Be a Supporter!
Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:54 AM, draco889 wrote: No, I think you're the one detached from reality. A business is owned by people.

Not right now, they aren't. They are owned by ruthless, butthurt, mechnical fruitflies from hell.

:The people managing the business then employ other people in order to produce a good or provide a service. In return the employees get paid. If there were no business, then there would be no employees, and no one would get paid.

You are really detatched from society and the likes of business ethics. These ''people'' take away people's way of living for their own selfish purposes. Then when you confront them, they say ''It's just ****ing business.'' Yet, when you take away their stuff, they throw a huge fit and will find every way possible to make your life a living hell -- or worse.

Seriously. You should start researching how many people are in debt because of big businesses encourage debt. If you are close to filing bankruptcy and are in a hole; guess what you will find in your mail? A fucking credit card business wanting you to use their card so they can milk what you have left. They do this when it comes to student loans, too. So many students find themselves in a rut, because they cadavering assholes know nothing about human values and human ethics. If there are no human ethics in a business -- then clearly it's a cold plane of nothingness built on nothingness except cold dreams and selfich expectancies.

Response to: Capitalism is A Human Trade Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:47 AM, draco889 wrote: ...

Capitalism is trade.

All trade is, is the distribution of commodities.

All Capitalism is, is the distribution of commodities in a governmental global distribution. It's the dick of trade.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:38 AM, draco889 wrote: I don't see it that way. Without businesses, the economy would be significantly worse off that it already is. Businesses employ people. The people then get money in order to survive. If there were no large businesses, there would be a lot less employment in general and, consequently, much more poverty.

You are kidding me, right?

You are implying that technology isn't making any robots that is taking people's places in jobs (which means less jobs, and implies they don't give a fuck about employment).

You are implying that all of the millions of people (increasing); and the people on strike against Wal-Mart are a speck of dust of importance.

Jesus, you are so detatched from reality right now. Businesses don't give people jobs. People give people jobs. These guys that are in business right now, are not people. They are incessantly mechanical fucks that have turned their entire life into a power trip.

Response to: NG Court Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:37 AM, Confucianism wrote: But you do over exert yourself.

Oh yeah? You are like a rambunctious kid that is constipated on the crapper. You're overtly exertive, but fail to be so.

Response to: Theme song of your life Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

Shaving My Balls

Response to: Capitalism is A Human Trade Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:31 AM, draco889 wrote: If you mean to say that it originated from trade in the sense that it was created to dictate how trade is conducted, then yes, you're essentially right.

Yes, and the only reason why people think they are different, is because one is broadened in governmental means and the other is local and simple.

Response to: NG Court Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:27 AM, Confucianism wrote: Me killing you. And with the line up you've told us, I would get away with it too.

Not if I kill myself first, from me laughing at your whimsical attempts to kill me.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:21 AM, draco889 wrote: How exactly is big business "milking us dry"?

They find loop holes. They find every way possible to screw us over. They don't see us as people, they see us as fuel for their corrupt businesses. The people who help make their dreams come true get shitty paycheckes, while the CEO's of these big businesses get big dick rewards for doing far less than those who helped build the business ground up, while sacrificing much of their life and barely able to put food on the table.

You tell me.

Response to: Capitalism is A Human Trade Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:19 AM, draco889 wrote: Corporations are set up in favor or traditional businesses for reasons of practicality.

Capitalism is not trade, you guys say.

Capitalism originated from trade, I say.

Response to: NG Court Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:59 AM, Mumbo wrote: You're in court for a crime. Here's what happens.
Choose your:
Crime

Being logical.

Attorney

Tox

Prosecution

Saqwerts

Judge

Xenomit

and 4-6 Jury members.

HurgenBurgen, Protagonist, Mumbo and Confucianism.

I wonder how this would play out...

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:09 AM, draco889 wrote: You're getting the government and private sector confused here. Big business doesn't have much to do with the debt that our government accumulates. Rather, our government accrues debt because it spends more than it brings in through tax income.

Okay. Let me rephrase this. Both, the government, and the businesses are filled with blithering, disharmonious, skull fucking shit bags from hell.

I'm well aware of the government's retard spending. Like those abandoned buildings our tax money goes into. They spend our money like a whorish wife.

Big businesses milk us dry, and this is my point. We have an economy being runned by children. We have a country being shaped by children, which is another point, that happens to be seperate from my OP's point. We can talk about both, if you want. Primarily, it was not meaning to correlate.

Response to: Show NG your desktop! Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

What?

Show NG your desktop!

Response to: EmmaVolt is not a 'She' Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 11:01 AM, Profanity wrote: As far as I can tell, you conflate "I" and "you" during every response, talk backwards for a few sentences, drop a definition, and then pull out a new logical fallacy.

More ad hominems, and false explanations from retard accusations. Do you have anything else? Besides *Types X, because X is all I have and I couldn't live with the fact that everything outside X is so fucking true, oh god*

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:59 AM, draco889 wrote: So that people wit business-sense actually run the buisness.

Of. All. Of. The. Fucks. That. I. Have. Experienced.

This is one of the worst.

Say that to the deficits fatter than my mother.

