Monster Racer Rush
Select between 5 monster racers, upgrade your monster skill and win the competition!
4.18 / 5.00 3,534 ViewsBuild and Base
Build most powerful forces, unleash hordes of monster and control your soldiers!
3.80 / 5.00 4,200 ViewsAt 10/26/06 04:23 PM, Begoner wrote: Profit, or rather the mis-allocation thereof, is criminal. Why should oil executives be entitled to all that money when there are children starving in Africa? Should we not care because the oil executives have "invested intelligently" while the children have not contributed one penny to the American economy? Is that how morally depraved our society has become? The failure of capitalism is not that people can become obscenely rich -- it's that very few people can become obscenely rich while the rest must eke out a living just above the poverty line and struggle to make ends meet. Smart investments aren't so easy to make when we spend everything you earn on food and rent. Measures need to be taken to forcibly redistribute the wealth from the ultra-rich to the poor. What is the point of a good economy if only a few people get to share in the benefits? Sure, it's a big pie, but only a few people can eat from it while the rest starve. That's one of the failures of capitalism.
you have no right to anothers property. Just because someone has the means to help another does not mean they shoudl be required to do so. that is not charity... that is armed robbery. Virtue like charity an only exist where thier is also mutual consent of both parties and a distinct lack of punishment for the alternative.
Noone has a right to work at my business. My businees is MY private property. And you have no claim to somoene elses private property... otherwise it would be called public domain. Laws that violate a business owners right to his/her/thier own property are unjust and attempt to assert the supposed "right" of another to thier property
Its the same as government stepping in and saying "this guy wants to take your money and we like him so he gets to"
How do i get my character to STOP walking when he is standing still? Is there a Key.onRelease command? How does one use .onKeyUp to stop this guy from walking continuously
At 1/17/06 10:51 AM, SIMPLYB wrote: http://www.sftt.org/..D=30&htmlId=4514
I hope this isn't fore real. If it is they should hold some type of hearing on this issue.
more reason to not support a standing army, bane of liberty, force of tyranny. Decentralize military might and return the might to the publics hands via second amendment rights. THE WAY THE NATION WAS MEANT TO FUNCTION.
The issue for gay marriage, the "right" to obtain a marriage licence, is bullshit
It is not that I do not want gays getting married. It is because NOONE should need state approval to enter into a social contract, or ANY contract in this nation. (we have unlimited right to contract in america among consenting adults) Why do gays and others continue to fight for there right to be licensed? They fight to continue the tyrannical practise of marriage licensing????
"HEY THEY CAN GET FREE SPEECH LICENCES!!! WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO AS WELL!!!"
The damn thing sholdnt exist in the first place!
They shoudl join the libertarian party in its cause to ELIMINATE marriage licencing.
Maybe everyone needs this brief history of the mariage license: blacks book of law circa sometime during reconsstruction says the licence to marry is a licence to intermarry. As in interracial marriage. It all started as a way to limit or outlaw or otherwise prevent intermarriage among blacks and whites. But it made uncle sam so much money he decided to say fuck it... everyone needs one if they wanna get married.
And for those of you who claim it is so they can get a tax cut... noone is entitled to tax cuts or tax penalties. Read article one section eight of the constitution which clearly states that all taxes must be EQUAL among the people of the united states. No man pays any amount more or less than another 5% for me 5% for you 5% for Rob Zombie. PERIOD.
gay marriage "rights" arent rights at all. Its a fight to continue a system that is oppresing your liberty
democrt or republican you still lose. Stop buying into the loop, the vicious cycle they have you all brainwashed into! Dont vote demopublican or republicrat. They both are the same party with a different name. They both want to enslave you but have dfferent means and a different logo
endless wars for reasons NOT self defense
theft of personal property
legislated morality and social intrusion
restrict on trade and business and peoples chance to prosper
support some of the bill of rights some of the time
the things they do support, they also want to RESTRICT and LIMIT.. MY RIGHTS ARE NON NEGOTIABLE DAMN IT!!!!
