Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/7/04 10:07 PM, Damien3003 wrote:

At 5/5/04 08:38 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote:
But truthfully, mexicans are hard workers. Going by construction sites I usually see white people standing around drinking a soda or something while the mexican is working his ass off.

I'm a construction worker. A while back we contracted mexicans from one of those mexican agencies that, for lack of a better word to use, 'rent' out their mexican workers. They worked for eighteen dollars an hour and did low quality work.
This is, however, just my personal experience with them.

Then why in the hell would you hire them? Nobody had a gun to your heads when making the documents and contract binding. And I don't know what type of agency you're talking about. One that rents Mexicans? I can't see how such a thing could occur since the Bracero Program doesn't exist anymore (at least, I think so), and Bush's plan was squashed very quickly before 9-11. And how would such an agency that rent out illegals be legit?

My assumption is that you went out looking for "pollitos" for cheap labor, but at the end, you got bit in the ass. But then again, I know nothing about the construction world...

At 5/5/04 08:52 PM, Izuamoto wrote:

At 5/5/04 08:19 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote:

It'd be kinda bad if they had to change a pad in the middle of a fire fight, wouldn't it?

i guess they'd just have to deal with it. i'm sure changing a pad would be the last thing i would be thinking if someone was shooting at me.
besides, we feminists don't use pads; we use cigars

What a sense of humor!

Well, all the tempon and pad commercials I see, these are superwomen, running into a burning house to save a kitty, etc.

Biologically, the period does make a woman's something difficult... but recently I've heard of drugs that would supress the period for three months, and then you have one giant one, or something like that.

Doesn't anybody else remember? It came on the news around during winter, and women were talking about it.

At 5/5/04 08:52 PM, Member_of_the_Despot wrote:

At 5/5/04 08:47 PM, spanishfli wrote: Angry rant.

Don't work yourself out, I was directing my comment to Mordeath as an addition to yours.

I'm sorry. I can be a TAD bit TOUCHY... especially when one like mordeath says makes such a statement about one's identity. Again, I appologize since it appeared that you were saying that statement towards me. I will be careful next time.

At 5/5/04 12:13 PM, FatherVenom wrote: I'm already an organ donor. In the US you can sign up for it when you recieve you driver's permit.

Props to you FatherVenom. I'm a organ donor too. Besides, what use do I get of my body when I die?

At 5/5/04 07:35 PM, THE_GOP_CANDIDATE wrote: , and I believe every word of it.

"Four legs good... two legs bad..."

They're just gonna get a little slap on the wrist.

At 5/5/04 07:47 PM, Member_of_the_Despot wrote:

At 5/5/04 05:01 PM, spanishfli wrote:

At 5/5/04 03:16 AM, Mordeath wrote: Depends, are we looking for laborers? In that case, blacks are supreme. If we are talking economics then you need a jew. If your looking for somone whos gonna sit back and collect a government check then you need a mexican.

Now that is plain stupid. A Mexican works so much harder then an average white american. And white americans are most likely to collect welfare. Don't be an idiot if you can help it.

Wow, does this guy actually belive that race (ethnicity, nationality, etc.) determines inherit skills or attitudes, wow...

Get your head out of your ass, and pay attention little punk. Go to Bakersfield, Pasadena, etc. and look whom wakes from sunrise and work even in the hottest part of the day until it's too dark to see.

No where did I imply that one's race "determines" whatever wack caca you said. S-0 wow yourself.

At 5/5/04 08:30 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote:

At 5/5/04 08:27 PM, spanishfli wrote:

At 5/5/04 06:50 PM, IceWraith15 wrote: I will not show one drop of respect toward Feminism unless they start respecting men. How can women expect respect when they so ZERO respect towards men.

How have they disrespected men? Examples would be nice... Just wondering...

<img src="http://www.menz.org.nz/News%20archive/Images/manu3mar03.JPG">Hopefully this worked </img>

Didn't work... but I saw it. Hum... Due to the source where this image is coming from, I cannot accept it as valid (especially with Adobe pics going rampant nowaday) If it came from a news source, it would give it credibility.

