293 Forum Posts by "gem1"
This pile of hot gravel would still like to know how to delete his user if you would by any chance know how.
Actually, fags don't bother me as long as they keep their "Adult" behavior to themselfs. Everone deals with a fag here or there and that's fine. No one really cares. I don't care if they take out the trash or manage company. When they start pushing it on others and kids that is when it crosses the line. It's perverted "Adult" behavior that needs to stay to themselfs.
Actually, if you can tell me how to delete my user profile I would be happy with that. I can't seem to find the part where one can delete their own user.
Why,
You are the one trying to convince everyone. It's the fags problems not mine. They can burn in hell and I don't care what their position is.
If I were to live with 2 women, it would be abnormal. It would be a lot of fun but I know better and I don't (not that there are 2 women that would). If I did I certainly would not go around telling people, trying to convince people that's it's an "OK Behavior" and I certainly wouldn't bring children into it. That would be fucked up. No one cares what fags do as long as they keep it to themselves. When they try to make everyone believe it's ok, that's when it gets fucked up. When they bring kids into it, they can just burn in hell. That's truely fucked up!
At 7/16/04 05:20 PM, spanishfli wrote:
Homosexuals don't fornicate with animals, as do heterosexual. Zoophiles are the ones whom have sex with animals such as sheep.
The visual post of two guys kissing is just as discusting.
At 7/16/04 04:58 PM, TheHedonist wrote: John Wayne was a homosexual.
But at least he didn't post images everywhere of himself kissing cowboys or hump'n sheep!
He wasn't really was he? Your gona make me cry!
I got a better idea, how about we work on things that help create better and more honerable people. Why did John wayne have to die so soon!
A lot of bad fires over the years blamed on tree hugegers blocking forest from being cultivated. Trees cut down in groups and re-grown. By doing so they can keep forest fires under control by managing how they are re-grown. We actually end up with more trees this way (and less loss of life and property). More fires in the headlines today.
At 7/15/04 08:27 PM, grand_retard wrote: My OPINION is that you are a loser. In (probably) a desk job, with a bit of a belly with knit real ambition. Bitter because you feel you’ve wasted your life (probably as near to the real you as you are to the real losers).
But you’re happy, and that’s cool.
I’m happy, so don’t call me a loser, and I wont call you one.
Well done!. Actually, I am a corporate pilot with some office/security duties. Airline pilot before family illness. If I even breath pot from a nearby user my carear and livelyhood would be gone in a flash. Actually I was at a desk today, yesterday doing 300mph over a populated city between the vapers of a smoke stack and navigating around thunderstorm cells. Cool job actually!
At 7/15/04 04:32 PM, ryoshi100 wrote:
Are we to completely allow them to self-destruct so that the responsible few can enjoy their pot??
Arg, your friend triped off of codene?? ("right")
btw, anyone who would ground up their medication and snort it is exactly the kind of jackass that I wouldn't want to be able to smoke weed legally... What if that idiot gets behind the wheel of a car.,
Ryoshi100 is being kind. I have many life experiences of being around pot smoking loosers. One was SlamDunk Sam a Harlem globe trotter who got the team put in jail out of the country. They barly made it out and back to the USA. He cleaned the toilets in the dorm rooms and got pot from the kids. The guy was a LOSER! Famous people? Famous people are in the news nightly for drugs, legal trouble and rehab. Look at Elvis. The Psyco SOB used to shoot everything with his pistols. TV's cars, lucky he didn't kill some one. Yea millions of one time pot users are ok. That's brilliant, so are millions who underwent anesthesia. And yes there are many problems with prescrition drugs. THAT'S WHY THEIR CALLED DRUGS. I tried helping a kid growing up who was on the back side of poor. I got him going in activities, hobbies, gave him good direction. At 16 he started doing pot, went from job to job and is living in a slum house with a bunch of other pothead losers! He ain't welcome in my house no more. I am currently seeking prosecution for a worker who is supose to be taking care of the elderly. Instead, we got her crouched down on hidden camera smoking pot and not taking care of residents. POT SMOKING LOSERS, they can justfy anything. I don't really care if it is legalized or not. Yes booze can be as bad in it's own way. I don't embraze drunken loosers either. We regulate so much in this society that we just need to create better people. Instead we create people who are more intersted in what their rights are than what is right. The problem with pot smoking losers is, they never realize their Pot Smoking Losers! Maybe it's the pot? Duh,
At 7/8/04 12:56 PM, StrongMatt wrote:At 7/8/04 12:54 PM, StrongMatt wrote: If I every find a 6 wheeled car...this will be the first place to be notified.I think I may have just found it...I hope this is the one...
