Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I'm vastly, unequivocally, certaintly, simply brilliant.

At 1/10/12 05:57 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

At 1/10/12 05:47 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Scroll up to read original text, you decadent whore.

The problem with "your philosophy" is that it consists entirely of paired antitheses, oxymorons, and arbitrary declarations. You do not give a concrete reason why your argument is sensible. You do not give a concrete reason why "your philosophy" looks at a broader picture anymore than the judgements, bias and persona you ridicule. Why? Because there is no basis for a belief besides perception. Every corner of the mind and personality is based upon perception. No statements can be made without perception, c'est la vie.

And thus, by rendering my own individual perception infallible, I make myself God of the Newgrounds realm. By all means reply, but first of all WORSHIP ME!

At 1/10/12 05:44 PM, II2none wrote: Remind me to nominate this Thread of 2012.

HE CONCURS! XD

You have hope to be converted yet, oh ignorant,whores of the temple of babylon of whores. Of ignorant.

That is essentially why this world looks more like it's being ruined by baboons and faceless; brain-dead beings, right?

That is why our human race is seperated in 1000's of groups, right?

That is why our human race is strangers even when we aren't as seperated, right?

That is why we worship materials as if it was beneficial to the cause of mankind, right?

That is why you are wasting your time insinuating that I think I am God in a premature state of satire, right?

So, my argument has to make more sense than all of this senseless ignorance to be right, right?

Wow. You can only dream of being able to see what I see.

At 1/10/12 06:06 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

At 1/10/12 05:26 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Why?

A gun is just a gun. Cowardice is just cowardice. They may also be other things on occasion, but they are not definitely so.

I wasn't meaning to make sensible bias logic with those two posts with the completely unmanagable, and pointless [yet subtly sensible by the very advocate of it's pointless nature] equations I came up with.

No. Can anyone else give me one single shred of divine truth? No. This world was never built around truth. It was built around the pursuit of truth. Everyone is creating fabricated foundations to support their truth; when that is now how you seek truth. Truth is whatever makes sense to us in our own right.. whatever makes the most sense.. it may not be divine truth.. but it's all we have and will ever have.. We are rats looking for cheese that doesn't exist.. It does feel right, because the way this world is now..

Then what makes your truth superior to anyone else's truth?

People are rebelling.. We have businesses running our world to the ground for what? Silk. People are losing interest in the very cortex of life itself. We don't look at ourselves as this brilliant specimen of a brilliant world with brilliant life forms living in a state of harmony and destruction through balance.. No, we look at everything as solid.. as material.. as objects.. We don't embrace the sentience.. the essence of life. We just apply form to what we pretend is solid.

This may be so, but your philosophy isn't the only answer to this (in fact, if you want to play it that way, my philosophy's been fighting that for the last 2,500 years). People may lose sight of what matters, they may over- platonify, but you don't seriously think you're the only person who sees that, or who employs a philosophy to change that?

More to the point what have you done to fight that with your philosophy that others have not done with theirs?

Yes. Let's use a gun while people are unarmed. Let's solve our own problems by permanently taking away another person's life. Guns are for cowards if they are instigators.

My truth is not superior to others like you state it is. It's simply alot more sensible. Simply because I have put alot of time and effort into applying sense to it that makes sense as a whole. It's not 100% correct, and it will always have it's flaws.. but it's much more sensible than anyone else's ideals to this day.

You don't understand that my philosophy has it's similarities to your philosophy you are referring to, but I assure you that I doubt they've taken the simple route that I've taken. I doubt that even 80% of the rest of my philosophy fits your philosophy you spoke of.

I have others who concur with my state of position. My philosophy is different, because I figured that is was better to solve things as a whole.. not just one single matter that I was bias. You cannot deny the flaws of our world, and their prominent gradual damage it's inflicting on everything and everyone.. My philosophy will continue to live until these flaws are taken care of.

At 1/10/12 06:08 PM, adamflecko wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:40 PM, FairSquare wrote: And here we go again..
Please, take your infinite wisdom and perfect philosophy elsewhere. The BBS is way too small for you, so stop bothering with it and strive to a bigger public.

Seriously, I'm starting to wish it was limited to 1 thread per user per day, because this philosophy shit is getting annoying as hell.

I am in my own right to speak my mind. Why don't you give a reason for your statement. If not, ignore it. Stop being upset that you don't understand how reasonable my philosophy really is.

At 1/10/12 05:57 PM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: Oh look! A pseudo-intellectual. Gather 'round, children. Try and poke it with a stick.

stfu

Pseudo-intellectual, eh?

