728 Forum Posts by "implodinggoat"
At 5/24/02 02:43 PM, Slizor wrote: Okay, listen to me. Try reading what I type. Communism is not an authoritian system by it's nature. Capitalism is not democratic by it's nature either. They are economic systems. The social system has NOT been defined for me. It is not my communism. And in my eyes is not Communism at all.
Not in nature but in practice. It just can't operate without an authoritarian system.
The social and economic systems in Communism become blurred because for a communits economy to work the goverment has to control employment, and production.
Personally I don't even fully trust my goverment and The U.S. goverment is pretty damn good as far as goverments go.
If you feel content to put your trust in an infinetly more powerful goverment than you have way more trust in authority than me.
At 5/24/02 02:46 PM, Slizor wrote:
They may think the same as you.
They don't have much of a grasp of politics or economics.
However I have rexamined my prior statement and there are good natured (if unintelligent) rednecks who I don't mind and some of whom are even my friends, but there are some assholes around here that I can't stand.
Many of said rednecks grow up as complete jackasses and are forced to cease being jackasses if they want to find decent employment. They would remain jackasses in a socialist system.
At 5/24/02 02:40 PM, dagger_happy wrote: Go Cleutus, undisputed King of the Trailorpark.
I like the Cuban system where people doing more important, advanced jobs do get payed more, but there is a "Maximum wage" just as there is a minimum wage, preventing wages spirally out of control and creating an undeserving elite. This is a nice compromise between ideology and practicality because it gives people the incentive to work and improve themselves as well as preventing the massive disparities in wealth that capitalism creates.
I think that for a Communist country Cuba is run rather well. If it weren't for the whole no public elections, school sponsered brainwashing, goverment run media, and no freedom of speech it really wouldn't be that bad.
At 5/24/02 02:36 PM, Slizor wrote: I couldn't think of what to call it.
I would say an "aggressive rebuttle".
(that turned out to be incorrect)
I live in a dinky town in Western North Carolina.
We have about a population of 1000 but we have 3 claims to fame.
1. Robert Frost died here. Or at least I think it was Robert Frost. Whoever it was it was a pretty Famous poet one that I've actually heard of.
2.There was a guy from here who got the Medal of Honor. He was an Army Doctor and he got his arm blown off while caring for soldiers and he continued to treat them until he bled to death.
3.We have the largest anual Barbeque Feastival east of the Missisipi
and my counties claim to fame (which I'm not proud of) is that it is the biggest KKK hotbed in North Carolina.
If you have erectile disfunction you can call it the slinky.
At 5/25/02 08:33 AM, Recoil wrote: Well...?
I'm not pissed off about it or anything but did you get the idea for this off of my Synonyms for Penis post?
Erie Canal, Furr Burger, the lotus, the troph, sarlac
This post is getting sorta stale maybe I should make a forum of Synonyms for Vagina.
Oh yeah a synonym....er...um...wait...I'm thinking...
Silo?
This posts pulse is growing weak.
Hyuck! Hyuck! I make as much money as Slizor!
At 5/24/02 11:15 AM, Slizor wrote:
Well, some would suggest the destruction of the family. However, after a while there would be the crisis of over-production(with all "markets" filling up). That would mean a significant reduction in hours.
Ah I see if we all lived in pathetic shithole tennaments like in Cuba or in the former Soviet Union we wouldn't have to produce as much. Thus we could get home early and have fun staring at the cracks, leaks, and rats in our tennament.
It is based on Commander's analysis. He said those were the reasons families are breaking down, I just added that they were the results of poverty. It's really not hard.
Let me tell you something there are people in Zimbabwe who get about $600 dollars a year who have an infinitely better family life than a rich family like the Trumps or the Kennedys or the Clintons.
"Slaves" when it's the enemy. "Workers" when it's you.
Workers have the oppurtunity to get a differnet job like in Democracy, slaves have to stay at the same job despite their feelings like in communism.
At 5/24/02 11:17 AM, Slizor wrote:
We don't have guns, and we have less crime. Hmm, makes you wonder.
You have less crime because you didn't have millions of desperatly poor and uneducated immigrants flowing into your country for decades and then flowing into your already overcrowded cities.
Who would want to?
It's hypothetical.
Well, you did call them insane.
Yes and if they broke into Charleton Heston's house there would be one less psycho running around.
At 5/24/02 07:19 AM, Slizor wrote:
p.s. It wasn't refuting, it was an attempted attack on my beliefs.
Damn, you don't have very thick skin do you man?
Have you ever considered the fact that you might have an agression disorder?
I have an agression disorde which is convinient because whenever I brutally attack someone on the street or knock over a liqour store I can use temporary insanity as an excuse in court.
At 5/24/02 07:14 AM, Slizor wrote:
Not unpreventale per say. But hard to get rid of, a nessicery sacrafise, whereas guns are unnessicery.
ps: Damn my spelling is bad.
