Be a Supporter!
Response to: The Worst Video Game Of All Time Posted October 19th, 2011 in Video Games

Half-Life is the most overrated video game in the history of video gaming suffice it to say if it did indeed have an overly large following it doesn't. The storyline is so monotonous and the level of detail on the baddies looks like design the drawing which is what they do before they do anything in the computer is they start with drawings and a written script and the drawing looked like it only took..5...10...15 minutes tops to make the baddie not long enough by a long shot, trust me, I'm an artist I know and anyone else who knows how to make art would tell you the same. And as much as I hated Doom that also highly overrated and monotonous just shoot and kill everything that moves in an excessively bloody and gory, but at least they had the decency to make a detailed baddy. And if you want to talk about ground breaking to the First Person Shooter in actuality would be and should be Goldeneye NOT Half-Life not by a long shot! And anyone totally convinced that absolutely no games are ever released for Mac OS at all or in partial I am here to tell you you are wrong there is one and only one company that chooses not to literally the only company on Planet Earth is those what did Half-Life and it's a rather pathetic resume they've only done Half-Life and it's sequel(s) not impressive at all it is an exceptional loss and anyone who knows Mac OS would also know Half-Life would be a taint to even have a demo of Half-Life for Mac OS it would destroy the most basic functions of an Apple Computer and turn it into a graphing calculator i.e. PC with windows 95 or higher!

Response to: Video Game Violence=real Violence? Posted October 19th, 2011 in Video Games

Wow! 18 replies and started this at 5 am! That's a new personal best I knew I had a good topic!

I believe violent video games are indeed a constructive outlet to express your frustration with any person or persons who are giving you too much bullshit at school or at any other location in life so I would indeed recommend they buy a bunch of violent video games nameley Shooters and Fighting games and let them play them as much as they want provided it doesn't impede on their studies and let them vent their rage in a fictitious video game world and I've tried it myself it does help completely and wholly and as long as all it is is done through violent video games and never the real world then there's nothing wrong with that at all.

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted October 19th, 2011 in Politics

At 7/3/10 11:53 AM, Bacchanalian wrote:
At 7/3/10 11:47 AM, Musician wrote: Anything written by Memorize.

Seriously, what is wrong with that guy?

Or Warforger! That guy is seriously fucked up and demented and would never last 2 minutes in any military on earth or any other planet in boot camp! Just another ideal quagmire flunkey: Viet Nam, Watergate, Iraq, Gitmo, Abu Grahb and so on.

He called me a little bitch in PM :(

Well I'm sorry you had to deal with a fucker like that and I too had to deal with another fucker like that! But I want you and everyone else to know this:

The only reason people make fun of other people is because they have absolutely no security in themselves whatsoever and have to make other people feel bad about themselves as well. And always are more likely of being themselves than of the accusations they are making. So to them I say: Don't come to me or anyone else with your problems I don't need 'em! There are private institutions for that! People you can pay to make your problems go away and since I've neither the certificate nor the license TAKE IT TO SOMEONE WHO DOES!

Response to: Presidential Jokes Posted October 19th, 2011 in Politics

A Branch of the Rumsfeld Family Tree: George Armstrong Custer Rumsfeld

Cavalry Man: So let me get this straight, you came in here with no escape plan, not enough troops and insufficient weapons and now we're all gonna die! WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY FOR YOURSELF?
George Armstrong Custer Rumsfeld: I won't resign if that's what you're asking.

Video Game Violence=real Violence? Posted October 18th, 2011 in Video Games

I searched and could not find a previously existing thread for this discussion and I'm surprised no one has thought to address this so called argument that blames Video Games in this case for virtually every ill will by human kind. REEAAALLLY? They usually try this with comic books, movies, TV shows, Hard Rock, Rap and now they've added Video Games. Well, what do the rest of you avid gamers think? Discuss.

Response to: Skeptics are dicks. Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

There is absolutely nothing amiable, commendable, or likable about a skeptic. They basically establish themselves as the means to declare a grossly limited number of actual facts if they can so be called and those grossly limited so called facts are the canon and anything new original or different like thoughts opinions and ideas are heresy and how ironic they denounce the idea of one or more gods. Sec semper tyrannus. Yeah? Well FUCK YOU ALL!

