At 12/3/09 10:58 PM, Adio wrote:

Anyone using a sniper rife is a "Noobtubing fag"

This is an excellent example. Awesome.

At 12/3/09 06:03 PM, DrHood wrote: Rogue Squadron, baby!

ROGUE SQUARDRON, WHERE'S OUR COVER?!!?

Most people realize that yes, more time=better game. The whining is a form of catharsis, pretty much "awww, crap, got my hopes up" Usually it's nothing more serious than voicing disappointment.

At 8/19/09 02:46 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote: I like Bad Company better. All 1943 is is a clone of Bad Company with a complicated HUD, worse controls, uglier vehicles, and clunkier weapons.

Don't know what bad company you're playing, but they have the same HUD and the same controls.

At 8/12/09 05:16 AM, OddlyPoetic wrote: When Tidus discovers that he's only a dream of the fayth in Final Fantasy X

That's pretty much the japanese equivalent of Bruce Willis being dead at the end of Sixth Sense. Kinda lame too, actually.

At 8/9/09 02:51 PM, Jerkapotamus wrote: Not offering it up as DLC is pretty criminal in my opinion; it's not like they don't have the means to do it. They're just looking to make people buy the game again so they can make more money.

I think I may buy this though. I never bought the original because I wasn't a big fan of the demo, and there were better games coming out at around the same time. If the rumored retail price of $40 is correct, I'll probably take the plunge this time.

It's a pretty enjoyable action title so long as you aren't expecting anything really OMG AWESOME. Just think it's a big insult to everyone who actually bought the game such as myself.

At 8/9/09 01:40 PM, Final2Legion wrote:

At 8/9/09 01:20 PM, HitTheTarget wrote:
Would be fantastic if all of the content was available to download. However, they say if I want to curb stomp Luke, I'll have to buy the game...again.

Tatooine is available for download if you want Hoth you have to buy the retail

That's...what I was saying.

At 8/9/09 01:17 PM, Final2Legion wrote: Looks kinda cool

Would be fantastic if all of the content was available to download. However, they say if I want to curb stomp Luke, I'll have to buy the game...again.

So instead of awesome, it's a big fuck you to those who bought the game.

At 8/7/09 06:06 AM, GodsBitch wrote: The reason that I don't finish games is because I either get so frustrated at a particular part/level that I just never bother to play it again or I buy a new game, start to play it and never go back to the game I was previously playing.

So you rage quit...for permanent.

At 8/6/09 04:27 AM, Lizzardis wrote:
I'm on the mission where you have to lead Doctor LI and them lot through the tunnels, and i saw a brotherhood of arms soldier and accidentally shot/killed him.?

Wow dude. Itchy trigger finger much? XD

Oh boy, the good ol' COD5=/=WAW. This never gets old.
c
As in it literally never stops because some people get an adrenaline rush for pointing out tiny irrelevant details when everyone knew what the OP was talking about in the first place.

At 8/2/09 10:51 PM, Hybrid-Of-Souls wrote: Ever feel like your favorite hero doesn't survive on badassery, more guns, and intellect alone, but that luck also plays its hand?

So yeah, why is it always luck that propels heroes to the end sometimes?

Well, it comes from an interesting chain of logic. If the hero is too badass, has too many guns, and is way too smart, the game comes off as boring. It's all about the conflict. However, in the rush to counter this effect, many game writers go overboard, and end up having to constantly write the character out of shitty situations. Too many times, and this ends up happening.

At 8/2/09 11:10 AM, Melkarid wrote: What was your most disappointing moment in a game? It might have been a weak boss, some crappy glitches that made you have to restart the whole game, or a lack of storyline.

Mine was in Gears of War 2, I was so cooked up to fight something about 10x bigger than General RAAM, but end up using the satellite on it.

Well, what did you really expect, Delta Squad to rush down and fight the thing with their chainsaws? It's the thing that made sense.

At 7/29/09 07:19 PM, CapnCrunchDaPimp wrote:

At 7/28/09 10:16 PM, Ragnarokia wrote: Wasn't Black meant to be the most realistic fps?

If you mean by being able to destroy everything in a painfully average shooter, than yes. I think Half-Life 2 is the most realistic shooter for it's painstakingly detailed graphics, advanced weapons, damage taken as well as the HEV suit and radiation, and of course, the physics.

Because shotguns can fire 2 rounds at a time, MP7's with grenade launchers, and magic suits that make everything feel better are totally realistic.

At 7/28/09 08:17 PM, danwolves wrote: I really hope that this crashes and burns worse than the Hindenburg.

People survived the Hindenburg. We need something much worse.

At 7/26/09 10:13 PM, explodingbunnies wrote:

TL;DR : FPS's and TPS's are getting old, and i want new and original games of different genres.

There's an actual reason FPS and TPS's are getting popular. They all pretty much use the same control scheme, so it's very accessible. Get in, get your shoots and get out. Everything else is a bonus.

At 7/25/09 02:05 PM, Dromedary wrote:

At 7/25/09 02:03 PM, Warrickneff wrote: See man, you don't hear of soldiers like that anymore. Men had real class back in the day.