There are few six wheel cars because they have lousy performance. It makes traction off ballance and adds tremendous weight. A stupid miata would run circles around it.
Is there a thread here where people really talk cars or is "gee that's a pretty picture" all one can hope for?
How do you close your account on this thing?
Those who promote their gayness are like Pedaphiles. The problem is very similar except open gaynes efects children indirectly instead of directly. It's sad children have to learn about it at young ages. It's not right. I saw the argument that gayness is seen in animals so it is natural. So are PEDAFILES! If you want to keep it to yourself, who cares. We work around people who are gay from time to time. No one makes issue of it, no one really cares until the gay people push it on everyone else. That is when it is screwed up! We should have a society which would help them in an apropriate setting. Instead we don't know what to do with these freaks. Do we ignore them? No, lets embrace them!" Gme a freekn break. They need psycological help and suport not encouragement.
Pot smokers loosers live off family and society contributing nothing but influence for more losers. They are something less than human and only take up the space of people trying to make it in this world. If all they care about is pot you can see why loser is the nicest thing you can call them. Pot smoking loosers are not welcome in most business areas of America. Their jobs at Burger King are only temporary. Soon they are living in friends basements floating from loser job to loser job wondering why their life is so bad, and how come the world is so cruel to them and "OH YEA, Pot should be legal". What a loser!
What this country lacks is people of honor. People do things for themselves and they want to hang those who have done stuff for them. You can’t drive down the road without some one pushing you out of your lane and flipping you off because you were in their way. This is becoming typical. I am not one who has not tried to help people. I took a kid in under my wings, helped him with radio controlled airplanes, bought his equipment, took him to events. And even got him his first job. After he reached 16 he became a pot smoking looser. He has gone from job to job and has no future. He knows not to show his face because he is no longer allowed in my home or near my family.
I will leave because, although interesting, there is nothing to gain from the immaturity and ignorance here. Kerry is probably a little better than Clinton from a personal perspective. Nothing can ruin the presidency like the acts of Clinton. Clinton even lost respect of foreign leaders. Kerry is a flip-flop and will not follow through with anything that will cost him votes. What will he do in Iraq? We are already there. Who knows. We’ll see if he is spineless or honorable. The left principles are for more government, more taxes and more socialized programs. This will stifle economic growth. He may actually gain from the growth happening now as Clinton did. There is a serious lack of understanding of the economy here and a lot of people think that everything should be given to them and they should not have to earn it. They simply deserve it. That is the Democrat way. Free Cheese for everyone!
Anyway, than you for your time, It has been interesting but there is obviously nothing more to gain here. ReiperX, thanks for the good conversation! This is my last visit. I am gone now so you guys can smear me without honor at will. I wish you all well!
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
Perhaps if Clinton had kept his promises, over 3,000 people would be alive today.
