48 Forum Posts by "GamesCool"
At 7/30/07 04:03 PM, Deathcon7 wrote: Check out this documentation.
Maybe there's something in there.
I was looking at transform, which allows you to specify the color with an offset, but that still wouldn't do the trick because the offset would still modify the black at times.
At 7/30/07 04:04 PM, daperson1 wrote: Why would it be so hard?
You use attachMovie to dump your thing on the stage, and the thing you're attaching has the inner clip in it to start with
You're missing the point. The whole problem would be DEFINING the inner part. Again, I have hundreds of MovieClips. I would have to go trough each one and define each white part as a new MovieClip, modify layering to make it look right and not go over the border, and it would take forever and wouldn't be very versatile for when you add new MovieClips.
Alternatively, post your code and let me tinker, or mail FLA to admin@earthnemesis.com.
There's nothing to look at, but thanks. To look at it, just create a while square with a black border (black border, white fill), and try to get the while part to change color WITHOUT making it its own MovieClip without the border.
At 7/30/07 03:53 PM, Deathcon7 wrote: It'll take some work then. You can't exclude colors when setting RGB. If I recall correctly I think that's actually a deprecated function. Look into it a bit more though and try a different function or something to just change the white in the MC.
Yeah, I've been looking in to other functions and I can't really seem to find a way to detect actual colors.
At 7/30/07 03:55 PM, Deathcon7 wrote: It's the seperation he doesn't want to do to all the MCs. The code is simple enough though.
Exactly.
At 7/30/07 03:56 PM, daperson1 wrote: Ok, also possible, if you draw your MCs with cod.
What do you mean?
At 5/1/07 09:46 PM, thoughtpolice wrote: I've been using this computer for over a year, and I've never needed more than Office 2003, unless you really need some of the new things in Office 2007, I don't quite see what the huge loss is, especially considering most of the people (students) here probably just need word and the like for writing documents and not much else.
Yeah actually I didn't realize they are releasing a new version of Office for the Mac.
With that said, there still is a software gap and when I see no clear advantages of the Mac over Windows the software gap is the deciding factor for me.
At 1/7/07 06:55 PM, Maus wrote: So please, leave your armchair modding where it belongs.
I'm not giving MY opinion, I'm stating what I saw.
All I know is I would have gotten pretty pissed off if I got a virus from that thread, and I'm sure a ton of people did :\
I think you just have to say something went wrong if were here right now talking about this virus and a moderator got hacked because of it. Come on, be realistic. These are KIDS. KIDS who caused all of this shit. But maybe that's normal. I don't know... I just hope as a user that there's been measures put in to make sure that I'm protected from these people posting viruses in the future, and I think everyone has a right to ask for that. Because who knows, I saw that thread, and if I hadn't heard of all this I might have downloaded it also.
At 1/6/07 10:14 PM, cvbcvbcvb wrote: Okay, but does .php pages allow html?
Of course :) You can always switch from PHP to HTML.
test.php:
<html>
<body>
<?php echo 'hello'; ?>
some more html
</body>
</html>
At 9/24/06 04:26 PM, BobbyJenkins wrote:At 9/24/06 04:24 PM, iJesus wrote:I'm having difficulty joining. Server's quite packed.At 9/24/06 04:17 PM, Afro-Ninja wrote: Let's do it. when do you guys wanna start?Whats wrong with now?
Yah just keep trying, and you'll get in, and don't exit so you can save your spot.
At 9/23/06 11:18 PM, JoystickX wrote: Luis crys at a frame rate of 24, actually
lol.
But in ALL seriousness, when Luis moves to Manhattan, he should make a Flash to "Take me home country roads" because it would be so appropriate.
At 9/21/06 11:52 PM, MidnytesAlt wrote: Yes, if you take these courses online, you do not have to take courses in a classroom.
It's much easier and convenient, as you can go at your own pace.
Honestly, I see no reason to sit in a classroom to take these courses. If I wanted to, I could most likely be done with these courses by tomorrow, when it normally takes about 4 weeks otherwise.
Wow, that's awesome.
I'm definitely going to look into them.
Thanks a ton for the advice.
DFox's alt
Well this songs pretty good...
I mean it's no Josh Groban but it's OK.
At 9/15/06 10:02 PM, skooj-lik-chaah wrote: yeah, most of luis' stuff is photoshop stuff while jamrock appears to have done his in flash.
I think it would only be right for Jamrock to give Luis some lessons at using Flash.
At 9/14/06 09:00 PM, Momo-the-Monkey wrote: it keeps saying [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Ah it says that when I go to it too, but if you just use it, it seems to still work fine...
