Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

It isn;t, assuming they did that in the last decade.

It is wrong to attack a country who can not attack you or harm in anyway.

If Bush used that excuss for going into Iraq then he would have to go into africa too.

"It is not true that all conservatives are stupid, But it is true most stupid people are conservitives." -John Stuart Mill

At 6/5/04 01:36 PM, -YANNI- wrote: Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S history.

What war are you refering to? Iraq, or Afganistan?

That is that liberal's opinion.

Let's clear up one point: President Bush didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.

I agree. But do not confuse the War on Iraq with the War on Terror, Iraq had nothing to do with al-Qaeda or any terrorist group when the US invaded for that matter.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

This is the most idiotic part of your post. Hitler and the rest of the Axis powers started WWII, when Germany invaded Poland, after he also invaded a bunch of other countries.

Of course WWII had more American causulties than the Iraq war, Hitler had an army of 18 million, Saddam had an army of a few hundred.

F.D.R didn;t goto war until 1941, WWII started in 1939, how did he start it if he wasn;t involved at the start?

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us.

From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

North Korea never attacked you, but they did attack South Korea, the reason the UN and US went to war (unlike in Iraq, where the US acted without the support of the UN) because he could not let communism have Korea, would you rather have all of Korea under the control of Kim Jong Ill today?

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost,
an average of 5,800 per year.

I agree that the war in Vietnam was wrong.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and
did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. Over 2,900 lives lost on 9/11.

So you approved of the "ethnic cleansing" going on?

You forgot the mention the causulties: 0, that is 0 deaths per year.

That is a lie, according to page 142 of Against All Enemies by Richard Clarke, Sudan's fabled offer to hand over bin Laden over to FBI agents never happend.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida,put nuclear inspectors in Libya,
Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst president in history? Come on!

Did you forget to metion that summer of 2001 PDB titled "bin Laden determind to strike withen US", he did nothing to provent 9/11.

He liberated Afganistan, that was justified over 9/11. But then , Instead of sending in more troops fast to catch bin Laden, he held off the invade Iraq, and now Afghanistan is virtually ignored because of Iraq.

It took years for al-Qaeda to plan 9/11, what makes you think they could whip up another one in the US, they can;t go for you because you are overseas from them, so they attack your allies, I.E. Spain.

Now here comes Iraq.

The reasons for going into Iraq have changed more than J. Lo's marital status, first, WMD, which have disappered, then, al-Qaeda Link, none found, then humanatarian reasons, *cough* Abu Gharib *Cough*, now what reasons you got left?

Now the invasion was good, but it was all down hill from there.

The Bush Administration thought that the Iraqis would be showering tanks with flowers, if you replaces flowers with RPGs, they were right.

"It's the economy, stupid"

George W. Bush is the First president to have a job LOSS while he was in the white house since Herbert Hoover.

Maybe you shouldn't be judging how well he is governing the USA on how Iraq is going.

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

I think they meant the occupation (which the US army and marines and not trained for), not the invasion.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

Was there a war over her billing records?
I don't think so.

And the Bushies have changed from "weapons of mass destruction" to "weapons of mass destruction related programs".

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

How exactly doess this prove GWB isn;t the worst president ever? it is the military that did this, unless George W. went over himself and blew it up.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!

Nice choice of words, the US has been occuping Iraq for more than a year, way more than it took the florida recount,

so for all those who claim bush is the worst president in history, you are WRONG.

Come agian?

"Come for the porn, stay for the games and toons"

alot has changed since the 6 years ago i stumbled onto NG.

IT'S SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

At 5/11/03 07:11 AM, Yakobusan wrote: You are 8,610 Grounds Gold away from your next secret: Naked pics of Tom!

Thats Y I stoped trying to lvl up.

At 5/11/03 08:39 AM, nightspy56 wrote: I hope they announce the new Pokemon Stadium for Gamecube. I cannot wait for that!

^Nerd^

At 5/10/03 08:55 PM, Mr_Congeniality wrote: What the heck is E3?

Have u been living under a rock?

Its a big fair thing where video game companys and any company video game realted show off their best new and "coming soon" video games and video game accessories/hardware.