http://www.rightturns.com/columnists/harper/sh20030915.htm
http://www.earstohear.net/china.html
http://www.rightnation.us/blog/hudson/blog_more.php?id=222_0_4_0_M
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/525255/posts
http://www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets/Bubba.html
http://www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets/Bubba_99_2.html
http://www.centerforsecuritypo...ection=papers&code=02-F_02
http://www.zpub.com/un/bclegacy.html
http://www.georgewbush.com/kerrymediacenter/read.aspx?ID=2439
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/jan2000/sou1-j31.shtml
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1249.cfm
http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=detail&storyid=208639
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37349
http://www.worldnewsstand.net/today/articles/coxrant.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/hottopics/Clinton_Scandals.shtml
http://www.dailyrepublican.com/clintonpunishes.html
And by the way, tell the guys they can delete my account. I can’t figure out how to do it (I know, I thought I was smart)
It has been interesting reading the stuff on this site. The liberals here have shown an amazing lack of understanding of logic, history and politics. The amount of miss information from the Clinton followers here has been amazing. Clinton has depleted the military, taken credit for the economy as he rode the Bush recovery, set us up for terrorist attacks, set us up for an economic downfall, and was a disgrace for our country. He lied flat out more than any person I know. One of the biggest jokes was his forecast of an economic surplus. This is an example of just how clueless the man was and how gullible the American people are. Clinton is a used car salesman that took America for a ride. Clinton was well known for his infidelity in Arkansas and in the business community. He was known to walk down main street in Little Rock arm in arm with other women on a regular basis. Pilots would pick up Clinton, and pick up a girlfriend somewhere else, then drop her off again latter. This has gone on for years. I have no doubt he and Hilary had an arrangement. Clinton took America for a ride, and everyone said thank you because they are too stupid to know and understand what went on. It would take volumes to explain the vile acts of Clinton partly because his lack of understanding of everything from military to global politics to his extra ordinary desire to give in to every desire. HE is the biggest disgrace America has seen in a long time.
Bush is cleaning up his mess and trying to take care of business. No one is perfect certainly not you, me Bush or anyone else. Bush’s intentions and Honor are intact. He is not there to play the sax, party with the best, steel dishes, buy favors by letting people stay in the bedrooms, selling information to China, (and on and on). Bush has many difficult jobs and is not bombing non-targets and claiming victory. Yes, a lot of Iraqis and Americans have died. The freedom in Iraq will prevail. They will be on their own and it will take time but the war is a means to an end that will come. The Iraqis could not fight their own civil war. Their situation is much more complicated than any conflict we have ever dealt with but the world will be a better place in the end.
When looking at the arguments presented on this board it is difficult to follow with any logical point because counter arguments are constantly non-relevant, not true, and often nothing but insults. The insults show an incredible lack of maturity and do nothing but scare me of the quality of mankind. If you guys represent our future, we are doomed. Insults and responses that lack understanding or explanation only further remove your points. In looking at the morals of our society the first ones to throw fowl language and insults are the first to bring down the threads of our society. They don’t bother me personally because I do not respect the opinion from these sources but those people have the least credibility and the least to contribute.
I have stayed away from the Gay issues in these threads because no real progress is made from the threads. People who have gay desires are similar to pedophiles. It is still wrong. If they chose to live a gay life style that’s up to them but when they bring the gay life style into people’s faces in arguments and banners, it removes any respect one could hope to gain.
At 7/7/04 12:27 AM, Alejandro1 wrote: I think you've really sumed it up. Spanking is a last-resort tool that should not be forgoten by parents after all other methods fail. In reality, spanking should only be necessary for kids under 6. When bad behavior (mouthing off, stubborness, whatever) persists past that age, it means you've been too lenient and need to make some corrections in the way you've disciplined your children.
Spanking is apropriate for young children esp under 6. Not that it needs to be done often or hard it is justy that 3 year old kids do not understand reason. A little spanking makes them understand it's wrong. Not a beating, not torchure, just a smack or two on the but based on what is going on. They don't understand "don't do that because".
At 7/6/04 10:09 PM, red_skunk wrote: Sorry, late-breaking news - there will not be war between the US and China.
Hope there never is! Do you even know why they were trying to keep them from developing weaponds? The details surounding it?
At 7/6/04 10:30 PM, red_skunk wrote:At 7/6/04 10:24 PM, Gooie wrote: Well, most are, however, teacher unions (I know several in New York State and I'm pretty sure there are a lot more) are very strong and seldom pussy out on issues.Nearly all of the unions in the US are in the public sector, that's true.. so?