But if it works, i bet it would be great!
Man, you are the most helpful user (besides Tom himself) i've seen all year!
Aww, thanks <3
At 9/10/06 12:52 PM, Andy_Smithy wrote: K, ill submit it at 9Pm tonight then ^_^
OK, you might want to go about 5 minutes early just in case there is a problem.
At 9/4/06 11:01 PM, Matt-G1 wrote: Flash Player, yeah. So does that give them permission?
I believe it does.
They were owned by the same company, and I'm sure the FlashPlayer TOS says by submitting the game to them, it gives them the right to put it on any of their network sites, AddictingGames being one of those.
So that is certainly not stealing.
At 9/4/06 08:16 PM, newgroundbound wrote: OK it worked thank you alot. What could I do to make it longer than 30 secs?
You're welcome.
Simply change:
timeLeft = 30;
To any number you would like.
Also, you might want to think about learning some ActionScript.
At 8/30/06 12:22 AM, Momo_the_Monkey wrote: which would be id......great...i'm confused now.....
No, you never took the value from the database and assigned it to the variable.
If you just want to do it on the users browser:
if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE") != -1)
{
user is using ie
}else{
user is not using ie
}
At 8/28/06 04:16 PM, Nino_JoJ wrote:At 8/28/06 04:09 PM, DFox2 wrote: How in the world are we supposed to know you don't want to do it via PHP,good question
Nino, Nino, Nino.
Elbleko GAVE you the answer, http://www.hscripts...g-indexof-method.php
You said it did NOT work.
At 8/25/06 05:40 AM, Eggy55555 wrote: That worked getting rid of the first one, but then it won't duplicate it anymore. :S do i have to attach movie or load instead of duplicate?
All you have to do is duplicate the MovieClips, and just not use that first one. Just duplicate off it, and use the duplicates rather than the original.
At 8/22/06 05:31 PM, Negown wrote: I'm getting an error saying call to undefined function mysql_query()
I don't know what that means.....?
Wow, that's really strange. It looks almost like you don't have the PHP MySQL functions on your server.
Are you sure you're allowed to use PHP with MySQL on your server?
At 8/13/06 06:07 AM, Dobio wrote: So what did he do to have that named after him?
Haha, I assume you're being sarcastic.
You do live in Canada though, and it happen in the U.S., but you must have heard of it. If not: http://www.cnn.com/2..son.ap.ap/index.html
At 8/7/06 10:22 PM, Jagazaar wrote: I myself have been banned 5 times, though 4 were the side effect of thread destruction (the other one was for going a little too far in a spam thread made by a drunken Maus). Now, should my account be deleted for that? As you can see, I'm hardly spamming with posts such as these, but should I be excluded from the site for making some honest mistakes? Think a little. Such a rule would inadvertantly get rid of many good users.
Wait what? Using the numbers I gave, your account would NOT have been deleted. 5 bans isn't that excessive.
But a user who constantly makes stupid posts IS hurting people. It's not what Wade wants. I ruins the community. It's more work got the mods.
But to elaborate a little more.
Maybe the policy can use the LENGTH of the bans in order to calculate the ration. Like if you get banned for 3 days, that's 3 ban points. Then instead of using bans for penalizations, use ban points. That way, you are penalized for the severity of your actions.
Also, this is why discussion is good. We can work on elaborating it.
At 8/7/06 09:58 PM, Ganondorf wrote: Great stuff
VERY well said sir. People are so scared of this because they feel they can't not get banned. That's why this whole issue is even present because banning has become such a regular and nonchalant thing around here.
Thanks for the well thought out post.
At 8/7/06 09:13 PM, Mo-ni wrote: What you are basically saying is ban or delete anyones account who doesn't meet your ratio standards.
more -
I have more to say but i'll stop there.
PLEASE make sure you've read and understood my concept before commenting.
I am in no way saying penalize first time offenders.
But if you are honostly going to sit here and preach to me that people who have been banned 10 times before 400 posts are the members who are good for this forum, and should be giving additional chances with out penalization, then this place is getting really messed up.
At 8/7/06 09:16 PM, Petroleum wrote: Oh, come on. don't tell me that you weren't banned 7 times before 1000 posts >:(
I've been banned like 15 times since march
That's nothing to be proud of. It makes you a prime example, unfortunately, of why a policy like this is needed. I have been banned 0.5 times in all my time here, and have way over 2,000 posts.
At 8/7/06 04:37 PM, owTolaH wrote: This rule really doesn't affect me whatsoever, so I guess I'll have to be cool with it.
Yes it does!
The NG policy should be: If you see something, say something.
