1,155 Forum Posts by "GunCrave"
At 5/21/06 03:59 PM, peedee wrote: Great logic. As a human, I also have the right to kill whomever I want, eat whatever I want, shit on whatever I want. Hell, I can DO whatever I want. Why? Because I'm human. I'm at the top of the mother fucking food chain.
As long as you do not harm other humans. You have the right to maim any animal, though.
If I had the option of punching all these eco-nuts in the face and not be charged with assault and battery, I'd do it.
As humans we have the right to drill any place, anywhere, at any time and screw the white spotted owl, they're only good on tacos anyways. What's the fucking point of having all those natural resources if you're just going to sit there and worship it? Do something with the petrol. Don't just squander it like a fucking fool.
At 5/21/06 05:23 AM, WolvenBear wrote:At 5/20/06 06:25 PM, GunCrave wrote: The ironic thing is Colbert is conservative.Um, no. He's about as liberal as they come. His entire show is just a spoof of the O'Reilly factor.
I don't watch his show alot, and since he said once he was a conservative I took his word for it. Perhaps I'm just gullible. But nonetheless it's good to see you back on the BBS, WolvenBear.
hhcash, you get the award for making the most useless topics.
Congrats.
At 5/21/06 01:09 AM, peedee wrote:At 5/20/06 06:56 PM, GunCrave wrote:I know how to hold my liquer.At 5/20/06 06:48 PM, peedee wrote: But then again, in Quebec there is far less alchohal abuse, and you can booze anywhere.Come to my bro's frat house. We'll teach ya how to down hard liquor like a man.
Yeah, but we'll teach you to guzzle it like Courtney Love five minutes before Happy Hour's done.
At 5/21/06 01:11 AM, facksfunny wrote: Exactly! It isn't like some inorganic matter quickly turned into a cell with a nucleus, mitochondria, chloroplasts, rough and smooth ER in a matter of a few days. It is like looking at todays jet planes and saying we couldn't have invented that, look at the jet engines, stablizers, fuselage, landing gear, controls, we couldn't have made all that at the same time. The airplane slowly became what it is today, the very first plane was very primitive. Or same thing if you look at the society we have today. We couldn't have made bulidings, cars, roads, electricity, at the same time. Of course, we didn't just pop up a jet plane, or a metropolis over night. Same goes for cells, they took very long to evolve and become what we have today. Like the first plane, or the first car, the first cell was very primitive compared to what we have today.
You know what the really funny thing is to all that? I mean this is a real holwer, quit the kneel slapper that makes you go "I''ve been a dumbfuck." Wanna know what it is? Okay, intelligent being created and designed those primitive airplanes and improved upon it with intelligent design. It's not like some bolts, fiber class and other materials came together magically and formed the first airplane, which evolved into more complex designs.
It's sort of like what these proponents of abiogenesis imply that non-living substances came together and magically formed the first living cell. That's gotta be more plausible than some invisible man ordaining life to progress!
At 5/20/06 11:48 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote
Just like "Racist" is a made up word liberals use to help them demonize anyone who disagrees with them on black people.
People can't help what race they're born in. People can help whether or not they get turned on by a trouser-snake. Yeah, I can really see it now, evolution, natural-selection, and trial-and-error all conspiring to make something a butt-fucker for some unknown reason because it's somehow advantageous.
People who "Disagree" with homosexuality tend to have absolutely nothing to back their views.
Neither do people who agree with homosexuality. It's all a matter of perspective.
They're welcome to hold their illogical views to themselves, but when they start ranting about how it's what's wrong with the world, that's extremely unfair and should be actively discouraged.
Oh yes, there's that elitist liberal attitude of yours. Their views are illogical because they disagree with YOU. Wake the fuck up, you're not an infallible being and neither are they, so quit acting like a pompous bitch. You're the exact kind of left-winger I was ranting about. You are too close-minded to even consider for a second you may be wrong.
It's prejudice. Not an opinion. Prejudice. Get that through your head.
Yeah, me hating homosexuality is automatically prejudice now under the decree of the
Fuhrer, Penal.
Partically, there's not much difference. You'll both up voting the same. What you don't understand is that it's people parading around their bigotry and using it to affect others that bothers people, not what values they hold, though they dislike that too, nobody wants to change it. And your arguments are never going to get taken seriously if you call liberals "Closed minded".
