13,999 Forum Posts by "fli"
I had the best half hour ride from work...
Seems one guy, Amador, lives just a block away from me...
Oooooohhh--
we were such bitches.
Fags know how to roll, that's for sure.
We're hardcore like that...
You, Man:
1.) Be an asshole... they really love it.
2.) Pretend you don't want them or need them.
3.) Cheat, and cheat, and cheat.
4.) Look filthy... they may complain, but there eyes are saying, "yes, yes, oh god... YES!"
You, Woman:
1.) When you say, "I just want a good man." You really mean, "I want a sexxxy man-whore."
2.) When a man says, "Sex?" That means, "I love you... I will never hurt you."
3.) Joblessness is a fucking aphrodisiac.
Case points:
K-fed, and Britney.
Pam Anderson and Kid Rock.
All my friends...
*sigh*
Good time to be gay or lesbian, amiright?
At 11/16/07 11:37 AM, BrotherJohn wrote: If we don't take a stand for ourselves, then we will soon find that although we are still well within the scope of the constitution, we are a severely oppressed people. We might be "better off" that way, but what sort of quality of life do you think that would impart?
I don't know if you're sarcastic...
but guess who voted on these laws?
People like me.
This isn't a "big government" situation because I think non-smokers just got fed up when we couldn't savor our food because we're smelling nasty ass smoke. We want to go to social night functions without smelling like smoke at the end of the night.
However, I think we ought to be fair too.
Allow some areas designated for smokers, you know. Which need to be a wide open place that's far away from non-smoking areas. (An outdoor cannopied patio, or up-stairs smoke room are good ideas.)
Otherwise... I think the right for air is greater than the right to smoke.
I can't simply escape from a person who's smoking, at least not in the same room. But a smoker can always smoke at home, or other areas of privacey.
Okay--
I'm not a person who likes the military... but if you're smart enough to know that you're prospect are low but have tenacity...
then you're SMART ENOUGH to realize to join the armed forces.
At 11/16/07 02:44 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: FEAR
crappy camera :\By September, 17th, I'll stop being a human,and transform into a number =D
Wait...
"Faculty of Teeth Economics?"
I'm wrong...
What's the word with the "d" in it? It's way to blurry...
At 11/12/07 01:09 AM, CommanderX1125 wrote: Alrighty, this is my take on this whole ordeal.
1. It seems to me to be unconstitutional for the government to tell private business owners what to do in regards to their business. If they want smokers there, than the government should stfu on the matter.
*eye rollie*
First off, ANY regulation can be deemed "unconstitutional." We don't have a seperation of business and government clause anymore.
If there was... then we would still have the Industurial Revoltion, child exploitation, loooooooong hours with no maximium, no pay with a minimum, and etc. Government regulates all those, and if they do... then why not smoking?
No.
It isn't unconstitutional to ban smoking at businesses.
At 11/11/07 09:59 PM, SEXY-FETUS wrote: We need to keep these bans reasonable, give rights back to business owners and at least keep the choice to places that only cater to adults(bars clubs). And remember we all have a choice as adults to recieve second hand as well as first hand smoke.
Okay, that's agreed upon.
However, I think you're under the impression that bars = smoking. How horrible is not smoking at a bar is? Maybe if they allowed a back area for smokers. I know gay bars have BEAUTIFUL back door canopied gardens for smokers that's lush with green foilage and vines. The rest of the area is smoke free.
Why can't that be applied to other places?
If a non-smoker doesn't want to be exposed to smoke at a bar, then it's a simple matter of not going over to the smoking section. Allowing smoking in bars is much more unfair to people who want to avoid smoking. The most fair choice to keep bars smoke free, unless it's a place meant for smoking. Or have bars that cater to smokers.
In fact, those ciggarette club stores... why can't they extend the business so it can be a bar at night?
At 11/15/07 05:46 PM, Tancrisism wrote: For example, the difference in "How many American citizens support the Bush administration"; compared to "How many American citizens are tired of the fascism".
It's a bit exaggerated, but you get the point.
Okay-- you made more sense than the poster.
None the less...