At 8/7/06 04:34 PM, scottmale24 wrote:At 8/7/06 04:20 PM, Nino_JoJ wrote: Now, tell me, isn't that shitty?!Almost as shitty as having your hard work stolen by some punk over the internet.
OH WAIT.
Hopefully Nino has put those days behind him. I feel he has.
At 8/7/06 04:31 PM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote: Question: Do this go for comments in signatures as well?
I only ask cause I have a latin phrase in mine. It's not really offensive, but I'd like to know if I need to remove it or not to comply with the new rule.
Why wouldn't it go for signatures? Is there some mod power that allows them to read signatures but not threads?
At 8/6/06 02:10 PM, Momo_the_Monkey wrote: Oh, so i guess you decided to add the calculator huh? Thanks GamesCool....whoops. Soory, i might call you that for a while.
Thanks DFox2. lol.
Momo, you have got to be kidding me. Thanks for not reading my post on the last page :(
You're welcome.
Also, I had to post the last post with this account as I went over the 4 post limit :(
PHP: Other links:
Official PHP site - Great for looking up functions, PHP info
PHP Freaks - Tons of tutorials, code snippets
Pixel2Life PHP section - More PHP tutorials
TechTuts.com PHP section - More PHP tutorials
PHP: Main Supporters (These are supporters who list PHP: Main in their signatures, of course in addition to the tutorial authors)
-cherries- (Bellybutton Treasure)
Craige (MustyWindows!)
DannyIsOnFire (Danny Is On Fire Productions)
elbekko (The General Forum)
ElementalFlash (Elemental Flash)
GamesCool (Orange Fox Games)
Momo_the_Monkey (Negown)
Nino_JoJ (Recruiting Grounds)
Pilot-Doofy (MustyWindows.com!)
Plakat (Crystalhosting)
Rellizate (Land of Flash)
SpamBurger (Helnet)
WoogieNoogie (WoogieNoogie.com)
Zendra (MustyWindows.com!)
Zwe (MelonBush.com!)
Php: Main - Discussion Thread - Please keel ALL discussion about PHP: Main in that thread. Only post links to new tutorials in this thread. Thanks.
We are continuing our "referall" program. If you put PHP: Main in your signature, you can get on the list under supporters with a link to your website. Simply put a link in your signature, and post here and say that you have put it in. You will be included in the next update.
One of the great things about running PHP: Main is that so many people take their time to submit great tutorials. I seldom have to reject tutorials because the quality of submitted ones are usually so high. On the page before last, we got a few that just weren't suitable. I was away, and these tutorials were included as it wouldn't have been fair for someone volunteering to post the list to reject them, but I did. If you feel your tutorial was rejected and shouldn't have been, please post in the PHP: Main discussion thread, or if you'd rather talk in private, feel free to PM me.
Aahh so much to talk about. Some programming forum regulars have suggested that instead of having the tutorial author's name link to their website next to their tutorial, to have a list like supporters that is "Tutorial contributors" that has all the links instead. Please pop into PHP: Main discussion to give some thoughts on this. Thanks.
Because of all the chaos from last update when I was away, I kept the "* NEW *" next to that updates new tutorials. Also, I want to thank Danny for making the update, Doofy for coordinating the update, and Sarai for cleaning the complete page mess up.
Also, on this update, I started a Other links category. Please pop into PHP: Main discussion thread and suggest some more.
As always, please report any mistakes.
At 8/6/06 04:26 AM, EccinNET wrote: Hmm, looks more pro and mature, yeah. JUST DO IT! Haha.
Notice anything different???
Thanks for the encouragement!
At 8/5/06 01:11 AM, WoogieNoogie wrote: Ick...I guess I looked over it too fast.
Oh no, don't get me wrong. The method he used LOOKS like it should work, but it just doesn't. It would be cool if that method worked, but a switch statement seems like the best way to do it.
Damn 4 post limit.
At 8/4/06 11:01 PM, KaleFlame wrote: no way dude.. tom green's talk show was best. while it lasted anyway.
lol, being that you had to use the word "lasted" it seems most people don't agree.
At 8/4/06 11:02 PM, Petroleum wrote: Conan>Leno>Letterman>Fergusen
in that order.
Agreed.
At 8/4/06 11:02 PM, CubeInABox wrote:At 8/4/06 10:59 PM, GamesCool wrote: I love when Conan goes off screen. It's really funny. He does some crazy things with the camera when he comes on.Yeah, same here, you just gotta love that about Conan. =)
You never know what he's going to do. That's what I love about him.
Yup.
Eveyone who likes Conan, try to get tickes if you're ever going to be in NY.