What do you got to show that you know any more than I do? Nothing.

Oranges.

When I was younger, I would draw smiley faces on them so my mother couldn't eat them, because she was too paranoid that the ink bled through the peel.

At 1/10/12 05:46 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

At 1/10/12 05:43 PM, Insanctuary wrote: A fool who calls another a fool without understand that they could be a fool is a fool's fool.

A fool who calls a fool a fool's fool who doesn't understand that he too could be a fool, without understanding that it is HE who could be the fool, and could be a fool's fool is a fool's fool SQUARED.

Infinite regression.

Essentially, I'm not creating a thread of flawed satirical delusions of another.

You simply stand for the wrong reason. A stranger to your own judgment.

At 1/10/12 05:42 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

At 1/10/12 05:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I hope you know that you already created the greatest flaw of pretending to be without pretending to be what I do not pretend to be what you insist of me to be.

This may be, but my pretenses to be that which is without pretense, creates the pretense of certainty, showing certainty to be pretense, and, pretense being the opposite of certainty, proving my pretenses certain and thus certainly proving that your certainties are but pretense, and my pretenses absolute certainties.

Takes back the 105 house points by verbally dividing by zero.

It is not my pretenses -- that you like to refer to it as -- that creates subtle certainty. It is my ability to create a rather sensible argument that does not stem from an imaginary foundation called 'logic' or in my eyes [bias logic]. The only reason why it's sensible, is because you are not sensible with your own state of position.

Your position affects your character, your character affects your persona, your persona affects your beliefs, your beliefs affect your ideas; judgment, your judgment is bias, therefore whatever you say is right unto yourself, and is only stated through your self.. Not the broader picture like my philosophy does.

This is why you are not going to be able to stand for the man you say; esp. when you cannot stand for the man I allegedly stand as you say.

At 1/10/12 05:36 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote: I know what you're thinking, oh mild- infinitely inferior minded friend, I must be shitting you, but REALLY, no-one has agreed with a SING ONE OF MY CONCLUSIONS! I am a singularity indeed!

Actually. I have people who concur with my philosophy.

A fool who calls another a fool without understand that they could be a fool is a fool's fool.

At 1/10/12 05:36 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

, for you vain protestations of being separate fail to notice that all is one and I am a goldfish!

Sling your arrows of acidic cynicism if you must, BBS, for I challenge you to a duel in which you must ride your horse across the blistering sands of the Desert of My Mind carrying nothing but a sack of memories, vain perceptions and whorish self delusions (and possibly goldfish) with which you can read and reply to my thread.

5 House Points to whoever knows exactly what I'm satirising.

*Takes his 5 points and another 100 for what I am about to do*

I hope you know that you already created the greatest flaw of pretending to be without pretending to be what I do not pretend to be what you insist of me to be.

To dig or not to dig is to dig within what is the undiggable bsed on digging into what they cannot dig to dig farther into what was once thought undiggable now to dig for all of the sake of digging because to dig is to dig and there is only digging until you cannot dig no more.

To see or not to see is to see without not seeing, for seeing what you cannot see is not seeing with what you can see without seeing, and to see what others see is like not seeing what you can not/not see.

Damn, I am damned for being damned to express how damned I am damned to be damned for expressing about being damned is damnable.

I was once what I was now I am what I was not to be, and to be what I want to be without being what I was is simply impossible until I consider to be what I was not to be and that what I was/was not what I was to be to be what I wanted to be.

Why does one deny to ask why to understand why we ask why to see why people deny why what I ask why to understand why?

At 1/10/12 05:29 PM, Jackospades wrote:

At 1/9/12 03:30 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/9/12 03:27 PM, Jackospades wrote:

At 1/9/12 03:20 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Relegate this reality with my 'pseudo philosophy'; 'pseudo intellect'.

SAY WHAT?

^_____________________________^

^^_____________________________^^

v ________________________ v

At 1/10/12 05:29 PM, ZeldaFan64DS wrote:

At 1/10/12 12:30 AM, Rallard wrote:

At 1/10/12 12:23 AM, Insanctuary wrote: What if the brain only exerts these chemicals when we 'intentionally' enjoy something?

Somebody has obviously never tried ecstasy/MDMA.

Haven't done it. Never will.

Drugs take you away from yourself. That's a good mindset.

At 1/10/12 05:21 PM, AlexDecay wrote: Tie between grapes and bananas.

Bananas are herbs. They derive from the lily family.

At 1/10/12 05:06 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:43 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Shot = Gun

Gun = Advantage

Advantage = Coward

No necessarily.

Coward = Unreasonable

Not necessarily.