These are all you will get as long as you ote republican or democrat
try a nice heaping helping of the "leave everyone the fuck alone" party (libertarian)
At 1/31/06 04:53 PM, mackid wrote:At 1/30/06 11:55 PM, iiREDii wrote: Guns, or more specifically "arms", are neccesary for a free societySo you want Joe down the street to be able to buy a tank?
you are exactly the kind of peson who assumes that anyone with a weapon or means to use deadly force WILL use it or suddenly becomes a raving lunatic when gun in in there hand.
The second amendment was meant to eliminate the need for a standing nationalistic federally controlled army which through out history has time and time again been used for nothing but conquest and suppression of the peoples rights.Not in the United States.
um yes it wasjackass. Read a fucking history book
The military undr the national government was mewant to be small and pale in comparison of the combined arms of the militia.To a point, yes. The founders didn't want a standing national army, but it became neccesary. The Constitution is a living document, not literally, of course.
living document my dick. It is a very clear and straight forward document,. To add fluidity to a document meant to outline your rights and powers of government s to allow the government to interpret its own powers. That is cyclical logic.
What is the milita? The militia is the people, the armed citizens of the united states.But now we have an organized militia.
No we dont. Show me where. A militia is not affiliated with the governmetn in ANY way. It is the people,,, not the national guard
It was to secure our ability to rise against the government shoudl it become oppressive as all governments do over the course of time.Oh, like your beloved republicans?
When did I indicate I was a republican you moron. I even posted a link to the libertarian website below my post (before i realized it was against forum policy to post exteral links...apologies) I am not republican or democrat.
the democrats and republicans are responsible for the last 50 or more years of constant war, theft, lies, legislated morality, spying, cencorship and trampling of rights... Why do you continue to vote for them?
Furthermore gun control shows no sign that it actually works. Infact where there is less gun control, there is less violent crime.Since when?
Since you read some damn information. Florida is a state that has recently loosened its gun control laws. It is seeing a reduction in violent crime. Numbers dont lie. Massachuesets you can carry anything and buy anything and their violent crime is nearly non existant
The replacement of the second amendent right to bear arms with police force is nothing but a bad trade. Especailly when the supreme court has ruled that the police are not garunteed or forced or obligated by law to even respond to a call for help.I've never heard of this.
Obiously you are ignorant on several accounts. Do some research. Read up on it and stop believing all the lies you hav been fed from day one to make you think guns are bad.
You have the right to arms to secure your right to overthrow the government. Now why do you think they want to get you to support signing away that right genious?
libertarian partyThat's just stupid.
what an intelligent and well thought out response. I love how you supposed open minded folk can just rule out other beliefs without so much as a second thought.
It may serve you well to know that the libertarian party is the third largest party in america (not that numbers makes a group right... democrats? republicans? hello...), of americans polled the vast majority showed very libertarian ideals but voted for democrats or republicans instead, and of polled voters those within the libertarian party were found to be of the highest number of informed and intelligent voters.
its not a problem with the RIGHT to seek compensation for encroachments on life, liberty, and/or property... It is the system in which we excercise this right that does not look to see if truly conflicts with these 3 basic rights
At 1/31/06 12:52 AM, JoS wrote: Under natural law then is it also okay for Iran, N Korea etc to pre-empitively attack their enemies before their eneimies have a chance to cripple them? Would you be okay with this policy?
Iran has continuely taken the stance that they will not and have no intention of using a nuclear reactor for anything other than power and other peaceful purposes. The IAEA has accounted for all of Iran's nuclear material, and found no evidence to support the claims made by the western countries that it was being used for military purposes.
Iran has issued a fatwa declaring nuclear weapons as something that goes aginst Islam and they will not ever seek to gain nuclear weapons. Why is it when they issue a fatwa like this we don't believe them, but when they issue one that is anti-Isreal everyone pays attention and believes that?
If someone infringes on your right to life liberty or propoerty you have the right to strike back and defend yourself from such things. But the matter here does nto concern us. We should not be spending tax dollars to defend other nations.
have we learned nothing from world war one?...