But even if this was credible, you are only citing one picture of one event, and there is no caption or an article citing the circumstances of that event.

(Is that John Kerry? in the background?)

Anyways, but I know the injustices of men too... but they don't amount as much as what a woman faces. The two I can name right now is that women are usually the ones that get the children, and the home.

Otherwise, the feminists goal are to fix the inequality that still occurs today (while I've heard of a few that blames men as the root of evil).

At 5/5/04 06:50 PM, IceWraith15 wrote: I will not show one drop of respect toward Feminism unless they start respecting men. How can women expect respect when they so ZERO respect towards men.

How have they disrespected men? Examples would be nice... Just wondering...

At 5/5/04 05:01 PM, spanishfli wrote:

At 5/5/04 03:16 AM, Mordeath wrote: Depends, are we looking for laborers? In that case, blacks are supreme. If we are talking economics then you need a jew. If your looking for somone whos gonna sit back and collect a government check then you need a mexican.

Now that is plain stupid. A Mexican works so much harder then an average white american. And white americans are most likely to collect welfare. Don't be an idiot if you can help it.

You know, what in the friggin hell is this topic here? How does one report this? I don't need to see idiots like mordeath make insults uncalled for.

BTW-- I'm Mexican. I attend the private Santa Clara University, my mother has never collected one single welfare check even when we needed it (not like our white neighboors when they lived next to us a long time ago) and I work as a supervisor at a bank. Don't tell me that all Mexicans are lazy.

At 5/5/04 03:16 AM, Mordeath wrote: Depends, are we looking for laborers? In that case, blacks are supreme. If we are talking economics then you need a jew. If your looking for somone whos gonna sit back and collect a government check then you need a mexican.

Now that is plain stupid. A Mexican works so much harder then an average white american. And white americans are most likely to collect welfare. Don't be an idiot if you can help it.

At 5/5/04 05:51 AM, NoHitHair wrote: I say it loud and proud - I'm a huge anti-feminist. I even used to wear a button around my college that said "Feminism and the Third Reich: Ask me How!" Why?

Because of people like Catherine MacKinnon. Because of organizations like the National Organization for Women (N.O.W.). Because of over 40% of false rape cases each year and the lives that are ruined because of it. Because of the tax dollars that went to my college to pay for posters that said "Rape is All Men's Fault." and posted in every bathroom on campus.

It's also interesting to note that even those feminists who claim to demand equality and no special rights would still carry the name "feminist". That would be like me starting up a group for equality between whites and blacks and calling it 'White Power'. Why can't they change the name to Individualism? Or Gender Equalizers?

Please don't bring up "Well, women were inequal not that long ago!" - it's not pertinent to this argument. Two wrongs don't make a right.

I, despite being a guy, am a feminist. I support womens' rights, and hope more will enter in politics, and hopefully there will be at least one woman president elected in my life time.

Feminism was concieved because of the unequal treatment by men. Their stuggle is to be equal to men. Not to be above them.

Now if you're against it and you're only argument is the false rape charges, then you have nothing to be against feminist movement. You're beef is with false rape charges. I think some things are messed up too... women are the one that get the kids and house after a divorce happens, etc... but then these are not things about the feminist movement. These are seperate injustices that should be fixed.

Ehh, in my high school, most people who were gay showed it in one or more of the stereotypical ways. However, I was a little shocked to learn that one of my friends (an outspoken conservative who made many gay jokes) was gay (though we all had a feeling =P)

You know, you would be suprised how many gay men look not like queer eye (which is a big turn off for me, btw) I've slept with more then a dozen women (all of them hotties) and when I was younger, I knew all the funniest gay jokes. When I was a kid, I beat another boy with my friends because we thought he was gay (although we didn't know what exactly the word "gay" meant, and only that if you were one, you had to be beaten up.)