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

At 10/16/11 02:32 AM, Iron-Hampster wrote:
At 10/16/11 02:18 AM, Iron-Claw wrote: "No matter what you've done you don't deserve to go to prison because of blah, blah, blah, blah, sodomy, blah, blah, blah, blah, therefore you don't need nor deserve to go to prison nor to be punished."
I personally prefer the idea of forced labor.

If you've broken the law you need to be punished and also need to go to jail or prison depending on the severity and indeed you deserve to be punished and apparently that person was opposed to the very thought of punishment that they shouldn't be punished at all! Do you really expect the justice system to do nothing as opposed to something to punish the law breaker? And that Is why I never associated with that pea green greener that gives actual greeners a bad image the kind that blow up dams! That's why I stayed the fuck away from that person.

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

I have a friend a literal friend not me but I am hard pressed to call him a friend because he can be so tactless and at one point he ended up proving how unworldly he was by going to The Outback Steakhouse and Australia themed Restaurant and he couldn't tell the bathrooms apart the options were "Blokes" or "Sheilas" and he couldn't tell them apart I shit you not! To which many others defended to "Could you tell the bathrooms apart in Japan?" to which I said no but I can tell them apart in Australia because they speak ENGLISH! HELLO! ENGLISH IS OUR NATIVE TOUNGE IT'S THE SAME DIFFERENCE IT'S ENGLISH NONETHELE-ES! And that is a testament to how worldly he is: None at all.

He is a huge fan of Tim Burton movies and I was lamenting that Spider-Man 3 didn't use Danny Elfman for the score. To which he responded: "Who is Danny Elfman?" For those of you a little confused Tim Burton and Danny Elfman go hand in hand if Burton is directing Elfman is composing and they've been together for every single motion picture they have done since the start. And that is a testament to how much class he has: None at all. It's very exhausting!

Response to: Presidential Jokes Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

A while back former president Bill Clinton set up an auction for certain "gently used" suits that he wore during his presidency. Only then at the auction could they be called "suits" but during his presidency they WOULD be called evidence! When they said "gently used" was a euphemism for covered in jism stains. You take 'em to the dry cleaners and they say "We're terribly sorry we just can't get the stains out!" So please for the love of God do NOT buy ANY SUIT of Bill Clinton's during his presidency! *shudders*

Response to: 21 Drinking Age Reform possibility? Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

That certainly illustrates the point that is a good one. The United States of America is literally the only country on earth that makes you wait for 21 to drink as opposed to 18 in every other country except one Japan drinking age is 20 but I say any country that will make you wait one less year is A-OK domo arigato. So to The US Government I say:

What the fuck is wrong with you? Makin' everyone 18 years old too young to drink but they are old enough to vote and smoke that in that case will tarnish their bodies in far worse and sooner ways than alcohol ever could and consequently die from that and vicariously they are old enough to die in your many many wars most of them useless especially if it requires a draft and a shitload of Republicans in charge where they shouldn't 'cause far too many innocent peoples die because of them vicariously a whole lot of 18-year-olds will die in that useless war and you are gonne tell me after doing all that clusterfuckery you won't give them alcohol because they're 18?! Yeah, well FUCK YOU ALL!!!

Iron Claw Has Spoken!

Response to: Area 51 Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

At 10/16/11 01:56 AM, aviewaskewed wrote:
Oh, so now you're an expert somehow that we should think your opinion is somehow accurate when you freely admit you don't know the verdict?

Johnathan Turley never left a public statement after the statement he was taking those responsible to court. He has since announced he will be taking on the case of several prisoners who not only had no warrant for their arrest they had no probable cause no habeus corpus they just took them because The Patriot Act said they could and spent the next 8 years in Gitmo and well if you haven't known about the Patriot Act this whole time and what it was and what it means and all they had to do was read it and they would've found it was going to turn The United States of America into a marxist republic that if anyone criticizes the leader of a marxist republic you have to lock them away no warrant no habeus corpus no probable cause they just do it because they're marxists but in The United States of America we have The Bill of Rights, The Constitution, and The Declaration of Independence and when someone throws them all away literally it's a crime and when The Bushies did such literally and I'm just shocked The Bill of Rights, The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence exist at all today no thanks to The Bushies! FUCK 'EM ALL!!!

This couldn't go into the "conspiracy debunking thread"

No it couldn't you arrogant son of a bitch! And here's why: This is not a conspiracy theory this is legitimate discussion of unexplained mysteries of this or any other conceivable planet there's a difference! "what's the difference?' Here's the difference! Conspiracy theories are complete and utter idiocy and lunacy that require a shitload of paranoid schizophrenics that wear tinfoil hats and should all be forwarded to the nearest walk in clinic with a psyche ward! I AM NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORIST YA ARROGANT SONS OF BITCHES!!!

