Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 2/18/14 07:34 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Can you do push up for 15 min, non stop? If yes then, you're quite strong. I wouldn't say as very athletic.

Doing push ups for 15 minutes is a sign of endurance and repeated action. I'm sure when you started doing push ups, you barely could do 20. If I took the time to do push ups like you, I'm sure I could do them. The same for prisoner in mates being able to do an easy 200. It's all about breaking into it. Unfortunately, that only helps the arms. My exercise helps my entire body. Therefore, human flag.

At 2/18/14 07:25 PM, Elitistinen wrote: How big is your belly? I believe you must weight at least 400 lbs.

I am 140. Very athletic. Abnormally strong.

At 2/18/14 07:27 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Only you.

It's a star.

Does insatiable charm count as a stunt?

How many here think the sun is not a star?

I am better than everyone at intellectual exercises whether it be extrinsically or intrinsically involved.

At 2/18/14 07:17 PM, Elitistinen wrote: I would if I could. Never compare yourself to Einstein.

I do not compare my genius to any other genius.

Experiencing a night wherein two actions split up between life and death; the person driving the car managed to react fast enough to avoid a car that was coming down the mountain side. I saw lights coming straight for us, but all I saw in those lights was a close look at death.

At 2/18/14 07:03 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Fixed for you.

Are you going to tie Einstein's shoes, too?

It's to discourage this from snowballing into something that can be easily abused; i.e this act becomes a freedom of speech fight > people win > young people start sending all sorts of selfies in the nude > perversion gets involved > all sorts of perversive systems are made up out of it > the internet becomes a pedophile's paradise.

At 2/18/14 06:54 PM, ASmallOstrich wrote: This, this so much, another pretty boy with a web cam. If not for his style, he wouldn't get nearly as many people following him as he does. I remember my ex, who never played a video game outside of fb games, was really into him, can't explain that outside of reasoning other than his mop top, pretty boy status.

Look at how PewDiePie-illiterate you guys are. You do know that PewDiePie does more than make random videos on Youtube, right? He's actually very intelligent, and you'll see that he's done some big speeches on some topics. Do your research you envious children.

- Genius

- Wants others to be genius

- Still only genius

I practice realigion.

PewDiePie is #1 on Youtube. #1 is never #1 when you're not #1.

Why does the OP's poll ask if Lego fans are retarded, but insists on marking people as "Yes", when they un-retardedly have a heart for Lego? Seems like Lego haters are the real retards.

At 2/18/14 06:08 PM, Elitistinen wrote: the only winning move is not to argue with a fool.

Sometimes doing stupid things in life isn't always non-constructively foolish.

At 2/18/14 04:15 PM, cheezz wrote: You haven't cited any scientific sources supporting your claims. And you still haven't shown any evidence that sociopaths are drawn to science. Do you have anything or not?

Look at all the fallacies you have to give, and what little facts you have to give. Just because we have internet, doesn't mean that I have to hold your hands with links to information that accounts my statements. I have asked you many questions that are answers to your questions themselves, hence your questions are untrue, biased and inaccurate. Now stop asking for sources, when anybody can claim a source as fact. I'm tired of sources, and I want to discuss these questions you continue to deflect because all you do is parrot crap that isn't true again, and again. I'm going to ask you one last time. Explain how ASPD and sociopathy are the same, when one can have remorse, and the other cannot. Explain how they are the same, when two distinctions are entirely different from each other. Answer this, or admit that you have contributed nothing to this thread, but instead rely on mindless sources that fit your black and white understanding psychical tendencies found in human relations. I don't need to prove myself of anything, when every question you ask contradicts itself, and ends up answering itself in the first place. You're wrong. Whether I am right or wrong will come when you, or others will actually come forward and stop pulling things out of their bias.

At 2/18/14 01:48 AM, cheezz wrote: I've shown you reputable sources saying otherwise. I haven't seen a shred of evidence showing me that sociopaths are drawn to science though. You haven't shown anything despite my many requests. Do you have anything to show? Or didn't you do your research?

Again, anyone that knows sociopaths will tell you straight up that they are very keen at being social and manipulation. ASPD consists of types that are opposite of that, in that they live in seclusion and secrecy. Sociopaths recognize their contradictions, hypocrisies and the like; people with ASPD generally do not have this privilege. Do your research you fucking piece of cheese.

At 2/17/14 09:45 PM, cheezz wrote: Why can't you show me evidence of sociopaths being drawn to science?

Why can't you realize that the source you're using is illogical and inaccurate, hence sociopaths are not generally anti-social, they are actually extremely well known and praised by many -- they trick people into giving them this attention, but the fact remains, sociopaths =/= ASPD If you were accurate, we wouldn't see sociopaths AND psychopaths going out there and manipulating people like they do. People with ASPD is caused by a whole variety of things, while sociopathy isn't. Finally, ASPD has people mostly involved with actual anti-social behavior, and they tend to always distant themselves from others and live in seclusion; this is not what sociopaths generally do. They have a few things in common, but the most important aspects do not match because they are not the same thing like you want them to be to support your rash opinions.