And I read in JAMA a very long time ago about murders of gay people are aroused when shown homosexual material. So people who kill gays may be doing it to repress certain feelings, denying their own homosexual identity.

I am sure that there are a whole lot more people who are gay or bisexual out there but are in the closet.

If you see American Beauty, which is one of the best movies I've seen, has a gay basher who is gay himself.

At 5/5/04 12:37 AM, n00bskvnk wrote:

At 5/5/04 12:33 AM, RedSkvnk wrote: Wrestling? Come On

yeah, no matter how much they claim to be manly and masculine and all, I still have my doubts of getting all sweaty and groping each other while wearing those skin tight uniforms

ahem... and people don't say anything about football players slapping each others' asses, or their skin tight pants. People grow up. The cooties doesn't exist. And when one's wrestling, you're not thinking, "boy, oh boy..." but, "You're going d-o-w-n, mofu!"

And what about that man's man sport/entertainment/melo-drama? WWE... Don't tell me Stone Cold between Goldberg's legs isn't as gay as olympic wrestling if you think that olympic wrestling is gay.

At 5/5/04 02:13 AM, Lavagasm wrote: here's how I feel, gays should not be abled to get married, but if they wish to be joined together through the courts then they should be able to that

Which is what a marriage is about... God, what with we Americans with euphemisms. "Joining in the court..." "civil union" "legal partnership", bla, bla, bla... it's marriage, okay... But if it makes people more comfortable and the process quicker, then let it be called whatever... it's still going to be marriage for gays.

At 5/4/04 04:04 PM, MasterGooie wrote:

At 5/4/04 03:29 PM, RedSkvnk wrote:

At 5/4/04 09:58 AM, xlaw42 wrote: Here is the biggest problems with gays. And it goes basically for anyone, but you tend to seem it mostly in gays. Its whent hey flamboyantly show signs of public affections.

WOW. Good job at stating another fucking stereotype.

Most gay couples I've seen and known are nothing like Carson from "Queer Eye" or fall under the stereotype. Some gays might show a little more affection towards eachother if it wasn't for anti-homosexual violence.

People wouldn't know I'm gay by looking at me, talking with me, or looking at my room. Every Friday I drink with my friends, play pool... My clothes are masculine... I play football, and wrestled when I was in high school.

The only thing queer eye about me is that I like theater... other then that, I'm really low on the gaydar...

But now we are getting off topic. So to get back on topic, here's a link on yahoo! news on gay marriage.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti...004/05/04/state1856EDT0127.DTL

I am very sad...

At 5/4/04 10:58 PM, n00bskvnk wrote: when the child grows up, they'll have to know that he/she was only born to help their sibling. I think that would give them a lowered feeling of self worth

Crap... I wish I was born because of such noble intentions... It's so much better then what my parents told me in their broken English: "Too much wine... no condoms..."

Why would it give them lowered feelings of worth? I would think it would raise anyone's feelings up to know that they were born to save another life.

At 5/4/04 04:43 PM, Damien3003 wrote: Jesus god. i hate the negativity that any authority gets.

Here's a secret, brothers: If you're not breaking the law, you generally will not be harrassed by authroties of any sort.
Now, i know theres the exception, your rodney kings and so on. But 99.9% of the time, authorities do not mess with innoccent people.

If the fbi is knocking on your door, or if there's a 'file' on you...it's probably because you broke a law, or multiple laws.
FACT: If you are a law abiding citizen, you have nothing to fear from the patriot act.

I don't know... those people whom I reported were law abiding citizens too me... and the only reasons why I had to report them because of "the list". (Not a secret thing, but to prevent me doing something stupid, I won't say anymore...)

And the un-patriot act has happened before, in 1917... It was called the Espionage Act, and people were sent to jail 10 years just because they made speeches against going to war, and etc. Do a search, click my link:

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWespionage.htm

Yes, I have nothing to fear, but at the same time, I don't want my government video taping me if I attend a march for Muslim Americans, or want my finances looked at (not that there's much to see anyways...) or etc...

