Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/13/12 09:34 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: writing forum dickhead

It's not a poem. It's a message of which is in poetic format, that I want people to respond to, in a less criticized manner. Instead with a more idealistic manner.

Forbidden fruit, is the hole in this world, truth is losing recruits, with less actions to burn. Stagnate stars, lost within our heads, unforgiven hearts, thrown into an oblivion instead. Grab the monkey's hand, make your wishes, you never did understand, what your sight misses. All the life before us, adhering to our moments, abandoned by the must, with our false atonements. The lips of death, the teeth of our doubts, there never was a last breath, to experience our first will to shout. Break the stone, moat our bones with blood, acknowledge what was once known, by the origin of our lifehood. Get off your knees, open your eyes, you were always free, it is you that became your demise. Endless circles, untouched dirt, one silent miracles, that never found its perch. To stand for the truth, to stand for what is now, to stand with the fruit, with the life is has endowed. No more gulping, taking sips, from this glass of tear in sulking, from our daily mindless trips. ~

It's a message in poetic format, but lest it is a poem, it's a very direct one at that.

At 11/13/12 09:10 PM, jacobmorris92 wrote: As an alternative to dictating to people what they should and shouldn't do with their lives as according to your own personal whim, you could accept different people's choices even if you don't completely understand them.

Sorry to burst your moral attempt to thwart my intentions, but you are the ones who are dictating your body in a way it was not originally intended to do so. This is a psychological dysfunction, which comprises of a conflict that has to do with people taking control over their body irrationally, because they can't take control of anything else in life for various reasons.

It amazes me how fond you are at missing the point: that telling me to not worry about other people's lives is, is acting on what you are telling me not to act on.

At 11/13/12 08:49 PM, jacobmorris92 wrote: You just compared transsexualism to murder.

No, I compared happiness to other problematic situations to express that happiness is a dangerous type of mental opium.

At 11/13/12 08:34 PM, Mumbo wrote: Maybe you have a psychological dysfunction. Have you ever thought that maybe all these things you preach are subconscious self-criticism?

No, I've stated my point clearly. It isn't my fault that you have rhinoceros spunk in your eyes.

Everything about this world is founded on happiness. We protect their happiness, but in the end, nobody is happy and everybody won't be happy. Happiness is not the solution, and it's just an even more of a pain in the ass to begin with. Life comes with thorns; perhaps people should stop belly-aching over their damned chemical system, ay?

At 11/13/12 08:32 PM, SONNYISAWSOME wrote: Serial killer:Someone who kills a lot of people per year and still doing it while police doesn't finds them.Some are dumb(Medical Detective's series)Some are smart(Zodiac's killer)but that doesn't quit them from what they're,killers

There is a possibility that my father and I have found the Zodiac Killer (he died in February, but we still have eye-capturing evidence to prove so), and we have done extensive research on this man. You are wrong to call him a serial killer, he wasn't a serial killer. He was an egotistical non-conformist who was detatched from reality. He did not murder people just because he wanted to, but through cunning and his hatred for his mother, that is why he was so hard to catch. He would brutally confuse the Valejo Police Department, by sending them on wild goose chases, and his 'disguise' was actually him not wearing any disguise at all. Just sunglasses and a different hairstyle. That is why one of the boys who were an eye witness said ''the guy looked normal''. By no means was Zodiac a serial killer. He was an ego-tripist high off of pretentious ire towards his bad childhood experience. I am even under the impression that the last murder he was involved in, the taxi driver being killed, was actually a friend of the Zodiac's. They said that the taxi driver only let close friends sit in the front seat, and it was the end of Zodiac's reign, so there is a possibility that the Zodiac finally felt remorse and ended it - only to find my mother online, and come here to die 4 years later. This man was definately Zodiac material, and his belongings are an even more precise dead ringer. We also have pictures that match the composite drawings and samples from places our guy was at, which happens to be in the exact same place The Zodiac was at.

At 11/13/12 08:24 PM, Mumbo wrote: This has nothing to do with religion.

The same psychological dysnfunctions fuel the transexual and homosexual movement. Of course nature is doing things right - we are the ones who puts stuff in our food, in our bodies and our minds that are not healthy for us.

Like sex, it gets better when you add things to it. BLT sandwiches, all the way.

