Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/29/12 04:15 PM, Entice wrote: Wow. You legitimately believe that there's no valid opinions other than your own, do you?

What? No. They clearly are idiots. Come on, any other time some child makes up bullshit people scorn and condemn them for it. When it comes to religion, for some odd reason you are too much of a conditioned bastard to brutally scrutinize it while it remains an enormous problem in our world that facilated 99% of our wars and has statistics working against it such as statistics showing criminal activity is higher in religious associated areas and that religious couples divorce at the same rate as atheists and that prayers don't fucking work and that they are all hypocrite douchebags that think you will burn in hell and that they imprison their children in their psycho babble hell and that churches are actually instuitions that feed of your stupidity and ignorance and that is why god always needs more money and the churches don't pay taxes.

At 10/29/12 04:13 PM, Entice wrote:

At 10/29/12 04:11 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Notice how he says 'I hope', which is a statement people say under a particular rebellious attitude.

That depends on context.

This is a personal discussion, therefore you should pay great heed to the words you use.

Then he said 'probably' because he could sustain his stupid reassurement.

I said probably because I do not try and convince people of absolutes and I cannot say absolutely that homosexuality never causes mental problems in itself. However, I do not believe that it has negative effects in the majority of cases.

You thought of a Utopia. You clearly have no hesitation in making up absolutes towards me either, so why act like you don't make absolutes? I know you do.

Are you gonna lock me up and give me electroshock therapy now?

No.

At 10/29/12 04:09 PM, Mumbo wrote: And you're supposed to be reasonable and smart. if you were, you'd know there is no way to prove or disprove religion.

Yes, I can. They are all idiots.

Case fucking closed.

You are an idiot if you can't understand what the individual person's God actually is. An individual's God is a manifestation of their self-projected ego. That is why their God is always personal and share similar beliefs as they do. They are their God through a self-projected abstract disconnection of themselves. This is why there is not a single form of God and God is seen in many different angles just like an every day cloud. God is personal because God does not exist out of their stupid heads -- period.

At 10/29/12 04:07 PM, Entice wrote: I hope you understand that any negative mental state is probably the parent's fault in the first place and not related to homosexuality.

Exactly what Entice is doing; reassuring himself of his own bullshit ways of living. Notice how he says 'I hope', which is a statement people say under a particular rebellious attitude. Then he said 'probably' because he could sustain his stupid reassurement.

At 10/29/12 04:04 PM, II2none wrote: Sure they can but the problem is parents NOT taking responsibility for their homosexual kids mental state.

No, you don't understand. This is a mechanistic compensation of the human mind. They can't stop it because they have to constantly reassure themselves of their own stupid beliefs. Religious people do this. Stupid kids do this. Women do this. Men do this. It is a mechanism, and you need to stop ignoring it. These are childhood insecurities, and they should be properly addressed.

At 10/29/12 03:59 PM, Confucianism wrote: *Laughs*

Please, do us all a favor, go take your pills.

At 10/29/12 03:45 PM, Narcissy wrote:

At 10/29/12 03:25 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I just told you that when there are a lot of people, it generally bodes problems. Now you are instigating I want to be in a rally.

If you want to do anything to do anything about the problem, you should be.

Yea,h because getting into a giant orgy of teenage angsty retards is definately the way to go!

Saying I'm a pseudo-intellectual does not mean I am one. Therefore my conclusion was based off your lack of objective basis.

This was before I called you on " Is it because ''I ferkin sed s0!''?"

Yeah, which is why I called you out on it, sir. Prove yourself, instead of trying to prove that you can prove against me. You will fail as long as you do not provide some backbone to this.

I don't give a fuck,

Bing again.

If you are going to take this out 2x in a row - -who knows what else you take out of context.

because I don't whine over trivial things that are personally subjected.

A doctor believes in Heaven , you whine. What?

I'm not whining. I'm telling it like it is. Whining is when you throw a fit when you don't get your way over something you know you won't get your way over. I'm not even trying to get my way, for there is no 'my way'. This is about you.

You'd be surprised how words can severely dismantle your entire ethos.

Oh dear.

Sarcasm is not healthy for you.

The truth hurts, sir.

Can.