I can't really believe this... if a girl gets pregnant, then tough luck? You know, there are people shouldn't be having babies, period. And with the crowding of adoption agencies, more kids going in then going out...

Yes, it's a terrible thing. But it would a worser thing to have a baby raised not wanted and thus not getting the attention needed who will most likely create another life and so on, and so on...

BTW... Hitler was also a fetus... Who cares! Everyone was a fetus. La-de-da...

We need to have condoms, birth control everywhere... programs on safer sex and abstinance, frequent STD testing, and etc.

*Sigh*, this problem would be so easily fixed if we hired snippers and had them radomly shoot people with not with depoprovera darts.

At 5/3/04 10:46 PM, n00bskvnk wrote: Outsourcing is becoming a growing problem here in the U.S. Our jobs are going overseas and unemployment rates are on the rise ( source ). The question is, how can we solve this problem before it gets much more serious?

Reduce benefits, longer hours, lesser pay... give greedy companies what they want. That's the only way to keep companies sticking to where they should belong, or have the government intervene and make a law against outsourcing, or try to curb it (which I doubt will happen.)

Otherwise, 10, 15, 20 years from now, we're not going to be the ones on top.

At 5/3/04 08:37 PM, THE_GOP_CANDIDATE wrote:

At 5/3/04 04:56 PM, RedSkvnk wrote: It's a hard life . . .

Who likes communists? Really?

not me.

Anyway if two unnatural fags want to go on with some sodom and gammorah type realtionships, it's their loss.

Yeah, our loss... *pff* Don't care what you say, but your poison better not be messing up my rights little punk.

Pardon me while I go punch the while a bit to forget how dumb you are.

Wasn't that the Cold War was all about, who had more ammo? Very stupid thing...

At 5/3/04 06:19 PM, n00bskvnk wrote: I have to do a research paper in my government class on the Patriot Act and I was wondering what's everyone's opinions? The Patriot Act

Gives way too much power to a government. I'm going to tell you something people. I work in a bank, as a bank teller. About a year ago, I signed a paper saying that if I find "weird" transactions, or "weird" behavior, or "weird" anything... report it. There is a huge list of what to consider, and within last year alone I had to report about more people then the fingers on my hands. Before that, I only reported probably once.

Now all those reports I done because I was forced to. I cannot tell anything personal about them, or the rules that I must enforce or else face certain penalties. But I am going to say this, these transactions were deemed normal before this act, and I had to report more then 10 people last year whose names may very well be in some file.

I wish I could say more, but personally knowing this experiance, I am very much against the "unpatriot" act.

It's funny how the government loves to give cute and positive names to rather terrible things. What was that favorite flash of mine by Sam T... George Bush Show... He was making fun of this point by having George make a "No Tree Left Behind Act". Hilarious!

At 5/1/04 10:39 PM, BrokenFaith wrote: Ok my mom is a lesbian and im tired of the damn goverment screwing up her happiness. She is very much in love and bbecause of laws in certain states they cant get married and thats dum.

Rock On.

Props to your mom!

At 5/1/04 09:20 PM, RedSkvnk wrote: I could choose to be gay if I wanted...

No you couldn't... You could ACT gay of course. From the age 18 till now I've slept with 23 women, all of them gorgeous (two were models.) But that doesn't make me straight. I simply enjoy men a WHOLE lot more. I've had much longer loving relationships with men, where as with women they've last till the next morning... My point, any straight person could sleep with the same sex, and a gay person could sleep with the opposite sex and it don't mean nothing.

At 5/2/04 12:18 AM, IceWraith15 wrote: Draft dodging if you ask me is TREASON, simply turning your back on your nation like that is COWARDLY and DISGUSTING. A person has NO right to run away to Canada while other Americans are fighting and dying for their country.

I higly regard a person who is willing to fight and die for their country, but even a whole lot more if they resist something that is against their concious.

