The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.39 / 5.00 38,635 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.09 / 5.00 15,161 ViewsDoor without doorknob? Interesting.
At 2/9/08 03:08 PM, sven647 wrote: I like this drawing i only see one minor thing wrong with it he has 6 fingers
The thumb that is actually pressing the button looks like it was drawn in after everything else was done. Also looks mutated coming out like that.
What's with the horrible load time? How big is this?
The last level seems the best one to make. It's simple, a train. You could also add the parts where you climb onto the roof to use the troikas, the berserker, and General RAMM.
Lucky you. I didn't even have mine for a month and it broke and kept freezing every two minutes. The repair center had the thing longer than I actually played it. They didn't even repair it yet.
what program are you using? How did you make such nice smooth lines?
If you upload to NG, you don't have to use their preloader.
Thanks for the help.
At 2/8/08 06:27 PM, jmtb02 wrote: - Flash Project is not really useful until you start working in multiple-file environments, so I wouldn't worry about that.
- A Flash Actionscript file is a file you can use for Classes or what nots.
A New Flash Document (Actionscript 2.0) or A New Flash Document (Actionscript 3.0) is where you want to be if you are starting out. You can do your entire project within one if these file types. The difference between the Actionscript styles are just whether you want to learn an easier, older coding type (2.0) or the more robust, harder coding type (3.0).
If I make an entire animation, and want to enlist the help of a coder but I chose the wrong type of actionscript file, will I be able to switch between them for the coder?
I want to make an animation, and possibly a game. I'll figure things out, but one thing I'm not clear on is whether to choose Flash Project, or Flash File (Actionscript)
What's the difference?
At 2/8/08 12:57 AM, reality-monkey wrote:At 2/7/08 09:23 PM, poxpower wrote: Guys, if you`re under 18 and you win, YOU STILL GET ALL THE PRIZES, I just can`t sent you adult mags in good conscience.yea, but itll be hard to explain to anyone WHY im drawing it..."uhmm...i get money?" so ya, no chance of me being in this one....
And hell yeah a little challenge never hurt anyone. Hehe.
I've been looking at this contest for a few days. But with all the reference images I would need, and just drawing it would be really awkward to do in front of my family.
I am thinking of making a flash movie or a game using this guy. Although my laziness will probably prevent me from doing so.
At 2/7/08 10:00 PM, noleader wrote: Im thinking about turning these into a line of posters. Do any of you think they would sell?
They look like CD covers to me.
Don't use 1% opacity.
What I like to do, is use the lightest possible color at 100% opacity, and then use darker colors using opacities of 10-80%. But that's just my technique.
At 2/7/08 10:11 PM, HEFLASH wrote:At 2/7/08 10:06 PM, hippl5 wrote: My only complain would be the shading on the moon, trees, and clouds. I think it would look better if it was smoother.Yeah I was thinking that too. I need to practice blending my colors. I don't like the way the moon turned out either. I swear, i think I'm my worst critique.
I have no idea what iscribble.net is, but if they don't have smudging tools, or brushes with opacity, then I guess it would be hard to make it softer.
My only complain would be the shading on the moon, trees, and clouds. I think it would look better if it was smoother.
At 2/7/08 08:39 PM, noleader wrote:At 2/7/08 08:31 PM, hippl5 wrote: So... wheres the art?Who's to say art and and illustration aren't one in the same? The message is there for those with eyes perceptive enough to grasp it.
When I asked this, I was typing it up before you posted your second image. All I had to look at was the first one you posted, which is text only. I thought that was it.
Ok, I posted before I saw your second picture. Nevermind.
So... wheres the art?
Why do people think that forum signatures are good to put into a portfolio? It's not your art, all you did was brush and add filters. No matter how good a signature may look, I don't think it belongs in a portfolio.
At 2/7/08 07:54 PM, mooguy wrote:At 2/7/08 07:29 PM, hippl5 wrote: Penguins - These were actually for a school project. Used them for a power point. I made everything there except for the rock texture. I found that somewhere on google.Nice except for the fact that it look like the rocks are floating on water.
The project was actually to design a holding pen. It's meant to be at a zoo. There was a cave originally, and I placed the model on the rock to show the profile.
Penguins - These were actually for a school project. Used them for a power point. I made everything there except for the rock texture. I found that somewhere on google.
The cat drawing isn't really old, but the penguins are. I made them in blender, but I don't have the blend file anymore.
You should have drawn bloodfang or deathmantle.
At 2/6/08 06:03 PM, raveninskyprime wrote: As in the outline? Yeah, I mean this pic is cool when compared to my other stuff... but it just doesn't have that professional look to it yet...
Because the windows/hatches outlines aren't smooth.
That's the hare? Looks more like a dog.
At 2/6/08 05:08 PM, All-Hallows wrote: thank you X3
another. of my WoW character <__<
2.
Can you link to your armory? I want to see if the stuff you character has in game is exactly what you drew.
Camera quality is not bad at all.