Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

What's the real question here? I believe it's that: Should transsexuality be accepted?

To which, of course, I answer, emphatically, YES.

At 5/1/06 03:36 PM, JMHX wrote:

MACHT SCHENLL WITH THE BABY MAKING

JAWOL, MEIN FUHRER!!!

It's a bit excessive to say that it's a facist state, but when one party controls both houses of congress, the White House, and some would argue, the Supreme Court, there's going to be little opposition to anything that gets done.

At 5/1/06 04:01 PM, WolvenBear wrote: And a fetus is a baby. Thanks for living up to your name!

Eh. In a way, you could argue this. But a fetus is a group of cells-a baby is the same, yet it's out of the womb.

Sometimes alzheimer patients have that problem too.

Source? They're self-aware, they just have memory loss and loss of cognitive abilities.

And coma patients fail that test too.

Wow, really? No shit.

Self-awareness is not a requirement for life.

In the purely biological sense, you are correct. However, from a moral and philisophical P.O.V, you're quite in error.

Not really.

That's your argument?

Doesn't matter. In the womb it is already exploring itself, sucking its thumbs. And just because it's not very bright, doesn't mean it's not a unique life with unique potential.

It has unique potential. It's genetically unique (unless it is a twin or clone, the latter which cannot happen as of yet), yes, but it's not human in terms of sentience.

At 4/30/06 08:44 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Many Begoners ideas are great sarge.

They sure are!

By the way, my other statement was /sarcasm/.

That's why we've got to help people so they can stay in school (if they have to drop out to work).

I don't think that hating such a relatively shitty movie is homophobic at all.

For the next elections, there's quite a few new battleground states.

15 seats in the house, for example, are the difference between a democratic and republican majority. 15 seats. For example, in connecticut, there are 3 seats that can be won...

Anyone else know of any other states like this?

Immigration is essential to our economy...many, many people consider it highly important, not just conservatives.

At 4/30/06 07:44 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:

Actually, I originally registered this account in an attempt to get this - http://wetflame.digibase.ca/monsquaz.swf through the Portal.

It's not funny. It's just poorly animated and dull.

I see what you're saying. So, it's true that there's a lot of reliance on senior NCOs?

Owned.

At 4/30/06 08:12 PM, Begoner wrote:

They fought and died for their country.

So we should lower the flag because somebody fought and died? Pfft -- thousands die every day and we don't care at all about them.

This is fine. Keep it half-mast permanently? No. You can't keep it down permanently. Many people die, but they're not dying in combat, serving their country.

A better idea would be to do away with the flag to stop a resurgent ultra-nationalistic sentiment from taking root.

Getting rid of national symbols? Oh joy.

At 4/30/06 07:16 PM, Dranigus wrote: I ain't dumbass, you retard.

Really quite cute.

What I had meant was the large amount of Jews that just poured right into that land after the War.

Actually, right after the war, the British, once again, tried to prohibit immigration, though many people ended up, thankfully, in Israel.

Um... right... the land was constantly being purchased by Jews from Arabs.

No, dumbass, much of it was purchased. Much was given or legally conquered.

Thanks for noticing and not being intelligent to know how to make actual sarcasm.

Make sarcasm? Sorry, what?

At 4/30/06 07:19 PM, ThePrimogen wrote:

Three words, YOU ARE FOURTEEN.

Good job! You can read a profile! By the way: You're fifteen...

Still, abortion risks are negligible.

Can you say: National quote?

At 4/30/06 02:07 PM, Empanado wrote:

I'm no law expert, but I believe that the Constitution does not apply to minors.

Outside of schools, it does.

At 4/30/06 06:34 PM, Begoner wrote: Why the hell should the flags be lowered because a soldier died? Are they better than the rest of us?

They fought and died for their country. That's more than anyone will ever say about most of us. They deserve respect and honor. As it's said: "On behalf of a greatful nation..."

At 4/30/06 03:11 PM, Peregrinus wrote:

When a soldier(s) is killed in combat, should the flags on government buildings be lowered in their honor?

Without a doubt. Hell, I'm all for keeping the flags at half-mast every day during wartime.

