728 Forum Posts by "implodinggoat"
At 5/8/02 09:06 PM, OrangeClock wrote: Everybody who has- Tell me if you have a family history of anger, or not. Tell me if you're prone to anger, also.
My family has a history of anger. I am very prone to anger. I have done all of the following.
1.I busted a hole in my wall with my bare fist after I spilled a drink.
2.Headbutted and broken a window with my head after I stubbed my toe.
3.After I was charged an extra dollar for a school club and confronted by the clubs extremely iffeminate president who said you haven't paid yet in a voice that I deemed disrespectful considering that I am a full 4 inches taller than him andweigh twice what he does. So I pulled out my wallet threw the dollar in his face and screamed "Here, Here is your fucking dollar!"
4.My freshman year I went to in school suspension 33 times.
5.In 8th grade I beat a lightly mentally retarded kid unconscios.(to be fare I didn't know he was retarded and he did punch me about 3 times first after which I beat his head into a metal pole repeatedly and told him not to punch me again. When he then punched me in the face I banged his head into the pole several more times and pushed him to the ground and then jumped on him and hit him a dozen times screaming "Never hit me Again You Little Fuck!". When he woke up he had two black eyes. He moved to a different school soon after that for some reason.
6.I once attempted to snap someones neck. But was stopped by my friends.
7.In the course of my soccer career I have gotten 12 red cards.
8.I once took a baseball bat to a CD Player.
9.I have sent death threats to broadcasting executives when they cancel shows I like.
10.I once attempted to crush one of my friends heads with two larger magnets.
(these are all true, I swear.)
At 3/6/02 02:41 PM, OrangeClock wrote: 1) How many hours of video games do you play each day/a week
6 till I get an X Box then It'll be about 50
2) What are the ratings of the games you play
M
3) What kind of grades do you get, or what is your job
A's 1430 SAT
4) Take this test and post your results
75 % Bastard 42% of witch is tard.
I am a God 97% of the population is less bastard than I am!
At 5/8/02 10:53 AM, EvilEmperor wrote: I guess the reason why lots of people hate Americans is coz most of em(the Americans) don't know(and dont care) what's happening outside their own country. Well, nowadays maybe the do care, since Osama managed to get their attention.
We don't know whats going on outside our own country? Then why are we the ones who always have to go save the day when ever shit happens!
And all the noise about Sep. 11. 7000 people died and it was made out to be the worst thing to ever happen although 20000 children starve to death each day.
Note, I'm not saying that what happened on Sep. 11 wasn't horrible, it certainly was. It's just that all the fuzz was made about it and we never even hear about all the people who starve to death every day. It's that they diffrentiate between the "important people" and the "unimportant people".
Don't hear about them how about the fifty adds I hear a day saying "Please save the children!". You people need to learn that you can't save everyone!
Besides we aren't intentionally starving people to death. The Worlds over populated, we gotta get these people to stop having so many damn kids!
People die! Lifes a bitch! Deal with it!
At 5/8/02 03:16 AM, Neotrance_Ice wrote:
Canadian is not a race you stupid mother fucker. I just hate Canada what is wrong with that
I think the U.S. should conquer Canada it would be fun! They're the only country we can invade other than Mexico and who the hell wants Mexico?
At 5/8/02 02:27 PM, Blackmagic wrote: God is my bitch! *puts out cigar on god's tounge*
Don't screw around with God Man. I did and he kicked my ass.
You know how Jesus was supposed to return on the Millenium. Well he did.... he just returned in the wrong field, so I pulled out my pump shotgun and took him prisoner. My idea was that I would keep him prisoner and live a life of sin so that when I died I could say to him if you want him back in you have to let me in. So anyway I was keeping him in a cage in my basement and when I came back to check on him God was there and he kicked my ass, when I woke up Jesus wasn't in the cage anymore just some Mexican Gardner named Jesus'. I kept Jesus as a slave laborer for a while until his entire 50 member family pulled up in a 1982 Chevy Astro Van. They liberated him and stole all the food in my fridge.
Now I don't have any food, no slave laborers, and I'm probably going to rot in hell for eternity. So whats the moral? Don't screw with God! hes a bad motherfucker!
At 5/8/02 10:05 AM, Rhomphaia wrote:
Hahaha that's the best beatles song, the whole thing doesn't make any sense,
I think they must have been high out of their minds when they wrote it. I'm glad I'm not the only person who doesn't get it.
At 5/7/02 08:29 PM, Losperman wrote: By trying to make us think this was a bad test.
http://www.crush007.com/love.pl?id=1020587195lfa
It told me I couldn't get layed by a Nymphomaniac crack whore on death row.
