Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Hypocrisies, hypocrisies everywhere.

At 2/15/14 02:54 PM, cheezz wrote: What makes a sociopath a sociopath is a lack of remorse and empathy, it goes beyond a just lack of emotion, they see other people as objects. Most of them wind up in prison or an institute in reality, not as this mad scientist archetype you're thinking of.

Most of them? 1% out of millions is not "most of them". They still have morals and goals, they just don't use emotions due to having intelligence, or negligence eroding its purpose. Do your research before you respond.

At 2/15/14 02:32 PM, oobooglunk wrote: I did say "assuming you're not trolling", which I'm now sure you are, but yep.

It was a safeguard to cloak and troll.

At 2/15/14 01:38 PM, Zachary wrote: "it would explain why the only time you see religious activity in a sociopath is when they are manipulating its practitioners, while they are genuinely drawn towards science"

Nice deflection. Yes, let's take something out of context to subjugate yourself deeper by your personal satisfactions, that always works.

Ask questions. Talk about why you disagree. Instead, you throw stones. Very counter-intuitive of you, Zachary.

At 2/15/14 01:23 PM, Zachary wrote: Obviously your logical thinking skills need some work...

Actually, his post talks about what he thinks.

My post talks about a correlation between a massive type of persons that share something vital to our knowledge, to further understand the nature of emotion and machine. There's a significant difference between the two opinions, since mine is anchored down by something with extremely objective potential.

At 2/15/14 01:45 AM, CiviLies wrote: Both fascinating and full of emotion. Well, in my opinion...

In your opinion is exactly why this post is irrelevant.

At 2/15/14 01:38 AM, oobooglunk wrote: HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

You forgot about the fascinating specie: the internet troll.

At 2/14/14 11:12 PM, cheezz wrote: Isn't the idea of sociopaths being drawn to science something you usually only see in works of fictions?

It's not. Do some research and look for yourself. Religious activity in sociopaths is only prevalent when the sociopath is looking for prey -- even then, there's very few that go this route.

At 2/14/14 11:11 PM, Thoth0 wrote: "stupidity isnt about logic or understanding through experimentation, its about smoking weed and staring at the stars"

Fixed.

At 2/14/14 07:19 PM, Lagerkapo wrote: ^-^

changes*

At 2/14/14 06:53 PM, Whoshotdabear wrote: FUCK YOU! You don't know anything about me, you arrogant spic!

So, did I strike the iron before your nerve?

At 2/14/14 06:35 PM, Viper50 wrote: Think of it this way.
Say you're just learning to drive. Would you take lessons from and listen to a person who isn't really sure how to drive a car but has some sort of an idea as to what they're doing but passes off the knowledge they have as absolute and ask you to never question them?

yes that is a run-on sentence. and no. i don't care.

Haha, you silly man. You're telling me to take an example that holds physical consequences over metaphysical enqueries. This example is irrelevant, because experience is a state, and not a thing, while the car is a thing, and it causes things to happen. Near death experience, or racism, or knowing a serial killer's mind without ever experiencing it yourself, is a metaphysical construct, thus you are trying to trick me -- or yourself.

At 2/14/14 05:51 PM, Zachary wrote: For some reason Insanctuary knows the answer to a question that scientists who have studied in the field for decades do not even know... weird!!!

It's called theorizing a logical conclusion by cross-referencing life's intrinsic conglomerations to how the human body reacts, since it's generally accepted that, as the world is consisted of math, so is the human mind, thus if you want to know how you work, figure out how the world works and cross-examine them both.

Can someone please tell me why we call them white, but white people albinos?

At 2/14/14 05:01 PM, chupacabras89 wrote: This is what should happen.

Don't you mean TAXES?

At 2/14/14 04:58 PM, ReiSaus wrote: Actually, the headgames you play won't work. Pessimistic view, prrrrgb :P

What head games? I don't have to introduce myself to your psychical realms, hence you have already sold yourself off into the stories made by others. You could not live your own life, so now you're looking for another story to wrap yourself in. Trying to get into your head, is like trying to fuck a porcelain.

At 2/14/14 04:50 PM, ReiSaus wrote: Glad to hear that. Nice to hear an honest answer :)

While you're being ubiquitously positive, the ravenous world you live in will always bear what you fear and cower from. You might as well grow a tough skin before you reach a point you no longer can fight this weighted reality. The walls will close in on you, and the madness within will only consume you -- or what is left of you.

At 2/14/14 04:39 PM, Sekhem wrote: Texas is the best state in the United States and it's not even fucking close.

You do know that this picture is graphically absurd, right? If any of those other states were green, where the fuck would the green arrow go? Up the red state's ass?

At 2/14/14 04:23 PM, Zachary wrote: Mocking you =/= trolling

It's strange how the derivative of this post is focused on me, hence the "you" being used to compliment your post, but here Sekham's post history is clearly consisted of trolling.

Why Zachary? Are you spitefully condensed toward me or what? It's like you enjoy responding to me. I cannot remember which thread I made that you did not reply to, so tell us all Zachary, why am I so special to you?