At 4/30/06 04:53 PM, ThePrimogen wrote:

Stop placing people into categories, politicians and the media have tought you this kind of impertinence, I REFUSE TO ACCEPT THIS EVEN ON AN INTERNET FORUM.

Lol, bravo. Bra-fucking-vo. You refuse to accept it? Wow. From someone who cannot even spell taught, you're quite the proud little bastard, aren't you?

Charlie Sheen is the national manwhore.

At 4/30/06 06:38 PM, Dranigus wrote:

You are aware that Hitler was dead when the Jews were moved into Palistine?

Dumbass, I'm tired of this shit. Hitler was dead in 1945, yes, but Jewish immigration was LIMITED BY THE BRITISH RIGHT BEFORE WWII.

That land was rightfully owned by the British and they gave it to the Jews.

Legally, yes. Morally, it was a good thing. Much of the land that was owned by Palestinians was PURCHASED, however.

Umm... no not quite.

Quoting half of your post? Wow, you're quite intelligent.

At 4/30/06 06:20 PM, lapis wrote:

6% is not much by any mathematical standard, not now, not in 1948.

250,000 acres.

In 1922, Israel was promised 48,000 sq. miles.

In 1946, Jordan was formed, using 32,500 sq. miles of the Mandate.

In 1948, Israel was to be given only 5,500 sq. miles (by the UN)

After the '48 War, Israel was about 8,000 sq. miles.

~390 sq. miles were purchased...

Another quick point: The arabs benefited from the founding of Israel. If you want reasons, I'll give you reasons. Here's a hint. Peasants.

Oh, by the way, I thought you could answer this: Why is Israel called expansionist when it only encompasses about 8,000 sq. miles, and when the arab states are dozens of times bigger?

Other way around. 1948. Arabs attacked.

Ugh, they were provoked. They had few other remaining options.

Provoked in 1948 by 8,000 sq. miles of land. Wow, big area.

Now I'm ignoring Irgun and Lehi terrorism and all other pre-1948 violence.

Lol. Terrorism. Yeah, it was, but not to the Arab scale. Ah. And the Arabs didn't massacre people? And the Arabs didn't kill noncombatants?

It's so beautiful. It's now my background!

At 4/30/06 06:19 PM, MarkyX wrote: Palestine doesn't just kill children, they use them as weapons to blow themselves up.

Uh...they do kill children. Over 80% of Israeli deaths were noncombatants.

By the way: There's no such thing as Palestine.

At 4/30/06 05:10 PM, therealsylvos wrote:

yah except those "rabbi's" are shunned by most sane jews, every jew i know ( and i know a lot) knows that those rabbi's a raving lunatics.

Most? I would say nearly all Jews are zionists, so most of us, even Chabadniks, shun anti-zionist Jews.

At 4/30/06 03:58 PM, Proteas wrote:

Even in the best of situations, abortions aren't safe procedures.

Since when? "Death occurs in 0.0006% of all legal abortions." (
Linky)

At 4/30/06 05:39 PM, Dranigus wrote:

Palestine? You do realize that the Jews were moved into there,

Not many. Most were kept out, even as Hitler moved accross Europe. Too many were kept out. And there were many, many, many Jews already there. Then, you have to realize that much of the land was legally purchased (often at exhorbitant prices for desert or malarial swamp, which was then turned, BY JEWS, to habitable land).

Zionist Jews attack muslims,

Other way around. 1948. Arabs attacked. 1973, arabs attacked. 1967, arabs were preparing to attack.

And the two continue to keep fighting, because of those damn Zionist Jews, which are no different from the Islamic Terrorist Organizations that plan on achieving world domination of their religion.

We don't plan on dominance. We want a nation. We don't indiscriminately attack civilliians. They do.

They don't care if the land is called Fartinballs or Bigwang, as long as they don't have to worry about war or about confrontations.

Well, then. What about the Islamo-Facists who consider Israel to be a waqf?

Praise Buddhism!!! The religion of PEACE!!!

I used to think that Buddists were tolerant, but oh well.