Be a Supporter!
Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 12th, 2005 in Politics

I hate you guys

Response to: The funniest quotes on politics Posted December 10th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/10/05 11:34 AM, Blackmagic wrote: James Kennedy (Center for Reclaiming America)

"The Christian community has a golden opportunity to train an army of dedicated teachers who can invade the public school classrooms and use them to influence the nation for Christ."
-James Kennedy (Center for Reclaiming America)

"Sex education classes in our public schools are promoting incest."
"The Media is ruled by Satan. But yet I wonder if many Christians fully understand that. Also, will they believe what the Media says, considering that its aim is to steal, kill, and destroy?"
"Evolution is a bankrupt speculative philosophy, not a scientific fact. Only a spiritually bankrupt society could ever believe it...Only atheists could accept this Satanic theory."
-Jimmy Swaggart

"Yes, religion and politics do mix. America is a nation based on biblical principles. Christian values dominate our government. The test of those values is the Bible. Politicians who do not use the bible to guide their public and private lives do not belong in office."
-Beverly LaHaye

“George Bush was not elected by a majority of the voters in the United States, he was appointed by God.”
Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin

"The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians."
-Pat Robertson

Ok, did anyone else notice the fact that that not one of those comments were made by someone who was not a hard core religious fanatic? Them, and those idiotic hard core feminists who blame everything in the world on men. And since when do atheists support satanic theorys? We don't even believe in satan!

Response to: Singles and adoption Posted December 10th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/10/05 05:15 AM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: Should unmarried people be allowed to adopt children? If a person is financially stable, but unmarried, does that make them unfit to adopt?

A child who grows up in a home with only one parent does not have another parent of the other gender. This will result in gender role confusion and stunted emotional growth.

Bullshit. Do you have any proof to back up those statements? My father shot my mom in the face when I was a year old. The bullet hit something in her head at just the right angle and came out of her ear. She lived and they sent that bastard to jail . I am now 14, and believe me, im get NO sexuall stimulation from guys whatsoever. And what the hell is stunted emotional growth? Can that even happen? And even if it can I know I don't have it

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 9th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/9/05 04:45 PM, Draconias wrote:
At 12/9/05 03:51 PM, hellsgift wrote:
AND THAT IS NOT SUFFICIENT REASON TO LEGALIZE IT!

Just because it's not the smelliest shit in the lot doesn't mean you should pick it up! It's still shit and still a problem! If we could get rid of Tobacco and Alcohol, even better; Tobacco is definately on the way out, but Alcohol is too popular and has been used for too many years to ban. Marijuana is a new kid on the block, so we can ban it without too much trouble, and there is no reason we SHOULD legalize besides the flawed belief that no reasons to criminalize something is reason enough to embrace it.

I don't really care enough to respond to that, i'll just let someone else disprove that ridiculous and foolish statement. But if nobody does, then I will respond, I just hope that I don't have to do it

Response to: New Religion (againlolol) Posted December 9th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/9/05 11:08 AM, Bandolph wrote: Its a little late, but what the hey.
"We are all one and the same entity, split through time and different bodies, the harm you cause others, you only cause it to yourself in a previous or future life".

Im pretty sure that's some form of philosophy, but I can't really be sure

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 9th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/8/05 09:40 PM, Judge_Dredd wrote:
At 12/8/05 12:09 PM, hellsgift wrote: MJ has no bad effects on a persons intellect, or thier sanity.
well some do say MJ has a link to schizophrenia. what would you say to that?

Im, not a schitzo, so I have no idea about that, I have never heard of pot schitzophrenia.

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 9th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/8/05 11:10 PM, Draconias wrote:
At 12/8/05 12:09 PM, hellsgift wrote: Do you have any proof to back up that statement?
And alos, if weed turns people int bumbling idiots like you say, then how are we able to put up a argument as good as this?
The fact of the matter is that MJ has no bad effects on a persons intellect, or thier sanity.
Honestly, I believe you're a dumbass. I was low on time and only had a chance to put up a response before logging off. It's nice to see you're a politically bigoted asshole, though-- lowers my opinion of you even more.

I honestly don't care what you think. If you want to sit there and assume that you know everything in the world about something that you have never even tried, be my guest. Your opinion has no influnce on me, as mine should have no influence on you. Don't take everything so seriously, and try not to be so full of yourself. It's ok to voice your opinion, but when you start ranting about something you know nothing about(which I know that I have done on a few occations, and I apologize for that) it pisses off other people, so naturally, if you come off as a asshole, other people are going to be assholes right back. A good example, I would not have been a bigoted asshole, if you had not been one first.

By the way, have you seen anyone post while they were high yet? I sure haven't heard anyone mention that, so lack of possible proof = lack of possible point in your statement. Put simply, Mariajuana does, by definition, have negative effects on your intellect during use. It's a fucking narcotic!

Just so you know, I am high right now, and I would be happy to prove it if I can. Ask me anything about what it feels like to be high, you prick.