Say that to our economy that went down town -- in the worst way possible.

Say that to the rich getting richer. That have money they can't spend in a lifetime. Not even their children, their grandchildren or their grand children's grand children.

Say that to the millions of people who have been cheated by the greedy bastards who have your so called 'business-sense', then get back to me with a less deluded response.

Response to: "Morals and ethics" outdated... Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:46 AM, Suprememessage wrote: Even if you can't justify cloning you can't argue with some of the other research. We could control our genetics, we could DESIGN humans. How much better would the world be?

I would kill myself twice as much, if they made a clone of you.

Your OP's are shit.

You know nothing of Science.

You have no knowledge of how everything works.

You are a sad fuck that filter feeds off of his own self-dwelling, socially inept environment.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:45 AM, draco889 wrote: I don't understand. What exactly are you suggesting? People shouldn't work for businesses anymore? People shouldn't form businesses anymore?

Assholes in charge should be taken down by people who can actually do a better job.

Response to: EmmaVolt is not a 'She' Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:42 AM, Profanity wrote: Also, Insanctuary is a classic "super ultra mega genius" who will bend over backwards to raise his post count. Don't take the bait.

Another sore loser who can't admit they were excoriated to existential hell and back.

Admit it. I made you eat all of your putrid ad hominems, because you have nothing else to contribute to anything you have to argue.

You are a troll in denial. Stop trolling yourself, kid. It's bad for your health.

Response to: "Morals and ethics" outdated... Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:41 AM, MrPercie wrote: we got enough assholes as it is!

I could say the same for OP's shit threads.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:32 AM, xeMadoka wrote: what

an*

At 11/3/12 10:32 AM, Dogmeat wrote: I don't get what you're trying to get it, but you're not poetic in the slightest. You make poetry look hard.

For someone who thinks ''This thread is stupid'' is anything special, your judgement is foolishness.

Let me guess. You are the type that condescends anyone, just because. Yeah, get out of my thread with your overtly compensation childhood insecurities. Is that you in the avatar? If it is, then those 'cool' glasses surely only make you look less cool, and this 'I'm a badass' feel you are trying to come up with is only making it all the more obvious that you are a chicken hawk that gets raped by reality.

Response to: EmmaVolt is not a 'She' Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:34 AM, JBK wrote: I don't gender bend. I am a lesbian and my gender is female. Anyone with common sense knows sexuality has nothing to do with gender.

Oh, it does, ma'am.

You are not a lesbian. You are psychologically dysfunctional, and acting on premature sexual urges that don't give a damn for logic, reason or self-control. Sexual urges are not in objects, like women. They are inside you, and you project them unto women and use them as your sexual fuel releasing slave.

Response to: "Morals and ethics" outdated... Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

ITT: OP being a paranoid schizophrenic, without taking into the consideration the dangers of letting anyone toy with Science at such an advanced level on human being; and eating his shit threads for breakfast.

Response to: Your Fairy Wish Prince! Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

I don't need wishes.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:25 AM, Dogmeat wrote: This thread is stupid.

Look at your name, sir. Look at yoru avatar, sir.

It compensates for you having no dick; and your responses having no substance, dawg.

Response to: EmmaVolt is not a 'She' Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:25 AM, Lintire wrote: I... admit that I am also a gigantic lesbian, though I am male.

Someone with your critical thinking would never be a lesbian. Only intellectually inept people bend their genders, hence gender bending is the result of misconceptions and psychological dysfunctions.

Response to: EmmaVolt is not a 'She' Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:20 AM, NOMORELIES wrote: 'This is my real voice' ... he says!!

It was really convincing and professionally wrapped up in an inconspicuous ruse.

This gave it away, though. I'm afraid.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:15 AM, Zachary wrote: Sorry, try again kiddo!

First, I will explain that I was implying that truth does not come from me. It comes from truth itself.

Since you are in a nit-picking mood, I will come up with something witty to compensate for what you did not understand in the place:

Communism, where the going gets tough, and the goers get fatter.

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 10:11 AM, xeMadoka wrote: as long as I can make enough money to buy shit I want, who cares?

You know what else is edgy? You, when you are working for the grown up versions of school yard bullies.

What if people took this seriously, and placed and edge for those who have put us on edge for centuries?

Response to: Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 09:56 AM, AutumnalEquinox wrote: You speak the truth!

I don't speak the truth.

The truth speaks to me.

At 11/3/12 09:56 AM, Shockoach wrote: is this a poem

Sort of.

Response to: Streaming music vs downloading musi Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

At 11/3/12 09:51 AM, BumFodder wrote: This joke is dragging on quite a bit

Great finisher.

Ants In My Pants, And Not In My Posted November 3rd, 2012 in General

Rants.

People should wake up and stop kissing ass to big businesses: Typing like a robotic fuck, who has oil deficiency in some random dark cubicle corner.

Picking up after an agriculturally inept fuck.

Being assigned to a boss with a big mouth and a small dream.

Forced to obey people who obey people who don't even know what obedience means.

Making little money, while shortening your life span by a lot.

Enriching the already rich, by cleaning their golden toilets full of shit with your tongue.

Et fucking cetera.