It always does. Why else are you people more offended by the truth than you are by the opinion?

Your argument doesn't.

Wasn't meant to hurt.

That is because it never was meant to be about truth. You are simply having a pissing contest with me, but my dick, my heart and my brain is way too big for your entire cloud of ignorance.

It never was truth.

Eye of the beholder.

No, you made an objective claim you could not back up objectively. This is not eye of the fucking beholder. This is your eye being stuck far up your ass.

Maybe your sick and twisted self-appointed truth, but not truth nontheless.

"My truth is more truthier than your truth. it's truth"

However, one's character isn't a truth. You believe yourself to be a light in the darkness, I believe you to be an arrogant ass. Eye of the beholder.

Now that's the eye of the beholder and your eye being stuck far up your ass.

That is because of their mass stupidity and incredible walls of deeply rooted denial.

Didn't I see this on a Facebook status?

No, that would be your brain not being able to comprehend it, so you jump to retarded conclusion in attempt to condescend me.

Quantity does not assure quality -- never will.

I said majority rules. Didn't say it would benefit the opposing side's subjective idea of favoritism.

That's why there is only one throne because there is one king before those who follow the king, right? The majority don't rule... If that was so, we wouldn't be milked by the corporations.

'many' people...

See answer A.

'many' followers

See answer B.

I see it clearly, sir. You clearly do not.

Which side is the opposing side, sir?

Well, currently a paper I gotta write.

You should wipe your ass with it instead. Might do you some good.

Now you are going to imply hypocrisy in my words,

No, you're doing that yourself.

No, you've stated it clearly. You played out the pot calling the kettle black concept very coherently. Don't even try to run away from the fact.

while you continue to defelect everything I've sent your way surely to incinerate your arrogance towards me.

You were sending stuff? I thought you were writing poetry.

I thought you were writing nonsense.

Not having an argument and saying ''you're a pseudo-intellect'' is making an attempt at an objective premise you should back up with objectivism.

Yeah, I should link your posts, huh?

That would be you being a hypocrite about the eye of the beholder. You first state it as objective, then retreat to subjectivity then come right back out with more retarded objectivism you never had. In fact, you are lacking a lot of objectivity in your pants, sir.

As long as you continue to ignore my points;

Poetry.

Better than nonsense.

you are no more or less an used inanimate object than the pot and kettle combined, sir.

Man, someone should make that. Maybe they had. The kepotle.

Potettle.

At 10/29/12 03:42 PM, II2none wrote: Stop the gay and proud nonsense and maybe societal acceptance will be a helluva alot easier.

They can't stop it the same way religious people can't stop reassuring themselves. They all know they are full of themselves. The mind has created mental compensations and that 'gay' and 'proud' nonsense is covering up their nonsense.

At 10/29/12 03:35 PM, Confucianism wrote: This post was made to give you something to ramble on about. And then I would laugh at that too. Unless you don't feel like rambling on about it. Either way, I'm still going to laugh at you.

You laugh like a kid who knows nothing of the situations they are getting themselves into.

Besides, if you are laughing without an explanation, then you provide absolutely no tangible structure to begin with.

This means that you are a fool's fool. I really wished this wasn't the case.

At 10/29/12 03:33 PM, DareDevilGuy wrote: It got pretty ugly for him.

Agreed.

At 10/29/12 03:22 PM, JBK wrote: 1. Women love to make lists.
2. You love to make lists.
3. You have a bloody gaping vagina.

How long did it take you to come up with this shit-fest of conclusions?

At 10/29/12 03:17 PM, Narcissy wrote:

At 10/29/12 03:08 PM, Insanctuary wrote: No, I like to heat the discussions because fire brings forth the true face of our people. When the going gets tough; when people are pressured; all shields are down.

You're on a forum. Not a political rally.

I just told you that when there are a lot of people, it generally bodes problems. Now you are instigating I want to be in a rally.

You've got me all wrong, sir. You know nothing of me and only jumped to an infantile conclusion of me

As did you, remember?

Saying I'm a pseudo-intellectual does not mean I am one. Therefore my conclusion was based off your lack of objective basis.

don't give a fuck

Bing.