Response to: Area 51 Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

At 1/20/10 06:57 AM, Shukumei-the-Fox wrote:
Making assumptions and assertions of which you have neither the authority or knowledge of anyone or anything of the subject at hand.
Excuse me?

You harassed ME little boy not the other way around. If you have the ability to throw a punch you must also have the ability to take a punch and since you can't take it you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

I fly the CH-146 for a living.

The Cessna is a civilian aircraft not a C-17 if you were flying a C-17 instead of a Cessna you would qualify to debate on Area 51 but you're still stuck with a Cessna.

I know more about aircraft than you may ever hope.

You are wrong and arrogant to assert such a thing.

:I'm constantly having to answer questions from civvies, but when they ask about stupid shit like this, it just pisses me off. There are no aliens at Groom Lake Bed. It's where they test new aircraft designs and technology before it can go public. The extensive security is to protect their secrets from enemy Intelligence Officers and whatnot. The nearby towns are all sworn to secrecy, too, or so I've heard.

They're probably confused because you're exaggerating The Cessna a civilian nonmilitary aircraft

Roswell happened in...1957, I believe.
You are wrong. Every source points to July 1947. I don't know where you got that year. Fox news right?
No, I just tried to remember off the top of my head. Fuck Fox News. They're too biased.

And you remain irrevocably wrong it happened in July 1947.

I agree with the rational people here who think you are either mentally unbalanced, or a complete retard.
Don't give a fuck what you or anyone else here or anywhere else thinks who could think such a thing.
Haha, good for you, I guess.

Yes it is because you remain irrevocably wrong to think such a thing as is anyone and everyone who has thought such a thing and you can say something that isn't true as many times as you want to and no matter how many times you say that thing that isn't true does not make it true no matter how many times you scream and cry it still doesn't make it true. And everyone who has was themselves retarded and insane completely it takes one to know one. And if you truly believe a scar like that was made by a weather balloon you are retarded and including you you are the only individual on planet earth who has seen that picture who believes such a thing. I have shown it to ex military individuals and everyone I know love or care about all say the same thing: It was made by an aircraft that crashed into the desert of some kind. AN AIRCRAFT! If you are indeed a Cessna pilot you are unfit for duty because you don't know the difference between an aircraft in distress from a weather balloon and that is a dangerous thing.

This is funny.
Bungee-powered ejection seats were invented in 1910.
The modern design as we know it was invented in 1929 by Anastase Dragomir.
The design was perfected during WWII, and used on aircraft like the Heinkel He 280, the He 219 night-fighter, the Saab 21, the Saab 17, and the He 162.
On 17 August 1946, 1st Sgt. Larry Lambert was the first live American ejectee.
Oh, I'm sorry. Perhaps your confused? I said ROCKET POWERED EJECTOR SEATS. ROCKET POWERED EJECTOR SEATS. RO-CKET POW-ER-ED E-JECT-OR SEATS. You know the kind that fire the little rockets of fire that send the seat higher, farther and harder in order to get clear of an exploding jet fighter flying subsonic speeds and up once a section of the canopy is ejected. Are we clear now? This is the kind of ejector seat that set the standard for every modern jet fighter which didn't start from 1956
1958, actually. Martin-Baker designed them for the old Delta Dart. Wrong again!

It's gonna take two years to design and test a new aircraft that's never been flown before testing started 1956 first certified for duty in 1958 Designed and Tested in 1956 Nine years after Roswell and once again they lied and once again they changed their official story and for all this time their official story has become a constantly changing topographic map and that is how you discern that they are indeed lying and the other signs to look for are profuse blinking and increase in heart rate and if you're smart enough you can not only see these things for yourself you can also arrive at such yourself and indeed that is what I see and you don't and you're wrong to think they're telling the truth because if you were smart enough and educated enough and done you homework like you should which you haven't you would clearly see they're lying. And since you can't you're wrong and stupid.

and will continue so long as pilots are people and not computers.
There will ALWAYS be a human in control, even if he or she is not in the actual aircraft. We have UNMANNED Aircraft, not AUTONOMUS Aircraft. There is a difference...

And yet the pitch has been to circumvent the human element entirely by the joint chiefs of staff and every branch of command of the US Military! Not that you have anything to worry about in your Cessna a non military aircraft!


