Be a Supporter!
Response to: Why Some Believe we need Welfare... Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 10:07 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
At 5/23/06 09:55 PM, Me-Patch wrote: Welfare is important, but the middle class is over taxed while big buisness and the rich are not. Sure the rich pay more but their still fucking rich, and don't get me started on corporate loopholing.
Quite. So, the solution is to increase taxes on business and the wealthy...Raise the AMT percentage etc.

That won't solve anything. All raising corporate taxes will do is cause the price of products to go up.

Response to: To torture... or not to torture? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

What if you have Osama Bin Laden in your custody? Does torture become justifed just to make some worm suffer? I say yes to this rhetorical question.

Response to: Most believable religion Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 09:45 PM, ChocoCrack wrote: Definitley Scientology!

KIDDING!!!! That shits rediculous.

Um, well im an atheist but I guess Buhdism (Can't spell it) makes the most sense.

Humor me, what about Buddhism makes the most sense to you?

Response to: Christian bashing is a-ok! Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 08:28 PM, Dargon_Luster wrote:
At 5/21/06 06:08 PM, TehChahlesh wrote:

let's make newgrounds a religion!

Man, what a shitty religion that would be. Would Tom be our Pope while Wade is our Arch-Bishop?

Response to: Arrested = publishing classified? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 08:37 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Oh, yeah! The 1917 espionage act!

Tell me, is the Espionage Act still a law the press has to abide by?

Response to: Arrested = publishing classified? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 08:26 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
At 5/22/06 08:49 PM, GunCrave wrote: Depends, I'm not sure I want the press releasing the locations of US bases in foreign countries or the latest developement for our new military ware. Somethings the public should know whether other things the public shouldn't know about. Incase some psychopath determines to run on the information leaked by the press and do something stupid, like bomb a Marine Corp. armory.
I've never met a journalist who would reveal the composition of the armor of an M1A2, but if you have, please tell me. The Pentagon Papers, under Gonzalezs, would be illegal to publish, and that's just crap, that is, if you know what the Pentagon papers are.

Sure, I heard about the New York Times printing the locations of secret US Airforce bases in Europe. The gov was pretty pissed off about this because they were worried some terrorist group would run on this information and bomb countries that helped out the US with it's against War on Terrorism. There is also controversy whether the New York times violated the Espionage Act. Check it out here.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 06:50 PM, YankeeFli wrote:
At 5/23/06 06:37 PM, stafffighter wrote: You're big but we're better at violent crime. So take that bitch
95 percent of Canada lives within 100 miles of the US border.

Maybe they want to breather our sweet air of freedom.

Or

Maybe there planning something.

Do you suppose we should drop a few nukes just incase they're up to sumthin'?

Response to: my dyke teacher Posted May 23rd, 2006 in General

Errrrr, will I regret clicking on the link?

Response to: For All Patriotic Canadians Posted May 23rd, 2006 in General

I don't feel like bashing Canada, but you think I could get a "Cool Yankie" medal anyways?

Response to: Why Some Believe we need Welfare... Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 05:58 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:
Better to die than be a leech to society that sits at home and smiles with undeserving success.
Yet capitalists seem to have no problem with people like Paris Hilton doing the same.

You think we give a shit about Paris Hilton being a moron, no. Why? Because her dad is the one who had to work hard to get his money, and after he earned it he can give it to whomever he wanted. Including his stupid bitch of a daughter.

Another point is the middle class' money isn't being wasted so Paris Hilton can be a dumb blonde, while welfare forces everyone to pay for some useless piece of human trash so he can continue to get his fix.

Response to: Arrested = publishing classified? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 10:37 PM, mofomojo wrote: This is bull, I hope they continue to publish articles exposing the corrupt government. Most likely, they're going to overturn any ruling that tries to prosecute them.

Have any proof of such accusations of a corrupt governemt or would you prefer to prattle the same leftist mantra?

Response to: bring back the USSR! Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 06:00 PM, dr_syko wrote: THE USSR ROCKS! ya i love the ussr they dont hvae eny of this *god* bullshit

I hope you die.

