195 Forum Posts by "Geordi-Laforge"
At 2/4/05 01:13 PM, -LazyDrunk- wrote:At 2/4/05 01:11 PM, UNOWNED wrote: The real solution is only have one mod, a dictator of some sort.OMG teh waid!
Wade already is our Emper. . . leader. He is the one doling power (through peace and love, mind you) to the Way of MOD.
Praise he who guides us through the valley of the shadow of n00b, and banneth those oppose our cause.
At 2/3/05 03:31 PM, arbitrarynickname wrote:
That is all. FOR NOW.
Shlast thee continue thy ways of deceit and disharmony?
Thy head is mine.
At 2/3/05 03:13 PM, arbitrarynickname wrote:
Also, the only light that a Mod will show you is that of his Maglite as you are being beaten mercilessly with the butt end of it, a la Rodney King.
I, will be the one holding the camera, as YOU are Rodney Kinged for your blasphemus input.
For littering.
Teh Mod rejoice in the littering of heathen heads strewn about the streets.
At 2/3/05 02:46 PM, arbitrarynickname wrote:
Blasphemus words of hate.
We shall show you teh love, whence you see the light Teh Mod hath provideth. Lest you convert, judgement shath be passed.
At 2/3/05 01:36 AM, arbitrarynickname wrote:
You're just jealous because you don't have hentai tentacles.
No, but we've got God.
Bitch what now
At 2/2/05 01:34 AM, Denominat0r wrote:
Post what click you were or are in, and whether or not you enjoy it and why you chose not to be with the others.
I hear ya. Since JH, I was always the student council/jock person. Popular among the sports crowd, looked up to by the preps. After moving out of the cities, into a small town of 1500, I scaled back on the student leadership stuff. I just wanted to enjoy high school for what it was, without the extra responsibility of deciding what this year's prom theme was going to be, or whether or not pizza should be served on a daily basis in the cafeteria. I was still with the jock crowd at this point, and decided to take up drama as my english requirement (I heard the teacher was awesome. Personality and intelligence-wise). After a career-ending injuring during the wrestling season, all I had left concerning school was acting. Of course, I still had/have a few close friends from sports, and we still hang out, but I got to get to know more and more people from both the "geek" clique and the stoner peoples. I blended in fairly well with both groups, having geek tendencies myself and being a recreational smoker, but never felt the urge to completely conform to any of the groups. Example: I'd go over to a buddy's house and play super smash bros for hours on end, but when there's something else to do, like a rodeo in town or a concert a few towns over, I'd jump at the idea while the "nerds" would still want to sit around and play video games. Didn't much jive with doing that 24/7. As with the stoners, smoking da pot is always a fun time. A great way to waste an afternoon. But when all you buds from the group believe in the theory of Wake 'n' Bake (getting ripped before going to school in the morning), you have your doubts. I'd only seen one or two of them sober at any given point. I sorta ditched trying to make friends in the crowds of people at the lunchroom. I'd sit by myself whenever possible, just for the comfort of hearing about how Tommy just got a fat QP and everyone's gunna smoke themselves sober on it, or Jack got the new version Xbox and Halo, and everyone was gunna bring their own TV and play with 14 people, all in different rooms. I was surprised when I'd sit down with other kids who were sitting alone and started talking with them. Nine times out of ten, they felt the exact same way I did. I've met and kept more very close friends that were loners, than those I've met in cliques. I guess it's about what type of person you yourself are. After I figured out what I wasn't (a full-time jock, nerd, stoner) I realized what type of people I'd have the best friendships with.
I dunno. End rant.
Just think, if every farmer got out his pistol, popped a cap in every cattle over 5 years old, there would be virtually zero threat of BSE from Canada. Then the U.S. media wouldn't be able to point out cases of BSE when Canada and the U.S. are attempting to open up the beef trade again.
Sacrifice a little bit of Betsy for allota American $$$
At 2/2/05 04:32 AM, Jimsween wrote:At 2/1/05 11:51 PM, Damien_FLAGG wrote: Some people like being janitors. Some people like being a construction worker. I know I do. Not everyone WANTS to be a lawyer, or a doctor, or an airline pilot.You sound just like a communist right now.
Not really, just a realist. I've known plenty of above-average construction workers, as well as many well-below. The thing they all have in common is they either need the job, or love doing it. I can tell you the ones that're very intelligent aren't doing it because they need to in order to survive.
It's pretty much what America was founded on; being free to choose (or at least have the opportunity) to do whatever you want for a living.
At 2/1/05 07:47 PM, FAB0L0US wrote: But not the ones that actually wanted the job. I have realized that unintentional leaders are usually the best. Power hogs are the worst.
Props to Cheney.
At 2/1/05 01:17 PM, _IceMan_ wrote:
I still dont know what shit you mean, but im very curious
At 2/1/05 01:14 PM, The-Mage wrote:At 2/1/05 01:12 PM, i-hope-you-die wrote: If you want a place that's civilized, go to politicsyour kidding right?
everyone there is a raging liberal communist and everyone bush bashes, but ofcourse we're all teens, and most teens are democrat by nature
Have you even been there recently?
I'm guessing you haven't. Conservatives are amking a comeback, and liberal whiny bitch teens get put in their place when they need to be.
If you want a place that's civilized, go to politics
At 2/1/05 12:05 PM, Earfetish wrote: I've indulged in Lady Salvia many times. It's not as good as shrooms. Sometimes, the feelings are more irritating than anything else.
The first few times I had it, I got the giggles and had some crazy thoughts, and a few small trips. Eventually it fades into nothing, and I don't buy it any more because of how crappy it has become.
They've been amplifying the extract more and more recently. I'm not sure what the amount is now (maybe 21x), but you're right, shrooms are better.