You mean teachers? vs Electritions, factory workers, etc?
At 7/6/04 09:36 PM, red_skunk wrote:At 7/6/04 09:12 PM, gem1 wrote: I don't think you've looked at my previous post. The main issue I have is unions that are too powerfull and overbearing. Guys with a high school education, working 3 hrs a shift, etc, just look back a couple of post.The US doesn't have strong unions, the government and big business have been breaking down any progress that has happened. US unions are crap.
Dock workers with high school educations making 200K per yewar striking and closing down the pears stop many US manufacturing across the country for a week or so. Airlines are in a world of trouble. I know captains making 3-400K per year. Electronic manufacturing is all but left the country. We use to say "Buy AMerican" but you don't hear that any more because even American stuff is made elswhere or has many parts made elsewhere. The problem is they have no middle ground. If a highschool drop out is making $80 a year standing in a factory doing a simple job, it's never enough. They have to bring the company to it's knees until it can no longer survive. It has happened time and time again.
The China trading deal s one of the flip flop acusations agains Kerry. When Bush shut down trading Technology, kerry suported opening it back up. When Clinton got in trouble over it, Kerry chainged his view.
At 7/6/04 09:32 PM, red_skunk wrote:At 7/6/04 09:19 PM, gem1 wrote: explain.Well Reagan and Bush seemed overjoyed at the possibility of giving anyone and everyone weapons, as long as they didn't nuzzle up to the evil russkies.
I figure all of the weaponry and money helped them in their evil-doer activities.
Oh, and the hundreds of millions that Dubya was providing to the Taliban to fight the war on drugs probably helped too.
Actually Bush closed off technology trade to China and there was actually disucsions of Impeaching Clinton over giving China the technology to create ICM missles. As far as Bush, which weaponds?
I did hear that Bin Laden was upset at the US when we got involved in the middle east and then backed out but I don't remember the details. I'll have to look that one up.
At 7/6/04 09:16 PM, red_skunk wrote: What do you mean 8 years? I think they were perfecting terrorism in the eighties when Reagan and Bush were funding them.
explain. (I did not say it started with Clinton)
At 7/6/04 09:09 PM, red_skunk wrote:At 7/6/04 08:57 PM, gem1 wrote: But iff service jobs are all we have left, what about the trade defficet. Japan is owning more and more of us every day.So what? What do you propose, dropping minimum wage and creating a 15% flat tax, bringing the US down to 3rd world levels just so we can be competitive? The trade deficit doesn't take into account intangible things such as art, music or movies.
I don't think you've looked at my previous post. The main issue I have is unions that are too powerfull and overbearing. Guys with a high school education, working 3 hrs a shift, etc, just look back a couple of post.
At 7/6/04 09:08 PM, red_skunk wrote:What I meant was, the WTC only killed 5 so that was not successful?Considering that they planned to take down the building, I would say it was unsuccessful, wouldn't you?
Actually I gues they just got a lot of practice in over Clinton's 8 years.
It's pretty easy to come up with articles which show succesful terrorism in the Clinton administration where Clinton was soft on his military reponses. Usually he would bomb a "Non Target" and claim victory and all the people would rally behind him and say "your my hero". Most of these documents point his weak responses to the cause of 9/11. With 8 years of practice they got it figured out.
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040702-122632-4277r.htm
That all came from Clintons mouth. He has never told anything with a shred of truth. Do you have other sources. What I meant was, the WTC only killed 5 so that was not successful? I didn't say he wasn't trying, if anything I said he was trying. Trying that is.
But iff service jobs are all we have left, what about the trade defficet. Japan is owning more and more of us every day.
At 7/6/04 08:45 PM, red_skunk wrote:At 7/6/04 08:23 PM, gem1 wrote: What other attacts were avoided?They aren't reported when they're avoided. Everyone knows this. And quick fyi: the WTC attack during Clinton's time killed 5.
Does that mean they were not successfull? I don't understand what that proves.