What was your point again?
What's yours? You think that by getting loud and shitty to compensate for the fact you haven't done any actual research on the subject matter that you can bring me down.
Pfft. Fuck Research. I've been studying aircraft before you were born, boy. And now I fly them.

Oh have you now? How could you possibly accomplish such being born 7 years AFTER ME! You don't know who you're making an assumption or assertion do you, BOY?! I guess you did get some flying experience as a sperm swimming around that didn't die after being shot on the floor then yeah. YOU DON'T KNOW A FUCKING THING BOY!

Response to: Area 51 Posted October 18th, 2011 in Politics

At 7/20/10 02:16 PM, aviewaskewed wrote:
Aliens would be too big for any one government to keep quiet. The idea that America could have recovered bodies and tech at Roswell, and then developed it secretly for years and nobody would find out? Come on...we weren't able to hold on to supremacy with the atom bomb for even a decade really. Do we really think we could honestly hang onto something this tremendous and monumental and keep it a complete secret for all this time?

Bullshit! Americans can keep it secret and hidden at Area 51, Wright Patterson Airfield and AUTEC because they're all hard to get to and if anyone does or talks they die. Russians have their approximation somewhere in The Ural Mountains I'm not sure if it's there or most likeley somewhere else at the real location a few Russians came to a field in this Discovery Channel Special and asserted they were too close to the site I'm not sure where but it does exist and they fled at any rate the site in Russia is hard to get to and if anyone gets too close or talks they die. I am absolutely sure they know the truth about the existence of Aliens that they are real and many of their craft and technologies have been reverse engineered to give us Microchips and Motherboards, Fiber Optics, Nightvision, lasers, and Kevlar body armor and according to Philip Corso who was a Lieutenant Colonel at the time of his retirement and says that is what was taken and produced from the craft that crashed at Roswell. Some things they were not able and still unable to produce like FTL As I've said before the means to travel the great distances in space the technique was a propulsion system that bends space and time as well. One plausible reason why we haven't heard anything since is because the wound up in our year 1947 and by approximation aimed for 1999 and missed. And that kind of FTL would be difficult to track as opposed to "Hyperspace" which would leave a substantial signature in space similar to the contrails left behind by jets going supersonic like your various sci-fi stories dictate.

I know what you're thinking: "Why would they keep such a monumentous and scientifically significant secret from us? What is their game?WHY?!"
To which I say: My sentiments exactly! We've been waiting and ready for this for too long! I really couldn't say perhaps you should ask them at your discretion of course.

Response to: Presidential Jokes Posted October 16th, 2011 in Politics

George W. Bush dies, goes to heaven at the gates St. Peter says "Sir, you've done far and many awful, awful, awful, awful, awful things to good people however I'm gonna let you in provided you spend all of eternity arm in arm with THIS WOMAN" he points then Bush turns to the woman to find a hideously ugly disheveled woman. And then bush says "Aw HELL! Well...it's better than hell! I'll do it!" So then Bush joins arms with the hideously ugly disheveled woman enters the pearly gates to find a gorgeous tall busty woman arm in arm with Bob Dole! To which Bush says "Boy I shudder to think what awful, awful, awful, awful, awful thing(s) you done!" To which Bob Dole says "Oh that's nothing you should've seen the other guy!"

Response to: 21 Drinking Age Reform possibility? Posted October 16th, 2011 in Politics

At 8/20/11 01:13 PM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote:
At 8/19/11 04:54 PM, flyingmonk48 wrote: I have so many friends who get wasted every weekend and no matter how many times they get busted they go right back because their rich ass parents bail them out. Then tell them its the schools fault or they blame it on everyone else not their fucking dumb ass angel who could do know wrong in the world.
Hm, well in my case I know a guy who wasn't so lucky as i described before, he got two of his friends killed while drunk driving, one that I knew slightly, he got bailed out of course by went right back when he violated his probation, at least the system isn't completely broken, they went on the angle of "he has suffered enough knowing he got his friends killed, n that it was one of their faults because they were older," But like I said the most honorable thing he could've done is take his punishment and not try to run from it.
And I remember our school had this big thing about drunk driving some time before, ironically.