Look at you taking my words out of context. I don't give a fuck, because I don't whine over trivial things that are personally subjected.

because I'm the one on these boards that has the balls to handle a heated debate while many of you cower and pull the victim card like sad sacks of hypocrisy.

Arguing over the Internet is ballsy?

You'd be surprised how words can severely dismantle your entire ethos. The truth hurts, sir. Your argument doesn't. It never was truth. Maybe your sick and twisted self-appointed truth, but not truth nontheless.

Argument of quantity is not helping you right now.

Majority tends to rule.

That is because of their mass stupidity and incredible walls of deeply rooted denial. They are no different than swatting a single bee compared to swatting hundreds of them. Quantity does not assure quality -- never will.

Hitler had many people who followed him.

Yes?

'many' people...

Religion has so many followers.

And?

'many' followers

God, the more people, the worse it gets.

For the opposing side.

Which side is the opposing side, sir?

You have no idea how ignorant you sound when you say things like that.

Have I introduced you to my friend Pot, Kettle?

Now you are going to imply hypocrisy in my words, while you continue to defelect everything I've sent your way surely to incinerate your arrogance towards me.

You don't get me and jump to silly conclusions. Your 'why' turned out to be subjective nonsense -- this is not surprising.

Everything you said so far is subjective.

Not having an argument and saying ''you're a pseudo-intellect'' is making an attempt at an objective premise you should back up with objectivism.

Oh, I don't need to know you to know that your ideas and subjectivity is a crock of self-appointed knee-jerking. You really act like you are better than me, haha. Go on, convince yourself so, I will only keep breaking your petty facade.

You and Pot seem to really be hitting it off. Good to know.

As long as you continue to ignore my points; you are no more or less an used inanimate object than the pot and kettle combined, sir.

At 10/29/12 03:14 PM, wankwest wrote: Every problem you've listed so far isn't caused by Capitalism or can be solved with any system other than capitalism.
Most of the things you listed shouldn't be blamed on capitalism, but human greed.

Actually, you have a point, sir.

How foolish of me to overlook that damned detail.

A thousand fucks to myself, good day.

At 10/29/12 03:15 PM, ttdub wrote: You love doing that don't you? lol

Of course.

My purpose is to live with knowing I have no purpose.

At 10/29/12 03:01 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: as human beings we were all designated to fuck up at more than one point in time

More than half of those fuck ups were entirely avoidable.

At 10/29/12 02:59 PM, Narcissy wrote:

At 10/29/12 02:46 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Telling me it, does not make it so. Why don't you give me the 'why'? Why am I not contributing to the intelligence side?

I'll throw you a bone.

I already have a skeletal structure doing me enough good.

Mindless bickering over trivial problems, lashing out on a forum that can't nor won't do anything about former trivial problems. Generalizing an entire group simply for having an opposite belief of your own. Using the term "retarded" so loosely that it loses all meaning aside from "not sharing my own belief." You also seem to feel shouting profanity off in your posts when debating makes you look more intelligent.

No, I like to heat the discussions because fire brings forth the true face of our people. When the going gets tough; when people are pressured; all shields are down. You've got me all wrong, sir. You know nothing of me and only jumped to an infantile conclusion of me and by saying 'i'll throw you a bone' you are condescending me, but I don't give a fuck because I'm the one on these boards that has the balls to handle a heated debate while many of you cower and pull the victim card like sad sacks of hypocrisy.

These are just a few things I seen in my short visits of the BBS after a long absence. If you can already leave that impression and a majority were to agree with me, then chances of you being on a wrong path with a self-righteous pseudo intellectual belief, is likely high.

Argument of quantity is not helping you right now. Hitler had many people who followed him. Religion has so many followers. God, the more people, the worse it gets. You have no idea how ignorant you sound when you say things like that. You don't get me and jump to silly conclusions. Your 'why' turned out to be subjective nonsense -- this is not surprising.

Oh, and there's this little tid-bit too.

Is it because ''I ferkin sed s0!''?

You have no idea who I am, and decide to not only force words down my throat, but also insult me. if you can't keep yourself in a civil manner when handling and/or discussing people who don't share a belief with you then don't attempt to.