'Free trade and open and earnest friendship with all nations... entagling alliances with none' - Thomas Jefferson
At 1/31/06 01:04 AM, SEXY_FETUS wrote:At 1/31/06 12:38 AM, iiREDii wrote: It is not a matter of not caring, it is the fact that you steal from one person to give to another. Using force to obligate me to donate to charityNobody is forcing you. You have the freedom to hop on a plane and go to a country without a welfare system anytime you want. As it stands though, since this country gives you the wonderfull opportunity to have a job that supports you, you have the obligation of helping the less fortunate who don't have the ability.
see my post above.
gee someone sounds like a republican... "IF YOU DONT LIKE AMERICA THEN GET THE HELL OUT!!!"
Who are yo to claim that I am obligated to help someone else. Are you jesus? How can you claim that I MUST abide by YOUR morals? You are promoting and supporting a system of slavery. A system of forced morality and forced charity.
This is akin to the Salvation Army coming to my door with a gun demanding I donate...
High quality Sound effects such as:
guns, doors, footsteps, machinery, thud like booms, metal clanging, cars, fire crackling...
Any Suggestions? All I have is http://www.flashkit.com
It is not a matter of not caring, it is the fact that you steal from one person to give to another. Using force to obligate me to donate to charity
see my post above.
haha. When I run for office, which I fully plan on, I will be sure to use EXTREME!!! and not extreme >:-(
At 1/30/06 10:57 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: I'm sure six months back you heard about the book Help! Mom! There Are Liberals Under My Bed! It's a childrens book that seeks to make good little conservatives out of kids early.
Well, now there's Why Mommy is a Democrat.
Both of them look pretty funny to me.
As a future parent, would you get your child either one of these books?
No. Never. I am working on a very libertarian serious comic set in the future... I will be sure to have my kids read it once they are old enough... :-P
perhaps I shoudl work on a book for children
"Johhny the free: evil comes in red and blue"
At 1/29/06 03:11 PM, JoS wrote: Why shoudl we ban Iran from trying to have nuclear power. Imean many countries aroudn the world have it, why shouldnt they? All they want to do is get away from dependence on fossil fuels, because oil isn't going to last forever.
Hell we have nuclear power in Canada, but we don't have nuclear bombs, so is it inconsevable that Iran wants to become more like Canada?
Everyone has the right to bear and possess arms. If they want nuclear weapons then the UN aka the NWO should butt out and stop trying to enforce international gun control.
labeling someone as extremist is nothing more than a marketing tactic. By suggesting that someone is beyond or out of the norm or extremely into there political beliefs is nothing but a tactic to alienate them in the upcoming votes.
"I dont like him... because hes extreme"
aka 'i dont have a REAL argument'
"Oh those third parties are jsut extreme. Keep voting democrat/republican"
... even though they are both the same damn thing.
Its a dirty tactic pulled by everyone.
Minimum wage does nohing but raise the bottom rung of the ladder for the workforce and helps to put more poeple out of work... the more expensive your employees are, the less you can afford to have. Furthermore minimum wage contributes to the ever raising cost of living.
Minimum wage should be eliminated or at least stopped in its tracks.
At 1/28/06 10:39 AM, Jizzlebang wrote: uh huh... ?
What about people who cannot work, people with disabilities?
Welfare infringes on my right to liberty and property. You are forcefully taking my capital and investing it in a forced charity under punishment or threat of imprisonment.
Furthermore welfare is inferior to private charitis. Government forced people to pay into the welfare system and recieved 25 billion doallars, private charity only asks and trumps every other nations charity total at 125 billion... five times that of forced involuntary charity called welfare.
Why is it my responsibility to pay for them? Who are you to make it law that I must take care of them. They have a name for that. It is exactly the kind of shit christians try to pull... legislated morality.
The general populace cannot distinguish between what I may choose to do or not and what I may be forced to do or not because someone says it's my duty. This relates to the issue of entitlement as it pertains to all the welfarism you will be arguing against out there; it has to do with the debate over socialized medicine, the matter of Iraq, everything. This twisted alturistic dogma that says that a person with means is obligated to aid the person without them.
Obligation is duty. It is an absolute imperative. That means it is the subjugation of the one so obliged. If someone is entitled to a thing, this means inexorably that the provider of that thing is obligated to give it to him. The provider may not object, he may not resist. If he refuses, the obligation on him validates the USE OF FORCE against him to make him... oblige. This is why all socialism is eventually slavery
freedom/liberty starts with self ownership. You own your self. Therefore you won your body and life. Since you own your body and life noon ecan tell you what to do with those. SInce you own your body and life and freedom as an extension, you also own your property as an extension. For your property is nothing but an continuation or fruit of your labor which is your time, life, and skills.
