Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/29/04 07:25 PM, GoryBlizzard wrote: I'll join this club for sure, if no one minds (I'm such a huge horror fanatic).

welcome to the club!. of course no one minds, in fact we are happy to have new members, post from time to time reviews for the movies you see or books you read or whatever you think could be interesting.

oh yeah theres some sort of lame ranking system so wait a few days and someone will assign you a rank

Regarding Ichi the Killer, I can't find the movie anywhere--but I have seen the trailer countless times in the past.

the trailer is great isnt it? although in my opinion the movie is not as violent as the trailer could lead to believe. i think you should be able to find it on dvd i have seen the dvd here in many places

which other horror movies do you like?

At 6/23/04 08:13 PM, bombkangaroo wrote:

At 6/23/04 08:06 PM, Spoon5i wrote: that was my point i was being sarcastic,

i think thats is exactly what happens with guns, people are too irresponsible to be allowed to carrysomething specifically built to kill.

so surely the next logical step is to only allow those persons proven, via a stringent application process, to be responsible and competent to own firearms, thereby eliminating irresponsible gun owners form the equation?

well i definitely dont think it is possible to determine who will and who wont be a responsible gun owner through an application process, i really dont see how such process could be any reliable.

And even if such process would be reliable, by allowing firearms to some, irresponsible owners would still have it much easier to get them than if they were not allowed at all.

At 6/23/04 07:54 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote:

At 6/23/04 07:42 PM, Spoon5i wrote:

At 6/23/04 02:18 PM, mabzie wrote: heres the fact, more guns = less crime

less guns = more crime

its like saying

more atomic bombs = less war

Hmm, you just made it worse for youself in your reasoning. MAD, or mutually assured destruction, is basically, if you launch a atomic bomb at you, I will launch one back. So basically more atomic bombs does equal less war.

that was my point i was being sarcastic,

i think thats is exactly what happens with guns, people are too irresponsible to be allowed to carrysomething specifically built to kill.

At 6/23/04 02:18 PM, mabzie wrote: heres the fact, more guns = less crime

less guns = more crime

its like saying

more atomic bombs = less war

i m looking forward to it, the only thing i have against it is that he took Ray Bradbury´s title without his permission

At 6/23/04 06:13 AM, humpii wrote: ha thats so sad there is a movie on 911.. is it an action or some garbage or like a documentry??

is a documentary, it won the Palme d'Or in Cannes in cannes

At 6/23/04 05:23 AM, Vowl wrote: He really shouldn't have taken the title from Ray Bradbury.

i agree with that, apparently ray bradbury didnt like that at all

on an interview he said:

"Michael Moore is a screwed asshole, that is what I think about that case. He stole my title and changed the numbers without ever asking me for permission

...

Do you disagree with his opinions...?

-That has nothing to do with it. He copied my title, that is what happened. That has nothing to do with my political opinions. "

At 6/22/04 06:24 PM, SoulShadower wrote:
That's true, I'm sure most of his time writing, he's sitting at home chomping on ho-hos and making things up about the president. It's kinda sad.

i dont think he needs to make much up, the president provides more than enough material

At 6/22/04 06:11 PM, Bigpapasakk wrote:

At 6/22/04 06:08 PM, -Shadowz- wrote: yeah well hes laughing all the way to the bank

thats because fuckin tree hugers belvie his shit dude
i laugh at teh sutff he says about anti gun stuff. "no one should have guns" then he goes to 1 town in Canada and says "do you all have gun shootings here?" while in the best part of the town, only interving a few people who gave the response he wanted!

you can make some statistics research on the internet and verify the point his trying to make

At 6/22/04 06:10 PM, SKUNKbrs wrote: As far as I see it, Kerry is taking votes away from Nader.

but Nader doesnt stand a chance, Kerry does

At 6/22/04 06:05 PM, Bigpapasakk wrote: i dont get this guy. does he try to sutr up trouble for everyone? Not only does he do that but most of his info is wrong. this guy is just trying to cash out on being anti whatever to get him money!

which of his info is wrong?, do you have any sources to back that up?

i dont see the point on voting for nader

At 6/22/04 04:11 PM, GenocydeSoF wrote: And your a dumbass. The war in Iraq when the father was in term was justified. I find this war to be justified as well, but that is just me. I don't really like Saddam. Killed his own people, yaddayaddayada.

why do you find this war was justified?