You listen here, mac and listen well: The Problem in question is NOT alcohol, at least not in your case being allergic you have to stay away otherwise you'll die because of that allergy, The REAL Problem is Alcoholism it happens in some people but not in all the peoples the fact is Alcohol is dangerous as is any other substance even legal ones but when and only when it falls into the wrong hands and when that happens people will die; the difference is know your limit and do so in moderation. Don't drink and drive or operate heavy machinery with alcohol or any other substance.

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted October 16th, 2011 in Politics

"No matter what you've done you don't deserve to go to prison because of blah, blah, blah, blah, sodomy, blah, blah, blah, blah, therefore you don't need nor deserve to go to prison nor to be punished."

WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN SMOKING?! I'm as much a liberal and a democrat I vote Democrat I recycle I support the legalization of marijuana and nothing else of harder value and I just signed the petition this morning however I do eat meat I do eat the minimum daily requirement I thoroughly enjoy beer as opposed to wine I am in favor of the death penalty and am all in favor of sending offenders to jail or prison depending on the severity of the offense and they do deserve to be punished.

Response to: Area 51 Posted October 16th, 2011 in Politics

I wish to set the record straight for all of you this thread here and no other is the original thread on the discussion of Area 51. I started it. All others are redundant threads. This is the true thread.

In actuality Area 51 was not established until 1955, 7 years after The crash at Roswell in actuality The remains and wreckage were taken to Wright-Patterson Airfield in Dayton, Ohio in Hangar 18 that in actuality it started there in 1947 and once the facility at Area 51 had been established the remains and wreckage would be moved FROM Wright Patterson Airfield in Dayton, Ohio
TO Area 51 not the other way around. In the 1990s Area 51 had a huge problem with the legitimacy of their establishment: In the process of the advancements of whatever technology they were developing in the process started producing a very large quantity of toxic waste. Since their policy of "Nothing and no one goes in except us and nothing and no one goes out because we don't exist." As such they needed to dispose of the toxic waste properly which is a requirement on a federal level. Instead they burned it with fire and not only is that a crime it is a FEDERAL OFFENSE and to make matters worse when toxic waste is burned the negative after effects of exposure to toxic waste is MAGNIFIED EXPONENTIALLY! The workers came home with the sensation that their skin was burning they quickly ran under the cold shower faucet to find they were growing fish scales on human tissue I shit you not! Naturally you and anyone you know love or care about are going to take the company to court on account of wrongful death and failure to abide by federal regulations in essence a Federal Offense that the company (Area 51) must be held accountable and the instigators must pay the price however many years it would be in a regular prison as opposed to a cushy federal prison no they don't deserve such a luxury. Do you know what happened? The Federal Government declared: "Area 51 does not exist, vicariously we do not have to hold 'Area 51' accountable, vicariously no crime has been committed by 'Area 51,' vicariously you are unfit to prosecute, vicariously we are immune." paraphrased of course. And to those responsible I say:

Yeah? Well FUCK YOU ALL! YOU BREAK THE LAW YOU GO TO PRISON! GO DIRECTLY TO PRISON! DO NOT PASS GO! DO NOT COLLECT $200! NO ONE IS IMMUNE NOR ARE THEY ENTITLED TO IMMUNITY! YOU BREAK THE LAW YOU GO TO PRISON! AND SINCE YOU DID BREAK THE LAW YOU GO TO A REGULAR PRISON! NOT A CUSHY FEDERAL PRISON! FUCK YOU!

Shortly thereafter then President Bill Clinton singed a Presidential Addendum I forget what the number sequence was but in it it declared publicly and federally that Area 51 indeed exists and are accountable to the full extent of federal and state laws. More that this it dot say. What does that mean? Well knowing that this makes number 4 on the list of reasons why Bill Clinton should be commended NOT CONDEMNED in addition to paying off the national debt and gaining surplus by raising taxes on the richest 1% and that is how you pay of the national debt and gain surplus, recognizing The Tuskeegee Airmen as national heroes of which Regan and Bush Sr. did not do and removed Slogodam Milosovich from power in six weeks with absolutely no friendly nations died in the process not a one; under Bill Clinton the trial would've begun shortly thereafter. I have myself never heard of what the final verdict was but I do believe the following:

All those in positions of power at the time have been removed from their positions in power and serving their sentence in a prison of some kind, preferably a regular prison but I really don't know to that extent however the sign that used to have an intimidating message at the end said "use of deadly force authorized" has now been reinserted with a slightly friendlier message that still warns it's just not as Orwellian as it was before which to me suggests that and that they are under new management. The prosecuting attorney is Johnathan Turley if you or anyone you know love or care about is in a jam with Area 51 find him when and if anything goes wrong.

