At 10/29/12 08:08 PM, koopahermit wrote: And thank you for brutally being the worst poster on this site and brutally helping me brutally increase my post count brutally.
You're welcome.
At 10/29/12 08:02 PM, 4761 wrote: Insantuary, I don't have to listen to what you say!
After all, I could say all of what you said is subjective.
Former is true (generally condones retardation, though), latter is you being a retard.
At 10/29/12 08:02 PM, koopahermit wrote: And you brutally rape dogs that have not done anything brutal to you.
And you are being brutally dishonest with yourself by assuming I brutally rape dogs that have not done anything brutal to me, so that means I have to brutally scrutinize you -- oh wait, I already did countless times and you had to cower your way into hiding behind obnoxious pictures.
Tsk, tsk.
At 10/29/12 07:58 PM, Dr-Worm wrote: Not to backseat mod, but I'm legitimately curious as to what constitutes hate speech on this site. My personal metric would probably include someone calling all gay people retarded delusional childish monkeys.
That would be ludicrous. I don't hate people, I simply have brutals things to say to people who deserve to be brutally scrutinized for being brutally dihonest with themselves.
At 10/29/12 07:52 PM, CrazySquirrel124 wrote: I didn't ask for this. Could a mod just come in and ban these hooligans already?
You intiate a sensitive topic, you get the horns.
At 10/29/12 07:38 PM, Xenomit wrote: He most likely didn't have any friends until he was about 17, and even then I doubt many people could stand to be around him
The Xenomit Bar
------------------------------
| | Retard
Super Retard
| | -Level 2-
Omega Retard
-Level 3- | |
Alpha Retard
-------------------------------
At 10/29/12 07:35 PM, TurkeyBased wrote: what
Becareful, if you keep paying for my head (I didn't know you were into that kind of stuff); you might discover Level 4 side of me, which I have never shown to anyone.
At 10/29/12 07:25 PM, Gramiscus wrote: sup b, you've gotten really mean and gay up on these boards in the past week. why you so sensitive
The Insanctuary Bar
------------------------------
| | Peaceful
Moderately Peaceful
| | -Level 2-
Moderately Passionate
-Level 3- | |
Passionate
-------------------------------
At 10/29/12 07:20 PM, naronic wrote: No it was more like you eating bananas and throwing the peels at me while I stood behind the fence and watched.
No, no. I remember it clearly. You tried to argue that religion is a good thing and people need it in life.
I said ''It's religion -- not REALigion.''
And you were like ''But, but... You're wrong! *vomits ad hominems*''
At 10/29/12 07:16 PM, Gramiscus wrote: fucking english majors, get off my lawn and get a real jorb working a 9 to 5 in a bank or something equally exciting for the rest of your years forever.
In other words, you feel inferior to us for some completely detatched reason, yes?
At 10/29/12 06:59 PM, naronic wrote: Me thinks it's well established by now that responding to trolls only serves as nourishment, so please let Insanctuary starve.
You are justmad because I severely devoured you in that religious debate.
At 10/29/12 07:11 PM, Xenomit wrote: Yes, I honestly and genuinely find furries infinitely more attractive than humans
This would be an insecurity. Fictional characters over real life, son.
It's not an insecurity, anything, they're just sexy. Now stop being a retard, not everything in life is some kind of twisted subconscious fallacy
Yeah, we both know that it isn't just because they are sexy. There is an underlying attraction for a reason and I'm willing to bet it has everything to do with your instinctive patterns. The furries represent the 'animal' side of humans and there is an aesthetic advancement because of people's ability to do things nature fails to do, miserably. This would be a guilty pleasure; guilty pleasures come from inner conflicts.
At 10/29/12 06:53 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: Money is a representation of labour expended in exactly the same way any commodity is a representation of labour expended.
Money fuels the same representated labour, but it sure isn't even close to the legitimacy of value as gold.