Once again Slizor you are assuming we live in a perfect world. There are people out there who are criminals and there are people out there who are just insane these people don't need guns to kill people but if they run into Charleton Heston's house and see a glass case over the mantle with an M-16, a flamethrower and a Bazooka in it there gonna run like hell.
Also did you ever notice that when you hear about celbrities being stalked by psychos (and being to scared to go out wearing their $10000 dress and $50000 necklace to the "combat poverty" press meetings) you never hear about someone like Ted Nugent or Charleton Heston being stalked.
I ask you if you were a criminal would you really risk breaking into Charlton Heston's house?
At 5/24/02 07:14 AM, Slizor wrote:
Not unpreventale per say. But hard to get rid of, a nessicery sacrafise, whereas guns are unnessicery.
ps: Damn my spelling is bad.
Once again Slizor you are assuming we live in a perfect world. There are people out there who are criminals and there are people out there who are just insane these people don't need guns to kill people but if they run into Charleton Heston's house and see a glass case over the mantle with an M-16, a flamethrower and a Bazooka in it there gonna run like hell.
Also I might point out that when you hear about celbrities being stalked by psychos (and being to scared to go out wearing their $10000 dress and $50000 necklace to the "combat poverty" press meetings) you never hear about someone like Ted Nugent or Charleton Heston being stalked.
I ask you if you were a criminal would you really risk breaking into Charlton Heston's house?
At 5/24/02 07:09 AM, Slizor wrote:
You answer your own question...almost. The parents have to work in their jobs to keep the family going. This clearly shows the problem with the current form of capitalism(based on your analyisis) if they don't work, the family falls apart, if they do work, the family falls apart.
Oh so we won't have to work in a Socialist Goverment? We can all stay at home with our families while food magically appears on the table and all the basic products we need to survive are magically made without anybody working.
Also just because some one works doesn't mean that thier family will fall apart. My mom is a single Mother (she works obviously) and our family hasn't "fallen apart" (read to kill a Mockingbird, I know its 8th grade level reading but the father is a good example of what I'm talking about).
Also I doubt that the family lives of the Heavy Industry Slaves of the Soviet Union were very happy.
I said that in the Koran Islam is a peaceful religion just that the Islamic Church (in much of the Middle East not the whole world is fucked up)
I agree that Osama Bin Laden is not following the "true" teachings of Islam. But I must say that I bet the Mosque you went to was Either an American or European one or a tourist spot. In western countries the Islamic church isn't that bad but it teachs some really fucked up shit in places like Iran, Iraq, and and such. Like all religions Islam can be warped to match the beliefs of those who preach it. There are historical paralles for this such as the Catholic church during the Inquisition.
People don't say Christians are all terrorists because there are far fewer Christian terrorist organizations than Islamic ones. Furthermore I don't blame all Muslims for the terrorist actions of some of them. I merely feel that because of the extreme fundamentalist teachings of the Islamic Church in much of the Middle East that the Church has produced religous fanatascism on par with Christian fanatascism during the crusades. If the whole Islamic church was run like it is in America or England than Muslims would not be widely sterotyped as terrorists.
At 5/9/02 12:03 PM, CirUs wrote:
You dont know what your talking about man. Mosques DO NOT promote hate or suicide bombings..infact islam is all about peace and accepts all colours and races to practice it.
I personally been to a mosque, we do not promote anything...Osama bin laden is a different story. Hes got everything backwards..no way does islam say that killing innocent people gets you in heaven. What osama bin laden and the alqaeda group are doing..cannot be connected to islam..personally i dont consider them muslims. They treat there own women as garbage and train young children to kill themselves for god which is a load of %#^@. Islam has nothing to do with it.
i would like to point something out Remember the Oklahoma bombing by Tim Mcveigh (i think thats how you spell it)..wasnt the bombing done by a christian?? SO why didnt anyone blame all christians for being terrorists? Same thing with september 11th. These people are gorillas and DO NOT represent islam even though they say they do!
The damn post before this fucked up I was tryin to Quote Cirus but it got fucked up read my next two posts the first one is what Cirus said and the second is my response.
At 5/9/02 12:03 PM, CirUs wrote:
You dont know what your talking about man. Mosques DO NOT promote hate or suicide bombings..infact islam is all about peace and accepts all colours and races to practice it.
I said that in the Koran Islam is a peaceful religion just that the Islamic Church (in much of the Middle East not the whole world is fucked up)
I personally been to a mosque, we do not promote anything...Osama bin laden is a different story. Hes got everything backwards..no way does islam say that killing innocent people gets you in heaven. What osama bin laden and the alqaeda group are doing..cannot be connected to islam..personally i dont consider them muslims. They treat there own women as garbage and train young children to kill themselves for god which is a load of %#^@. Islam has nothing to do with it.
