At 12/2/06 08:51 PM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: UCLA FIGHTFIGHTFIGHT!

FUCKING RIGHT!

At 12/2/06 08:50 PM, Lil-Jimmy wrote:

At 12/2/06 08:49 PM, the-come-back-kid wrote: what is this? sports or something? what are sports? Are they like fastest typing contest, please i am very interested in this sports thing

How did you extract "sports" from that very vague message?

by not being a noob.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16009172/

Suck it.

We won.

FUCK SC! :D

and fuck you all who don't give a fuck :)

UCLAFTW!!!!

I just browsed through the last pages.

Just as many dumbfucks here as when I left it.

I'm going to leave you guys to argue amongst yourselves without actually having to deal with this personally.

At 11/17/06 08:46 PM, Fyndir wrote:

Yes, there are cases of police brutality.

No, this is not one of them.

Bad situation management. At least. He also made threats to protestors after the arrest.

At 11/17/06 08:41 PM, subpar wrote: It's impossible to look at the whole situation objectively if we don't have a video of the whole thing.

Yes you do. I just told you. He was convinced to leave and by the time he was acting on leaving, the police got there.

I've noticed that quite a few of you are saying he deserved it. But the fact that the student is a "whiny brat" does not mean that he deserves to have a taser used on him several times just for not standing up right away.

I don't care for them. They don't attend this school, they don't have second thoughts of this specific police force every time they walk by. They talk like badasses to sound like badasses, and they sound like badasses, nothing more.

At 11/17/06 08:27 PM, dicF00D wrote: ahahah heinousdude isnt it funny how this thing is basically bigger on the internet and nationwide then it is here on campus

Yes.

I didn't know of this until my roommate told me today.

UC science classes don't leave time to listen to news anymore.

The police should've been trained to resolve situations with minimal force. From the point the police got involved, the student has always agreed to leave. In addition there are cases when taser has been proved lethal.

Better have your BruinCard with you dicFOOD.

At 11/17/06 03:05 AM, Serphyas wrote: Bullshit. They didn't call the authorities because he said "he needed a minute to pack up." He refused to leave, and then refused to cooperate with the police officers after they were called. He got tazed.

Somehow I can't classify this as "police brutality." I see an elitist, smart-ass college student who thinks he knows how the world works, i.e. that pussy-ass "Here's your Patriot Act for ya!" comment he made to the police.

Wrong.

I go to school here.

The story goes: library policy requires ID after hours to prevent the homeless, etc coming in for shelter. He doesn't have his ID, refused to leave. Security called police while disputing with him. He decided to leave, then police arrived, then this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g7zlJx9u2E

Regardless whether you think he's elitist or not, the police could've dragged him out just like they did at the end of the video. Instead they decided to stun him a few more times before doing so.

He's not a tard, you just are an asshole.

At 10/29/06 01:31 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 10/28/06 11:23 PM, HeinousDude wrote: You're getting back with her illogically. I won't feel sorry for you when she lies to you again.

Well fuck you then. You don't understand the scope of the situation.

At 10/29/06 12:03 AM, Captain-Jack wrote:

At 10/28/06 11:10 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: shes going to move back to Seattle. So I think this might be a good thing.

Hey dude, well done getting this girl to change her entire life just to satisfy your own selfish interests.

Well screw you Jack, screw you.

Wow, you sounded like a victim the first few posts with the story, but now you're just an asshole. Captain Jack's a girl. Instead of pissing her off you're better off befriending her so she'll tell you how girls think. I gave you advice in a few pages and she gave you one and you're just going along the path most likely to screw yourself over again.

I don't care for you anymore. I'm just glad that as a guy who has been screwed over just like you, I'm wise enough to get out of the cycle.

At 10/28/06 11:10 PM, cellardoor6 wrote:

Cross your fingers bitches, cross your fingers.

You're getting back with her illogically. I won't feel sorry for you when she lies to you again.

I stand by my initial advice. The more you tell me about her, the more she sounds like trouble. IMO you shouldn't even have agreed to see her to begin with.

That "made me regret staying away from her" deal when you hugged and kissed wasn't love, just lust.

How can you not see the simi... oh you're a kid.

Fox News.

Just emphasizing for you.

At 10/27/06 10:21 PM, Ankokukishi wrote: Well the plan would require enough people to out number the American people and would take alot of time and effort but in the end whould I work? Personally I think it would seeing as it's my plan.

It wouldn't work. Unlike the original patriots the Americans of today are so afraid of death they'll willingly alter the constitution to give up people's rights just to feel safe. Hence they'll make up some weird laws prohibiting Asians to vote.

At 10/27/06 10:41 PM, dumbbannaman wrote: i bet most of you clicking on this are thinking " no you fucking moron" or " do you watch full metal alchemist or sumthing." Well actually i hat full metal alchemist and no i go to a decent school with decent grades ( 11th grader b's and c's). So this is about REAL alchemy. I was thinking about buying sum alchemy books for entertainmenr,fun, and even a little science purposes. so if you think it's real giv me sum tips and just talk about it i'm bored. Well i hope you enjoy this blog or thread or whatever you wanna call it.

b's and c's just mean you're the best of the stupid.

Alchemy is not real. Neither is Mary Shelly's Frankenstein. The study began with knowledge they didn't have that we do now that can be used to prove Alchemy doesn't work.