Response to: Whites are too Gullible Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 09:19 AM, SevenSeize wrote:
At 5/23/06 03:56 AM, -poxpower- wrote: If we're gullible, then native-americans must need a new word just for them haha.
I am Native American. This makes me sad. I will not give you any of my corn or turkey for at least 2 more days....
Maybe 1 day if you give me some pretty beads....

I'll trade you some smallpox for those turkeys and maze(Indian corn I believe).

Response to: The Narcissism of Liberalism Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 05:56 PM, Kenzu wrote: Actually I wanted to say that it's too corrupt.

If you believe any country, continent, government form, institute is without corruption you're a bigger fool than Barbara Kingsolver.

Why to give others jobs, when I can keep the money for myself? *sarcasm*

It's called freedom of choice, you should look that term up sometime. Trust me, everyone having a job is not a good thing. A manager at McDonalds who has all the positions filled necessary to run the dive can't just magically whip up a job without suffering an unnecessary burden of paying someone he doesn't need. On top of that they're plenty of job available right now. The Capitalististic market's growing and the demand for more man-power is at an all time high. These hobos are just too lazy, drugged out, useless to hold a job.

Response to: Democrat or Rebublican? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 04:17 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:
Democrats wanna spend, spend, spend on welfare, medicare and other useless shit programs, which In the end, won't help anyone and waste even more revenue.
I love how welfare and medicine are useless and don't help anyone. As if a medical practitioner ever saved anyone's life. It's also amusing how you recognise how war mongering Republicans are, yet have more problem with people saving lifes than taking them.

Penal, please learn how to read more thoroughly. Did I ever say medicine and practioners were useless? No, I said quote: other useless shit programs: end quote. My point is these programs don't help anyone because too many people can take advantage of welfare easily enough, and most people have medical insurance. The people who don't usually are the ones who are living off welfare or maintain a low-paying job. Even if they don't have hospital insurance they can still get treatment, but they just have to pay all of it.

In the end these people don't learn a lesson in self-sufficiency when they relay on society to bail them out. Why is it mine and every hard-working person's responsiblity to assist those who are not helping anyone else out? It isn't our obligation, nor should we be forced to help if we do not feel obliged. Our tax dollars are wasted pointlessly on these programs so the self-righteous can feel good about themselves making the middle class unwillingly pay for something that isn't our concern in the first place.

Response to: Democrat or Rebublican? Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

Neither, both republicans and democrats are fiscally irrresponsible, or at least in this current administration that is proved.

Republicans just want to spend, spend, spend on the military like we're preparing for the God damned Apocolypse. These guys are fucking warhawks. I usually side with them, though.

Democrats wanna spend, spend, spend on welfare, medicare and other useless shit programs, which In the end, won't help anyone and waste even more revenue. While these guys are fucking socialist idiots.

Response to: The Narcissism of Liberalism Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

Though I agree with most of your points, MeSmashie, you're asking for trouble. You're going to get self-righteous reprobates in here like Ravariel and Penal. I guarantee you this much.

Response to: bring back the USSR! Posted May 23rd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/23/06 09:21 AM, Kenzu wrote:
At 5/23/06 03:38 AM, Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:
At 5/23/06 02:34 AM, FAB0L0US wrote:
At 5/23/06 02:20 AM, Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

USSR never used oth.... Nowadays 98% of Cubans can read and write and Cuba has become an authority on health research world-wide, ...
It is actually 99.8% of cubans who can read. CIA statistics are biased, so you can't trust them. Other sources state 99%, 99.5% and 100%.

I think that the 0.2% are just people, who can't learn to read and write. Afterall is education compulsory and no one is allowed to skip it.

There is no point for everyone to learn how to read in communist countries. In a communist country the government chooses your job for you, and unless something catastrpohic occurs in the industry, you're bound to that occupation for life. Some people might be assigned to be janitors, low-brow construction workers or grunts in the military.

Just another freedom capitalism gives that communism doesn't: the right to choose.

Response to: I Hate Bitches. Posted May 22nd, 2006 in General

At 5/22/06 08:45 PM, milinko959 wrote:
At 5/22/06 08:44 PM, CUBErt wrote: Just dumped?
You stole my question.