Liberty is being able to defend those things for yourself. Governments are set up by the people to help protect these rights... or at least they should be... ours was originally founded upon the principles of liberty... a minarchist federal government with little power over the local government which in turn was meant to have few laws as well.
If your a Nazi and reading this, then go away because you have no right to say anything, and don't deserve any respect, all you deserve is death.
Make Nazism illegal.
Yes lets outlaw freespeech! Lets kill people for having different beliefs! Lets outlaw being gay and having long hair as well!
As long as someone does not infringe on your right to life, liberty, or property you have no right to take action against them. My grandparents didnt fight in ww2 to let this nation become what nazi germany was... an oppressive facist state.
my goodness elfer... your signature is horrible... horribly funny! hahaha
Guns, or more specifically "arms", are neccesary for a free society. The second amendment was meant to eliminate the need for a standing nationalistic federally controlled army which through out history has time and time again been used for nothing but conquest and suppression of the peoples rights. The military undr the national government was mewant to be small and pale in comparison of the combined arms of the militia. What is the milita? The militia is the people, the armed citizens of the united states.
It was to secure our ability to rise against the government shoudl it become oppressive as all governments do over the course of time.
Furthermore gun control shows no sign that it actually works. Infact where there is less gun control, there is less violent crime. It is the threat of force, the threat that the law abiding "good" are armed and able to defend themselves from the "bad" outlaws of society that causes this. When criminals are interviewed the thing they are the most scared of is that thier victim may have a gun. Many cities across the nation are loosening there gun laws and right to cary laws to respond to crime.
The replacement of the second amendent right to bear arms with police force is nothing but a bad trade. Especailly when the supreme court has ruled that the police are not garunteed or forced or obligated by law to even respond to a call for help. Take this and the fact that they cannot be everywhere at all times and the very fact that the police are a reactionary force incapabel of protection... just reaction... and you should see that it is a bad arguement that police are a decent replacement for self defense. (not that it was meant for self defense, but for national defense)
flashkit.com
look under sound loops
sorry thats all i got other than here at newgrounds :-/
So If I am gonna have multiple baddies on screen it is best to use bitmap graphics in place of vector? When you break (ctrl+B) drawings in flash do they remain vector based or do they become rasterized?
I am working on a game and need to know whether I am going the wrong route using vector graphics...
At 1/29/06 02:22 AM, MFProd wrote:At 1/29/06 01:07 AM, iiREDii wrote:robot for myspace profileI'm sorry, but it's bad enough you use myspace... but putting a robot pic for your profile. Have you ever thought... I don't know it would make you the biggest nerd on myspace. w/e
Firstly I dont understand the whole mysapce is the dvil thing around these parts. Its just a way to meet people and find old friends for me. And especially serves as a way to discuss politics and debate over various things in the plethora of forums that populate myspace.
Second, Myspace is an excellent way to promote yourself. I mean for shits sake, there are probably millions of boners on myspace and in addition it has a classifieds section which I post on and have gotten temp jobs from. My profile serves little more purpose than providing a profile for people to see who I am when I am on forums and as a place to simotaneously get my art seen, even if just by the few who visit my page.
Third, if you dont like giant robots, you suck.
Captain Sleeze
fairy for my girlfriend
robot for myspace profile
can I get an opinion? :-/
robot for myspace profile
fairy for my girlfriend
captain sleeze
sorry I guess I effed up placing the image... is my newb ass supposed to upload them or what?
<img src="http://www.darrinknode.com/robotjpg.j
pg">
<img src="http://www.darrinknode.com/fairy.jpg"
>
<img src="http://www.darrinknode.com/captain.jp
g">
example of my art for this game
please forgive the quality... I do not have acccess to photoshop here at school so I had to opn with adobe acrobat reader take a screenshot an paste into freakin microsoft paint :-P
The style certainely lends itself to vector art I suppose, as that is what it was created with... what do you guys think of it?