At 5/7/02 09:17 PM, Losperman wrote: Ok, my mistake. I thought you were saying that Paul wasn't vital to their success. Sorry about the misunderstanding.
Thats okay I rarely put coherent sentences together.
At 5/7/02 08:11 PM, Losperman wrote: I don't think you know what you're talking about. Without either Paul or John, there would be no Beatles. By themselves they probably wouldn't have been discovered. Both were musical geniuses in their own rights. They both had pretty radically different writing styles, but were individually talented as well. To say that without Paul the Beatles would have been great is pretty ridiculous.
This is just my opinion. I don't like Paul or his writing style. What I said wasn't that without him they would have been better what I said id that if they had a better muscician in his place like a Syd Barret, A Roger Waters, or an Eric Clapton, then they would have been much better. They wouldn't have been more popular but they could have totally avoided their embarressing early pop period.
At 5/4/02 06:36 AM, Slizor wrote: You implied and are implying low morals.
Now your applying your standards to the Vietnamese.
name one since WWII(when we saved your asses).Hungary 1956.(And you didn't save our asses, I've een over this many times, the USSR did the iggest part in WW2 and would have won it on their own.)
Wow one, I can name about fifty where Britain has sat around and let us take car of things. Also I do belive that yes Hungary was being subjugated by your beloved U.S.S.R.
Also while the Russians took greater casulties, they didn't do more, they just had such crappy strategy that they dropped like flies. Also Britain couldn't have posed an offensive without the United States and then the Germans wouldn't have had to fight a two front war and with their technological superiority they would have won. You know why, because if the U.S. hadn't gotten involved even if the Russians were winning the war would have lasted a couple more years and the Germans would have invented the A-Bomb and if they had A-Bombs and V3 rockets the world would have been fucked.
That's because it was a grass roots army, there was no need to kill people who shelter that army, although, that is the American way.
Oh so we shouldn't try to kill the enemy we should shoot at them and when they run into a village and use their civilians as shields then we should just say "Oh, Well they killed a couple hundred marines this morning but we can't fight back because we might hurt civilians.". They didn't give us an option! We could either sit there and get killed or strike back and kill civilians. This was an efective if brutal strategy, that lead to a N Vietnamese Victory by swaying U.S. public opinion.
It is my opinion that with the strategy of the Vietnamese the only way we could have won that war is if the United States totally overwhelmed them by mobilizing like we did in WWII. This could have won the war rather quickly but politics kept it from occuring. While a quick full out attack would cost less in lives and funds then a long drawn out war, explaining the immediate cost to the American people made this option impossible.
I'm in a bad mood.
When I get in a bad mood I start post crazy ideas.
Note don't think I'm a rascist because I don't think the U.S. should nuke the Middle East.
I think we should nuke the whole world!
Except New Zealand.
At 5/7/02 12:28 PM, CirUs wrote: You fucking americans never learn. September 11th should have tought you that you guys are NOT unstopable. Dont take other countries lightly.
We are unstopable! They struck a militarily insignifigant target and look what happened. We took out the Taliban and shit beat Al Queda. If we waned to we could go Nuclear on those assholes and Knock Islam down to being less influental then the Jehovas Witnesses. Fortunatley for them we try to keep civilian casulties to a minimum.
At 5/7/02 12:55 AM, Falconrath wrote: The biggest assholes in my opinion?
1. DoritoClock (For attempting to trick NGers)
Howd he try to trick NGers? I wanna know.
3. Mushroom_Clock (Attempting to insert religion into newgrounds and saying we'll all go to hell)
I hate him more for his views on censorship.
At 5/7/02 01:12 AM, RaNcIdPsYcHoJoSh wrote: The RaNcIdPsYcHoCrEw are apparently my bitches. They do whatever I tell them!
You were treating them like shit the other day. I'd criticize you but they were n00bs anyway.
At 5/7/02 05:27 PM, Sublemon wrote: What's your favorite Lennon song by the way?
Despite the fact that I'm a cold Hearted bastard I do like Imagine alot. I also like Come Together alot because even though I think Mcartney has partial credit on that one I've convinced myself Mcartney probably just sat around and twiddled his thumbs in a corner while Lennon wrote it(likewise I've convinced myself that Paul was totally responsible for every anoying pop song the group ever did).
What the Fuck happened?
and Who's Lenoon?
At 5/7/02 07:23 AM, Sublemon wrote: I believe The Beatles are the greatest band of all time. They have just so many great hits that they're nearly impossible to compete with.
Lenon was all that was holding that band together. Leaving the beatles was the best thing he ever did. If the Beatles had, had another great musician in place of that pop music bitch Mcartney then they would be a great band instead of just a good band.