Response to: Skeptics are dicks. Posted October 14th, 2011 in Politics

At 8/31/11 06:24 AM, MatthewF wrote:
At 8/2/11 03:57 PM, Iron-Claw wrote: To the extent of Aliens and UFOs:

-On Alien Abductions they bring in multiple eyewitnesses who say they've been abducted and present their testimony. I do believe they are telling the truth. How Do you know? If you're smart enough you can tell the signs to look for are: Increase in heart rate, profuse blinking, and incocistentcies in the story they tell. The Eyewitnesses show none of the above.
Are you aware of Recovered Memeory syndrome where someone has been suggested something by a hypnotists and believes it actually happened when there is no evidence to suggest it ever happened

I am indeed and if you actually read the following statement thereafter you would be able to understand that if indeed it was from a psychologist or psychiatrist it is they who should be in the chair not the other way around. And if you had actually read that statement or any subsequent testimony you too would understand that what they went through was violently disturbing perpetrated by violently disturbed individuals and a human being would not be fit to practice such an act itself nor be in the medical professionals and they couldn't themselves conjure it because for those of us who have actually read their testimony and/or watched their testimony they describe an encounter that pushes them to the brink of what the human condition is able to conjure themselves or for even the most ardent science fiction writer. You really should research this from the other end which you don't. Literacy is a wonderful thing in spite what The Republican Party may criticize you for.

-On generic Aliens and UFOs they bring in an "expert" who is a skeptic who once again make the same 3 arguments. Once again I declare in actuality there's mountains of evidence in support of whereas they have not one iota of actual evidence to the contrary merely flaming of the individual and/or The Community.
Easy if said people want a skeptic to believe then all they need to do is grab a piece of technology off the shelf when the aliens are not looking. Amazing it hasn't happened yet with the amount of abductions we have heard about so far.

And yet you yourself have not one tiny iota of actual evidence to the contrary you just sit there and declare "There's no evidence whatsoever" "It's outrageous" and "Everybody who believes such shall be crucified" all this can be attributed to is harassment and that doesn't qualify as a professional status just another bully as I have said before. On multiple occasions people have recovered implants from parts of their body that have an actual electrical charge and unlike any material made on earth. This has been an actual occurrence for the past 20 years and you mean to tell me you've never heard of this? By your logic it never happened at all because you've never heard of it. That doesn't make you anything but grossly uninformed.

-On Ancient Aliens they have multiple experts on history, archeology, and symbols who are also Ufologists that talk about the availability electricity and the means to power machines in the bronze age. On multiple occasions there have been multiple archeology sites finding multiple "Bagdad Batteries" that's what they call them.
The batteries establish they experimented with electricity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence if you want me to accept that they made complex electrical items then you would need to produce an archaelogical said item.

Indeed. Here it is. Seriously do the research if you wish to qualify for the debate. Just you never heard of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because you don't know something to be true doesn't make it untrue it just makes you grossly uninformed.

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted October 14th, 2011 in Politics

"It's ok for commercial airliner pilots to carry guns in the cabin in case of a terrorist tries to highjack the airliner because F/A-18 Hornet pilots carry them all the time."

Well that is a serious misconception as to the overall purpose an F/A-18 Hornet pilot to carry a handgun is not for protection in the cockpit but to be used as a weapon on the ground in the event said pilot is shot down behind enemy lines and has to eject. In actuality explosive decompression is an urban myth however unnecessary a handgun is whereas every commercial airliner has 1 standard issue fire ax and 1 standard issue fire extinguisher one to finish off would be assailant and one to knock out said assailant.

Response to: Skeptics are dicks. Posted August 30th, 2011 in Politics

At 9/6/10 02:31 PM, poxpower wrote: That reminds me of those tests they make dowsers go through.
You know, something like having 6 rows of 6 containers, only one in each row contains water ( chosen at random ) and the other contain sand.

Then they get dowsers to use their awesome powers to find the water and they always fail.

And it never changes their minds. Ever. They could fail a million tests and still think they have magic powers.

That's the kind of nutbar we're dealing with here, I wonder if being polite is really going to make a dent in that. Holy shit.

Most people are indeed smart enough to distinguish a jar of sand from a jar of water simply by picking it up there's no magic just common sense really and to fail at such a task is idiocy.