I don't have much time to finish this post, but I'd like to show a nice little exerpt for the last link. Any quick search will provide a long list of Marijuana-related murders and damage.

"John Nahale Miranda used ... marijuana before taking several people hostage at his former workplace Feb. 6...."

Yeah... I swear, it has no effects on your brain. Surrre. Cmon, there is a hard link between drug use and totally fucked up lives and crime. You're not gonna get by claiming it has no negative effect. That's the weakest bullshit I've ever seen.

The entire point of this thread was to prove that marijuana is nowhere near as harmful as other drugs. And also, just because marijuana was involved in a crime, that doesn't mean that it is at fault itself (sorry about all of that personification). Who's to say that that particual person wasn't just insane? And also, do you know how many people smoke weed? Alot, ok. And when something is illegal, that means to buy it is a crime, so naturally, some violent crimes are going to be occur from the illegal purchasing and distribution of the drug.

Response to: Is Pornography Sexist/Racist? Posted December 8th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/7/05 04:42 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: Does anyone know the etymology of the word pornography?

No, but you can ask Maus, she always knows.

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 8th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/7/05 10:20 PM, Draconias wrote: No, Dredd, that is not a valid reason. You can show one case of a Cop shooting a Pothead. For every one of those cases there are at least 50 Potheads shooting a civilian.

Do you have any proof to back up that statement? No, of course you don't. All that has come out of your mouth since this thread was started is a bunch of right winger bullshit. I have yet to hear a convencing argument come from you that has any basis of fact whatsoever. The arguments that you make that are convencing, you have absolutely no proof of. If you are going to say something like that, then the least you can do is provide a link with some statistics or something of that nature. And alos, if weed turns people int bumbling idiots like you say, then how are we able to put up a argument as good as this? The fact of the matter is that MJ has no bad effects on a persons intellect, or thier sanity.

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 7th, 2005 in Politics

At 12/1/05 04:09 PM, brown_recluse wrote: I have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why it should be banned from public consumption. The fact that it is a mind altering substance doesn't hold any weight because, as was mentioned earlier, tobacco and alcohol are both perfectly legal. The fact that it may have long term negative side effects doesn't hold up either because the same could be said about many of the the substances we Americans imbibe including the food we eat. I see no benifit to society from spending tax dollars and police manpower to stop users from taking it. The laws against the possession of MJ seems a bit arbitrary to me. I don't smoke myself, I'm just wondering on what basis did the U.S. gov't decide that it was worse than what we already use.

There we go. He just boiled down ten pages of arguments with a single paragraph. I salute you, my good friend! but, of course, some asshole out there is going to take this paragraph, and try to discredit it with some bogus websites or some other pointless shit like that. This argument is going in circles, because the people that have been brought up on all of this bullshit will not quit preaching about how harmful it is. I have just one thing to say to these people, SHUT THE HELL UP ALREADY! Please? Could you just stop talking?

Response to: Illegalize Masturbation Posted December 7th, 2005 in Politics

At 1/6/03 05:46 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: Wow, that sure was a response. do you have any statistics to back that up?

He does not need any statistics, that is common sense. I really don't feel like reading this whole thing, so I am sorry if I say anything that has already been quoted but...Masturbation is healthy! It keeps us from going out of our minds with sexuall tension. Just think of a world where you couldn't go home after a hard day of work and cranke one out. I get the feeling that if I wasn't allowed to masturbate when I wanted that I might go into the nearest resturant, grab a good looking waitress, hit her over the head with a wine bottle and then mount her on the salad table. Why would you want to make masturbation illegal? That makes no sense to me.

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted December 7th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/29/05 09:25 PM, Draconias wrote:
At 11/29/05 08:13 PM, hellsgift wrote:
At 11/29/05 08:06 PM, Altois09 wrote:
If you read this entire thread then you will understand....... all of the bullshit that the minors (<18, inexperienced, unable to make accurate statements on lifestyles) and the MAJORITY of Potheads (not all) say about MJ.

Do you ever shut the hell up? Hold on let me refraise that.....Do you ever get off of your soapbox and stop spewing out a bunch of nonsense that has no basis of fact whatsoever?

Response to: Usa Vs China Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

War is so wrong.....

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/29/05 08:06 PM, Altois09 wrote: Well if its for medical reasons, I say " yes" and if not i say "no"

If you read this entire thread then you will understand....... all of the bullshit that the government and the MAJORITY of the religious community (not all) say about MJ.

Response to: Video Game Regulation Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

GOD DAMN IT! CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT KEEP THIER NOSES OUT OF ANYTHING!?

Response to: Usa Vs China Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/29/05 08:05 PM, Altois09 wrote: Do you think in the near future, that the United States will wage war on China?

I think that we will because China has weapons of mass destruction, and since we are U.S we might wage war.

Well we are war mongers after all so I would have to say that we will eventually.