At 5/7/02 07:23 AM, Sublemon wrote: I believe The Beatles are the greatest band of all time. They have just so many great hits that they're nearly impossible to compete with.
Lenoon was all that was holding that band together. Leaving the beatles was the best thing he ever did. If the Beatles had, had another great musician in place of that pop music bitch Mcartney then they would be a great band instead of just a good band.
At 5/7/02 07:23 AM, Sublemon wrote: I believe The Beatles are the greatest band of all time. They have just so many great hits that they're nearly impossible to compete with.
Lennon was all that was holding that band together. If they had another good musician in the group in place of that bitch Mcartney then they really would be able to compete for greatest band of all time with the likes of Hendrix and Pink Floyd
At 5/6/02 11:16 PM, Paul138 wrote: Everyone! We're all assholes and should be damn proud of it. That's what makes this site great.
True, I know I'm a jackass(at least thats what my therapist tells me).
I've never really liked the Beatles that much. Their early pop crap has biggoted me against them.
Also I have a question could anyone explain the meaning of the following....
"they are the eggmen, I am the Walrus GooGooGaChoo!"
I've never really gotten it.
I still haven't gotten any advice on how to get my own personal bitches. Some people out there treat their bitches like shit which makes me think that they might be paying people to be their bitches(or else they created multiple profiles to give themselves a confidence boost)
If I had a bitch I would care for it, like a Chia pet.
Well VA7DAS is back but he doesn't piss me off as much now that I've found some real assholes on NG.
Check this out after C1k4 wrote this.
At 5/5/02 09:19 AM, C1k4 wrote: i have no mom or dad, if you still have yours, tell them you love them. I didn't get to tell her.
then a Jackass named PennyBainClock wrote
At 5/5/02 12:20 PM, PennyBainClock wrote: I killed her. She died when we were having unprotected sex. I survived but my pussy exploded. Her pussy exploded too but it killed her.
Damn I want it back to. I'd been working my way up over the past couple weeks. I was on the verge of breaking the top 100.
At 5/5/02 11:22 PM, M60 wrote: Jaws. That fool never dies.
Jaws does kick ass did you see the one where he was in a car that exploded than just walked out.
At 5/6/02 10:11 PM, Marioman089 wrote: Why do you always have to post stupid shit. Now I know who I hate the most on NG and it's PennyBainClock. As for you C1k4, you have my simpathy(incorrect spelling).
I posted a Forum for venting your anger on people like PennyBainClock its a poll of who the biggest asshole on NG is I think I'll submit his name and post what he said with hopes that others will realize what a fuck he is.
At 5/6/02 09:56 PM, Commander-K25 wrote: In no way do I advocate this, but the ultimate irony would be for him to be killed by a suicide bomber. I still favor exile to international waters, though.
I agree that exhile is the best way. As while I think that Arrafat is incompetent I don't think he deserves to die(unless he is truly responsible for the bombings). Also he would probably end up a martyr and inspire more killing. I was just saying that if Mossad was going to kill Arafat (which they might) they need to make sure that an Islamic group takes the blame or else things will get much worse.
At 5/6/02 10:50 AM, Slizor wrote: How does this relate to what I said?
Its a very valid point. Socialism is antiquated because Capitalism is no longer as exploitive of the workers as it once was. This is why the labor unions aren't big any more they accomplished there goals so they faded away.
That's not quite true. To start a buisness you have to have money, which is not free. Therefore in a capitalist system you are only free to do that if you are rich.
In a capitalist system a determined person has the ability to become rich. I will give you an example. There is a boy in my school named Coy Durham. He studies an obscene amount and has a 4.8 GPA. Now Coy is smart but he is not as smart as many people at my school such as myself (his SAT is about a hundred points lower than mine), but he works his ass off. Coy comes from a poor family with 8 kids and he is now a Morehead scholar and will probably suceed more in life than I will despite the fact that I started out more wealthy than he did. Coy will be a sucess not because he is rich or even because he is obsenely smart but because he is so determined.
At 5/6/02 04:57 PM, Slizor wrote:
But how else can you have true equality?By true, do you mean total? If you do, you misunderstand. People are equal when they all have clothes they like to wear. People are also equal when they have food they like. They aren't objectivly equal, they are relativly.
I like Armani suits to wear, and Lobster to eat. Will your wonderful socialist goverment be able to provide everyone with all this?
At 5/3/02 02:17 AM, VA7DAS wrote: Simple, Isreal backs out of the westbank, if suicide bombing contiues kill Arafat, and anyone who gets it the way.
Kill him anyway. He's proved he can't handle his country. The Israelis just need t make sure it doesn't look like they did it. (Which wouldn't be easy)
