Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/27/10 09:27 AM, FurryDemon wrote: I think people are growing soft.

Sadly, you may be right.
Have they not resorted to these tactics in Australia?

At 11/27/10 11:50 AM, conservative23 wrote: I wonder if it was a Muslim or some third worlder who tried to bomb it.

Nah, it definitely was a White American, it is too politically incorrect to say it was a Muslim.

Nope, he was a Somali Muslim.

And regarding domestic terrorist threats, I wasn't expecting this either. Considering the location I'd figure the Earth or Animal Liberation Front would pose more of an imminent threat than Al-Qaeda.

At 11/26/10 08:39 PM, Swackman wrote:

At 11/26/10 12:01 AM, foxkitaxel wrote: What the hell is sonic colors?!

What rock have you been under?

The commercials are everywhere right now.

I haven't seen a single one.

Today was a lucky day.
I got both the Iron Curtain and the Dangeresque, Too? along with a fistful of Poker Night achievements. (I got the Lugermorph and License to Maim a few days ago.)
On top of this, I FINALLY got the Dr's Dapper Topper as a drop!
YAY!

I want MY van converted into one of these.

not really, I'd prefer a Sailor Moon motif

My hair is fairly long, almost past my shoulder blades.
For some reason my hair doesn't grow very fast, though you can't tell how long it really is most of the time since I have rather tight waves.

You should come down to my house and spray all the wasps that come in through the chimney.

Try running it through TinEye.

At 11/25/10 03:53 PM, kittehg0d wrote: This is even more retarded,

Old news is old. They're famous for stunts like these.
A fact to consider: PETA kills WAY more animals each year than they save.

Conspiracy debunking thread this-a-way.

At 11/25/10 10:37 PM, orangebomb wrote:

At 11/25/10 09:51 PM, HibiscusKazeneko wrote: Did anyone besides me watch this?
Admittedly I lol'd when Al Roker misidentified the anime as "Space Battleship Yamamoto."

Chances are that not too many people outside of Japan would've known what that anime was, so even though that he got that wrong, you can't really blame him for mistaking the name of an anime that not too many people knew about until recently.

It ran in the US under the title StarBlazers: The Quest for Iscandar back in the 70s and 80s and in syndication on various networks until 2005. At least a few people would know.
I guess the reason they did this was as their annual Internet pop culture reference in conjunction with Takashi Murakami's appearance.

Did anyone besides me watch this?
Admittedly I lol'd when Al Roker misidentified the anime as "Space Battleship Yamamoto."

So, are you a Deekerite or something?

WARNING: NSFW link

At 11/25/10 12:38 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: no shit jailbreaking the I phone is legal your 3 months late there buddy.

Maybe just the iPhone.
I heard about a month or so ago that a known console-jailbreaker was going to trial.

Probably Raphael.

At 11/23/10 01:06 AM, Hornby wrote:

At 11/23/10 12:47 AM, Statwhore wrote: Re-submitted by author.

But the question still remains, why?

My best guess would be it had a glitch in it and the author just removed and resubmitted it to fix the problem.

Sadly, he has a point.
Those of us who would like to travel further than a car can take us are forced to submit to being photographed naked or sexually molested. That's why I have declared never to fly again.

At 11/17/10 10:58 AM, poxpower wrote: You know what, I think people are way over-protective of their junk.
Yeah, big deal, some guy patted your crotch for 0.5 seconds. BOO FUCKING HOO, GET BACK IN LINE.

It's called modesty. Some of us, especially us women, are required to safeguard our bodies from any form of inappropriate touch or viewing.

At 11/20/10 08:23 PM, Rabid-Animals wrote:
Creating a separation wouldn't really serve any practical purpose. If there's a page that has had content removed due to violations, the message stating that the content has been deleted should be enough. There's no need to keep extra pages up all over the site to explain that somebody didn't know how to read the rules.

The way we have it now, the text reads "This submission was blammed by our users," which is obviously not the case. There has to be some distinction made in case someone tries to accuse us of removing popular videos for no reason. Even an error page with Agnry Faic (the same type used for BBS bans and nonexistent userpages) would be better than nothing.

I remember back when I first discovered this site back in 2004 that there was a distinction made between movies that had been blammed due to low scores and those that had been otherwise removed from the site. I remember there was this one submission that was in one of the Collections (I think it was Music Videos) that instead of the movie had a still picture of what I recall as a blond girl in a trenchcoat and the words "We're sorry; this video has been removed due to copyright issues."
The reason I bring this up is because ever since the redesign of 2007, no distinction has been made between videos and games that were blammed due to low scores and those that were removed due to rule violations. Is there any way we can restore the distinction, like make a special redirect page for flagged or removed submissions?

Onanism.
Moral pollution.
Unnatural stimulation.
Self-abuse.
Secret vice.

These are all outdated; I know. But medical textbooks use these terms to describe the act into the mid-20th century.

At 11/15/10 08:13 PM, fuSEEk wrote: Yes, you shouldn't have to choose between being radiated and having your naked body saved into a database or being molested, in order to protect you from terrorism. It's unfortunate that Big Sis is continuing her agenda to install these machines throughout every major airport in the country by spewing out more propaganda about the safety aspects and disregard for privacy, I feel revolt is imminent though.

Yeah, that's what I've been trying to tell people all along.
Unfortunately if the revolt DOES happen, there is a strong possibility that President Obama will declare martial law.

At 11/20/10 06:32 PM, Stevenscar wrote: It likely has a bad script.

It crashes Flash Player on Windows/Firefox and Gnash SWF Player won't even play it on Ubuntu/Firefox.

I'm using Safari on a Mac and it causes the entire browser to freeze; the only way I could get out was to hit Command+Option+Escape and Force Quit the application (the same way you go into the Task Manager on Windows and selectively close out applications).

At 11/20/10 06:27 PM, ihatesonic1 wrote: That's happening to me too, should we flag it? I was able to vote on it.

It's already passed judgment; now the only option we have left is to get the admins involved.

Funny that he says that now, when these signs were distributed everywhere just a few years ago.

At 11/20/10 06:09 PM, Chdonga wrote: There's a bad script in it which causes flash to run slowly or not work at all. I suggest you just vote zero on it.

I can't even vote; the voting script requires that the movie load first, and we all know what happens then.

Hi, I don't normally do this, but whenever I try to view this movie it causes my browser to freeze and I have to force quit. I can't blow the whistle on it because of the aforementioned reason. Can anyone help me?

This.
I got tired of it when I was 7 or 8. I'm still tired of it now.

At 11/12/10 11:38 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: What are you trying to purchase exactly?

Seconded. I used to get that error a lot because Genius would make recommendations for stuff that was not available in the US store (possibly removed due to copyright issues).

At 11/12/10 06:15 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:

At 11/12/10 05:26 AM, Iron-Claw wrote: All Stolen from Ghost in the Shell 1.

You say that as if they don't acknowledge it.

Whether or not they acknowledged it doesn't give them the right to take credit for other people's work.
There's nothing that pisses me off more than seeing people steal ideas, market them as their own and make billions off it. It's the main reason why I boycott Disney.