It sounds like horse pokey still because, for starters, there is nothing wrong in stating that there are more non-Christians than Christians. That statistic isn't being slanted in any way. What is more, you could google these statistics up from a variety of sources.
In the most likely conclusion it was NOT a "bogus" number that he saw. It was something that he personally didn't like... and the only supposed agendas that exist are his own personal one against Liberals... and the imagination one that says that Liberals have an agenda.
What's happening is that the poster is so hyper-sentive conservative that any mention of a topic that has a history of contraversy will make him assume it has to be in either a good or bad light. EVEN if it's nothing at all in reality...
At 11/15/07 05:37 PM, WoogieNoogie wrote:At 11/15/07 05:09 PM, fli wrote: And WHY is saying statistics is some sort of agenda?That's just it, they weren't statistics. They were set up to look like fact, but they were just random numbers thrown into a chart.
Okay-
so I'm assuming that you're saying that it's a lie. So, there are more Christians than non-Christians?
I'm sorry,
but that sounds like horse pokey...
At 11/15/07 08:34 PM, Empanado wrote: Anybody knows why we've got this thing laying around in the middle of the city? Because I don't.
I don't like it. It looks french.
Colonialism...
Well, I like it.
In Mexico City, there's the Plaza de Tres Culturas... So pretty.
BUT anyways...
At 11/15/07 07:00 PM, Proteas wrote:At 11/15/07 05:44 AM, fli wrote: Oh wells...I can top that. My parents have a jar of yellow banana peppers that were canned in 1983 in the cupboard somewhere, and every time I bring it up they refuse to listen to me. They might need it someday... never mind that we've got bags upon bags of frozen veggies in the freezer from the past five or six years that we've yet to get into yet.
Wanna a competition?
My mother has a bottle of hair conditioner from 1976. Yes, during the Bicentennial... Back then she had hair that grew down to her calves so she had to condition it. This particular bottle was really expensive for her and she would use it once every two weeks to last. Well, we still got a half bottle off the honey-wheat germ conditioner from I don't remember who.
We had toilet paper from the early 80s... and they were in COLORS. Pale baby green, and baby blue...
And my mom had these bottles of geletine flavorings circa 1981.
Man, was she pissed that she didn't see them at their spot two weeks after I threw them. (This was last year.)
Seriously-- I just throw them away. First I empty them so that homeless people don't get to them and get sick... and throw the cans not in our trash, but at the neighbors. Why do I do that? Because my mother just KNOWS when I've thrown something out... it's her spidey sense.
Okay... Now, I'm from a Mexican heritage family, but...
Why would you want to study in TJ?
At 11/15/07 04:58 PM, WoogieNoogie wrote: I was giving just one example of a statistic that they pulled out of their asses.
And WHY is saying statistics is some sort of agenda?
Statistics are, for the most part, free from bias. Or at least it's been scrutinized by many people before people can say something about them.
At 11/15/07 06:50 AM, bluedemonspeedracer wrote:At 11/15/07 04:28 AM, fli wrote: Wait a second...It used to be full out sectarian violence but now has just reduced to a street gang territorial pissing contest.
don't they still have that relgious war going on?
Catholics versus Protestants?
But does the IRA stil exist?
I remember, I think in 2003 or 2004, that they disbanded. For some reason, or another... I maybe wrong.
At 11/14/07 11:43 PM, SolInvictus wrote: it announced the fact it was only 27% juice as though it were some sort of achievement. man, crazy times back then in 2004.
My mother's WORST habbit: Costco.
God, I hate buying things in bulk. They last forever, and then you just have to throw them away. Buying in bulk is not cheap folks... unless, you're some business.
Now--
she's got a pantry that's full of expired food which she won't touch but also won't throw away. So basically-- we got stuff like canned jalapenos from 1999, or a box of Sarah Lee Brownie Mix from 1992.
I have to throw them piece by piece... and secretly... and I have to toss at another's garbage.
My mom blames this behavior on her experiences of growing poor. My mom just likes the feeling of having a full pantry, even if it's full of crap. But I grew up poor (goddamit, I will always remember my plastic Nike knock off shows... MADE IN CHINA!!! *blrg* ) and I don't want to fill my fridge or pantry with stuff that should had been digested and passed out 2 or 3 years ago.