At 2/14/14 04:32 PM, Entice wrote: You really don't have to change anything about your life.

You can play stupid, but you cannot play smart.

At 2/14/14 04:25 PM, Lagerkapo wrote: Wow, you've seriously no power over your own life or something...

Don't need power to make correct decisions.

LIFE IS DEATH IS LIFE IT'S COOKIE CUTTERS CUTTING COOKIES IN DIFFERENT SHAPES

Incorrect. If that was true, then explain why there are 8,000,000,000 people alive right now, while back then there was only so many. Where did 8,000,000,000 souls come from? If life and death were as you say, this wouldn't be the predicament. Why don't you give this conundrum a blowjob? It clearly enslaves you.

There IS a memory, a non-corporeal seeing which has impact upon the corporeal realm.

Yes, a memory. It does not have an impact on the mundane world. It's a non-sentient ghost in the machine.

Heh, you seem to have fully confirmed to yourself that you have no power over your world.

Here you are talking about power again, when you assume that I do not hold accountability or responsibility for my virtues, while forgetting that power is one of the greatest artifacts of nothingness that guises itself as everythingness.

Let me tell you; responsibility, not just materially, socially or physically, but spiritually, for your life, is the most terrifying thing you can embrace, until you've done it fully; then it's the most comfortable.

There is no "spiritually"; you might as well say, "what I have inevitably misconceived".

A man who does not question axiom is as lost as his counterpart who, although he does not like to catalog it, listens only to it.

I never said that the axiom should not be questioned. I said that this is an axiom we accept thus far. And spouting spiritual nonsense does not have any affiliation to this axiom. Ever notice that people's spiritual experiences are only special to themselves, but scientific experiences are special to anyone that is interested? Think about that will ya?

Wow, your nihilism seems quite poorly veiled.

I am a holist, and a voidist wrapped inside a parabolic chamber of shadows and paradigms, which I can say contains more weight than your "spiritual" flatulence.

At 2/14/14 04:18 PM, Sekhem wrote: Those bereft of the divine often invent lies to satisfy themselves.

But the religious types that say, "I feel something divine", are really unaware of what they feel to begin with, when it could be just indigestion, or the same habit children grow into when they watch anime like Dragon Ball Z. Religious people are like children that think they can punch a guys head off in one punch. It's called being imaginatively voracious. They have absolutely no construction or realism involved in their analysis towards life. Everything they say is built entirely on reassurance and reapplication of the imaginative world they rather live in than this one. It's all about when they are ready to believe in something that doesn't require self-assurance and self-doubt. Something that you can know without wearing it on your sleeves, or having to share it with everybody like someone that is sexually insecure about themselves are strangely sexually active on the surface. It's compensatory shenanigans, and I understand it, so I'm not going to be hateful and resentful towards people that want to believe. I just won't accept it in a logical discussion for reasons I have written above. There's nothing wrong with believing -- it's when you let that belief live you -- that's when you start to irritate me.

At 2/14/14 04:04 PM, Sekhem wrote: Yes, his brother was George Washington Whitman. Extremely fascinating! (not)

Fuck you. You hide your intelligence, and conceive into this trolling nature. I know you're hiding it, hence you responded as I expected you to.

At 2/14/14 04:04 PM, Lagerkapo wrote: Fuck it all, we're as fucking real as we choose to be

Yes, let's project realities that we have no understanding for. That's like trying to use a gun we have know knowledge of, and then proceed on waving it around thinking we're cool.

At 2/14/14 04:03 PM, Sekhem wrote: How do mentally retarded people know if something is true or not?

Well, considering those that think they are right think the sun isn't a star, it's an axiom that the religious are intellectually illiterate. It's nothing new, hence religion is built to deny the systematical world we live in, in search of something "more" that we commit ourselves to.

At 2/14/14 03:01 PM, Sekhem wrote: dang, you're a real whitman now

Did you know he was a brother of George Washington? Read this, "After suffering a paralytic stroke in early 1873, Whitman was induced to move from Washington to the home of his brother—George Washington " ;D

At 2/14/14 03:57 PM, ReiSaus wrote: I believe things that are true.

You can't believe in something that's already real.

I fuck her body and her mind.

When you believe in something, you don't become something; you become a part of something. Therefore anyone that says I am "this" because I believe in "this" are arrogant fuck-all-heads.

At 2/14/14 03:48 PM, Viper50 wrote: Then again. The only people who know for sure what happens after you die are people who have died themselves.
Nobody else should have the privilege to say what happens after you die if they themselves haven't experienced death.

Martin Luther King Jr. wasn't racist, but somehow he knew more about racism than anyone alive at that time. Strange.

They are re-animated by the imagination.

Texas points us to one direction: Hell

At 2/14/14 03:41 PM, tsukikomi wrote: Why are you trying to be a internet tough guy? Possibly you don't have a lover today?

Or possibly because he is controlled by his sister, but blames the lack of reconciliation on everyone but himself.