The only thing I don't like about Salvia is that ya gotta smoke more than would would seem necessary to get the desired effects. At least it works well with alcohol. Strangely, not weed.
What's with all the red bull fans? The only reason red bull even exists is for the liquid viagras. And even in that case, Monster works ten times better.
Props to Monster.
At 2/1/05 09:06 AM, JeNNiF00F00 wrote: funny. I used to grow Salvia in my garden, if this is the same salvia that you guys are talking about. Id never have enough guts to smoke it tho.
There's only one type of the sage that's hallucinogenic. And for the person who said it's an herb, not an incense needs to read up on the legality of salvia. It can only be sold under the premise of "it's an incence, I swear!"
Yes, it's flavor doesn't compare to a good nugg, but you also don't trip from weed.
And if you do smoke it, smoke at least a gram at a time and use a torch lighter, not a bic.
At 2/1/05 11:35 AM, ShitOnAStick wrote: Petrucci and Mustaine<3
Mustaine never had shit on Hammett.
At 2/1/05 03:48 AM, Mortimer_Gobbit wrote:At 2/1/05 03:41 AM, i-hope-you-die wrote: Wouldn't your three quick jabs pierce her thin plastic inflatable body?SIlly hope-you-die, interweb nerds don't have the muscle mass to pierce thin sheets of plastic.
Yea, I suppose you're right.
Even if they did, I'm sure his needle-dick would've done the trick long before the quick jabbing began.
. . . with salvia divinorum?
Don't know what it is? Technically, it's an incense, but the extracted active ingredients have been found to have hallucinogenic effects.
SO, folks who've tried it: Did you trip?
At 2/1/05 03:37 AM, bluemidgetguy wrote: When ever im done having sex I always tell my matey "ROLL THE FUCK OVER AND SPIT OUT MY CUM, IT DOSNT BELONG TO YOU BITCH" Then I do 3 quick jabs to her forehead and give her a swift head butt to her Cervix.
Wouldn't your three quick jabs pierce her thin plastic inflatable body?
At 2/1/05 02:41 AM, -0706- wrote: Me. I am soooo underrated. I can play jingle bells.
YOu can play jingle bells on my nutz
At 2/1/05 02:01 AM, Denominat0r wrote: blah blah blah canadian army pwning silly ignorant americans
Bet you never learnt that in History class.
I didn't even know Canadia had a real army. I always you guys just ran around talking Frenglish and bitching aboot things.
But I suppose I shouldn't be so harsh, since I am part French-Canadian.
Hey, at least SOMETHING good has come from you guys.
At 2/1/05 02:00 AM, The_Confused wrote: Another one:
"Let's play Top Gun! I'll be Maverick, and you can be Iceman!"
How bout, "I bet you could drive a truck through there!"
This is almost as good as your sister
Is there supposed to be a burning sensation?
At 1/30/05 10:46 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Wow, they started a petition?
Do you think Wade will get wanked off that they're doing this? Maybe come down on you harder as if you're behind it and trying to stand up to his authority?
At 1/30/05 06:16 PM, red_skunk wrote: I believe they were talking about a well-regulated, state-run militia.
I disagree. The Founding Fathers were very deliberate in their choice of words discerning Government from other entities.
NotYouZ, you didn't bring up the fact that the 2nd amendment uses the word "people" instead of "man." Everywhere else in the constitution, the use of "people" means collectively - not individually. The use of "man" means individually.
Cannot individuals be addressed as a whole without inciting government? Isn't that what independance is based upon, individual freedoms?
You have to look at it from their point of view. At that time, nearly everyone had a gun. They hunted, they target practiced, they incited revolt.
The first two things you mention are non-points as to why the Founding Fathers decided to include firearm ownership in the Bill of Rights. The third, however, is the biggie. They thought it necessary for every able-bodied man (Until the Militia Act of 1903, the militia still consisted of all men capable of bearing arms between ages 18 and 45.) to have a right to bear arms for the purpose of overthrowing corrupted government; not just England's, but for our own as well, if it ever came to that point.
There is an express reference to the security of a "free State."It is not a referance to the security of "The State".
Did they really think it was necessary to codify their right to own a hunting rifle? Of course not, being able to own a weapon was an unalienable right at that point in time - they gave kids guns.
Did they mention hunting or recreation in the Amendment?
Here's a good article, fairly bipartisamn.
ClickdeLink
What they were afraid of, was an omnipotent federal government overstepping its boundaries. They were afraid that the federal government would begin to "pull an England" on the states.
Correct.
They wanted to afford the states the constitutional right to protect themselves. With "well-regulated [state-run] militias."
The only part the state has to do with militias, is the ordainment of officers to TRAIN the militias. The people (individual citizens) are still the bread and butter.
I'm just trying to look at the 2nd amendment from the most realistic, practical point of view possible. They didn't want the feds infringing on states rights.
And if the States agree with the Feds infringing on individuals Rights, what then? It's still boils down to the people to step up, as their duty, to a government, whatever it's size, that oversteps it's bounds in taking away ANY of the people's Rights. Not only the right to keep and bear arms, but free speech and all that other jazz as well.
At 1/30/05 07:19 PM, red_skunk wrote: I have nothing against communism. I wish the sanctions on Cuba would be lifted - it's an interesting social experiment.
I agree. Is the U.S. still bent over Fidel Castro? Open up trade with 'em, Jesse Ventura-style
BeFell, you still doing the bear suit thing?
At 1/28/05 06:45 AM, _IceMan_ wrote: Do you?
Till what price?
I would, Ng is my life!!
I would never pay a penny for membership. In spite of it's wonderful debates (politics forum), it just isn't worth real $$$
It's something you grow out of.
NG just isn't a big enough part of my life to invest money in it.
Now if NG put shares into the sotck market, that'd be a different story.