Trust me, you've demonstrated enough how close-minded liberals can be. Also, take your own god damn advice. No ones going to take you seriously if you blame all the worlds evils on "neo-cons."
What's there to understand about homophobes, exactly? We understand the REASONS why people hate gay people, and we know there's more than one. We just think they're bullshit, more than that, many of them are completely non sequitor, illogical, based on the slippery slope fallacy and can simply NEVER be true under any given circumstances.
Are you fucking dyslexic? I just stated that people either hate gays themselves or hate homosexuality as an act. Penal, you've used the phrase "slippery slope of fallacy" so many times I'm starting to think that's the only thing you can say in retort to a person's argument. They're always wrong and you're always right because they're big, stinky-heads.
Ironically in your fairy world, yes. Though I guess right wingers dont' like fairies much since they remind people of such horrible things as hippies and imagination.
Sorry, but from what I've seen liberals are as equally hateful. You're just too damn blind and partisan to see it. I witness liberals of all manners looking down on christians, orthadox jews, americans, and Israelies in ways that would seem prejudiced. It's all because these above groups question their agenda the left-wing agenda or go against.
Some opinions are more correct than others, because of something called "truth", and another thing called "logic" which I already explained.
Too bad all your opinions are based on your own emotions.
Oh, and as for neo-con, you know who we're referring to; what other word are we meant to use?
It's no different than Michael Savage calling liberals a bunch of pinko-commie shitbags. Making up bullshit terms is futile.
... and so do you. I would certainly consider myself morally superior because I support most forms of self expression, but take a stand against those which interfere with other's self expression or right to be the way they were born.
No, actually I don't believe in absolute morality. I am a deist and I don't think there's a given set of ethics by some sort of divine being. As for your argument of interference: the government has no right to shut-me up for encouraging people to bomb abortion clinics.
The people who are against homosexuality see it as a danger to society because they cling to the belief it's evil, and evil spreads like a pestilence. They believe homosexuality will invoke a negative effect of karma. So don't be so damn dismissive of their views.
People on your side hate gays because they think the Bible says so.
More liberal bullshit. People on my side don't hate gays, they hate homosexuality. I don't read Bible because christianity isn't my religion or cup of tea, but I don't think it says "Hate the sinner not the sin." This is some of the vile lies your side spews to misinterpret the opposition like "Conservatives are against affirmative action because they're racist." or "Conservatives hate the poor because they won't agree to suck the lower class' dick for free."
How could I NOT be morally superior?
You're not, you're just full of yourself. There is no such thing as morality and the forms of morality that do exist are artificial concepts made by man.
That's a matter of opinion. Right and Wrong exist as logical concepts as to what helps people the most and what hurts people the most.
No, these concepts are shaped by cultures and philosophers. In one culture killing your neighbor for his wife may be acceptable while in another it is punishable by death. See where I'm going? I'm pretty sure if you go to individual people and ask them to define the ten-commandments you would get bizarre answer. No side is really right, because we follow the ideology that appeals to us most.
Lol, now the PC liberal shitbags have come up with another politically-correct term for illegal aliens. Now left-wingers are calling them "undocumented-aliens." It's shit like this that makes me pro-fascist.
Wow, people who are against capitalism haven't even offered any decent arguments lately. How sad for them. I was expecting a challenge today.
At 5/20/06 10:41 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote: Guncrave, you never stop do you? Are you actively denying that homophobes exist?
The word is shit. It's a made-up word liberals use to help them demonize anyone who disagrees with them on homosexuality. That's all I said or tried to imply by my definition of homophobe.
Usually liberals are too close-minded to differentiate between people hating gays in a Fred Phelps way, and people hating homosexualty because they believe it's an abomination. Liberals try to discredit whomever they disagree with by making up new words and catch phrases like homophobe, neo-con, hat-mongerer, mental-dinosaur, etc because they don't even try to understand the otherside. Ironically left-wingers become the very things they claim to fight against, dogmatic-drones who rave about their ideas and ignore others.
Liberals also believe themselves morally superior somehow. Despite the fact they don't realize there is no such thing as absolute-morality, and that rigtheousness is an objective term.