At 10/27/06 05:10 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Update: Shes not coming here, I'm going to her place in about an hour. She has a hot roommate.

I'm going to see if I can swing a threesome. If not, either way i'm going to take pictures. I'll post some that aren't bad or derogatory so that my thread doesn't get closed or so i don't get banned. But I'll see what I can do.

I think if things go well I'm going to give her a second chance. I'm going to give it some time and see if it feels right, after a while I'll make my final decision.

I hope you read this when you're back. I'm going to get to the points.

1. Glad you didn't shoot the man. At that point you couldn't have known if he knew she was alrady taken.
2. You gave her the doll anyway. That's even harder to do than not shooting the other guy. Mad props.
3. I've been lied to similarly but to a lesser extent. I feel the pain though.
4. You said at first she denied cheating on you; then you said she later denied having sex with the guy. Therefor she already lied to you on multiple occasions. I am in college statistics, but it doesn't take an education to know it would not be wise to trust her again.
5. It seems you've already let go of the love. When you were in love you kept promises, taught her things and treated her with respect. Now you're posting her pictures without asking her. The way you treat her and her belongings now are already different from the way you described you treated her.

You're only 19, she lied to you more than once already, and you already don't love her like you used to anymore. Leave her.

At 10/17/06 12:16 AM, dicF00D wrote:

At 10/17/06 12:13 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

At 10/17/06 12:12 AM, dicF00D wrote: wh0aa!!

do u live on campus

4 blocks east in westwood :(

neat, i probably walked by your place on the way to the university credit union the other day hahaa

I meant 4 blocks west.

2 hills away from campus.

With the off-campus monster calves to prove it baby!

At 10/17/06 12:12 AM, dicF00D wrote:

At 10/17/06 12:07 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

At 10/17/06 12:01 AM, dicF00D wrote: going to ucla, what do u wanna know?

Visit me bitch!

wh0aa!!

do u live on campus

4 blocks east in westwood :(

At 10/17/06 12:01 AM, dicF00D wrote: going to ucla, what do u wanna know?

Visit me bitch!

Universities all suck. You'll have a better chance of a good professor in a community college.

At 10/16/06 11:36 PM, WadeFulp wrote: So far everyone is fucking up. READ my entire post. No one is saying when they're active on NG, some aren't saying why they'd make a good mod (and those that are, are offering very little).

I may delete out your initial posts so you can try again. Although if you got it wrong, it's probably a good sign you're not up for the job.

Nobody here should be mod.

Most mods shouldn't be mod either. Hang around long enough and there'll be users who can point you to incidents of abuse.

Bring back Freakapotimus >:(

At 10/15/06 10:16 PM, Ladylor wrote:

no I'm saying I'm not a immature little asshole bitch who giggle and laughs everytime a guy that i dumped walks by i pretend like it never happened and continue like were still friends and it worked because the guy was extremely shy and i felt kind of bad so i was as nice as possible and didn't shy away like a idiot but if your definition of mature is ignoring someone just because they asked you out on a date that's your right.

You misunderstood him. By mature he meant "pretend like it never happened and continue like were still friends."

At 10/15/06 07:16 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: If you are not interested in a guy, tell him so.

The last thing I fucking want is to wait for a phone call that doesn't come, just because you don't have the bollocks to tell me that you find me repulsive.

That is all.

Those girls are more repulsive themselves than they think you are.

http://www.newground../topic.php?id=588959

At 10/15/06 06:53 PM, The-answer-AI wrote: I honestly dont even know what we're arguing about anymore. This thread turned into some big agreement discussion.

....

The way it should be.

If you like arguing so much you can always start shit again with uncalled-for insults like the one you threw earlier.

At 10/15/06 06:27 PM, Wtfpwn wrote: it's a trophy thing for the girls.

oooo, look at my spankin' new boyfriend who is 5 years older than me!

and then they hate guys who use them for sex. that's not hypocritical at all! the girls can use guys for trophies, but the guys sure god damn better the fuck not use them for sex, or else they're assholes.

Speaking of hypocritical, I never see women bashing one another for using the term "boy-shopping."

And with that, it's back to homework for me.

At 10/15/06 06:16 PM, Mo-ni wrote: Why not?

I can't multitask. I don't know how to put it in words better than "if they value themselves they wouldn't," and that's not close to the concept in mind. physics hw ftl.

Just like age has nothing to do with experience.

So the choices are young girls and mature girls, they both have experience, but the young one bitches more. Which one would YOU pick?

I wouldn't pick either one. I am a female. By bitching what do you mean? A girl/woman who doesn't smile and nod but speaks her mind? Or one that always has something to complain about?

My bad. Didn't check profile.

By bitching I meant talking nonstop about the tiniest things that vexes her, things that a mature mind would just let go knowing that it matters not.

At 10/15/06 06:05 PM, revolutionx wrote: the mods and admins are cool.

So you finally ventured out of their colons to make a post? That's cool.

At 10/15/06 06:05 PM, Mo-ni wrote:

At 10/15/06 05:57 PM, HeinousDude wrote:

Which drives me to not want to put up with their shit even further. I have no reason to want younger girls, they lack experience.

Not all young women lack experience. I know some girls younger then me who has went through a lot more than I have.

And they shouldn't.

Just like age has nothing to do with experience.

So the choices are young girls and mature girls, they both have experience, but the young one bitches more. Which one would YOU pick?