At 11/12/09 10:13 AM, EvilerBowser1001 wrote:

At 11/12/09 10:11 AM, ismellarat wrote:

At 11/12/09 10:07 AM, Elfer wrote: If you want to make sure that birth control is being used properly, YOU have to take responsibility for it, which means wearing a condom every time, even if you'd rather not.

I'd rather sit and watch and make sure she takes the pill.

And yet you call your friend's ex a control freak.
Sure sounds like the kettle calling the pot black.

That's not taking control, that's taking responsibility. I trust my girlfriend enough to not have to do that though. I'm just suggesting an alternative way of ensuring contraception is taken care of, without having to use a condom.

Take care of your own body, and don't get into other people's bussiness about their bodies unless it's harming you.

Having a child would be harming my future.

At 11/12/09 10:07 AM, Elfer wrote: If you want to make sure that birth control is being used properly, YOU have to take responsibility for it, which means wearing a condom every time, even if you'd rather not.

I'd rather sit and watch and make sure she takes the pill.

At 11/12/09 09:38 AM, gamejunkie wrote: ALWAYS WEAR A CONDOM.

You say that until you have bareback sex. It is noticable. Very noticable.
And for those taking the pill responsibly, there's less than a 2% fail rate.

At 11/12/09 03:20 AM, Gagsy wrote: If he doesn't want a kid he doesn't have to have one, even if it will be born, he doesn't need to involve himself at all.

At 11/12/09 03:35 AM, Frank-The-Hedgehog wrote: Well, the the best thing he could do now is to hire a lawyer and get as much out of it as he can.

Your concern is appreciated, but unnecessary.
So far it appears she's content with the single mother approach, and he hasn't complained about Child Support yet so he must be free of that too.
In case anyone cares, the baby is a boy, and he's actually really cute.
I'm not going to post pictures, because I don't think either parents would be pleased about that.

At 11/12/09 01:13 AM, FurryDemon wrote: Also, IS SHE HOT?

She was already slightly overweight, now she's popped out a kid, what do you think?

Hey guys.
For those of you that may have cared.

HAHA Yeah right.

The baby is now born.
The mother is attmpting to raise it herself (no doubt with financial help from both her family and the government.) and the father has yet to even meet it, as per his wishes.

I think she claimed to not know the father, so he's safe from Alimony.
People still bring it up to him though, despite him asking people not to. Why is it that people have to bring up painful, awkward conversation in public?

There's 3 things you could be thinking after eading that title.
1. FUCK YEAH MAN
2. Are you kidding me?
3. WTF IS BARBELLA FUCK OFF

Yes. Barbarella is the greatest movie ever.
You're probably thinking "Now that's a bold statement, there's plenty of classics".
None are as good as this movie.

Here's why.
For a starters, it was made int he 60s, and we all know everything was awesome in the 60s.

2nd, this movie is full of hot chicks. In ridiculous, skimpy outfits, And sex. Lots and lots of sex.
And it's not even a porno.

3. This whole movie is like a ketamine trip. It almost feels like a Zappa song come to life.
For instance, in one scene, Barbarella lands her wall carpeted, breathing space ship on a strange ice planet. She is then kidnapped by children, tied up and eaten and/or gangraped by evil dolls.
She's rescued however, by a 'catchman', a fat hairy guy dressed in a mammoth coat shooting a net at the kids. She offers him anything he wants, and the seedy fucker of course asks to make love. Barbarella is kean, as she reaches for he sex pills so she can make love by touching his hand for a while after dropping one.
That's how they do it on Earth afterall.
The catchman, being a real man, teaches her to make love properly, as they chariot away on their ice gliding cabin with inflatable dick sails.

4. It's has Jane Fonda, looking hot as all hell, having an orgasm, and fully nude several times.
This is Jane Fonda, daughter of Henry Fonda and Frances Ford Seymour, the then Royal Family of USA.

5. Lasers and spaceships.

There's more, but I can't think of any more at the present moment.
If you still aren't convinced, watch it while baked or pingin'.
Crazy shit.

No, none at all.

At 8/11/09 12:41 PM, physicsman09 wrote: If I was the owner of a business, I would want to make sure my employees were upstanding citizens.

I sure as hell wouldn't want to have a drug addict as a worker.

Drug addicts can be good people too. Although I still think they are a good idea, maybe they shouldn't be used before employment, but rather after the employee fucks up or something.
Innocent until proven guilty.

At 8/10/09 12:05 PM, ashman112 wrote: it would be better for the thread if it was more than just a helmet, imellarat if you want i can clean up the lines on that and we can use that as a new template, anyone yes no?

Go for it, just so long as I don't have to :3

I've gotten started on a pink, luff themed ODST.

Here's a more interesting template.

Can't post here because my computer is on its deathbed.

At 8/5/09 08:35 AM, FIGMENTUM wrote: I prefer their second soooo much more, probably because they drift from the deathcore scene.