At 5/9/03 11:58 PM, dumbmonkey912 wrote: I WANT TONS OF DETAILS! PICTURES TAKE PICTURES

Yeah, we want pictures. Videos too, buy a camcorder.

Hey, this is my hundreth post, yay.

Looks like NG is moving into the fast lane. Just remember tom, when your a big and famous video game producer, don't forget the little people.

No problem. I like surveys.

How long will it take to get the user profile search back up? It's been down since like last year. Couple days my ass.

At 4/11/03 07:42 PM, TomFulp wrote: You should definitely check out Da Ali G show on HBO, nonetheless! :)

I watched that show once. It was excruciatingly funny. The host was funny as hell in a dumb sense and the show has great guests. I havn't laughed that hard since I saw my first south park episode.

At 4/11/03 11:32 AM, fuckeroo wrote: porn

Very complex post there, fuckeroo. If he wanted porn then he would just go on that dress up section that oh so many 12 year olds go when they want to "explore" and why the hell would he want to see the insides of a girl if he wanted porn? It's not like you get a boner from seeing a smaller intestine.

At 4/11/03 11:32 AM, fuckeroo wrote: porn

Very complex post there, fuckeroo. If he wanted porn then he would just go on that dress up section that oh so many 12 year olds go when they want to "explore" and why the hell would he want to see the insides of a girl if he wanted porn? It's not like you get a boner from a seeing smaller intestine.

Newgrounds.com got on PC Gamer mag :] They put it on in the may 2003 issue in the letters section.

Congrats. A word of advice: I wouldn't show him the pics of you with fake poo in your mouth.

I've been gone 1 week and wade's a dad and tom's a home owner. Looks like the fulp brothers are entering adulthood.

At 3/5/03 11:44 PM, BigDPCTech wrote: thanks for the info and i will try to support more clean ads

you not tom fulp... or wade... Your ust some retard who thinks hes tom or wade.

I think the USA shouldn't bomb Iraq. Alot of innocent people live there. They should go in there and get saddam outta there. Everyone in Iraq isn't like Saddam(from what i've heard havn't been there myself). That's like saying everyone in the USA is like George Bush... I thank god everyday.

At 3/5/03 09:21 PM, HeinousDude wrote: I just hope tom doesn't pick any ads like the coca cola ad. Ever.

yeah, coca cola is horrible lets stick with the nude amatuer girls(if you have a half a brain you know im being sarcastic but if you don't i am).

I think this will benift NG in the long run but it will be tough for NG to start off without a host. Did tom say more responsablity? This may equal a new NG employee.

I will click on 1 clean ad everyday (if i visit on that day)

Congrats to mini-putt and combat-instinct 2 for getting in pc gamer's top 50 free games, But alas no NG on top 12 gaming sites. Maybe if NG were more of a family site(less porn). If you wanna see it for your self pick up this months PC gamer! (acctually it says the next month on the side).

At 2/24/03 07:45 PM, alienature wrote:

I didn't have a good day either, some idiot went to 3rd base with this girl I am eyeing.

HaHa

I never thought that newdgrounds idea would fly. But it is a good thing you tryed it because it got some of the questionable **cough**porn**cough** stuff and ads off of NG. Of course you lost some traffic cuz some of the horny 12 year old boys stoped coming (not that im dissing them. Hell, i usta be one). Getting to the main point of my post i think you should try and clean up NG a bit. Don't get rid of ALL porn just the hardcore ads and stuff... Do you just have the hardcore porn ads cuz they pay good?

At 1/22/03 01:23 AM, Gabu-X wrote:

At 1/22/03 01:03 AM, Ice_Demon wrote: Then put it on the bottom

Then we'd have to scroll all the way down to see the P-Bot thing.

GOOD

At 1/22/03 12:54 AM, Shins wrote: There wouldnt be enough room to fit most of it. It would be really long and take up a lot more space if it were squished.

Then put it on the bottom

At 1/22/03 12:50 AM, Ice_Demon wrote: ohh yeah and give p-bot a thing on the side instead of in the news section. I wanna see what going on without* scrolling down. :)

i corrected it