True that, it's all down to honour and things like that.

The thing is. the more advanced killing weaponry gets, the less honor has to do with anything in war. As soon as semi automatics and automatic weaponry became commonplace, it was almost nonexistence. It's now merely kill or be killed.

At 7/25/09 02:58 AM, Blaze-Heatnix wrote:
Because MGS3: Subsistence and MGS4's camera COMPLETELY ruined the atmosphere. It's just a fucking camera angle. And how would better graphics do anything but make the game better?

Because being able to see where you're going is a shitty gameplay feature, amirite?

At 7/25/09 08:57 AM, scarneck wrote: I bought it on the PC and to be honest I wouldnt really suggest it. Its really cool at first but becomes repetitive quickly. The map editor can result in some really fun maps. I wouldnt suggest paying $50 for this game but if your getting for cheap or something then go ahead and do it.

It only really gets repetitive if you let it. Gotta vary the playing styles every once and a while, experiment.

At 7/23/09 11:38 PM, Dezimo wrote:
Bethesda didn't make the original Fallout so i don't think they'd have permission
They managed to fuck up Fallout 3 anyway so i wouldn't trust them with it :)

And i think the original Star Fox team disbanded since Dylan Cuthbert is working on Pixeljunk at the moment, a proper remake is unlikely.

Fucked up Fallout 3? Says you. Vast public opinion says otherwise., As for a proper remake for a Star Fox game, gonna sadly have to agree and say that doesn't seem likely. It also seems nintendo itself doesn't want a pure StarFox game, seeing as we haven't had one since 64

At 7/23/09 07:00 PM, Dezimo wrote:
When i was researching it i remembered seeing FF7 for the ps3 though
A proper remake not just the ps1 version ported over

Still leaves you with the shittiest protagonist/antagonist and storyline known to mankind.

At 7/23/09 12:49 PM, VGmasters wrote: Guess it's gonn abe something like The Animatrix.

If it's anything like the Animatrix, I'm up for it.

At 7/22/09 09:30 AM, sniperdude117 wrote: i like halo its pretty good but im no fanboy.I think Half life 2 is better because it has the better physics engine,better graphics i think, more strategy is envolved.And there are LOTs of ways to kill the bad guys.

This rivalry was actually relevant years ago. You know, when the games were actually coming out.

At 7/19/09 12:48 PM, warshark wrote:

At 7/19/09 12:19 PM, Kagoe wrote: When i was younger, i always thought link was cool :(

What. The. Fuck.
You thought correct when you were younger.
Link is the definition of cool.....probably.

The dictionary says no...but my heart says yes.

At 7/19/09 03:47 PM, xscoot wrote:

At 7/19/09 03:45 PM, HitTheTarget wrote:

Dunno what SOCOM you were playing, cause it definitely wasn't the same one I was. You're practically invincible in those games.

The first one. Besides, it's harder when you're eight.

Ah, ok, the first one was good enough about the damage, but the AI was horrid. Worst SEAL team ever. And the series only got worse from there.

At 7/19/09 03:36 PM, xscoot wrote:
Of course. Otherwise, it would just be like respawning indefinitely, like in the CoD games. Only, unlike the CodD games, the enemies you already killed stay down. And, it has to be hard. A single bullet can kill you hard. Think SOCOM, or Rainbow Six. Well, the good Rainbow Six.

Dunno what SOCOM you were playing, cause it definitely wasn't the same one I was. You're practically invincible in those games.

At 7/14/09 04:49 PM, xscoot wrote:

That was the first CoD game I ever played. In fact, I beat it multiple times, and on the hardest difficulty level. That may explain my current hostility to CoD.

What the hell? Do you enjoy pain? I got all the way to the American campaign, and just stopped playing forever. Sold it 2 days later. It's sad that game ever saw the light of day.

At 7/14/09 02:55 PM, Jerich0 wrote:

At 7/14/09 02:53 PM, HitTheTarget wrote:

At 7/14/09 02:10 PM, masterchef56 wrote: CoDWAW is the worst CoD game to ever come out for any system. I'd rather play number 2.

You obviously haven't played Finest Hour, the steaming pile of shit that was for the PS2. WAW is just fine, especially compared to that mess.

You obviously havent played big red one that was Awful.

It wasn't a great game, but it functioned. It didn't have Sgt Asshole screaming at me to stay behind the tanks for the 10 billionth time even though the tanks did nothing, my team does nothing, and the Nazis shoot through the tanks with machine gun fire.

At 7/14/09 02:10 PM, masterchef56 wrote: CoDWAW is the worst CoD game to ever come out for any system. I'd rather play number 2.

You obviously haven't played Finest Hour, the steaming pile of shit that was for the PS2. WAW is just fine, especially compared to that mess.

At 7/8/09 02:35 AM, blakedatch wrote: The Halloween episode was pretty entertaining. The rest of them have just become so grating on the ears that AVGN isn't funny anymore.

He was funny to begin with? I was under the impression that all of them were unfunny because all he does is complain about shit he doesn't like.