Be a Supporter!
Response to: Your weirdest dream Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

Serial killer going around cutting people's eyes out, putting sunglasses on them, tying them to a stand attached to a raft, which are floating on this moat they had built. When I went into my room, I found out I was the serial killer, or atleast connected to them.

Response to: Guys I have girl troubles Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:50 PM, Mumbo wrote: What do I do. I need help.

13 is an unlucky number.

It's a trap.

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:48 PM, alternativesolution wrote: Of course it's worth stating! Have a little faith in its growth

When talking about mystical creatures, the good side deserves it own page; it does not deserve to be mashed up with incessant childishness.

wait i forgot - faith is a joke!

Faith alone is not a joke, as it has survivalist attributes. Faith in a non-existent being is a joke.

Response to: Have you heard the word of Yeezus? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:45 PM, Innermike wrote: Aww isn't that cute, you think you sound smart on the internet. I bet your Mum and Dad tell you you're special.

Considering that you're condescending me, I'm going to assume that you are too pharisaic to take this discussion to rational places.

At 6/14/13 10:42 PM, Zachary wrote: I said the best lyric on the album was that... you replied with him not being talented. Do you even know how to hold an argument or what?

You said that was his best on the album. 4 lines, of highschool lyricism. Shows the quality of your expectations that regard Kanye West's music. I don't mind your personal taste, but what I do mind is mindless aggrandization.

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:40 PM, alternativesolution wrote: Fixed to show the other side

That other side is so taboo, so rare, so seldom, so scarce, it isn't even worth stating in this behemoth that is a shit society.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:32 PM, Convey wrote: A lot of people like using computers, watching tv, listening to music, eating food, drinking water, and breathing. That shit is so mainstream.

I don't see money revolving around it. I don't see the mass governing it. I see the mass interacting with it. the mass didn't build it. Stardom is built by mass opinion. Objects are not.

Response to: Have you heard the word of Yeezus? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:35 PM, Innermike wrote: You must know that you sound like someone who has only just discovered music that doesn't play on the radio. The funny thing is I bet whatever you listen to is still pretty mainstream, you don't seem like someone who's tastes are very eclectic, I'd be surprised if you've even listened to any Avant-Garde Jazz, Musique Concrete, Krautrock or even Ambient Electronics. It's hard to take such a condescending attitude when the person it's coming from doesn't seem like their in a position to have one. I mean surely you would never say "It is commercial music. I don't care for it." around anybody in real life, it makes you sound like a pretentious douche, it baffles me that anyone could actually type that out without cringing.

Have you ever listened to the music I make? It's bleeding with avant-garde. As for my musical taste, I am into things that people are not aware of. Nice presumptions, hypocrite. It is commercial music. It's terribad compared to artists that never see the light of day.

Do you have short term memory loss?

Apparently you are unaware of how hyper-paradoxical the mind is, and how it can distribute itself amongst opposites in a natural manner, as I can be happy and angry towards someone because I am happy for one reason, and angry for another.

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:35 PM, alternativesolution wrote: Well that was broad. Just whose "god" are you dismissing in comparison to a feminist/video game discussion?

All gods; the same way for all ghosts, goblins, boogeymans, fairies, werewolves, lochness monsters, big foots, aliens, demons...

People are good at three things! - Making up shit

- Liking shit

- Liking the shit that they make up

Response to: Fucking the dog Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:30 PM, Xenomit wrote: Oh, dog pussy isn't pussy?

Lmfao.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:31 PM, Zachary wrote: So you are saying if a lot of people like something, then odds are it is shit? A+ logic.

Thank you.

Response to: Flame wars Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:28 PM, alternativesolution wrote: It makes sense, actually. You get to see the extremes of both sides and are able (somewhat, I should say) to form your own (non)opinion on the matter at hand, while at the same time not really caring.

This is true.

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:24 PM, alternativesolution wrote: Look at that self-righteous statement, you. Please tell me how my username is more self-righteous than this thing that you have typed.

By your logic, all scientists are self-righteous. This entire discussion is a joke. It's a fact. There is a difference between writing actual assessments, with sources, with arguments, without red herrings, bias, assumptions, accusations, denial and ignorance. The entire pro-anita side is a joke. The same way pro-god is a joke. The same way pro-truther is a joke. The same way pro-racism is a joke.

Pox wrote an assessment that is irrefutable.

Rev wrote an assessment that is irrefutable.

I wrote an assessment that is irrefutable.

All they have to bring to the table is what they think. Not what they know. Not what they understand. They speak based off of irrational spite and angsty drivel.

Response to: Have you heard the word of Yeezus? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:18 PM, Innermike wrote: Aside from learning to how to use the word 'implying' you should probably hmm, I dunno, listen to actual music and discuss based on actual experience using actual musical vocabulary instead of trying to reply using pointless abstractions to cover the fact that you're not old enough to be on the site and you suffer from illusory superiority.

Let me lay this out in layman's terms.

I wasn't judging the entirety of Kanye's music. I was judging Zachary's judgement based on what Zachary stated in regard to those 4 lines.

It is commercial music. I don't care for it. Kanye West is only appearing to be the best because society allows him to show his face, while others have to kiss ass and constantly have muck to get through inorder to even do as well as they do. Might as well call stardom "God's Podium".