Response to: Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? Posted August 30th, 2011 in Politics

Absolutely! America knew full well the attack by Japan at Pearl Harbor was going to happen and did absolutely nothing to prevent it mainly because they had no just cause going to war in Europe against the Third Reich because they had done nothing to the Americans then along comes Tojo and his fleet attack Pearl Harbor and not only "justifies" war with Japan the day after Pearl Harbor Hitler declared war on America. It's all true. Just like Pearl Harbor could've been prevented 9/11 also could've been prevented because Richard Clark knew full well the plan for the attack and sent the memo to the Bush Administration except they weren't too keen on reading like it's a bad thing! Really? And that is why I pride myself on possessing literacy because it can help prevent catastrophe even save the world.

Response to: 21 Drinking Age Reform possibility? Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

At 8/19/08 01:41 PM, Tancrisism wrote: College Presidents say 21 Drinking age isn't working.

Fuck, we've been saying it all along. Mothers Against Drunk Driving you counter-progressive cunts, eat cold hard statistical truth.

Solution: LOWER The US drinking age to 18. I say if you're old enough to die for your county in a useless war, vote and smoke tarnishing your body in FAR WORSE ways then you're all old enough for alcohol. And truly MAAD are a bunch of cunts! I despise MAAD! They're even more useless than Fox News, Internet Encyclopedias that let any wise ass edit, and Homeland Security the most useless institutions in the universe!

Iron Claw has spoken!

Response to: Americans, Evil Or Ignorant? Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

Indeed there are those Americans who are bothe Evil and Ignorant but not all Americans. They do bring down the status quo and force the leaders to lower the standards faster than they can raise them. GOD DAMNED REGANOMICS! But rest assured there are far more Americans are good, intelligent, well educated, well spoken, accepting of all good peoples of The Universe and hardworking. I'm one of them. So please, do not condemn an entire nation of good people based on the actions of a very small group of fascists.

Iron Claw has spoke.

Response to: Racism in conservative politics Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

I tell you it drives me insane the way every single conservative keeps fighting tooth and nails to destroy every single piece of legislation by Barak Obama! They wouldn't do this with a caucasian President! They'll do it with a black President, vicariously they are racist. That's the trouble with America they put too many peckerwoods, crackers and rednecks in positions of power! In case you can't tell I'm white I can say that.

Response to: Consumerism and Your Views On it. Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

I myself have a proper understanding of the true definition of communism and the problem is NOT communism it's people with a perverse practice of communism like: Mau, Stalin, Ho Chi Mihn, and Kim Jong Il. If I were in charge is it how I would run things? Most definitely NOT. Done proper it has the potential to work but I wouldn't do it. This is what communism means:

A group of political leaders establish themselves and create a commune. The work in a group on a committee and decide on laws, budget, law enforcement, firefighters, and other pieces of legislation. It's really not a whole lot different than Democracy except no elections of the leaders. It does have the potential to work done proper but again it is not the way I would run things if I were in charge.

Response to: Sex Education: Abstinence Only Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

It is inhuman to deny human beings of the proper age of consent sex. At that age the physical need for sex kicks it. That's right. Sex is a physical need as real as food water and sleep Even self satisfaction as in masturbation can satisfy the need for sex. People of that age should not be conformed to the dogma that requires you to get married before you have sex most people at that age are not ready for a commitment like Marriage but they are ready for a commitment of sexual activity. Unless you actually want a baby please, use birth control and don't let the dogma of the church prevent you especially from using condoms.
Fact: Use of condoms does protect against STDs and HIV/AIDS at a success rate of 98% and does protect against pregnancy with a 89% success rate.

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

"The/A Holocaust never happened."

I know what you're thinkin' "Theres more than one?" You bet your ass there's more then one.

1) The Armenian Genocide: In World War I The Germans invaded Armenia and completely destroyed every single member of the nation of Armenia. The current peoples of the republic of Armenia are non native they're merely immigrants. There are no more Native Armenians in existence on Earth. Holocaust.

