http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 7050

advertisement

Here's the current reviewers who's been affected:

Black-ops
Killer-Duk
Aci6
Metal-therapy
ParadoxSaint
Buster-1
FodeyOz

Hopefully there will be resolution for this. Bug fix?

You da man BR!

At 4/23/08 04:55 PM, Buster1 wrote:

At 4/23/08 12:53 PM, BR wrote: The number of demotion just seems out of place... II'll try to PM Tom and Wade on this.

Has anyone experience a level up in whistle level in the past 2 weeks?

ya i want from silver to normal? in 1 day

I went from bronze to garbage in one day myself. Sure doesn't take care long to dig yourself into a hole. Evidently you lose points a lot faster than you accumulate them.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 6374

Links to porn site.

At 4/19/08 04:43 PM, Kidlazarus wrote:

At 4/19/08 04:06 PM, Felipe wrote: to kid lazarus read his second post he quoted the wrong post because he's fucking stupid and sucks at doing shit properly.

What's your problem? I took a few minutes to type up one post and you say I "suck at doing shit properly"? Go back to school and learn some basic grammar.

I believe he was referring to my post earlier. I replied to the wrong one by mistake. Either way Felipe has sand in his vagina.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 5726

Advertisement

At 4/19/08 04:06 PM, Felipe wrote: to kid lazarus read his second post he quoted the wrong post because he's fucking stupid and sucks at doing shit properly.

Take it easy there felipe. It was an honest mistake. Don't get your panties in a wad...

Sorry that was supposed to be response to Malachy's post earlier:
{SHUT UP.

IT'S NOT TRUE.

LISTEN TO ME, I'M A REVIEW MODERATOR FOR FUCKS SAKE: YOU WILL NOT LOSE WHISTLE POINTS ON REVIEWS FLAGGED IN SPAM SUBMISSIONS, YOU JUST WONT GAIN ANY POINTS FOR IT!!!

HOLY GODDAMNIT FOTHERMUCKER.}

At 4/19/08 01:55 PM, Kidlazarus wrote: Only One CGUE

If that were true, then why did my whistle status go from normal to garbage immediately after two abusive reviews I flagged were deleted from spam submissions entitled:
1. untitled - viewtiful chris
2. Recent turd of the week - FUCK You Faggot Ngers!!!!(Recently deleted from the system)

I know my whistle staus changed from these two reviews alone because I hadn't flagged anything else until I knew that those reviews were deleted. Doesn't that kind of contradict what you're saying?

WHOO HOO!!! I'm garbage thanks to the new rule and nobody telling me!! I wanna play baseball!!

Here's a nice little golden shower porn vid for some big whistle points!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4471

I say fuck a whistle...I mean NG staff has literally made it impossible to advance your whistle status now. First of all, I never saw any public posting(other than the mention of it in this thread once) that indicated NG users of the new rule. This, in turn has fucked anyone with a decent whistle status to garbage in a matter of seconds.
NG has successfully managed to make it just as impossible to advance to a deity whislte as they did to make it to level 60. I mean, come on!! How many fucking 40 year old NG users do they expect to find here anyway!! This is some serious bullshit...

This doesn't make sense. The last two reviews that I marked abusive and posted here in this forum were removed yet my whistle status dropped down to garbage. Am I missing something?

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4062

darkmegax telling the author to f*** himself and that his work is a piece of s***.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 2525

gonuts123 callin viewtiful chris a fag.

Submission: Defend

http://lookoutitsabob.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash

This guy in general leaves some overall negative reviews. Check out his pages.

Blam comment:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 2633

At 3/27/08 03:53 PM, zimzap wrote: Just a note: I was looking at Afro's reviews and many of them were marked as abusive, however, they are among the most descriptive and helpful I have seen on NG. Anyone know why his keep getting marked abusive?

I think his reviews are very constructive and I am not recommending that people mark them abusive. So please do not blindly click below and start marking. Thank you.

http://afrounderscorestud.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash

I would think that it's the public's way of getting back at him for all his Adolf Hitler:CAI493+D 220 movies. Alot of people think that they should be blammed but every single one has passed so far. I agree though, he does offer some of the most constructive criticism on Newgrounds.

At 3/25/08 03:19 PM, AshtonNextGen wrote:

Source of abuse (gldmine): http://betty.newgrounds.com/flash

HOLY SHIT THAT GUYS RIGHT!?!

Wow...you could upgrade in one day with all this abuse...

Here's one, 1st on the page.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /423640

Bonzi280....just a "wtf"...no real review here.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 8890

Bronze baby!

The one that says caca:

<a>http://xwolfx6.newgrounds.com/reviews /audio/3<a>

At 3/12/08 12:46 AM, 36Holla wrote: Quite a nice little pile of them in for this submission. But that should be expected when grandma necrophilia is involved. There are at least 3 pages of straight 0's, most of them calling the author sick in the head. You know what to do.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /429493/11/score

I think the review entitled "craaap" says it all. Wouldn't you agree?

At 3/12/08 09:45 AM, SBB wrote: http://xwolfx6.newgrounds.com/reviews/au dio

This asshole has some disturbingly stupid abusive reviews spread throughout it

Indeed he does. Mini-gold mine here.

So do you lose whistle points for wrongfully flagging a review too or just for flash submitions?

So you like Kerry? I'm fixin to go vote and my biggest concern is that we don't elect an official that sympathizes with anti-war, bleeding heart liberals. Otherwise we'd get run over by all those countries that hate us right? What do you think?

I must apologize...I'm new to the whole BBS forum. Just trying to express my political view, childish as it may seem at times. My point being, is that Bush, (compared to option B) is our best bet at this point. Especially in regards to his policy on terrorist attacks. You take and pick a candidate that best suits your personal interests. I mean, yeah, Bush sucks in some aspects but works to our benefit in others. You just have to know how to look at the big picture and not the petty bullshit.

France? You come from France? Kerry thinks they's be great at running the country. Anyway, I jest love Bush's policy on war.....what is a draft by the way? You must have two headz up your ass or maybe potatoes?

I go to vote tomorrow for the conservative Republicans. I have to say that Kerry's political platform is in the toilet. For example, his foreign policy suggests lending the U.S.'s power/control to that of our allies? We have enough problems as it is only to increase them by taking suggestions from other countries as to how we delegate our authority.
But to the point, Kupaman, it's true, the democrats will always bitch as long as the republicans are winning. They will forever make false accusations instead of establishing legitamite and/or vote-worthy platforms instead.

At 10/18/04 12:37 AM, KupaMan wrote: It seems like every election, some democratic accuses republicans of cheating when they're ahead. In 2000, they said Bush stole the election. Just after the 3rd presidential debate, Jesse Jackson accused Bush of cheating and saying that he had a transmitter on his back (They were his shouler blades. Look at the picture). Why can;t people anymore admit to losing without whining about it? If Kerry wins, I bet there won't be any accusations of tampered elections. If Bush wins, I bet Michael Moore will make some other "documentary" about it using rumours and theories as facts. Stop complaining. I only complain now because it's getting kinda irritating. No one is cheating. Kerry is not cheating, Bush is not cheating, Nader is not cheating. Drop it.