Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/26/12 04:32 AM, Dawnslayer wrote:

But you beat me to the joke, so...oh well.

In all seriousness, though, here's a link for you: http://theslenderman.wikia.com/wiki/Slender_Man

Thanks for the link. Paranormal activity always intrigues me but this is just...smh lol

I dont have much to say about the spice girls besides that they fell off quickly. One hit wonders basically.

At 9/26/12 12:57 AM, Trogdrr wrote: It beats starving, fast food is pure convenience. You don't have to eat it everyday, I usually cook for the most part. That and some of their offers aren't always bad for the price they ask.

Agreed, fast food is pure convenience. Order your food and within one minute its ready. You eat it, enjoy it and go home. Now is it the healthy choice, obviously not but who are we trying to kid? If we are hungry and want something delicious for cheap...those fast food places provide what we are looking for.

At 9/26/12 04:04 AM, GodOfVideoGames wrote: NG shouldn't have any worries about being dwarfed by mobile users.

No worries? Sounds like you're underestimating mobile phones. I sell phones...they are more than just a communication device. People make movies off of them, upload, download, sketch art, social network.... i think people do more things on a phone now-a-days than they do with computers. You dont think this is true? From my own experience, i find myself most of the time going on my phone to watch youtube videos because its faster. lol

Cellphones are just mini laptops that can go anywhere with you with easier access to apps. If i can't convince you, by next year, i wont have too. As the say "the proof is in the pudding"

At 9/26/12 12:15 AM, Cootie wrote:

At 9/26/12 12:06 AM, Sensationalism wrote: No, I don't live around blacks.

Who the fuck rides bicycles?

who the fuck STEALS bicycles is the better question.

I thought we were talking about a motorcycle, then this would all make perfect sense

At 9/26/12 03:40 AM, Grubby wrote:

At 9/26/12 03:38 AM, Luis wrote: I think youre underestimating the term mobile. Its not just a little 3-inch screen anymore. People are accessing the internet from way more devices not tethered to a desktop machine, devices that have all sorts of different capabilities and screen sizes.

Dat picture.

Give him some color and that will look like me when im at work. lol

At 9/26/12 03:38 AM, Grubby wrote: I think the new MySpace should strike a balance between this "unrestrained" customizability and preserving essential sections of people's userpages so that it's not challenge to find out how to do something as simple as sending a message to someone.

Totally agree.

YOOOO i havent changed much on my NG profile and i just realized i have a myspace link that i havent updated in 4 years! its still awesome hahaha. Check it out its funny because im alot more different now.

At 9/26/12 03:31 AM, Weeaboo wrote:

At 9/26/12 03:27 AM, FallenMartyr wrote: These social media outlet websites are a fad, it's inevitable something new will come along and replace it.

It kinda annoying when someone says this, because social networks arent "only a fad".

THANK YOU WEEABOO! Thank you. Finally someone see what im talking about.

Honestly i thought myspace was alot cooler than facebook to begin with but ALL my friends transitioned to facebook soo... fuck it... had to roll with the punches. My myspace page had more of my personality on it.

At 9/26/12 02:56 AM, Luis wrote:
I read somewhere that mobile access has grown like at astronomical numbers, and it will soon begin to be a case of if you arent on mobile, then you are invisible.

Hey tom, Luis has an amazing point. if people had more access to your website through an app maybe people would be on more often. I have a million apps on my phone but the ones i constantly use are mail, facebook, youtube and google. I bet if people could access your website through their device it would help ALOT.

I wish i knew how to develop applications for cellular devices. I swear im going to learn how sometime soon.

Tom you should brainstorm with your fellow NGERS.

At 9/26/12 02:54 AM, 24901miles wrote: I mean uh penis lol

You are retarded miles but im glad you bumped this thread because i missed out.

So after tom gets off of work from newgrounds he gets on his alt and get back on.

8 years and i still have 4k posts. I remember when i used to post about 5 per day. Now there isnt a post per day.

Newgrounds will be fine. With TOM/WADE as the creators...im sure they will make strides toward prosperity.

I don't know anything about slenderman... anyone care to elaborate?

Not sure what to say.

"The BBS is whatever you make it" feels appropriate but honestly...

when newgrounds first started the BBS was full of artist of all calibers . People that, IMO, really wanted to out shine another person. I would constantly see their name and post of something randomly interesting. Small community that felt larger than it really was. I still see a select few that participate in the forums like the old days but nothing near what it was like. Then again we were all teens and responsible-free ATM. Now most of us are making strides toward our goals in life or busy overcoming obstacles.

Whatever the case may be... im part of a different era in the BBS but still like to post regardless. Soon i will probably take another extended period of time off from here and return with more wisdom to share.

At 9/25/12 05:51 PM, FBIpolux wrote:

At 9/25/12 04:37 PM, Timmy wrote: But your theory doesn't really pan out - Bill Cosby dropped out of both highschool and college, but I think we can all agree that he is the funniest man alive.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Or is he?

dave chapelle period.

Now do the black comedians POX!!!!! i want to hear this!!

i have facebook and like it...

who hates me now?

At 9/25/12 01:06 PM, Shade wrote:

thats deep.

Not really, I then realize that isn't possible due to the fact that I would remember what happens next.