2) The Holocaust: In World War II The Germans under The Third Reich began the systematic slaughter of an estimated 13 million people. They were Jewish, Gipsy, Gay, Environmentalist, Immigrant Workers, People with conditions, people inclined to speak out against The Nazis and Twins. They were either gassed, burned alive, starved to death or tortured to death. It shocked and awed the entire world including the German people and to this date many Germans are unsure they can be proud to be German because of the war crimes of The Third Reich. Holocaust. The Germans have invented a word for people who seek joy and laughter in other people's misfortunes: "Schadenfreut" I'm not sure if that's the correct spelling but the correct pronunciation is SHAH-DEN-FROYT

3)Atomic Holocaust: In World War II the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the atomic bombs Little Boy and Fat Man. 25,000 people died instantly in the blast at Hiroshima. 100,000 people died instantly in the blast at Nagasaki. 60,000 people died from complications due to radiation poisoning an accumulated total of 185,000 people. Holocaust. That is the namesake for the scenario of Nuclear Holocaust. Nuclear Holocaust is when every living thing on a planet is killed by a series of Atomic Bombs being dropped.

In some parts of the world they actually have laws against denouncing The Holocaust. So if the Republicans want to make an anti flag burning amendment turnabout is fairplay then we must make an anti cross burning amendment and an amendment that makes denouncing any Holocaust a federal offense.

Response to: Should marijuana be legalized? Posted August 4th, 2011 in Politics

Rest assured there are far worse hard drugs to legalize than Marijuana. Any and all hard drugs should still be and forevermore shall be illegal. Only Hemp should be legalized people tend to forget if you only legalize Marijuana then Hashish will remain illegal therefore you should and shall put "Legalize Hemp" on your petition to your state congress not just "Marijuana." And while you're at it, lower the US drinking age to 18! If you're old enough to die for your country in a useless war, vote and smoke then you qualify for Alcohol!

Iron Claw has spoken!

Response to: Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? Posted August 3rd, 2011 in Politics

At 8/9/10 10:53 PM, Warforger wrote: Not in the context you were using it, thats Holocausts original meaning

Once again you'r not reading at all: Thorough Destruction by fire. And what else is an atomic blast?

This is what you get. It's the simplest entry I could find for simpletons like you

Also just because some Japanese people would call it that doesn't MEAN ITS TRUE.

And that is your opinion just 1 and I who would tell you you're wrong and everyone I hold to be worthy of friends and family and are worthy because none of them are Xenophobic and you are Xenophobic. You are hopelessly outnumbered and out spoken because you are a single individual who is insignificant. In actuality it is YOU WHO IS INSIGNIFICANT!

Atomic Holocaust by Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Read it and weep.
Nuclear Holocaust If you haven't heard of that before this point in time in your entire life you are intolerably uninformed

maybe I should put on a tinfoil hat to pick up your special radio waves?

HA HA HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Go ahead put on a tinfoil hat you won't accomplish a thing except looking stupid and crazy! And if you truly believe the works of Homeland Security, Fox News and wikipedia I honestly don't know how anyone with a single functioning neuron in their brain can to believe:

"We can no longer allow Toenail Clippers on an airplane because someone might use themas a weapon to highjack the airplane."

"We can no longer allow Hair Gell on an airplane because it can be used a makeshift incendiary device."

"We can no longer allow Shampoo or Conditioner on an airplane because it can be used as a makeshift incendiary device."

"People with almanacs are Terrorists."

"We are now placing Vegetarians and Vegans on the top 10 most terror watch list."

"Senator Larry Craig is a Democrat."

"Why is it none of these black people are saying 'Hey! Somebody get me some mother fucking iced tea!'?"

If you truly believe an of that from those most useless institutions in The World then You are a fucking moron! It would appear we have a new contender for that segment here on NG: Warforger

Response to: Dumbest argument you ever heard Posted August 2nd, 2011 in Politics

At 10/9/10 03:34 AM, WolvenBear wrote:
At 10/6/10 01:03 AM, Antimatter500 wrote: fox likes to call themselves "news" while only making chicken shit right wing editorial arguments, and purposefully scaring the living daylights out of people to make them conform.

that is not news.

/argument
Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox news, is an ardant left winger. He has supported EVERY democrat candidate for president since the 70s. Claiming that a life long Democrat is scheming to tilt the news to the right is moronic.

No. Rupert Murdock is a Republican. I don't know who put that idea in your head but they are wrong and if you truly believe such you too are wrong. Rupert Murdock is no more a Democrat than Stephen Colbert is a Republican. For those of you who are grossly misinformed Stephen Colbert is a Democrat who takes on the persona of a Republican for the sole purpose of lampooning on The Republican Party! I am shocked at how little Republicans can or have picked up on this! The verdict is: Fox News it bad and Republican by the tab of 8 to 2. Fox News is indeed bad and Republican. Majority rules. That's Democracy.