All the songs sound the same, so the whole thing just blurrs into what seems like 1 long, repetive song.

At 9/7/07 11:15 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: But you could like All That Remains which is what I think is the definition of Deathcore.

All That Remains are metalcore in every sense of the word. Their first album was melodic death metal, but that album sucked any way.

The only deathcore band I can stand is BMTH, and only the first album.

At 8/3/09 01:58 AM, C1ph3r wrote:

At 8/3/09 01:43 AM, hateyou1 wrote: I also need 1.21 jiggawatts!

gigawatts*

No, he was right. A jiggawatt is expenentially more powerful, and needs plutonium or a bolt of lightning to create such power.

At 7/29/09 11:04 PM, Fleshlight wrote: are sex toys really nsfw?

What would your boss think if he saw you looking up sex toys at on the clock?

At 7/31/09 03:01 AM, ParadoxVoid wrote: Dieing like this guy.

This, except with a bomb to take the sluts with me.

At 7/16/09 09:46 AM, J-qb wrote: Abstract, does not mean lacking subject matter. It is a commonly made mistake, but its not true. Abstract art (can) has(ve) subject matter just as imagery art has.

I've been taught that hte point of abstract art was to throw away real world representations as subject matter, instead using the elements of art (Colour, line, shape etc.) as the subject matter.

At 7/16/09 07:10 AM, Zoriath wrote: Meanwhile, I have another picture titled Confusion

By far my favourite, it is excellent. Captures all the charm intended for abstraction.

The next one is called Excitement:

A bit boring, and it clearly defines a smiling or laughing face. Or maybe I'm just so stoned I'm convinced that what I'm seeing is intentional...

It looks too simplistic. It doesn't quite look intentional, more like you were just slacking off.

At 7/15/09 11:07 AM, thespazicat wrote: now thats what megatron should of looked like in the recent movies, not that porcupine looking thing that turns into jet. i mean for fuck sake, he transforms into a gun, he's not starscream.

Apologies for double posting, but I just can't believe this.
I always thought that Megatron transforming into a gun was humiliating. He's supposed to be the leader of the Decepticons, and he's reduced to a tool for Starscream.

Just like the Prime thread back when, this is excellent. You never fail to bring me fapping material.

After this, how about throwing together a tutorial on how to draw robots? :3
My whole life I wanted to draw my robot cartoon characters and couldn't. :(

With all due respect, I regret to inform you that this is not abstract. Abstract, by definition, means 'lacking of subject matter'. Your picture clearly represents a bird, so it is merely an abstraction of a bird.

Anyway, it looks pretty cool for what it is.

Devo sucks my asshole, and I always considered Blondie to be Pop Rock moreso than New Wave.

At 7/14/09 12:14 AM, Spiff wrote:

At 7/14/09 12:04 AM, Qwazal wrote: Looks like someone threw-up skittles.

Hehe. That's pretty cool! Sort of like when they played a record player on old vases and could hear voices from the past? History can be really cool!

Except that this picture is of a modern household, complete with dinner table and a box of breakfast cereal.

At 6/22/09 05:54 AM, CraigCastello wrote: The American government doesn't have any dignity, ask the victims of agent orange

You're comparing the past with the current. Times have changed.

and Extasy doesn't 'fuck' people up, it has no effect on them what so ever,

LOL WUT.
Amphetamines are among the most addictive and corrosive drugs to the body, particularly the brain. It just seems to have no effect because people rarely ping more than once or twice a week.
I'm not against drugs, as I often indulge in them. I'm still at least aware of the damamge they do, as should everyone, for or against.

Submit better work in hopes that people will take a genuine interest.
Also, don't post liquify spammed horseshit.

I got a PS3 because of MGS4. I actually bought the game upon release, before I even had the system.
Now I regret not getting a 360, as none of my friends have PS3s.

At 6/17/09 09:25 AM, Lorkas wrote: I smell a rat around here...

I smell an unoriginal, unfunny piece of shit.

<3

At 6/17/09 09:30 AM, Scarab wrote:

Advice.

Well I went through all the settings and they all seem fine (Cookies enabled, Medium Firewall etc.)
I also can't load images or videos from IGN. What the dick could be causing this? Maybe I should just smash my computer with a brick?

At 6/17/09 09:06 AM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: This used to happen to me. Do you have any anti-virus software installed? When I disabled McAfee's Privacy Service I could upload images fine.

I use Zonealarm Security Suite, and it's never interfered with Newgrounds until (apparently) recently.

For about 2 months now, I've not been able to log in on Firefox. Whenever I try, it says something along the lines of "Server problem, try again later". This also happens 2/3 times on IE.
On neither browser, however, can I post pictures on this forum. When I use the browse button and select an image, another window (www.newgrounds.com/upload or something) and the scrolling bar thing just freezes, the new window does nothing.

What the dick is going on? I could put up with filling out my information for every post, but now I realised I can't even post my art. Anyone know how to fix this shit?