At 11/13/12 07:58 PM, Scarface wrote: At this point, I'm just going to disagree, and leave it at that. You and I clearly see the insecurities of humanity on different levels and, as llssm put it, we'll never be able to change each other's points of view.

Regardless, I always become shortly more experienced with every discussion I get myself in, so thank you for the attendance.

FUNK, I like the satire here. Bravo.

At 11/13/12 07:50 PM, Mumbo wrote: Why can't we just acknowledge that they're transsexuals?

There is a possibility that homosexuality and transexual are only be aggrandized, because many child prostituion rings were lead by 'gay men'. Essentially, the 'homosexual' activity is being fueled by morons; 'transexual' is just a giant black head on the false concept called 'homosexuality', like being born a 'sinner' is a black head on religious practices. All the while, people with 'other' motives' are finding ways to adopt children and sell them to their child sex ring. And these idiots are letting them get away with it, because they are too much of an idiot to realize that there is no such thing as being a transexual or a homosexual as much as there is no God, no aliens, no ghosts, no boogeyman, no fairies, no magic, nothing that is convenient in life. Not even sex is convenient, and even we continue to abuse our responsibilities for temporary momnts of bliss, while abandoning permanent positions in life. We should be ashamed of ourselves for blowing all of this out of porportion.

At 11/13/12 07:44 PM, Scarface wrote: But once again, none of that means you're necessarily insecure about yourself.

I'm going to put this bluntly: Everyone has insecurities. That is why everyone is fucked up, including myself. At least I embrace what isn't perfect about myself and I polish what I can. Others, their problems become the world's problems. Corporate beasts are compensating for their insecurity that involves their inability to find love and compassion. That is why they are cold and mechanical. Religious people seek for warmth, security and truth, but live in lies, in a cold world denied by their insecurities. Superstars are cookie-cut, falsely perfect images that are covering up a severely dismantled persona that leads to the falling of many superstars. Other average successful people who have a good life, got there, by throwing away their human qualities. Nobody in life is successful in actually being a human being. They are only a tool to our society's bloodless reign.

At 11/13/12 07:40 PM, jacobmorris92 wrote: ITT, we marginalise people whose sexuality we don't understand by assuming that they must be mentally ill.

Actually, no. You see, when someone says ''I'm happy, I don't know why, but I feel happy, and nothing else matters.'' I can easily counter this by saying that there were murderers who loved what they've done to their victims, children who cut themselves, drug themselves, sell themselves out and people founding their lives in superstitious and magical thinking. You will argue that their sexuality isn't harming anyone, but I could argue that having a psychological dysfunction is no different than a house having poor electrical wires. These people need help, and your ignorance fuels their psychological conflictions. This was never about their sexual orientation. This is lust wrapped up in a cooked human baby's mushy brain with a side of self-delusion.

At 11/13/12 07:39 PM, MKzero wrote: Someone you can't describe.

They are quite easy to describe. They aren't as far off from ourselves as we like to make it appear. Some fall under a ritual of self-gratification, while missing out on the moral foundation and intellectual virtues for other people's lives. Others fall under a ritual of anger and resentment with a shade of penance from past experiences. It's all something we could avoid if we took better of ourselves, our world and the sole fact that we are observers in a world of experience.

At 11/13/12 07:33 PM, Scarface wrote: Of course, there is stress, and there are people depending on you and talking about you. That doesn't, however, make you insecure.

What world do you live in? Every fortune comes by the misfortune of another. If you can walk over your own human race for a false success, then you surely are not a human to be psycho-analyzed to begin with. All prices are paid with a value that is beyond any wealth fathomable.

At 11/13/12 07:20 PM, DarkShadowblade wrote: Good for both of them, they deserve it.

The only thing these people deserve, is a life related reassessment. It's quite obvious when people are in cahoots with their own foolishness. It's very obvious when people are full of themselves and attempting to push the impossible with false possibilites.

At 11/13/12 07:18 PM, Scarface wrote: I never said super stars, I said successful people. You made the assumption that I could only have been talking about a famous superstar, but that was a false assumption. I merely spoke of anyone who was monetarily successful in life.

You never said it, but you've implied it. You said 'successful', so I used the superstars to form an assessment against your assessment. To make a point against what you've said, that not all successful persons are insecure. The way you'd stated it, I felt like you were getting too comfortable with their lifestyle, and unaware of the fact they have got to be one of the grestest strangers on this planet. They live to be something they are not. This is detrimental to our identifying selves. They are forced to live as the facade people know and love. This world does not accept real people who stand for what is real, because the pain and anguish to stand for what actually matters is unreal.