Oh wells...
Wait a second...
don't they still have that relgious war going on?
Catholics versus Protestants?
It's pretty redicules to think that the GED has a Liberal slant because a question states that there are more non-Christians than Christians.
First off, I think that statistically speaking, there are more non-Christians in the world. I've seen and heard that several times in my life.
And second, there's nothing "liberal" about saying that.
It's positively nothing. What-so-ever...
Until you can some how prove that stating there are more non-Christians than Christians in the world... you can't say that the GED is part of the Liberal Agenda for World Domination and Socialization.
At 11/14/07 08:57 PM, SolInvictus wrote: i just found a gallon of cranberry juice (NOW WITH 27% JUICE!) that had expired in 2004, made an awesome sound when i opened it. debating what to do with it.
Shouldn't it be 27% vinegar by now?
I seriously don't know why it's hard for English speaking people...
I mean, have you never pretended to beat a drum and trilled that r sound?
Like in Wayne's World, or National Lampoon Christmas?
At 11/12/07 10:33 PM, stafffighter wrote: I just want to ask one short question. Why is it that when people know you haven't slept all they want to talk about is how tired you should be?
Misery loves company...
I admit... I do this all the time.
I'm back from work, and I got to edit a paper *blrrrg* and I'm... SOOOOO TIRED.
Gay bars aren't what it cracked up to be... you know.
At first, being hit up by old queens was fun. But when ONLY old queens hit up on you, it makes you feel like, "What? I'm chopped liver now?" Not that I'm looking-- just makes me wonder. Somebody asked if I was 20... I cried my happiness inside. Everyone always think I'm older.
At 11/12/07 05:50 PM, Krisddd wrote:At 11/12/07 05:48 PM, fli wrote: Just go to junior college.omg they make u do PE in collage too :'(. jeeze i thought i was done with that already
Cheaper, that's for sure.
Just only get the important classes (2 Englishes, 2 maths, 1 PE) and get the hell out. Otherwise, you're gonna be those people who stay in the JC forever.
PE is fun...
Just get a weight lifting class-- that's always cool. You make cool friends, and talk while you're working out.
Just go to junior college.
Cheaper, that's for sure.
Just only get the important classes (2 Englishes, 2 maths, 1 PE) and get the hell out. Otherwise, you're gonna be those people who stay in the JC forever.
At 11/11/07 07:39 AM, SuperDeagle wrote: That is up to the 10 year old kid. It could be an act of revenge towards his parents.
But this doesn't matter. The fact is kids are becoming smarter and smarter as the years go bye.
Is there anything stopping this one kid from not knowing what he was doing? Of course not!
Isn't obvious that younger and younger children are committing crimes? And quite often as well?
For example my brothers girlfriends younger brother at the age of 10 caught there house on fire knowing full well of what he had done and why he did it. At age 10 this kid also occasionally shoplifted, smoked cigs, and probably got drunk on the weekends.
That is a whole lot of poppycock--
You're talking about a highly improbable situation where a young kid... so tactful, evil, and smart that he has some sort of agenda.
Seriously.
Think about it. Yes, kids often play with fire but this is curiousity. Yes, we have kids who play with fire because they're exhibiting deeply disturbing desires BUT such fires are not even on the scale like nearly all of Southern California and upper Mexico!
Then what kind of kid has an agenda that involves with fire? Children who exibit pryomanic tendencies usually contain their crime within family and friends (they usually burn their own homes down.) Mass destruction is something that's realistic.
So, if this is Stewie Griffin we're talking about or Henry Evans... or even young Hannibal Lecter-- I'm gonna say that mass (beyond mass, really) pyromania isn't something that young children plan.
Generally, if a kid will do something bad, then it's usually the "common evil" that they will pick such as stealing, smoking, drinking, sex, etc. And even then... these circumstances usually reflect a hectic and unstructured life full of troubles.
Think Maury Povich Show kinda of stuff.
Do you not have a slant towards wanting the kid set free? Of course you do we wouldn't be arguing if you didn't.
