Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

i had the movie (i still do) on VHS and a Small Soldiers animated bank

Surfing Bird by the Trashmen
maybe when it starts it will scare the piss out of him so that i could get a cheap punch in

seriously......Believe by The Bravery

At 4/20/08 07:22 PM, Ragnarokia wrote:

At 4/20/08 07:09 PM, arcansi wrote: this one may be a bit difficult... :\

Sonic The Hedgehog 2.

Super Mario 64 fine. Boring people.

Now I get a go yes?

Guess BOTH game names.

its the mog minigame in the golden saucer in final fantasy 7
booya

At 1/16/09 05:30 AM, Psycho-Simple wrote: I would get a game with good gameplay, over a game with good graphics. Graphics don't make a game, gameplay does. I was rather disappointed with Gears of War 2 as the game wasn't long enough. So in truth I would like a game that's original, well made and has good length to it. So games like Fallout 3.

what the hell are you talking about?
GOW2 was much longer than the first and overall had a long campaign

At 1/15/09 11:27 PM, Greenfrost6 wrote: Having a game that has awsome graphics but terrible gameplay (much like GTA4) is like having a Ferrari with a lawnmower engine under the hood.

lol, i know what you mean

were you connected to xbox live because sometimes some b****** will join just to screw with you.

in one of the hospital rooms there is an x-ray of the hand pictured on the cover
(four fingers!!!)

At 1/15/09 03:17 PM, TehreTard wrote: Gameplay first.

GTA IV was fucking garbage due to placing graphics and realism over fun.

exactly, the ridiculous stuff you could live through is what made the others before it so great

i know there are a whole lot of people who won't play a great video game because it has bad graphics
i personally would rather have good gameplay than good graphics, but thats just me
I want to know what you think

At 1/13/09 06:31 PM, Hybrid-Of-Souls wrote: I don't think this is TECHNICALLY a commercial, since it never aired due to 'some' reason, but I always liked this one:
Xbox 360 ad that never aired

'Jump in' indeed.

why wouldn't they air that it was funny
more proof that the people who manage xbox and all that s*** (not microsoft) are stupid

At 1/3/09 04:59 PM, heroicspatula wrote: Let me start by stating that no, I don't think this is going to happen, at least not by 2010. But do give the guy some credit; he first predicted this back in '98, so his time line for the economic and social crisis isn't off by more than a year.

Also(for those of you who read the article) he said "America has a 45-55 percent chance of disintegration". Even he thinks the odds of it happening are low.

And before you start to think that all of Russia is hoping we will break up( and Russia will become number one again), he was quoted saying "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia."
Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

certain russians have always thought that the U.S. would fall because we are an economy based on capitalism and greed (Karl Marx-capitalism will lead to poverty and a worker's revolution)

mario has got to go
after many years and many, many terrible games, it is time for the fat man to die
bad games: SMBs2, SM Sunshine, Mario party (all of them)......................the list goes on

its gotta be Torque from The Suffering because we need someone who will not piss his pants in the face of something really f***ing ugly

FFVII's combat system was great, but I think VIII's was a little better because you could also customize your characters more

turn based combat is great, it adds more depth and strategy to games instead of the more spontaneous actions of non-turn-based combat