kidding? games have more replayability now than ever, and to add to it there's multiplayer tacked onto nearly everything.

You are clearly ignorant. Fuck you.

He's not ignorant, he's been making valid and opinionated statements throughout this thread, and The Reason most retrogames have so much replay value is because a lot of them were Arcade Style where you just try to get the highest score, Space invaders, Galaga Donkey Kong, Mario to an extent I guess, all of the rest were like that with exception of a few like Zelda and Metroid were designed to be played in short bursts, or for a night or so because gaming wasn't a big thing back then so games were shorter and can be entertaining for days because you're only playing for an hour at most a lot of the time. But now Games are bigger with way more to do Take inFamous for example Its got an awesome story, a fairly deep main character, great graphics and tons of sidequests and trophies to get you're meant to drain some serious hours into that game.plus you gotta play it twice to get the full experience. While Super Mario Bros you run Right and jump over blocks and get various power ups there's a few secrets some places Warp Zones bonus pipe levels etc. but its all very straight forward and that's a good thing, Retro and modern are two completely different worlds in the gaming universe but to say Retro is overall better than modern you're pretty dumb (OPINION) The games of today are far better than the games of yesterday, take any game from the modern era and send it back in time to the era along with a X-Box 360 or PS3 and let them play it they will tell you that Twilight Princess Is a thousand times better than Ocarina of Time.

At 4/5/10 12:56 AM, ImaLumberjack wrote: Well ,believe it or not, the graphics like in Silent Hill 1 were cutting edge and people were blown away.

WERE is the is the active word in that, not nowadays they suck and are headache inducing (FOR ME). You see old 3D graphics suck, old 2D however is pretty cool.

Now I've been a gamer since the Ps1 era, I got mine in 1998 or 97, before that I played Genesis, and I do Have tons of love for retro games, but frankly I don't care much for retro games now, I play them when I really have an e=urge to but I can get tetris on my phone and do have it so It through out my gameboys (minus and SP I got from a friend) because they were a waste of space and and I could play every game on the SP so While I think it is important that Retro games aren't forgoten completely I think its stupid to want to punch people in the face for not respecting them. because in a way retro games will never die there will always be flash games that use the basic formula, PSN and XBLA and WiiWare games available for download so there's no need to look down in people who don't give a shit about keeping outdated old ass clunky gameboy colors, or Atari 2600 or NES's of course I have a NES my sister gave me but thats cause I don't have a wii.

Well now that spring break has started I finally have some free time to do whatever, I've decided to make a car in Solidworks. Not just any car though, The WasteLander: here's my sketch page of itwhere I just scribbled out ideas:

So I am in a drafting and engineering class at school and acquired Solidworks for free.. mostly my teacher has been making us do little things but we had a big playground project and I'd like to share it with you guys now my first attempt to color and it was hastily done but now I'm just making excuses.