No, but he ought to face an APPROPRIATE sentence... one that is free from HEAVILY OPINIONATED minds that aren't realistic. We can't make up motives and impose them on him, and expect him to serve a punishment that would ultimately destroy his life. I'm not talking about letting him go scotch free--
but let's not make this thing more complicated than it should. The most probable cause is that the kid liked playing fire and it got out of control. Beyond this situation, the only people who can diagnos him are psycologists.
Animals will eat anything... almost.
My doves are so tame, they will fly to me if they think I'm eating... even if I may not be eating and so happen to lean my face onto my hand. We sometimes give them our food if it's vegetable or bread. Only in small amounts.
The other day, they went crazy on an Asian pear that I was eating. I diced up up some, and they were in just utter bliss. Poor things... if I was eating pellettes everyday, I would also welcome a new change in diet with great gusto.
Everyone, even the most despicable, ought to have their human rights.
How are we better if we deny theirs when they've denied them to their victims?
Work should be 8 hour days, 40 hour max.
And it should not be pointless... but work that's does something.
Making toys...
knitting scarves and sweaters...
growing food, farming...
etc.
And I don't think that excessively dangerous people ought to work-- light term prisoners, and those who are least likely to harm people. People with good people skills, and a WANT to work and earn money.
In that way,
they could afford some luxuries such as TVs and snacks if they've got the money.
I forgot which prison this was, but that's what they do. Prisoners work... and they buy their own flat screen TV. (Although-- they got to be clear and of a certain brand so that stuff can't be hidden in them.) Not only do prisoners get a sense of accomplishment, but they are generally more docile and thus easier and safer to handle.
I think some places are too far, but know what?
I'm a non-smoker, and I don't like going to a bar that's heavy with smoke. It's not that I dislike it, but it makes my eyes dry as hell.
So I think bars ought to be smoke free... unless, smokers make bars that exclusively caters to smokers and people who don't mind smoking.
As far a not smoking like inside your car and etc--
that's dumb.
I think people just got tired of smokers being such huge fucking pigs and throwing their used butts on the ground. I know I did whenever I went to the park and wanted to sit down a bench. Just fucking disgusting to see the playsand filled with ciggerette butts...
At 11/11/07 07:52 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote:At 11/11/07 07:49 PM, fli wrote: It makes them feel better and allows them to work harder.And seems to counteract the effects of low oxygen at altitude.
Who knows, but when the indigenous over there were slaves... they used coke leaves extensively to survive being overworked to death and, literally, genocide.
But it isn't abused as heavily... It's used ceremonially, It think. And it has to be placed in the mouth in a certain way. (3 leaves pointed in a crown. Held on each finger and pinned down by the thumb.)
I remember seeing it done on Motorcycle Diaries....
in defense of cocaine..
the indigenous of South America have used Cocaine (albiet by just chewing the leaves) for several hundreds of years without the extensive problems we see with coke usage in the US.
It makes them feel better and allows them to work harder.
I haven't written a review for a long time... either...
There's no way to give criticism because it's nearly ALWAYS viewed bad and thus all criticism, even if it's constructive and not beligerent, is removed.
So that very crappy flashes are full of sensational reviews jocking on their poles, making them look a whole lot better than they should. It's like mixing icecream with horse crap, I tell you...
Flashes full of "yes men."
At 11/9/07 07:02 AM, SuperDeagle wrote:At 11/9/07 03:53 AM, fli wrote: Now, I know the kid is 10 and he couldn't forsee the IMMENSE consequnces of his actions.How do you know that? As far as you know it was in full interests that he did what he did. I find it interesting that here on NG anytime you make fun of someones argument they try to pull out the age card. Yet for some reason this attached capability of knowledge falls when the situation is different? Why is it this way? Sympathetic guilt on your part?
Ask yourself...
What kind of self interests does pyromania serve for a 10 year old kid? At that age, you know well enough to not play with fire. But kids still play someimes until... they get burned.
Some guys need to piss on the electric gate to know not to piss there...
Unless this kid is extremly mentally disturbed, there's nothing of interest he had in these ghastly fires.
Sympathetic guilt?
I hardly feel guilty for something I never done.