This COULD be a super star, of course, but it could just be a successful business man. Do you know how famous the average business man is? Not very. Unless you are the head of a world-wide corporation, such as Steve Jobs or Bill Gates, you won't be well known, and won't have the pressure of tabloids and gossip to the extent of a super star.

I am very much aware of, my good sir. I've explained it above.

Perhaps OP should have went to ''How to open a box'' academy. Besides, you have never told any of us what the box looked like. Missing details like this only begs the question whether or not the OP actually happened.

Porn magazines. Sexually gratifying tools like the dainty fleshlight.

At 11/13/12 06:55 PM, RandomRoarness wrote: You know, I'm starting to believe that as well now. It's the state of mind we put ourselves until we reach something that is satisfactory.

Agreed. These people will do anything for their own personal satisfactory. Even if they have to become the equivalent of a child trying to bring his dead hampster back to life or a crazy old man keeping a giant fat lady in the basement of his house.

At 11/13/12 06:54 PM, Insanctuary wrote: the mobster mentality of that movie.

series*

At 11/13/12 02:37 PM, Painbringer wrote: At least the therapist lady from Sopranos.

My father watched Sopranos. I never did take much interest in the mobster mentality of that movie. I'm not sure if I fall what you are implying, but I am going to preassume it's a negative implication.

At 11/13/12 06:40 PM, Scarface wrote: I never made a statement regarding a homeless person's life, though. By making a statement about it, then saying my assessment was false, you make it sound like I made an assessment on homeless insecurity in the first place.

The power of misinterpretation, deary. Your assessment was that not all superstars were experiencing insecurities. My counter assessment was that superstars are one of the most insecure bunch of us all - next to religious persons, political persons, conspiracy theorist persons and sexually oriented inquiring persons. The homeless person statement came from me, to demonstrate how insecure the superstars are compared to a homeless person that is living on the streets in a rough lifestyle.

A serial killer can be counted as a part of us, in a way. Serial killers derive from an already built system which is known as our physiological, mental and abstract principles. Whether people want to accept this, or not, we are all merely a few steps away from being a serial killer. It takes a plan, cunning, a weapon of choice and a victim to go down that path. We act like these people are far from us, when 4 simple actions can open this Pandor'a Box of counter psychology.

As if the news had quality interests.

Global Warming is like Ignorance; We the people know it's there, we know it's destroying our lives gradually, but we do not want to take responsibility for our actions - or the lack of action.

At 11/13/12 06:07 PM, Scarface wrote: No, that sounds pretty much like he's disagreeing with me.

Which wasn't the point. I was making a comparison. You claimed I was inferring a strawman for your argument in regard to homeless people. I certainly was not; and I was making a metaphor, so you could understand the approximate difference between a homeless person's life of insecurities opposed to a superstar's.

At 11/13/12 10:44 AM, Lintire wrote: I don't particularly care either way, and I doubt most people do either.

''Most people'' are complete, scientifically illiterate egits. Religion teaches you to lie, lie about lies, lie by lying with a truth that is a lie in disguise, by lying about the truth being a lie in disguise and using lies to lie about that one archetypal lie.

At 11/13/12 10:32 AM, w33zl wrote: You need the human race in order to progress it. I never said stupidity in humans came before humans themselves.

My point is that bullshit was inherited after we came into being.

Stop making arguments which make no sense. This is why all your threads are being locked.

Stop misinterpreting my arguments as if they were equivalents to your unhappy ejaculations on a winter night.

At 11/13/12 10:13 AM, w33zl wrote: Stupid people find refuge in their beliefs whenever they are outsmarted. Religion is entirely responsible for the delay of scientific, moral and otherwise intellectual progression of the human race.

Right. Living as we are is not a position. There is no position in not believing in other people's bullshit. Bullshit came after human life - not with it or before it.

At 11/13/12 10:07 AM, w33zl wrote: It does. It's why Western law is the way it is, and why the West finds law in Arab countries to be inhuman. Though, truth be told, the Arabs may think the same of us.

I'm going to put this bluntly:

Religion has 0 impact.

Stupidity has 100% impact.