Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/2/13 09:17 PM, Sekhem wrote: wow great analysis

Your childish response tells me you are desperate to make it appear you are still standing, even when you have fallen the moment you dared to utter your insipid buffoonery.

At 1/2/13 09:44 PM, Sekhem wrote: why are you friends with him

Why is he friends with you? Mhmm...?

At 1/2/13 09:37 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: I charge 1.50 USD/m for dirty chat. 5 USD/m for phone sex.

What if nothing is dirty in my eyes? What if I see it all as natural experiences? ^_^

At 1/2/13 09:35 PM, CoalClock wrote: Dude! If you seriously think Insanctuary is an idiot, you need to LURK MOAR. o_o I think we've just got ourselves a badass over here, LOL. Seriously -- Insanctuary is one of the smartest people on these forums. He's FUCKING hilarious and in all my time lurking on this site, I've never seen a more competent, sensitive, intelligent individual... nor a better friend, for that matter. GTFO!

You are a diamond in a rough. Keep your distance. Sekhem will absorb your hardness. It also explains Sekhem's exuberant dick related thought process.

At 1/2/13 09:37 PM, Sekhem wrote: get off his D I C K

Someone's jelly. Be sure to use that jelly to lube up your fat premeditatively before you go out for a liposuction.

At 1/2/13 09:31 PM, Slint wrote: Nope, seems like a pretty good theory to me, I'll go on board.

I praise you and provide you endless prayer because you agree with me, even though I don't know why you agree in the first place.

At 1/2/13 09:30 PM, Sekhem wrote: dig deep down in ur soul and find some confidence, pussy

My confidence tells me that the absence of confidence takes away our will to gain confidence. The fact that you are subordinating me tells me you have superior issues. You are compensating for a power in position that you cannot normally obtain otherwise.

At 1/2/13 09:28 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: Begone, demon!!!!

All I have to do, is say the magic word: ''EmmaRevolting''

At 1/2/13 09:22 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: But I am already in my pants.

What's it like?

At 1/2/13 09:21 PM, Sekhem wrote: are you brain damaged (serious question, not 'trolling' or insulting ur gay ass)

It depends. Are we talking perceptually or actually? If perceptually, sure you can assume I have brain damage as the blatant troll you are. If actually, I'm not sure. If I was, how would I know if I was?

At 1/2/13 09:20 PM, koopahermit wrote: I know EXACTLY what you mean.

That would be based on your own personal experiences, I'm sure.

The internet is the world's last rendezvous to get away from the crock of shit we have deployed over a small time frame.

At 1/2/13 09:08 PM, Sekhem wrote: if insanctuary doesn't prove me wrong in the next 24 hours i'm branding him my bitch and i will sell him into sex slavery

Now you are using forms of intimidation and extortion you don't have the priorities for. Another sign of trolling. You're proving yourself wrong. Good job!

At 1/2/13 09:06 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: If you require help, my office hours are from 4:00PM to 6:00PM on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Well, I do have this beast I can't control in my pants. Do you do that sort of thing? Perhaps you can't control it, like you can't control your hyperboles and non-statements. Clearly you are an atheist who don't know what real proof is. Most people back then who shape our world today were on drugs and alcohol. Alcohol even saved us during the Civil War. Clearly you are misinformed and haven't found your way in life. You need God, yourself, and in your pants.

At 1/2/13 09:11 PM, The-Great-One wrote: FINALLY! It took you long enough, but you finally said something intelligent.

What you call ''intelligent'' is a rare moment in time where I say something that hasn't been said before and can be perceived by you personally and understood in agreement by you personally.

At 1/2/13 09:15 PM, Sekhem wrote: he likes DICKS cuz he is a homosexual

Or because you're the homosexual and vicariously live through your assumptions of me.

At 1/2/13 09:07 PM, killerrob wrote: No 14 year old girl has bigger boobs then a 26 year old unless she's a fatty and that's not sexy.

Why would a guy like small tits is what I mean.

What planet do you live on? There are 13 year olds with D's.

It's a preference and has no association with age?

At 1/2/13 09:04 PM, Sekhem wrote: prove me wrong u little bitch

I just did, hence your ad hominomnom's, non-statement's and blatant deflection with a side of instigating.

Good game, troll.

At 1/2/13 09:04 PM, killerrob wrote: I didn't mean children I meant like 14-16 year olds

Here's a food for thought. Look at it backwards. Young girls can grow big breasts. Now enough with this substanceless topic. And I'm not referring to the breasts.

