Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

What do you mean by illegal? Other than discussing how to mod a semi-auto AK-47 into making it fully automatic, I can think of nothing else.

The trigger guards are not accurate.

At 4/23/08 06:42 PM, Ultimate-343 wrote: i had to do it on ms paint cos my comp with flash screwed up.

That's no excuse for sucking.

Reports of so-called penis snatching are not uncommon in West Africa, where belief in traditional religions and witchcraft remains widespread, and where ritual killings to obtain blood or body parts still occur.

Another reason to bash religion.

Do you have any quality control whatsoever? It's going to suck. You barely put any effort into your example.

Here's the non-animated, smaller, finished version. If anyone actually noticed that there's writing, it says "METAL" In futhark runes.

A bigger version of what I drew (finished). NG won't let me post.

At 4/22/08 11:17 PM, PrinceFlea wrote: I could have sworn I've seen that exact same style from someone else here.

One of Krinkle's Garbage/vomit/piss shorts?

At 4/23/08 04:29 PM, elliott20 wrote: Accidents happen, and drinks will spill. That is just how things are. But when an accident do happen, the result should not be having people going through 3rd degree burns.

So, now McDonalds puts warnings on their coffee. That won't prevent dumb asses from spilling it.

One ear is larger than the other. The arms are fat, and a little short near the shoulders.

Not done yet.

Charcoal drawings? Looked like photos to me.

Those James Randy videos just rape the fakes. Awesome! Thanks pox.

At 4/22/08 10:38 PM, SolInvictus wrote: there is still no guarantee it will work as expected on other humans.

That's why we use multiple test subjects.

At 4/22/08 08:39 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Employers are 50% more likely to hire a white man over an equally qualified black man.

Does that statistic factor in the fact that blacks only make up 13% of the population while whites make up 75%?

At 4/22/08 07:09 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Employers who, on average, hire a white man 50% more often than a black man do it. Banks do it when they refuse loans to minority neighborhoods. The biggest companies in america do it by only hiring white men to high ranking positions. The police do it by arresting minorities more often than whites. And the justice system (also mostly run by whites) does it by sending innocent blacks to jail just because of the color of their skin.

I didn't ask who does it, I asked what percent of the white population actually discriminates. If a white guy is hired over a black one, that's automatic discrimination? What if he was more suitable for the job?

There's more whites than blacks, so obviously you'll see more of them.

For the justice system, I don't believe what you said.

At 4/22/08 07:21 PM, Grammer wrote: If we can test drugs on an animal with similar results to that of a human, why do it on a human?

How many times have I said more accurate? A dog can be 99% accurate, but a human can be the full 100%.

At 4/22/08 06:43 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Your right, mexicans, asians and a lot of other minorities are discriminated against. White people aren't though.

Maybe not on race, but on other factors, yes.

Don't give me that, "black people call me cracker! I'm discriminated against!" bullshit. As a society, we still oppress and discriminate against blacks, and other races.

"we"? What percentage of whites do that?

At 4/22/08 06:38 PM, SevenSeize wrote: I remember a debate I judged while in college and one of the opponents used this argument. The counter argument was "what will this do to the individual who administers the punishment?" How will someone be selected to administer the disembowelment, torture, etc. Will it affect them mentally?

Who cares about the person administering it? They can be one sick puppy. They might even enjoy it.

At 4/22/08 05:40 PM, Zeistro wrote:

At 4/20/08 10:10 PM, hippl5 wrote: If I had things my way, we would have public disembowelment, hangings, tortures, and decapitations.

Hangings aren't painful at all since it induces a coma. Decapitations aren't much better for a painful death, unless you count the 30 seconds the head's still alive.

Hanging, the coils break the neck. You can get rid of those. It's more of the gore factor than the pain factor.

At 4/22/08 05:45 PM, Grammer wrote: Maybe, maybe not. I could make the argument that animals have a weaker immune system than humans, and therefore if they weren't susceptible to a drug's side effects, humans would not be either.

If it's intended for humans, what reason do you have to believe that an animal will offer better results than an actual human?

At 4/22/08 05:48 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: So, you're saying the only way to suffer in this world is to be a slave?

Because last time I checked, black people are still discriminated against.

Every single one of them? My ass. They're not the only race that gets discriminated against.

At 4/22/08 12:29 AM, arcansi wrote:

At 4/22/08 12:21 AM, Grammer wrote:

At 4/21/08 01:46 AM, Dr-Worm wrote: stuff

stuff

Grammer, you sir, have taken the win. This is for you.

The flag on that card has 48 stars. Commie.

At 4/22/08 10:13 AM, poxpower wrote:

At 4/22/08 09:37 AM, hippl5 wrote:
Well, if there is no corpse, or any evidence other than the witness, how can they even charge someone?

You don't, and nor should you.
Haha.

Right, so by saying that, catman just proved your logic to be right.

At 4/21/08 11:28 PM, catman03 wrote:

At 4/21/08 10:42 PM, hippl5 wrote:

At 4/21/08 10:35 PM, catman03 wrote: By your logic a sole witness to a murder is always wrong.

There would have to be a corpse. You can see a corpse.

Assuming there's no corpse, that is. If the witness, who really did see the murder, was the only evidence, then by his logic there would have been no murder.

Well, if there is no corpse, or any evidence other than the witness, how can they even charge someone?

At 4/22/08 02:30 AM, G-Locked wrote: The reason African Americans call themselves the N word in an offbeat, slang way is to collectively belittle the incredible suffering that they were subjected to.

They didn't suffer shit. The older generations did, but can they even trace them back? I doubt it. Why claim you suffered when nothing happened to you?

At 4/22/08 01:33 AM, TonyTostieno wrote: I propose that we simply go with the cheapest possible way, but if there's even a little doubt that they did it but they're going to be executed anyways, it should be painless.

How about making it public and having people pay if they want to see it?

At 4/21/08 11:04 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Since the sate of Illinois re-introduced the death penalty in 1977, more prisoners on death row have been set free because they were innocent than have been put to death.

Do you propose that we disembowel an innocent man?

Proof

I said we should disembowel them if there is extremely strong evidence that they're guilty, such as a video.

At 4/21/08 10:35 PM, catman03 wrote: By your logic a sole witness to a murder is always wrong.

There would have to be a corpse. You can see a corpse.

At 4/21/08 10:32 PM, poxpower wrote: maybe there's other people reading this... maybe they're laughing at you right now. Maybe they're laughing at me? Well they can come and tell me in my face if they want.

I'm reading your posts, and they're entertaining really. I agree with what you said so far.

At 4/21/08 10:28 PM, LazyDrunk wrote: If you want to experience heaven, you have to make an honest attempt to build it.

Religious folk who're savvy to the lord's prayer know this. "..on earth as it is in heaven."

I've lost you here... If I want heaven on earth, I'd accumulate enough money for a large house, and fill it with everything I could ever want, women, exotic pets, weapons, expensive cars, servants etc. That's heaven.