Would you agree? Machines that can print unlimited amount of paper money is going to result in serious economic problems? If not, then why?
At 10/29/12 06:51 PM, Xenomit wrote: I'm alright with myself, I'm pretty damn sexy, I just think that furries are a thousand times sexier
You have undertones of arrogance. Don't you ever notice your own pride and arrogance behind your words? When someone challenges you, it is like you exert these 'sparks' of mood swings. You clearly have some childhood insecurity that is creating pride and arrogance.
There are no repressed childhood memories, there are no deep emotional scars, I purely see furries as a much more attractive race
Are you absolutely sure about this? 100%? The way you talk and are easily offended, the fragility of your character and seemingly low self esteem tells me otherwise.
At 10/29/12 06:32 PM, Narcissy wrote:At 10/29/12 03:58 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Yea,h because getting into a giant orgy of teenage angsty retards is definately the way to go!You mean what you are?
That's the piss being beaten out of you talking.
Yeah, which is why I called you out on it, sir. Prove yourself, instead of trying to prove that you can prove against me. You will fail as long as you do not provide some backbone to this.I don't need to prove it to you, or anyone else. Many of your posts radiate it.
So you make an objective claim out of that eyeball lodged up your anal passage ways?
If you are going to take this out 2x in a row - -who knows what else you take out of context.No bing this time.
Bing.
I'm not whining.Uhuh.
There's a difference.
I'm telling it like it is."If you believe in Heaven, something that can't be proven and/or disproved, you're an absolute retard. Fact."
If nobody can prove it, then whence cometh 'Heaven'? Whence cometh any 'concept' or 'idea' of 'Heaven'? Well, it obviously came from the mind's of idiots who also created the concepts of bigfoot, ghosts, fairies, werewolves, aliens and all other kinds of hocus pocus stuff. You don't speak that of which has 0 evidence in a realistic or objective manner, this would be called lunacy.
Whining is when you throw a fitOr complain in general. Which you do over a man's religious choice.
No, this is making a point that you are too narrow-minded to see right now.
for there is no 'my way'.Goodness me. Humility?
What of it?
This is about you.I'm flattered.
Not just you, but anyone else for that matter.
Sarcasm is not healthy for you.Oh my.
Oh my, you said ''oh my''.
It always does.Once, someone told me they'd give me a free sub-sandwich and did. Was a good truth.
We were talking about when truth hurts and not when it is good. That is irrelevant.
Why else are you people more offended by the truth than you are by the opinion?You seem to mix the two.
That's your problem. I don't mix them at all.
That is because it never was meant to be about truth.More about your opinion which you seem to pretend is a truth.
My factual and objectively based statement that you think is a opinion through your opinion?
You are simply having a pissing contest with me,You're getting closer.
You took no caution to hide this motive.
but my dick,Bing.
Wut.
my heartIf I only had a heart.
Uh huh...
and my brainWait, this was the first part. Let's start over.
No, no. You catch up, I'll wait here.
is way too big for your entire cloud of ignorance.This guy who thinks he's better than the majority of the world.
That's your eye riding up your ass again. I have never thought myself better than others, but people love to feel inferior when people do things they wished they could do.
No, you made an objective claim you could not back up objectively.This whole "argument" proves any point I claimed. You're a conceited, hateful individual who thinks he's better than the majority of the world. You're a dime a dozen. One thing you got going for yourself is a stronger vocabulary.
My vocabulary is not even that big, for fuck's sake. You literally got everything backwards here.
This is not eye of the fucking beholder.Bing.
Now you're contradicting yourself.
This is your eye being stuck far up your ass.Bing.
Now you really are contradicting yourself.
Now that's the eye of the beholder and your eye being stuck far up your ass.Bing.
Now this part was amusing. I liked the part where you said ''Bing.''
No, that would be your brain not being able to comprehend it, so you jump to retarded conclusion in attempt to condescend me.Boy, aren't you a hateful guy?
