Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Mine stick to my ears because I have so much earwax.

Congratulations to the winners!

At 5/5/12 01:36 AM, Skaren wrote: I have 12 fans, I'm surprised to find that other people don't have more than that.

I have 21.

Happy birthday, bryan.

Newgrounds in one word.....Newgrounds.

15,000+ B/P!
Level 23!

At 5/4/12 10:03 PM, SCTE3 wrote: So aside from it being a screamer, it doesn't do anything?

Eh, I don't think it does anything more, because as misty said, the previous one was the same and that was a screamer (at least, it was a pic of a roblox guy saying "i am teh noobz", because my volume was on mute.
I'm sure it'll get blammed eventually.

At 5/4/12 09:21 PM, GhostOfHalloween wrote: http://www.kongregate.com/games/asitgames/pretty-valentine-g irl-dressup

There are no more dressup games on NG, buwuhahahahaha!

At 5/4/12 08:01 PM, Xenomit wrote: I think its hilarious that these people take trolls seriously.

I can't believe that they called the people who used that picture "a troll"

quote: everybody is a troll waah

At 5/4/12 12:32 PM, Decky wrote:

At 5/4/12 11:41 AM, SCTE3 wrote: Can you imagine how many threads would be made from various users whining and complaining they got a portal ban for no reason?

I can't be the only one that thinks this is a good idea just to see how many of threads are made by these idiots. I'd be understandable if it wasn't pointed out in a NG news thread.

If it was sitewide then Tom would probably alert all the users so as to not make them revolt. The PM would also say something along the lines of "This is a test portal ban. From today we are banning all shovelware accounts. To prove you are a legit account, please click here. Oh, and the link is safe. -Tom"

At 5/4/12 08:06 AM, Dent0n wrote: How much kills could a denton denton dent if a denton could kill denton?

0, because a denton cannot kill denton.

Meh

At 5/4/12 06:00 AM, Decky wrote:

At 5/4/12 05:17 AM, Gimmick wrote: (stuff)

It's a good idea although i see a problem with it. New shovelware accounts could just be created and after all the trouble of creating a bot (or if Tom sent the PMs himself or whatever) to distribute the messages it seems like quite a big fault and because of that I don't think they would do it.

Ah. Well. Here's something I didn't anticipate.

Okay then, the best solution is the same method, only an IP ban instead of a portal ban.

Because timezones.

At 5/4/12 03:32 AM, Decky wrote:

Is that a good idea or not? Yay or nay?

I'd say that it's a good idea, I'm not going to lie I'm a little confused as to how it will work even after your explanation but as much as I got seemed to be an idea that could work.

It's like that "perma review ban" from when Canas' account was compromised: It showed a link that said "Click here to appeal your ban" which was malicious -- it's the same like that for this case, except here it's not malicious; it IS a flash portal ban appeal, and if you can provide proof you are a legit user then you're unbanned. This cannot happen for those who have existing bans. I'm thinking this can be done because admins know which people were banned, so they can "blacklist" those users.

And then you click the link, then something happens, you get another PM in an hour or two, and you're unbanned.

This will not happen for shovelware accounts because they don't reply to PMs, so even if they receive it they won't respond to it. Of course, there is no actual "expiration date" for that, as users can appeal whenever they want, as there is a chance that users can be inactive for as much as 2 years.

So when a normal user has arrived from his 10 year break from NG, he checks that PM, poof! He's unbanned, and he continues to a) ignore NG or b) visit NG regularly.

This works, as said before, on the assumption that shovelware accounts are bot-like and so do not reply to PMs; thus, EVERY user is "considered" a shovelware account, UNTIL they reply to that PM. They can't submit anything until they reply or click that link? Good. They bother to click that link and they resume. The ones who are not accessing NG won't have any problem since they're not accessing it anyways.

Win-win.

All of them.

At 5/3/12 04:30 PM, SCTE3 wrote:

At 5/3/12 04:24 PM, Decky wrote:

I think the idea of a flash is great. That way all of the shovelware games could be deleted.

A flash or a thread about them?

I think a flash would be much better as there are probably more portal-goers rather than BBS-goers on Newgrounds; however, a combination of both would be equally good...but if the users just do the opposite to annoy the thread maker, then I guess it wouldn't work.

Oh, and why not just let ALL the users, ALL of them, no exceptions, be portal banned forever?

That may seem lke a bad idea, but here's the thing: The portal ban is -- reversible -- meaning that all the users get the portal ban, and then they're sent a PM automatically. If they click a link in that PM, then they'll automatically be portal-unbanned. This only applies to those who have NOT already been portal banned, so regular users who comply with the rules will get the reversal message; since the shovelware accounts do not go to the portal or otherwise even ANSWER private messages, and just submit flash, then it'd make sense to ban all of them and only let through the *legitimate* accounts.

Is that a good idea or not? Yay or nay?

At 5/4/12 12:16 AM, beardkiller wrote:

At 5/4/12 12:06 AM, Prinzy2 wrote: Long live President McJesus!

And vice president satan

I'm pretty sure you mean "Santan"

you get the reference

At 5/4/12 01:09 AM, tox wrote: a jew, muslum, and paki, walk into a bar
that bartender looks up at them and says

get the fuck out

If it wasn't racist/religionist then I would have laughed even more at it.

At 5/4/12 01:25 AM, tox wrote:

At 5/4/12 01:24 AM, benjadaninja wrote:

At 5/4/12 01:22 AM, bgraybr wrote:
Says you. I'm gonna bring the BBS down just so I can watch it burn.

Be nice, bring your school down instead.

oh lets not go there guys,

Yeah the students are much more flammable than the school.

To submit a bug report, you have to post in the Redesign Bug Reporting thread. You also need to write the OS you have, the browser you're using, and any other information you feel is relevant.

So...in what way is this a "bug report"?

"He who can- does. He who cannot- teaches"

At 5/3/12 11:29 PM, beardkiller wrote: Have you ever stepped in cat shoe feces with no socks on?

Hey, at least you can wash your feet easier than washing your socks...

Okay...get a dream (or nightmare) about you logging on to newgrounds and getting perma-banned...or banned for 30 days...and see if you're scared yet.

At 5/3/12 12:03 PM, ih8dude wrote: Sad news everyone. Your World failed to meet it's goal. But don't give up hope guys Bunky Doublechinington

Wow, his name is Bunky Doublechinington? Wow...I wonder how the people he's hiring manage to take him seriously with that.

And this summarizes my response to Dunky BubbleShinington, and I couldn't have said it better:

At 5/3/12 12:13 PM, Ilssm wrote:

At 5/3/12 11:48 AM, C-toff wrote: stuff

Good job, you smoke pot, and you re-hashed common internet knowledge. You deserve a fucking medal.

He has got a point, though. Some people may not have known what he said despite being on the internet. Myself included, previously.

Cool. I'll be using it in the near future. Thanks!

At 5/3/12 07:37 AM, CrazyRock wrote: They're not that bad.

But Soup Squad on the other hand...

...they're wonderful!

At 5/2/12 08:02 PM, 111122223138 wrote: Thanks for helping me toss shit against a wall and seeing what stuck. I'll keep this thread updated with what happeneds next by major events.

Love you guys.

Good job. You alerted the authorities in a situation where another person (e.g me) would have been scared to do nothing. I respect you even more for that.

At 5/3/12 03:23 AM, sugarsimon wrote: As one of the most photographs have been made.

...

What did I just read?