At 5/20/06 07:11 PM, thinkpinkydink wrote: Atleast the bible is one of the only books that doesent give paper cuts
That is pretty cool. The Bible must be made out of somekind of magical paper.
At 5/20/06 07:24 PM, duffeknol wrote: Fat is a sign of prosper. It's a compliment.
America rocks.
Would you bang a fat chick?
At 5/20/06 07:08 PM, deathofself wrote: At 5/20/06 07:05 PM, GunCrave wrote::
You should make it a national sport. Football players aint got nothing on gladiators.It hurts my heart to admit it as a football player (and hopefully a semi-pro one come next year), but your right. Gladiators get weapons and can fight to death... for pie.
Don't forget for hot babes and a sweet crown of leaves/olivers or maybe that's for winners of the Greek olympics.
At 5/20/06 07:01 PM, --Judge_X-- wrote:At 5/20/06 07:01 PM, GunCrave wrote:It's in the 10 rules, isn't it?At 5/20/06 07:00 PM, SevenSeize wrote: Can we still have punch and pie?Only if you risk life and limb in the arena.
You should make it a national sport. Football players aint got nothing on gladiators.
At 5/20/06 07:00 PM, SevenSeize wrote: Can we still have punch and pie?
Only if you risk life and limb in the arena.
At 5/20/06 06:48 PM, peedee wrote: But then again, in Quebec there is far less alchohal abuse, and you can booze anywhere.
Come to my bro's frat house. We'll teach ya how to down hard liquor like a man.
I have another party platform. Same sex will be legal, but only for women and if they're hawt. I made the slogan already.
At 5/20/06 06:47 PM, marc_murray wrote: are you a homophobe?if so....why?
Homophobe = Buzz word for liberals so they can call people who disagree with their ideals on same sex marriage.
This kid is just another miserable shit who has to try and piss everyone off. I don't even care much about religion but stupid emo shits like him are better off aborted than allowed to live.
I'm going to go down to the ghetto and scream into a megaphone how Dr. Martin Luther King was a moral hypocrite and fraud, after they(black people) beat the shit out of me I'm going to the KKK message boards and cry about how black people are so savage. - radioheaded.
There is no way someone can be as much a dumbass as this kid. He's obviously an alt or something.
The ironic thing is Colbert is conservative.
Here's an idea "radioheaded" quit being a little bitch and deal with it. What you did was purposely intended to offend people. Here's an idea, why don't you take a Quran or Torah to school and rip/tear/eat it w/e. Chances are you would be equally punished for the infraction. People don't like it when you damage their religious documents. So you expect they would greet it with open-arms?
dipshit.
Okay, I'll explain again. There's a HUGE difference between mental retardation and a mental disorder/learning disability. People with these can actually be productive.
At 5/20/06 01:36 PM, Ev0lJam wrote: ebaums world had more than ng once!
Well of course it did. You don't hear ebaums raving about some bullshit holiday like Pico Day.
braces to be flamed
At 5/20/06 12:00 PM, Zealot_Kommunizma wrote: What made USSR better than other Capitalist countries is that it was Communist-tending. Preserving capitalism made the communist goal impossible.
A few former communist residents would disagree with you. Have you even experienced a communist country first-hand?
The answer is easy, Kemcab. J_squared1 is an attention whore.
The government should just make people watch the NRA instruction videos about proper handling of a gun.
At 5/20/06 12:43 PM, Elfer wrote
And the founding fathers didn't use computers, so those should be outlawed.
Did I say spanish should be outlawed? Fuck no.
And twnety-five is the age when your brain stops developing. Maybe we should postpone privilages that could endanger your cognitive thinking abilities until you're twenty-five. It's funny, in my state you can smoke when you're eighteen but can't drink until you're twenty-one. Either the tobacco lobby really has its shit together or Congress and state government are self-righteous pigs.
At 5/19/06 10:00 PM, Brownie_210 wrote: Actually, had the founding fathers installed alanguage we would probably be speaking German. At the time thewre was a bid debate about it I guess.
OH YES! I suppose that's why The Declaration of Indepedence, the Constitution and every major document of the colonial days, in regard to the state of the colonies, was written in english. Not to mention the language they all spoke during a Continental meeting was in english.
Face it, there's no plausible reason to be against this undertaking of english as the official language.
Unless you're a PC liberal cunt.