Not at all. I'm a passionate guy.
That's why there is only one throne because there is one king before those who follow the king, right? The majority don't rule... If that was so, we wouldn't be milked by the corporations.Majority can come in the form of money, as well.
No, no. This has nothing to do with power and that value you speak of is an illusion.
You clearly do not.No, I do.
Do you?
You should wipe your ass with it instead.Bing.
Bing.
No, you've stated it clearly. You played out the pot calling the kettle black concept very coherently. Don't even try to run away from the fact.I wasn't.
Then what were you doing, besides doing what you claim you weren't doing.
I thought you were writing nonsense.You mean the poetry you're writing?
No, I mean the textual vomit of yours. That alphabet soup for autistic children.
That would be you being a hypocrite about the eye of the beholder. You first state it as objective, then retreat to subjectivity then come right back out with more retarded objectivism you never had. In fact, you are lacking a lot of objectivity in your pants, sir.More insults.
Bing.
Better than nonsense.More poetry.
No, no.
Potettle.I like it.
I do, too.
But all kidding aside, I said you weren't contributing to the intelligence side. That's subjective, not objective. Why? You can be intelligent in different things. People can deem others to be completely idiotic for a variety of reasons. Attitude, beliefs (as you do with religion), spelling, skill-set, etc.
Uhh, your intentions were clearly attacking my philosophy -- don't even try to run away from it.
You claim religious people to be stupid because they're religious. You call them "retards." That's the thing about religion, you can't prove nor disprove. You also confuse morals with success or rule. I said majority rules, and for some reason you responded a generic "Hitler X as well." Okay, sure. I don't agree with him, but that doesn't hinder the majority rules statement.
They are stupid because they are religious. Mentally ill people who would rather live in fantasy before reality. They are selfish infantile monkeys trapped in their delusional world. No, I did not confuse morals with success and rule. Show me where I did otherwise.
My statement of saying you weren't contributing was my belief over your attitude not contributing to intelligence. Not for your beliefs (shitty as it may be), but you attacking a whole religious group.
Yeah, they are attacking the entire spectrum of logic, intellect and reason with their bullshit.
That's not to say you're not intelligent overall, I think you are. I think you're the type of person who would go about arguing with religious people unintelligent and make people who share a like-minded belief that you're against not think any favor of yours.
You've got me all wrong, again.
Over this course of an argument, with me poking and prodding you, you also showed how conceited you were. You said things such as calling me arrogant -- which was true, I was being very arrogant. But you also called the majority idiots. You showed yourself to be this individual who feels that he's superior to all others.
You mean my passion, right? This is not arrogance. The majority are clearly and unequivocally ignoramuses.
At 10/29/12 06:37 PM, MrPercie wrote: heaven is when insanctuary shuts his fucking mouth.
Why are you so butthurt? I don't tell any of you to shut your mouths. Why am I the special one who needs to shut up?
At 10/29/12 06:36 PM, dark-fox wrote: Do you just do this to stroke your ego? Do you think being wordy and arrogant will get you liked or at the very least listened to, it won't.
No, I'm asking some simple questions. I'm not having any trouble with anyone here. It's you guys that have trouble with me. Do you know why? You're arrogant and are victimized by what you assume to be my arrogance. My assumed to be arrogance is better than your arrogance, hence it takes someone to have more arrogance for an arrogant person to cry arrogance.
At 10/29/12 06:33 PM, TurkeyBased wrote: let it be known.
100 stacks for insanctuary's head
Yay, brutal violence for unintentional violence.
At 10/29/12 05:48 PM, II2none wrote: Elaborate.
There are distinctions between you and them. Compare yourself to the pony brigade. Compare yourself to people projecting themselves unto anime character. Now compare those people to the pony brigade.
This is not rocket science.
At 10/29/12 05:06 PM, Entice wrote: The same way gold has value: humans value it. Paper money is agreed upon as a unit of exchange and that's where it's value comes from.