At 2/17/14 05:52 PM, cheezz wrote: So the distinction being made here is that a sociopath meets more of the criteria of ASPD than people with ASPD. This doesn't show two different problems like you stated before, it's distinguishing people with the same disorder. This is coming from your own (albeit unreliable) source.

You state that what's they implied, but it's like them writing the two terms as two different bodies goes right over your head.

I'm still waiting to see what you have to say about a sociopath being drawn to science. Do you have anything to show or not?

Go do research. Stop pigeon-holing and then covering said holes with your sneeze blanket. There is no proof that sociopaths are religious, and if you actually used your brain, you'd realize that religion requires some form of emotion (it's a personal experience), and so, it makes logical sense why nobody really has any information on a sociopath's religious activities.

At 2/17/14 02:21 PM, cheezz wrote: You're wrong when you say there not the same. Eat your own words and do some research and put two and two together. I'm still waiting on your evidence that sociopaths are drawn to science by the way.

Here's an easy reference for an easy self-entitled enthusiast: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090513161344AAPB7t0

At 2/17/14 05:47 AM, cheezz wrote: Where's your evidence that sociopaths are drawn to science? That's what I really want to know.

You do know that ASPD, and sociopathy are two different problems, right? Sociopathy harbors some of the same symptoms as ASPD, however those symptoms are never the same when it bothers with remorse. People with ASPD can have remorse -- sociopaths cannot. Therefore you're taking ASPD to blanket your bias towards sociopaths, when sociopaths take up a much smaller area than people with ASPD; people that still can have remorse, or have mental disabilities that have nothing to do with sociopathy, yet causes ASPD. Why don't you instead admit you were referring to people with ASPD, and not sociopathic tendencies? I am talking about sociopaths, not people with all sorts of different varieties of mental disabilities causing ASPD, which is unfair to argue with when sociopaths have no remorse, whereas those with ASPD can have remorse -- the two are irrelevant and do have their layers of distinctions to tell the two apart considerably.

TL;DR ASPD =/= Sociopathy

At 2/16/14 09:14 PM, Zachary wrote: I am not defending him, I am just pointing out that you are avoiding posting the research you are claiming. Surely you knew that though... unless you fail at reading comprehension.

I'm not making any claims. He is the one making the claim, hence why I know his claim is undeniably false, and my confidence in that alone is already enough to tell anyone intellectual enough to put two and two together that I have done my research to know that he is inaccurate. I do not have to bring out anything for someone that can't even research.

At 2/16/14 08:11 PM, Zachary wrote: No surprise that he ignored you. It is expected of someone who does no research and only goes off their own unintelligent beliefs.

Zachary, you're defending someone that stated most sociopaths end up in prison, when there are 2,000,000+ sociopaths, and 1% of that ended up in apparent trouble. That doesn't look good on you at all.

At 2/16/14 06:11 PM, The-Great-One wrote: Funny, all three of those things actually sort of tie in together.

I do a lot of subtle actions that triggers the actions of others. That is the result of it.

At 2/16/14 03:14 PM, cheezz wrote: Yes I'm sure, show me. I want to know what this research is that you've been looking at.

You're the one making a claim, and demonstrating already you don't have any reasonable clue towards what you're writing.

At 2/16/14 02:10 PM, ManDeep wrote: Can you elaborate? Or give me an example? I don't quite follow.

When you come across questions like, "Why do we have emotions"; "Do we have a soul"; "Is there altruism", it's guaranteed that science will bluntly give a logical assessment of those things -- none of it which you'd expect -- before losing your innocence and humanity.

At 2/16/14 12:46 PM, ManDeep wrote: I doubt that science kills empathy in people.

Science doesn't; it's the questions that come from science that induces excuses to water down reality and its purposes.

At 2/15/14 10:57 PM, cheezz wrote: I know what a sociopath is, but I would like to see this research you're referring to. Why don't you show me?

Are you sure about that? You just waltz into this thread to make a statement that is, "most sociopaths end up in prison", and you're bloody inaccurate. You do your research. I already did mine.

At 2/15/14 06:38 PM, cheezz wrote: Sure, I need to research. Sociopaths are moral, intelligent people. You couldn't possibly be misusing the term. That couldn't possibly be a made up statistic. Prison inmates aren't known to display antisocial behavior at all.

Do your research. Your biased drivel can only demonstrate what little contribution you have to give.

At 2/15/14 04:54 PM, megabad wrote: Science is fun! maybe you just need somebody to show you.

Actually, making something fun or explaining the psychology along with science is what I look forward to, but schools around the world do not have this. Simply because a few shows have this, doesn't hold water to the rest of the world's lack of such possibilities.