Maddox disagrees with you.

Response to: Arrested = publishing classified? Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

Depends, I'm not sure I want the press releasing the locations of US bases in foreign countries or the latest developement for our new military ware. Somethings the public should know whether other things the public shouldn't know about. Incase some psychopath determines to run on the information leaked by the press and do something stupid, like bomb a Marine Corp. armory.

Response to: Only for Socialists and Communists! Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 07:58 PM, Begoner wrote:
Remember, there's a lower GDP than KENYA, only $3,300 GDP PPP
Surely that doesn't have anything to do with the US embargo? Of course they're not going to make a lot of money if they can't export their goods.

Since they don't comply with US demands it isn't hurting them that much.

Response to: gods real name Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 05:15 PM, A_Carrot_By_Dr_Riot wrote:
At 5/22/06 05:10 PM, GunCrave wrote:
At 5/22/06 04:35 PM, A_Carrot_By_Dr_Riot wrote:
At 5/22/06 01:41 PM, GunCrave wrote: No one can prove it either way, Sunday.
Prove that! I have a sneaking suspicion that you're just too stupid to figure it out.
Suck my dick. It's impossible to prove God exists or doesn't exist when he supposedly exists on a supernatural level.
So, are you suggesting that when it comes to the supernatural, no knowledge is possible? I'm curious as to how you've come to that conclusion because I suspect it is wild speculation.

You can't prove it by scientific ways, therefore it is not falsifiable. You can't take a carbon dating and prove if a god exists, you can't take a statistic and figure whether there's a god or not. See where I'm going with this? Can you give me one logical process to prove whether God exists or doesn't?

Response to: gods real name Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 04:35 PM, A_Carrot_By_Dr_Riot wrote:
At 5/22/06 01:41 PM, GunCrave wrote: No one can prove it either way, Sunday.
Prove that! I have a sneaking suspicion that you're just too stupid to figure it out.

Suck my dick. It's impossible to prove God exists or doesn't exist when he supposedly exists on a supernatural level.

Response to: soldiers are murderers. Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

The only reason HogWash made this thread was probably because he saw this one.

Response to: Iraqi's Vs Apache Posted May 22nd, 2006 in General

I want to be an apache pilot now.

Response to: gods real name Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 01:25 PM, SundayBest wrote:
At 5/21/06 03:30 PM, Popsticle wrote: God doesn't exist
Prove it.

No one can prove it either way, Sunday.

Response to: soldiers are murderers. Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 01:36 PM, Cajunspirit wrote:
At 5/22/06 01:30 PM, GunCrave wrote:
At 5/22/06 01:27 PM, Cajunspirit wrote: " All is fair in love and war "

Hahahaa
How true is that?
The Hahahaa was an indication of sarcasm

Seriously man, everything does go in war. The reason being, in my opinion, is you're already murderering your human brother, so there's no reason to abhere to codes or ethic on the battle field.

Response to: Evolution... Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/21/06 04:17 PM, facksfunny wrote: What's really funny is that you didn't get the point of my post. You didn't understand anything at all there. The airplane example demonstrates how look at the evolution of the cells. You fail to recognize that the very first cells were very, very simple. Do some research and you will see how primitive they were. The only reason you can't see how organic matter could form into a cell is because you see a cell as a complex organism.

Dude, that's all fine and dandy. But you missed my point. I'm not questioning whether or not the prodecessor of modern cells were extremely simple. I am trying to convey there's a difference between these cells and old-fashion airplanes. The cells formed by themselves or theoretically, while the airplanes were designed by an intelligent being, therefore, you cannot really correlate them in a way of example of abiogenesis.

Response to: soldiers are murderers. Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

At 5/22/06 01:27 PM, Cajunspirit wrote: " All is fair in love and war "

Hahahaa

How true is that?

Response to: soldiers are murderers. Posted May 22nd, 2006 in Politics

Hahahaha, I want to join the military to see the world, experience strange and new cultures, and meet people of ancient order and descent.............then kill them. I want to be the first kid on my block with a confirmed kill.

How does that make you pacifists feel?