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:12 PM, alternativesolution wrote: More people being on the same side doesn't make it any more correct than the other. Or is this alliance some sort of powerful, life-altering thing?

Of course, but aesthetically, it's more appealing. I can be an instigator myself, sometimes. This discussion was a joke the beginning someone went pro-anita. People will always complain about the stupidest shit, and never realize their arguments are irrelevant to their stupid complaining.

We might as well start complaining about how skinny guys aren't heros. They can be, but they aren't viable to fit that role, when burly men fit that role better. The same applies to the protagonist being a man, and not a woman. Women aren't even supposed to be focusing on their animus, they need to focus on their anima, as men should focus on their animus, while they both should acknowledge their opposite gender attribute to keep themselves psychically balanced.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:09 PM, Innermike wrote: Man are you even trying to seem any older than 13? You probably havent listened to more than a couple hundred records and likely in no more than 2 or 3 genres. Also, when you say 'the mass' also realise that he is one of the most critically acclaimed artists of the last decade, not that I'm saying this is equivalent to perfection, at the end it's subjective sure but just saying even publications renowned for praising mainly underground/independent/experimental shit admitted they loved MBDTF, a platinum chart topping album. That's rare. That's something special. Even pitchfork (notorious for their love of indie darlings) gave him the first 10/10 in 8 years. It's not just the masses bruh.

Kanye West's renown is as baseless as Obama's renown. Mass, or critical opinion, when you are a symbol to many people, it always spells out trouble. Religion. Conspiracy theories. Gangs. Presidents. Most critics are the mass, but they forget about that part.

Response to: Anita Sarkeesian is back Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:00 PM, naronic wrote: please do something more constructive with your time

I blew this pointless discussion away and called out the red herrings, denial, assumptions, accusations, bias and ignorance already.

My deed here is already done.

Response to: Have you heard the word of Yeezus? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 10:02 PM, Innermike wrote: Judging talent from 4 lines, that's like judging an amazing band for that occasional bridge where they sing "oh oh whoa" a couple times, are you trying to look retarded?

Implying you do not know how to distinguish what is judging the whole album from what is judging somebody's judgement/expectations based on 4 lines.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:58 PM, Zachary wrote: Fu*k the SYSTEM MANNNNNNNNNNNNN #edgy #wow #fukdamainstream

99% of the time, when someone is famous, they are only there because the mass is infamous at liking shit.

Seriously, grow up lmao.

That phrase never made sense to me.

Response to: Have you heard the word of Yeezus? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:51 PM, Zachary wrote: Fuck you and your Hampton house
I'll fuck your Hampton spouse
Came on her Hampton blouse
And in her Hampton mouth

This is highschool level lyricism.

Kanye West is not talented.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:47 PM, Innermike wrote: Oh do tell about all those people he murdered!

Auto tune is #1 killer.

At 6/14/13 09:47 PM, Zachary wrote: Implying your opinion matters.

Implying that Kanye West is talented in a shit system that is distributed across global opinions. Everyone is shit. That's because money is shit. Fame is shit. Expectations are shit.

You don't even read books.

K.

Response to: What's your favorite watch? Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

Clocks are badass. They give me a hand, on my hand with their hands.

Response to: I <3 Kanye West -- no homo Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:38 PM, Zachary wrote: If you think Kanye West is honestly untalented then you must have something wrong with you.

Kanye West really isn't talented.

Response to: Fucking the dog Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

Work would be me passing time.

Response to: Middle School Shooter Gets 30 Years Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:11 PM, Boomstick wrote: Yeah, 30 years serves him right. Being a pussy and using his gun, only real men brawl with their fists.

Implying that people only cower by gun.

Implying this world isn't founded upon cowardice.

Response to: Show Newgrounds your teeth Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

My teeth can be found between her legs. I photoshopped them. Look closely.

Show Newgrounds your teeth

Response to: My foots asleep Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:04 PM, Wegra wrote: Actually on second thought okay

Ahh, you have done it! You have demonstrated a game of irony for me, thank you Wegra. The game was about being nuts by not having enough nuts. Now you have enough nuts, thus you weren't nuts.

Well done.

Response to: Middle School Shooter Gets 30 Years Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 09:03 PM, BigFatKid wrote: Sure 30 years is long, but a 14-year-old understands that shooting a person in the back of the head usually indicates the intent of killing.

Implying that people are always rational.

Implying that emotions do not interrupt people's rationality.

Implying that everyone is raised in the right environment, with a purpose in life, while being treated adequately.

Response to: Middle School Shooter Gets 30 Years Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

At 6/14/13 08:55 PM, BigFatKid wrote: Then why did you reply? If I don't care, then I wouldn't bother responding, let alone click the thread.

I'm pretty sure you'd care if Mr. Memon was, for some reason, let out of prison and moved into the house next door to you.

"I don't care" is an actual dispositional aspect of one's perspective of any stated matter.

As for Mr. Memon, I'm upset that his name wasn't Mr. Lemon; I was going to make a "If life gives you lemons" pun.

No pun; no punishment.

Response to: Middle School Shooter Gets 30 Years Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

I don't care.

Response to: My foots asleep Posted June 14th, 2013 in General

If I don't see your signature with more nuts by tomorrow, I'm going to wegrape you.