The thing is, it isn't like there is an infinite supply of gold, while they can keep on copying dollar bills and inflating the economy with a trade item that they have an endless supply of. This leads to serious economic problems.
At 10/29/12 05:01 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: Please read the first volume of Das Kapital.
Are you implying that paper money has value?
They just make more paper money.
How does it have any value compared to the gold standard?
At 10/29/12 04:49 PM, II2none wrote: Let me try this again. So how do you know the difference between a person who projects themselves onto a character VS a person who simply likes the character ON THE INTERNET?
The same way I know how to find religious people without them saying anything religious. People that project themselves unto other things present a very fragile and easily destroyable character.
At 10/29/12 04:44 PM, II2none wrote: If it's a psychological cause then yeah, it's too late.only thing they can do is not let there sexuality define them.
Actually, it is not a problem. Their experience is so far around the corner, that if we were to tell all of them what they were actually experiencing, they would be overloaded with logic. It is clear that the reason why there is somebody in the relationship pretending to be the other gender, is simply because this isn't about sexual preferences at all - -that is only a distraction to cover up what it really is. That gender role switching nonsense is triggered by no other than your mind. Ever noticed that all mental compensations are logically backwards? Women with no intelligence get big breasts, people who can't get love get money or sympathy, males with small dicks buy limos, bullies pick on little kids, et cetera. These are all mental mechanisms that people are too stupid and ignorant to understand.
At 10/29/12 04:37 PM, Mumbo wrote: I facilitated 99% of your mother.
Now, now. There is no need to resort to motherly reference you have no logical way to support. This is counter-intuitive.
At 10/29/12 04:35 PM, II2none wrote: How does that work on the internet?
Thought patterns lead to mood patterns, mood patterns lead to the intentions behind ideologies, ideologies lead to the confomity between ideology and character, character leads to the core of their entire being.
At 10/29/12 04:30 PM, Mumbo wrote: Nah. I pointed out your ignorance so I can't be more ignorant than you.
No, you pointed out something I've already stated in its raw formula. I specifically said every debate was founded upon ignorance, so then you did some tiny thinking and then decided to try to pin it against me. I did all of the work, while you took my work and claimed it as your own. Tsk, tsk.
I bet you don't even lift.
What drives you to be so condescending towards me?
At 10/29/12 04:17 PM, II2none wrote: Well it's too late
It's never too late.
At 10/29/12 04:29 PM, Otto wrote: Whilst Insanctuary is once again struggling to make a coherant point
I really find a thousand tons of difficulty comprehending your implication of my lack of comprehensibility; all the while I have people who I discuss with outside of this cess pool of intoxicated neanderthals (except a few people), and they understamd me just fine; and respond to me with a healthy response that takes everything I've ever said into perfect context.
At 10/29/12 04:18 PM, OingoBoingo wrote: A dull, lifeless cunt, devoid of any and all emotion.
I have something better for your signature, my good sir.
How do you fill a cup, that you can not see?
You fill it with nothingness.
At 10/29/12 04:22 PM, II2none wrote: Nail hit on the head but at the same time I also really enjoy this character so even if I was fully satisfied with myself who's to say I still wouldn't have a Sonic icon?
I can tell when people are not satisfied with themselves and are projecting themselves unto cartoon character and other objects/characters.
At 10/29/12 04:14 PM, Mumbo wrote: And since you start debates, and debates are fueled by ignorance, you, by process of transitive property of equality, are pure ignorance.
No, it would mean that I'm ignorant, too; but not as ignorant as you.
Select between 5 monster racers, upgrade your monster skill and win the competition!
4.23 / 5.00 3,881 Views
Build most powerful forces, unleash hordes of monster and control your soldiers!
3.93 / 5.00 4,634 Views
© Copyright 1995-2014 Newgrounds, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
newgrounds.com — Your #1 online entertainment & artist community! All your base are belong to us.