I agree that Osama Bin Laden is not following the "true" teachings of Islam. But I must say that I bet the Mosque you went to was Either an American or European one or a tourist spot. In western countries the Islamic church isn't that bad but it teachs some really fucked up shit in places like Iran, Iraq, and and such. Like all religions Islam can be warped to match the beliefs of those who preach it. There are historical paralles for this such as the Catholic church during the Inquisition.
i would like to point something out Remember the Oklahoma bombing by Tim Mcveigh (i think thats how you spell it)..wasnt the bombing done by a christian?? SO why didnt anyone blame all christians for being terrorists? Same thing with september 11th. These people are gorillas and DO NOT represent islam even though they say they do!
People don't say Christians are all terrorists because there are far fewer Christian terrorist organizations than Islamic ones. Furthermore I don't blame all Muslims for the terrorist actions of some of them. I merely feel that because of the extreme fundamentalist teachings of the Islamic Church in much of the Middle East that the Church has produced religous fanatascism on par with Christian fanatascism during the crusades. If the whole Islamic church was run like it is in America or England than Muslims would not be widely sterotyped as terrorists.
At 5/9/02 11:01 PM, Icarus32 wrote:
Um, second of all, Nirvana is nothing original. They just ripped everything off of old punk bands, mainly the Sleepers. Also, Pat Smear from Nirvana was in the Germs, which is a far superior band than Nirvana ever was. The whole grunge movement whose base principle was apathy was really dumb to begin with. Oh well.
Who's Pat Smear? There were three members of Nirvana bassist Krist Novoselic,drummer Dave Grohl, and of course Kurt Cobain on Guitar. This Smear guy may have played with them alot but he wasn't a member.
At 5/21/02 02:31 PM, dagger_happy wrote: Never mind, Implodinggoat, I forgive you.
I just looked it up and I don't know where the fuck I got 80 million from. I've seen 2 million and I've seen 8 million maybe my subconcious added a 0 to the second number because I wanted to refute Slizor.
At 5/23/02 03:48 PM, thejoe324 wrote:
are you saying boo, or boo-urns?
I was saying boo-urns.
At 5/23/02 03:12 PM, GINGEclock wrote:
EZ3 is the biggest moron, then Ki10 and redapple...
how dare u insult the clocks!!!
Wasn't redapple a clock like five minutes ago?
Getting rid of guns of course thats the solution!
Then we will have to get rid of knives, then any thing sharp and anything hard. Then we will have to pad the ground with rubber and make cars out of feather matresses.
If I wanted to I could walk out on the street and beat somebody to death with a rock I found by the side of the road. Getting rid of guns won't stop people from getting killed.
Also I might point out that the United States tried banning something "dangerous" before....
It was a little something called prohibition and what happened? Drinking and Alchoholism increased and the Mob took over the damn country. If we outlawed guns then criminal who are intent on buying guns could still get them through the black market and then nice law abiding citizens such as myself wouldn't be able to shoot the fuckers when they break into our houses.
At 5/23/02 05:08 AM, Slizor wrote: Your signature is the wrong way round.
"It is better to live on your feet than die on your knees"
Whats the signifigance to that statement? Of course "it's better to live on your feet than die on your knees"
I was trying to express my feelings about big goverment. In other words if someone tried to make the U.S. into a socialist state I'd die before seeing it happen (either that or move to New Zealand).
I wish Thomas Jefferson was still around, he would of bitch slapped some American senetors for the unconstitutional bullshit they've passed over the years.
At 5/22/02 11:21 PM, Paul138 wrote:
That's what they say about every generation. That's what you get for being a corperate nation. Not to mention all the goddamn brainwashing and corrupting going on.
Brainwashing? Fuck son, I just finished my AP U.S. History course and the only brainwashing thats in that book is telling me about how LBJ's Great Society program was wonderful, how Nat Turner was a great American for killing 40 innocent people, and how white people are inherently evil and rascist.
Also I would say that the American Goverment is less corrupt than about 95% of the Goverments out there.
At 5/23/02 09:18 AM, Yefim_Myashishchev wrote:
My mistake, it was my 8th, I already had 92 posts before I was uotd & that was 2 & a bit days ago so.
I realized about two days ago that you weren't a complete n00b. You don't have to go on telling me how many damn posts you have.
At 5/23/02 09:10 AM, Yefim_Myashishchev wrote: Oh for fuck's sake get over it, why the fuck are you bitching over such a stupid thing, if this is the result of it I'd gladly ask Ross to remove the UOTD feature.
Jesus Christ Fuck face. I commented on it once then I told you why I commented on it. Thats far from obsessing. You've said stop whining like five times now thats obsessing.
This is my 5th post since your whine, Once again if you can figure out how to use the search you would know this.
Screw using the Search! That takes to much God Damn time! I'll keep on pressing the view profile link thats all I need! And if the God Damn View Profile link tells me you've got no posts then that what I'll fucking put down!