Thats even deeper than the previous

At 9/25/12 07:33 AM, Shade wrote: Sometimes I wonder if right now I'm lying on my deathbed and my life is playing through my head one last time before I slip away into the void.

thats deep.

LMFAO!!!!!!

At 9/25/12 06:13 AM, ICY-HURR wrote: I still enjoy the idea of folding space.

what about nuclear fusion for energy resource? Do you think we'll see this in our life time?

okay before we jump into ANOTHER TOPIC lol im going to get some rest. i'll return tomorrow with a bump if there is a needed reply! night!

I still enjoy the idea of folding space.

what about nuclear fusion for energy resource? Do you think we'll see this in our life time?

At 9/25/12 05:21 AM, MuyBurrito wrote:
I believe that an understanding of physics with respect to the nature of subatomic physics which believes in "space" and "time" at any level under molecular interactions is conceptually naive, but I don't write that on tests or in papers.

lol awesome.

At 9/25/12 05:25 AM, Light wrote:

it was sad because he never got the girl, as he was either a prick or retarded, and only jennay can fuck 'tards

Was it Flowers for Algernon?

Any good movie recommondations on netflix???? feel like falling asleep to a movie, but if its good ill maintain conciousness

At 9/25/12 05:10 AM, keyword wrote:

At 9/25/12 05:03 AM, Prinzy2 wrote:
The topper is that it would be able to gain access into anything electronic including military fighters, bombers, battleships, nukes. Scary thought to be honest.

that parts a little sci-fi

his idea ^_^

At 9/25/12 05:03 AM, Prinzy2 wrote:

At 9/25/12 04:49 AM, ICY-HURR wrote:

At 9/25/12 04:12 AM, Prinzy2 wrote:

Not a chance. Everything we have relies on computers and electronics. A machine achieving singularity would continue to absorb information on it's own and eventually develop it's own theories. The topper is that it would be able to gain access into anything electronic including military fighters, bombers, battleships, nukes. Scary thought to be honest.

i agree. A very scary thought indeed.

At 9/25/12 04:59 AM, keyword wrote:
i say if we are aware of the problem now we will probably have several fail-safes in place by the time this issue arises.

Lets hope this is true.

Now, do you guys think singularity is something we will witness in our lifetime? According to Moore's law, its possible for technology to keep expanding for 30 years at the current rate even though a more realistic number would be 10 years then slowing. Vernor Vinge is idea of singularity is more likely to occur during the 21st century, but will it? hmmm

At 9/25/12 03:49 AM, Prinzy2 wrote: *Cough Cough Cough*

very interesting. thank you for posting.

At 9/25/12 04:12 AM, Prinzy2 wrote: Whatever achieves singularity will definitely eradicate the human race, it is the logical step to ensuring it's own survival, which is the most basic instinct that any conscience being possesses.

Ironically it was the subject in Ted Bell's latest spy thriller Phantom.

You dont think the human race would be able to withstand the war? In singularity's early stages im sure would still be dependent on humans. Once singularity is achieved, eradication should'nt take place immediately, but if cognition purely relys on basic instincts then i guess you would be absolutely correct.

At 9/25/12 02:03 AM, keyword wrote:

At 9/25/12 01:16 AM, FloydBoy wrote: my problem with being smart is that i'm good at learning things

wat

lol

i think "smart" comes in a few forms but doesn't determine the quality of conversation you have with another person. If you're trying to relate with someone who doesn't have similar knowledge then maybe you're not that "smart" to begin with. If you feel distraught because you have a deeper understanding topics other than politics and religion and cant relate, then i equally should share the same emotion because im sure i have a deeper understanding about getting pussy and having multiple 3 sums.

Life is an ongoing pursuit of knowlegde but i don't have much tolerance for condescending, pompous assholes.

Like i always say... " Many genious' are ruled by a lesser" - me (im sure somone has said something similar in a smarter way ^_^)

At 9/25/12 03:26 AM, keyword wrote:

grown man was 50 years ago.

alternatively there will always be people to profit off of knowledge and they will always find some way to sell it to people, and with the advent of technology its only getting easier and easier.
hell, maybe one day we can do that dr.who thing and just download info into our brains.

What a feat that would be, but with something as astonishing as that may sound...That would, theorectically, split people into groups. ( two factors that would apply would most likely be poverty and religion). I.E middle east and africa. Some people in their 50's still dont know how to read and you already know how humans deal with things they don't understand. (I.E women accused of witchcraft and wrongfully killed during the 18th century, which believe it or not still exsist in today!)

The day computers discover/create something themselves without the human cognition, is when tech singularity has arrived. IMO

At 9/25/12 02:06 AM, keyword wrote:

At 9/25/12 01:46 AM, FloydBoy wrote:

At 9/25/12 01:45 AM, FloydBoy wrote: philosophy has come too far

it's almost like "how can we take a simple idea and apply 'science' to make it more complicated"

no "real" thought outside of "let's complicate things"

i cant think of anything more wrong.
i dont think me explaining the principles behind philosophy and physics would even help in this case.

lol no real thought behind the litteral principle of thinking.

this is great. you guys are teaching me couple things. i like this. Im into technology and i just fell into moores law to determine when its best to purchase and sell tech products, even though the meaning is deeper. Tech singularity by vinge is a little difficult to grasp as i am curious on how that would affect humans. could be negative due to everything now-a-days being programmed through tech. Makes you think thought huh?