Unreasonable = Reason

Reason = Unreasonable

Unreasonable paradox x 23 x variables = A sad miserable fuck who thinks unjustified deaths will fill their void.

Free association =/= logic.

At 1/10/12 04:37 PM, Insanctuary wrote: It has never let me down, and it is leading me to a direction that seems to stump everyone; not of my incorrect nature; but of my ability to retain my defense with my words that appear to be unsolid; illogical; yet it is solid and well established.

Can you give me one divine truth that has eluded everyone else? One empircal fact that has eluded all others? How on earth is your argument "solid and well established"? This largely seems like self justification with word play. By equating parallel antitheses in a didactic tone with stative verbs and excessive superlatives you may be able to create a philosophical voice, but there is no content to your philosophy apart from "what feels right is just right". I'm sorry, but you're human, your perception is fundamentally flawed, I don't buy it.

And that is why I'm out

Why?

[and]

Why?

I wasn't meaning to make sensible bias logic with those two posts with the completely unmanagable, and pointless [yet subtly sensible by the very advocate of it's pointless nature] equations I came up with.

No. Can anyone else give me one single shred of divine truth? No. This world was never built around truth. It was built around the pursuit of truth. Everyone is creating fabricated foundations to support their truth; when that is now how you seek truth. Truth is whatever makes sense to us in our own right.. whatever makes the most sense.. it may not be divine truth.. but it's all we have and will ever have.. We are rats looking for cheese that doesn't exist.. It does feel right, because the way this world is now.. People are rebelling.. We have businesses running our world to the ground for what? Silk. People are losing interest in the very cortex of life itself. We don't look at ourselves as this brilliant specimen of a brilliant world with brilliant life forms living in a state of harmony and destruction through balance.. No, we look at everything as solid.. as material.. as objects.. We don't embrace the sentience.. the essence of life. We just apply form to what we pretend is solid.

At 1/10/12 04:50 PM, FairSquare wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:45 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:40 PM, FairSquare wrote: And here we go again..
Please, take your infinite wisdom and perfect philosophy elsewhere. The BBS is way too small for you, so stop bothering with it and strive to a bigger public.

Your sarcasm has yet to elude me.

I'm only speaking my mind.

[Like everyone else, right?]

You seem to think you have the answers to everything and that the way you see the world is the right one, so if you believe that then why still bother posting here instead of making your wisdom known to everyone in the form of a book, or hell stand on speaker's corner?

In my eyes, the way I see this world is the most sensible way. It's not 100% right. I'm sure. It's the best in my eyes, and I've spent plenty of time putting what should truly matter together.

Clouded judgment is the farthest state of perception we will have. It's how we manifest what we do become aware of that truly matters.

Which is why my words are no more solid than your words. What matters is who stands, and who topples over.

At 1/10/12 01:24 PM, thdrkside wrote: God created Satan to have an excuse to create Hell so that he would have a place to put dumbasses like you.

I love how you essentially said that hell doesn't and does exist only for you express how much of a dumbass they are.

What My Mother's Strict Professor Told Me. Which Every Student In Her Class Hates.

Hello Young Man!

My personal view.

Above all, I'm so appreciative that you shared your scholarly work; I esteem you; you are 'brilliant'. I regard you as a critical ''thinker'' - defined as a self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fair-minded way; one who is attempting to rationally, reasonable, empathically; you have diminished the power of egocentrism and sociocentrism. According to your work, you use concepts and principles to analyze, assess, and improve your way of thinking; your work shows that you have dilligently developed the itnellectual virtues of intellectual integrity, intellectual humility, intellectual respect, intellectual empathy, intellectual sense of justice, and confidence in reason; however, it also illustrates that you realise you have skills but strive to improve your reasoning abilities. I am impressed as well as enlightened... Thank you!

My favorite is found in Plato's classic Book VII of the Republic - The Allegory of the Cave, a love of wisdom.

Have you submitted your work for publication?

At 1/10/12 04:49 PM, Ilssm wrote:

Whilst bringing up points that normal human beings are capable of bringing up-- but never did they decide to sought for more -- so it only appears to be abnormal points.

How about you stick with what you know and I stick with what I know, sound fair?

That's counter productive.

At 1/10/12 04:46 PM, froggerfreak wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:43 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 1/10/12 04:39 PM, froggerfreak wrote: And that's the reason why I shoot and killed 23 people, you wouldn't understand though..

Shot = Gun

Gun = Advantage

Advantage = Coward

Coward = Unreasonable

Unreasonable = Reason

Reason = Unreasonable

Unreasonable paradox x 23 x variables = A sad miserable fuck who thinks unjustified deaths will fill their void.

