So your saying that a member of an unrecognised organisation that commits crimes in the name of that organisation cannot be prosecuted because an organisation cannot be prosecuted?

Even for making bomb threats, aren't Americans crazy about that sort of stuff?

http://www.kentucky.com/158/story/164960 .html

"Religious teens found happier than Atheist teens"

I agree, Mick. Pointing out that Atheists are happier then those with faith is an incredibly weak point, and its also not specifically true! However the same could be said the other way round.

So even though God clearly doesn't exist, pointing out that those who think there is an invisible man in the sky are sadder than you adds no weight to your attempt to show Scientific reasoning to such a person that does think there is an invisible man in the sky.
The same could be said for different people who believe there are different invisible men in the sky, just because one group is more violent or one group contributes more to society, it is completely unrelated to the education of someone unsure of how scientific reasoning works, and such a claim has no place during such a time.

Innocent until proven guilty.
Freedom of speech.

I'm sorry Anonymous, no matter how many teens you can amass to sing Rick Astley and hold Mudkiepz signs, you have no power to accomplish anything apart from being prosecuted for making death threats/bomb threats. Give up now before you over commit.

To be honest Anonamous/4chan (is there a difference?) is not better than Scientology. Scientology harasses people, Anon harrases people. Scientology promotes 'propaganda'. Anon makes death threats and bomb threats against the church.

Seriously I doubt anything Scientology has done is worse than anything Anon has done. You think Fair Game policy is bad? You've made your own fair game policy of "They harass some guy, we harass them and make all sorts of threats"

Oh and I don't get the murder thing. Apparently they've killed people, and no authorities seem to mind. Tin foil hat much?

Just curious - what did Scientology ever do to Anonymous? Bomb threats and death threats, for what? They allegedly killed some woman some time ago that went completely unnoticed by all authorities, and are taking pictures of people when they move nearby church property?

Who cares? Some people want faith in their lives, who is anyone to say that they can't?

What effect do you think Banning the publishing of political polls would have on a democratic election?

I hate newgrounds but for different reasons, pretty much revolving around people like you.

So... What are the lastest developments in atheism? Have we won yet?

A radio wave is not a weapon

I thought it was....meh. Not bad, but no-where near as good as some comedy programs, for example: Father Ted.

Wow is a pretty decent game but you to enjoy to fully you need to be...

1. Not a moron
2. Not get bored when you watch fantasy films
3. Have time

9/11 is not a joke, you make me sick.

Have fun?

At 8/14/07 05:36 PM, IrishLaddie wrote: I love you too!

Now bend over.

I rest my case.

Newgrounds is no worse, just replace the whining with retarded spam.

Meh i tried my best but i suppose just mentioning something like healthcare makes people want to ramble without reading the first post :(

At 8/12/07 07:22 PM, FatherAnderson wrote: I live in Canada. And i feel that everyone is entitled to free healthcare.

Grats, now get the hell back on topic before you de-rail my thread.

17.5% Value added tax on bought goods

Not that i didn't expect this thread to turn into something like this but I don't care if you're for or against an NHS but it's if you think that healthcare shouldn't be the only service that is private.

For example

At 8/12/07 12:31 PM, Memorize wrote: Yeah, I've only had to go to the hospital around 6 times in the past 4-5 months.

And yet... I still don't expect others to pay for MY HEATH

If you're house caught on fire 6 times in the past 4-5 months, would you expect others to pay for the fire brigade to sort your house out?

At 8/12/07 10:38 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: Lets say Person A and Person B are neighbors. Person A buys police and fire protection, Person B doesn't. Person A has a fire on his property, and he calls the fire department. Person B benefits without paying because the fire isn't contained and doesn't spread on to his property.

Person A suspects suspicious activity in the neighborhood, so he calls for a police patrol down his street. Person B lives right next to Person A, so he benefits from A paying for it.

Could that be different to person A having an infectious disease, going to get treatment and being cured quickly, person B may benefit because he wont catch the disease from person A?

So I go on these forums (somewhat less than i used to) and tend to go to the political forum more than the general, I noticed after Michel More(sp?)'s film about Public healthcare a few threads were put up backing his opinion.

I live in Britain, and am certainly for our NHS (National Health Service), and the majority of America must be against it, because it's a democracy. An argument that pops up is: "Hey, I can pay my health insurance, and I don't want to spend my money to keep the poor people in shape."

But if that is how you feel about health insurance, why not go all the way with that idea? It seems a tad strange to be sitting halfway. How about you pay for your fire insurance, if you have a fire, aslong as you have insurance you can get sorted out. Why should your tax money go on paying for those people how can't afford fire insurance in the first place, It's your money.

And to a lesser extent, police insurance. That one would be a lot harder to sort out, but in essence the argument is the same. Your money goes into protecting yourself, and those people who couldn't afford it. Why should you go paying your money to help out people you don't even know?

What do you think?

15 years at the keyboard gives on the ability to touchty[e flawlessly

FUCKING FUCK IT

Is Newgrounds fucking 4chan now? Fuck off you degrading alt.

Either the brother that lives keeps going in the other guys memory, or he goes emo and cuts himself.

I reckon Darlek fire would be pretty hard to adapt to, and dont forget Darleks have torpedos etc in their spaceships to vary the firepower.

Robots never make mistakes, he meant to say 'hittest'.

The joke is too old to be 'daring' and not old enough to be funny.

Fail.

Either:

Cuntmuffin
or
Gizmo, In Memory if Gizmo.

At 7/29/07 08:33 PM, xXCostelloXx wrote:

At 7/29/07 08:28 PM, FeargusMcDuff wrote: All the bosses you've posted are pathetic, they arn't even a tutorial compared to The Four Horsemen In Naxxramas, In World of Warcraft.

WTF are you saying??? people have trouble with diffrent bosses! back of you WoW nerd,just like the other players of that damn usless game i best you've never even tuched a real game or a girl at that! the people he are cool becuse they posted about the shit that gave them trouble in real video games and others didnt harass or poke fun of becuse everyone has the boss thats tough as hell for them;
besides WoWs some shitty MMRPG awnyway i played it and it was fucking gay,warcraft reign of chaos owns it!

Hahahahahaha stay on topic, little nublet. The four horsemen is the hardest boss i've ever fought against and you wouldnt last any more than 56 seconds.

ps: my best friend beat those pony guys the first time he seen em' in WoW and he suck at that game.

He soloed a 40 man instance, where everyone has a rotation of 6 jobs to do for about 15 minutes, and if one person screwes up, you start again?

At 7/29/07 08:35 PM, CryogenChaos wrote:

At 7/29/07 08:28 PM, FeargusMcDuff wrote: All the bosses you've posted are pathetic, they arn't even a tutorial compared to The Four Horsemen In Naxxramas, In World of Warcraft.

They never fucking drop Corrupted Ashbringer. Never.

It dropped today for my friend in a Naxxramas pug. No joke.

All the bosses you've posted are pathetic, they arn't even a tutorial compared to The Four Horsemen In Naxxramas, In World of Warcraft.