At 1/2/13 09:00 PM, Sekhem wrote: i have a theory that insanctuary does this thread numerous times a year and it's always gay

I can contest against you, by simply stating the obvious. You are a troll and nothing you ever say on these boards hold any water. How does it feel to be a wrinkly arid troll nobody likes? Go live with the sand butt scraping pyramids where you belong.

I prfer it, so I don't see where the correlation with children comes from. Clearly child represents the entirety of the person's growth and not their breast area. /smh

At 1/2/13 08:54 PM, jjjkuk wrote: I hate theories

I promise you. It's better than the Bible, Crayon (did I spell it wrong?), and other subgeneric holy books nobody cares about.

At 1/2/13 08:54 PM, GrizzlyOne wrote: Now let's get back on topic.

We are on topic. I know what you mean, too. However, the way you worded it was incorrect in its very nature. Ideas can be as harmful as humans can be. However, ideas are facilitators. Man is the instigator.

I believe my first one was ''ShadowEyes0@hotmail.com''. However, I could be somewhat off.

At 1/2/13 08:44 PM, Gimmick wrote: Also something about curses and kings.

Do you have proof? This is merely atheistic dogma, if you don't provide proof that I personally agree with. If I don't agree with it, then it's your opinion.

At 1/2/13 08:41 PM, GrizzlyOne wrote: also, in that case with religion, it's still the people, the people who exile other people for not believing in their religion, an idea has no physical effect on anybody, it's always the people.

You don't understand. Their ideals are more than ideals. It's a way of life. They live by the ideals as it were food and water. There is a difference between ideas that serve as an opium and ideas that are recirpocal and unharmful in nature.

At 1/2/13 08:36 PM, KillerSkull wrote: I actually carry a lot of fire wood when I camp. Does that count? I also do tons of sit ups.

Yes, carrying large weights in a constant sequence builds up strength & endurance. Hell, do yourself a favor and try this example. Stand up from your computer, then extend both arms out like you have wings, then keep your arms at a constant position. Do not move them. Do not bring them back in towards your body. Hold them there, then experience how even the small weight of your arms can take a toll on you. The more you discipline the core strength of your body and mind, the less of a burden this exercise turns out to be.

I would rather stick my tongue into a horse's arse after a firecracker went off from inside.

At 1/2/13 08:25 PM, GrizzlyOne wrote: it's not the ideals fault, it's the people who blindly follow them.

Actually, in this case, it is the ideals fault. Look up the term 'apostosy'. Then refrain from typing up inane drivel. They have no choice to be indoctrinated.

At 1/2/13 08:25 PM, KillerSkull wrote: I stopped counting...fuck you. Having said that, wanna lift?

I don't lift, mate. There are different varieties of physical strength. The bigger your arms doesn't mean a damned thing. Bruce Lee could do one finger pushups. That's because the arms aren't even half of the physical disciplinary requirements. My strength comes from doing flips, climbing, holding myself with only my arms, et cetera. However, I used to carry around cinderblocks, but I don't call that lifting. I hold the cinderblocks on each side, while walking a somewhat far distance and back to my house. You should try it. It's much more efficient than the typical weight-lifting scheme.

Clearly you're lying. You would remember how many you have done. I personally can do 200, which involves count keeping. Hwoever, you could be one of those... err... people who become mentally challenged under pressure.

At 1/2/13 08:00 PM, Sheizenhammer wrote: This is not worth arguing over. Not even for the sake of comic relief.

In other words, you are a self-defeated person who hans't found their way and do not have a counter argument. You must be an atheist.

I'm going to create a theory, I want you to debunk it as a professional would. I want you to elaborate on how what I say is false and how you can prove that what I say is false in its very nature. Provide reasons in a list form and summarize your logical assessment accordingly.

The theory: Pyramids were built for the purpose of cleaning out sandy butts. What you have to do is sit on the pinnacle and guide the point to your butt's content.

My theoretical argument is that this is the only answer that makes sense to me, personally. There is no other reason for pyramids to have been built except for aesthetic purposes, boredom or to bury bodies in respect for those who have once lived. You weren't there, so you can't disprove my theory. Or can you...?

At 1/2/13 07:12 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: Pwahahahahahahahahah!!!

Stop queefing through your dick.

At 1/2/13 07:08 PM, Zerok wrote: Retort report:

Clearly you came into this thread as a degenerate because the involvement of dicks raised up previously underground insecurities.

At 1/2/13 07:00 PM, TheColourAwesome wrote: Poorly cropped image. 1/10

Could you explain to us all as to why you have a poorly cropped image of your hairy phanny on the internet?