This war was drapped in patriotic colors and whored around the world as "freedom fighters" although my belief is that the intentions of the US is nothing patriotic.

But I'm not going to spend energy telling sheep... "Four legs good, 2 legs ba-a-a-d..."

At 5/2/04 06:40 PM, Adun wrote: Bush's christian fanatacism gone wild.
http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/purity/index.asp

Its hard to believe that something like this is real, maybe it isnt, I hope it isnt. Theyd be pretty bold to do something like this if this is real.

Don't be so naive... was a very good laugh... besides, people who argue that masturbation is bad and back it off from the bible... what about wet dreams? It's god's way of giving a people a helping hand...

At 5/2/04 03:02 AM, The_King_of_Wolves wrote: It's kind of funny. There's a lot of clubs and organizations out there for different nationalites or cultures. Like we have a black academy awards and a bunch of other things like that. Now I'm not saying organizations dedicated to their nationality is a bad thign but by having seperate events (like the black academy awards) aren't we inducing segregation? Why don't we just have one event for everyone? If we want to be so politically correct why do we divide ourselves up into these categories. It's hypocritical.

I could rant a bit more, and a bit more coherently if it wasn't so damn late. Wanted to post it while I had the idea in my head.

Perhaps it is because Hollywood is still a bit racist, and the people you see on the silver screen are mostly white. Most of the stars I see are pretty much European in appearance. The only few ones I can think that aren't are Salma Hayek, Lucy Lu, etc... Wasn't it until Halle Berry that no black got an award? I don't remember...

I don't think Acamedy Awards for Blacks is segregation in the sense of 50-100 years ago.

BTW, now that we are on the topic of movies and minorities... I was approached a few days ago to do a movie. The part was for a light skinned Mexican drug dealer who can talk English and Spanish. I declined for the reason that I've done bigger and better things such as Macbeth and Hamlet, have tons of acting experiance not only in classical plays, but in more modern ones. I will not due just a "simple" part that perpetuates a bad image on Latinos. It seems that everytime I see a Latino on the big screen, he's either a drug dealer, some kind of laborer, etc. and pratically never the hero. That's going to change once I finish my screenplays...

I myself am a type D.

I see myself as a type C. This is an important issue because it directly affects the lives of women.

When a woman wants an abortion, she is most likely going to get it despite the circumstances of the law. If it was my mother or sister, I would certainly would not have them go some kind of stranger and have a clothes hanger shoved in their womb, and higly likely die of hemmorage, infection, etc. Yeah, I don't like abortion at all, it's an ugly thing to see a fetus head, but it is something necessary. But I would rather have my mother or sister go to a sane clinc then have them do it in other places.

The abortion battle isn't stupid. It's important, and rather insulting to a few women to down grade this struggle with others such as the Iraqi War.

At 4/30/04 08:05 PM, Royce_Glass wrote: u just dont get it....

Make an argument. I'm all ears, other wise, I'm believing in the contrary.

At 4/30/04 10:54 PM, RedSkvnk wrote: well i would have to say that different color skin shouldnt really dictate the intelligence of any one person i mean really its just the amount of pigmentation in the skin that is the only difference between us and those negroes and maybe their penors might be a tad larger but that doesnt really matter because my penor is above average in the size department the average being six inches and my penor being about seven and a quarter to seven and a half depending on how happy i am and if there is a seckseh lady in the room then my penor gets larger but if there are three old asian men having gay sex then my penor gets smaller unless i am enjoying it in which case my penor would get bigger but that usually doesnt happen because i dont find most asian men attractive except when they are doing karate then i get a little turned on but not as much as if i was gay not that being gay is bad or anything but its just not mu style unless they are doing karate.

Ha, ha, ha... you're funny... Just love that...

Anyways, back to the topic... Asides the obvious differences in race such as skin color, hair type, eye shape, etc... There has never been conclusive evidence to support intelligence diffrences. And if you're lucky to stumble something, there are usually flaws such as bias, not suitable test subjects, etc...