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/29/05 08:02 PM, Imperator wrote: I really don't care either way, as long as you don't use it when you drive. I've had enough psychology and personal experience lessons to know that any substance that afftects your brain WILL mess up your driving.

And don't use cells either! Even headsets, psych studies on attention have thus far shown high correlations between cell phone use and bad driving, with minimal extraneous variables.

Well, the govenment could make it just like alchohol, if you drive under the influence, then you will be arrested, that seems pretty logical if you ask me.

Response to: Taking the Christ out of Christmas Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/28/05 12:36 AM, LordXanthus wrote: It seems every year, society gets a bit more ignorant during the Christmas season. Various atheist groups are trying to either transform Christmas into a more secular holiday, or to do away with it altogether. Why do people bother trying to rename Christmas, and why must they strive to eliminate nativity scenes, or anything else that may remind us of the holiday's origin?

What ever happened to free speech? If a gay pride parade is acceptable, then why not a Christmas parade, hm? Naturally, some of us will disagree with one or both of these ways of life. Is that a reason for them to sweep it under the rug? Not at all. We all have a right to speak our minds, regardless of who is offended by it.

Am I the only non-Christian who believes this to be utterly ridiculous?

No, I belive that it is utterly ridiculous as well, your not alone. It seems to me like this whole argument over christmas has been blown way out of porportion, i mean after all, who are we to try and change an age old holiday just because we don't agree with it?

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/29/05 05:01 PM, king_bob_the_king1 wrote: weed is the granddaddy of alchohol......it is WAY better......

Why do you have a 1 at the end of your name?

To maus... Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

I had been using google, it kept giving me sites that had nothing to do with etomology. I got pissed and frustrated and I figured that you guys could give me a little aid, so thanks, thats all I needed.

what is Posted November 29th, 2005 in Politics

the etymology for the word biology?

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 28th, 2005 in Politics

I forgot a q. mark, my bad.

?

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 28th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/28/05 05:58 PM, red_skunk wrote:
At 11/28/05 05:08 PM, Draconias wrote:
The links I provided also addressed the immediate effects of marijuana. You have yet to give any reasonable negatives of a moderate marijuana habit. And lastly, standardization is a non-issue, since overdosing is practically impossible. And, not to mention the fact that one can determine the quality of marijuana by simply examining it.
You don't need to use Marijuana, so why in the hell are you using it?
You don't need to use the NG BBS, so why in the hell are you using it?

There, that covers just about all of it. Now could we please please PLEASE! start talking about how to get it legalized

Response to: Legalize Mary Jane Posted November 28th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/27/05 03:23 PM, CaptinChu wrote: So.... Everything that has ever been taught to me about Marijuana... is a lie? The only thing I'm totally scared about Marijuana is that I've been taught it shrinks your testicles. Is that true?

I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!

Yes, it is all a lie, and it definetly does not shrink your testicals, who the hell told you that?

Response to: that 70's show club Posted November 27th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

At 11/27/05 09:07 PM, Quixoni wrote:
At 11/27/05 09:02 PM, hellsgift wrote: You mean Eric not hyde.
That's what I meant. 0:)

Dude that pokemon hentia shit is fucked up!

Response to: Euthanasia, Right or Wrong? Posted November 27th, 2005 in Politics

At 11/27/05 09:00 PM, Gunter45 wrote:
At 11/27/05 08:50 PM, Redbob86 wrote:
Oh yeah, I agree. That's not the point, however. If somebody wants to kill themself, I think they should have the freedom to do so. However, if they are physically capable, they shouldn't be able to go to a doctor and have the doctor kill them.

But why won't the government legalize suicide and euthanasia?

Response to: that 70's show club Posted November 27th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

At 11/26/05 11:14 PM, Quixoni wrote: I'll join I guess.

My favorite characters are Fez and Red..

My favorite quote is:

Kelso: Hey uh, can I use your GI Joe for an experiment?
Hyde: What? No!
Kelso: I thought you'd say yes. *pulls out melted GI Joe*

You mean Eric not hyde
Mine is

Eric: Hey Kelso, can I use your van for a little experiment

Kelso: Uhhh, no

Eric: I thought you would say yes (holds up a mangled stearing wheel)

Response to: that 70's show club Posted November 27th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

At 11/27/05 08:49 PM, beeryay wrote: my fav chraters are jackie , red and donna .... oh god i forgot that foriegn kids name! :( how could i forget! god dammit!

Who? Fez?

Response to: The pot heads club Posted November 27th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

SOMEONE PLEASE LOCK THIS

The pot heads club Posted November 27th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

You can come here to talk to other pot heads, but you must first answer these questions.
1. Do you hallucinate while smokeing weed?
A. Yes
B.No
C.Only if it is dusted

2.Where does a buzz start?
A.Head
B.Feet
C.Stomach

What is the hole called that you put your finger on to keep fresh air from flowing into a water bong?
A.pit
B.choker
C.The hole