Oh, I don't need to know you to know that your ideas and subjectivity is a crock of self-appointed knee-jerking. You really act like you are better than me, haha. Go on, convince yourself so, I will only keep breaking your petty facade.

I agreed with your assessment. I am against the idiots of our world. I am not in the politics game. There is literally no place or room for you to tell me I am a pseudo-intellectual. All you have is what you have said, which is self-appointed drivel.

At 10/29/12 02:58 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: they never relate to any specific topic or argument and essentially just fuel a massive debate

Oh, trust me. Every debate is fueled off of ignorance. Ignorance is in everything we say, do and touch.

At 10/29/12 02:55 PM, ohbombuh wrote: Doctors can believe whatever they want about life after death, since you can't scientifically prove or disprove it. And it's not like he was prescribing anything based on his beliefs.

That is not their job to extract their nonsense out of their heads and influence people with garbage. The reason why there is no way to disprove it or prove it is the same reason we can't prove the boogeyman or disprove him. You have to be an absolute retard to buy into 'faith in antithetical values'.

At 10/29/12 02:53 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: preachy as fuck

You know, people are always flaunting their stupidity and ignorance. I see nobody doing anything about it. You protect the idiots and attack those who can't stand the idiots. Does this make you an idiot of all idiots? You entice the idiocy, you fuel their idiocy, these people would not be idiots if this world would take this idiocy seriously and not pull any of that 'let them do what they will with their lives' card or the 'they know themselves better than you do' card. This is absolute buffoonery. This is absolutely hypocritical. This is absolutely insanity.

At 10/29/12 02:43 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: opinions can't be wrong.

I just proved it wrong.

At 10/29/12 02:43 PM, Narcissy wrote: You're certainly not contributing to the intelligent side.

Telling me it, does not make it so. Why don't you give me the 'why'? Why am I not contributing to the intelligence side? Is it because ''I ferkin sed s0!''?

At 10/29/12 02:41 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: she has you by your balls now.

You could not be anymore wrong.

It does not take a preschool psychologist to figure out that this girl was setting up a facade to cover her own ass.

At 10/29/12 02:37 PM, TB1ZZL3 wrote: First of all, people would take you more seriously if you abandoned the atheist zealot tone. Calm down.

I wouldn't sound so much as a 'atheist zealot', if people weren't so zealous at being stupid.

Second, Newsweek itself isn't implying that its employees as a whole believe in the afterlife, or telling other people that they should. It's an article based on one person's experience. They used an attention grabbing title to lure in morons.

I don't give a fuck. They are retarded for doing this to the already stupid minded people of this world that continues to make people lose hope and reason to live life. All this does is tease the fellow human beings and fuels their already tard-o-meter.

At 10/29/12 02:29 PM, naronic wrote: Why does this bother you so?

The fact that these people are fucking lying to your faces? They do this for profit and/or attention and/or they are bat shit crazy and/or all of those things.

There is no heaven. The only heaven there ever will be, is when all religious people suddenly died off.

At 10/29/12 02:27 PM, Narcissy wrote: I'm now tempted to pull a Romney.

And that is...

At 10/29/12 02:16 PM, tox wrote: I mean seriously... For fuck sakes

More like, stupidity is more real than ever.

At 10/29/12 02:23 PM, Narcissy wrote: I never accept "X can't help them-self" as an excuse when it comes to physical violence or crime. If X couldn't help it, then X shouldn't be allowed to walk around freely since X is a loose cannon.

I agree with this man's assessment against the moral turds.

At 10/29/12 02:15 PM, MrPercie wrote: or you know, all assholes can learn some fucking manners and keep their mouth shut, I wouldnt find that too difficult so why should they.

They wouldn't have to keep their mouths shut if they had nothing retarded to say.

Therefore, racism would not exist, if retards did not exist.

Can anyone top this simple solution?

At 10/29/12 01:53 PM, thegarbear14 wrote: that would not end racism at all. Now only whites would hate other whites based on ethnicity or w/e. Ex: yugoslavia conflict...... croats and serbs are both whites.

It really... Does not take more than a second to see that people with different skin are not any more different than we are.

Therefore, if there weren't any retards, there wouldn't be any racism.