Shot = Gun

Gun = Power

Power = God

God = Me

Me = God

I am very justified sir.

Gun = Empty Power

Empty Power = Coward

Coward = Unreasonable

Unreasonable = Reason

Reason = Unreasonable

Unreasonable x God x Motive = A distorted man who has lost their way.

At 1/10/12 04:39 PM, Ilssm wrote:

No. Just speaking my mind like a normal human being should.

Whilst bringing up some points a normal human being wouldn't usually bring up, yes.

Whilst bringing up points that normal human beings are capable of bringing up-- but never did they decide to sought for more -- so it only appears to be abnormal points.

At 1/10/12 04:40 PM, FairSquare wrote: And here we go again..
Please, take your infinite wisdom and perfect philosophy elsewhere. The BBS is way too small for you, so stop bothering with it and strive to a bigger public.

Your sarcasm has yet to elude me.

I'm only speaking my mind.

[Like everyone else, right?]

At 1/10/12 04:39 PM, froggerfreak wrote: And that's the reason why I shoot and killed 23 people, you wouldn't understand though..

Shot = Gun

Gun = Advantage

Advantage = Coward

Coward = Unreasonable

Unreasonable = Reason

Reason = Unreasonable

Unreasonable paradox x 23 x variables = A sad miserable fuck who thinks unjustified deaths will fill their void.

My philosophy is the sole foundation of what I, you, and everyone lives for. It's the most simplest form of being able to distinguish this world, scrutinize this world, understand this world /the best that we can/. It's about accepting everything with not of face value; what it appears to be; not of morality; it's an illusion; not of destination; goals; end of the rat maze; not of finding an answer to anything. It's not about anything, really. That is the illusion. My philosophy is built around the flaws and incomprehensible elements that were created by man. How word of say is just as formless as our imagination. How every action we make is acted upon how we interpret this world we stand in, and our abilities; virtues; goals. How nothing is as solid as it appears, and it is human ignorance -- for how metaphysical it appears to be -- adds realism to this world, and how we percieve it. It's an illusion, just as much as my philosophy. I just want to tear away at all the lies; deception; the illusions of our world that plagues our rightful judgment, and our real sense of direction from this world, and ourselves. I work through heaven, hell, this world and my mind all at one piece, so to speak. I am creating balance by understanding everything I can understand, and being opened for any newly founded awareness I could obtain. I understand that clouded judgment is the farthest we will ever have, but I expanded on this and learned to make the best of what I am, and soon to be aware of. Every human has tunnel vision, but not every human can stand through a storm of questions and answer them all; rendering the questioners questionless. I have established a way to question the unseen through the unseen. Through simplicity, and not complexity. Through nothingness, that will soon equate to everything and everyone.

That is the idea of my philosophy. I cannot tell you in words what really goes on in my head. The imaginative realm is the language I listen and speak of; understand. It has never let me down, and it is leading me to a direction that seems to stump everyone; not of my incorrect nature; but of my ability to retain my defense with my words that appear to be unsolid; illogical; yet it is solid and well established. I am able to completely re-evaluate what we ever thought was real; true of this world.. and that is why I consider my philosophy a philosophy that cannot be contradicted, and stands through time as it had. I'm not continuing to be 'blinded' by my passion via my philosophy because I chose to; no, it's more than that. It's because people look up to me, people listen to what I have to say and follow my soundless judgment I have spent every single second of my life to build to better this world. It's the people around me, strong and weak, that keep my philosophy alive. Not me.

At 1/10/12 04:32 PM, Ilssm wrote:

IQ doesn't exist. Only awareness and ignorance. The shallow and wholesome state of perception.

You're some kind of extreme liberal smart ass, aren't you?

Not trying to be mean, just making an observation.

No. Just speaking my mind like a normal human being should.

I'm waiting patiently.

I expected a rather sincere response. None of this is very sincere. Not even quite.

At 1/10/12 04:05 PM, Ilssm wrote:

Can you agree to disagree that I disagree with you disagreeing with our own mutal argument that we inadvertently agree on disagreeing until we both agree to disagree and agree with your disagreement?

Thank you, for lowering my IQ.

IQ doesn't exist. Only awareness and ignorance. The shallow and wholesome state of perception.

Honestly, I think it's a convoluted mess of irrational love and peace.

At 1/10/12 04:06 PM, adamflecko wrote: Your threads aren't deep and thoughtful, actually, I think they're just paranoia mixed with being an attention whore.

Instead of stating bias towards my philosophy. Explain your bias.