Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/14/13 12:01 PM, Boomstick wrote: yeah, but popcorn doesn't sting the shit out of you if you're not careful.

This is true.

At 6/14/13 11:40 AM, T1ttyK1tty wrote: I never implied any of the said accusations. I use the BBS simply for entertainment, not to seek perfection nor innovate originality. Does this notion offend you? Are you insuniating that everyone must work at the limit of their abilities to acheive originality? If so I care naught about your doctrine.

Ahh, but you have! There are certain ways to validate claims such as "originality" by knowing what makes something original. There is also no reason for you to deflect my questions by making it about me, when I was merely curious about your qualityless posts; if there was any quality behind your shit posts, and you were concealing it like some people I have come to know from time to time, which has proved to be a great experience!

You seemingly use big words, yet you must be quite immature to incite a debate based on such a petty premise.

What makes a word big? I think words should be distinguished in terms of what is erroneous compared to what is simple rather than what is small compared to what is big. Like I remember the scientific term "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis" because it's not erroneous; it's rather a whole bunch of words mashed together. While there are really irritating words out there -- that can also be small, mind you.

As for premises, curiosity knows no bounds.

Has anyone noticed that when cooking bacon, it sounds exactly like popcorn? ;x

At 6/14/13 11:12 AM, BumFodder wrote: Too bad they messed up the story every 5 seconds

Hahahahaha.

At 6/14/13 10:57 AM, T1ttyK1tty wrote: Wow, you're really inimical. Are you implying your name and posts are original?

You implying that you do not know what makes a name original?

Are you implying that admitted unoriginality can contest questionable originality?

At 6/14/13 10:28 AM, T1ttyK1tty wrote: No.

Unoriginal name.

Unoriginal posts.

What else?

Can I come?

I hate the countryside. It's like pseudo nature, because civilization ruined it all.

I'd rather bathe in venomous razors contracted with aids.

It's quite obvious that the pole is used for people in wheelchairs, because the bus floor has an incline, which causes the wheelchair to roll forward. This proves difficult for people who are trying to get out of the bus.

Mystery solved!

At 6/14/13 09:42 AM, tox wrote: Picture

Subliminal messages for pole dancing for midgets.

Subliminal messages for pole dancing.

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/539139 Been repeating this all day; listening to Aphex Twin seemed to have paid off!

*accuses others of attention whoring*

*ATTENTION WHORES*

Yes, because having to read information in a book, rather than researching elsewhere and conversating with all wakes of life throughout varius sources, automatically makes me ignorant. I laugh at how you guys tell me about myself, when you can't even get your logic straight; fucking lol.

At 6/13/13 10:29 PM, Elixur wrote: I bet you jack off to Encyclopedias at night.

I actually don't read books. :/

At 6/13/13 10:22 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: .

Feasibility > Feasability

Like:

Belief > Beleif

You've got to be fucking kidding me, if you think I'd legitimately mispelled that. I love that word to death. I use it a lot, which is already proof that your attempt to question my actual intentions are left to shrivel up.

At 6/13/13 10:12 PM, BasedBubbus wrote: i want to hear this

That was to fuck with you. You're easily baited. Shows how much you have to offer. Pft.

At 6/13/13 10:04 PM, Natick wrote: fixed this too

You must fix things, because your life is so shit, it's unfixable.

At 6/13/13 09:59 PM, BasedBubbus wrote: its hilarious and sad at the same time

It's amazing how much of a hypocrite you are, how assumptious you are, how ignorant you are, but don't even comprehend the feasability of your ineptitudes!

Hahahaha.

At 6/13/13 09:48 PM, alternativesolution wrote: Whether or not she is an attention whore had nothing to do with that statement, I think you were looking way into that, or you just plain don't like her

Someone is being somewhat reasonable. I like. ^-~

At 6/13/13 09:35 PM, Zachary wrote: Oh ok...

Implying that the definition only involves the inability to read and write.

At 6/13/13 09:33 PM, Natick wrote: bubbus, i think yer a great guy and all but it's like talking to a brick wall, mang

*blames people for attention whoring*

*attention whores*

Actually, being lazy causes the body to slowly deteriorate, which does not boost self-awareness, let alone advanced self-awareness.

At 6/13/13 09:25 PM, MiloBased wrote: ehhhn

steals* I wrote l's because of the word spotlight having a dominate L sound.

what i mean is you didnt need the word intellectual in there at all
but for whatever reason you had the need to throw in more words to make you look smarter
you could have just said we're illiterate which would be a stretch but at least be pointing towards us being dumb
but then you unnecessarily put intellectual in front of it which roughly translates to "you guys are smartily not smart"

Umm, no. What are you illiterate of? Intellect

"smatily smart", so when someone says someone is scientifically illiterate, it means they are "scientificially, dumb"? Okay then.

At 6/13/13 09:13 PM, Natick wrote: yes, you've been re-affirming that for the past what... three days now?

*calls OP attention whore*

*attention whores the fuck out of every thread that stills the spotlight from thy sorry ass*

Yep.

At 6/13/13 09:13 PM, BasedBubbus wrote: you really gotta stop trying to use big words

Implying those are big words. :)

At 6/13/13 09:07 PM, Natick wrote:

At 6/13/13 09:06 PM, Hydex3 wrote: i dont care to entertain you any longer. have a great day :]

I am. Thanks.

Wow, aren't you guys a bunch of intellectually illiterate fucks. You envy OP's positive attitude, so you have to be the little bitches that have to be troublemakers, because god forbid you are left with your muck.

At 6/13/13 08:27 PM, Mumbo wrote: It'd go something like this:
-Becomes self-aware
-"Fuck me man, what's the point?"
-Death

Self awareness is achieved, full self awareness has not, and never can be because knowledge is accumalative.

At 6/13/13 08:26 PM, Xenomit wrote: He's as deep as a kiddy pool

Intellectual speaking to an intellectual against an intellectual.

My brain hurts.

At 6/13/13 08:24 PM, Mumbo wrote: The needle would have been balanced when your brain was at it's normal state. I figure that if you think hard enough, the displacement of particles (when the electric currents connect) would provide enough motion to bip it over.

Of course, but you are also implying that conscious thought (thinking) as if it were a light load, when it is one of the most enigmatic, complex aspects of the entire cosmological system that governs thought!

Let's all ignore advanced cognition, self-awareness, self-control, and all have a global orgy!

A deep post from an intellectual fellow. I'm interested.

Considering we do not govern every atomical energy, I'd say that it would have to state that this balance relies on the stars alligning on this one.