Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

"Hi my name is teddy, if you do not spam 8 entries with this post you will die in 24 hours after reading this, there is no way I can possibly prove this and instead I'm hoping that you're stupid enough to believe everything I say. But go ahead spam the portal with these reviews, since if you don't you will die by something that doesn't exist, but if you do then you will suddenly be rich just by posting some old message."

Are you sick of reviews like these? Do you want to help rid newgrounds of these pests once and for all? Do you want free whistle points?

This crew will be dedicated to finding these reviews and wiping them out. A couple years ago newgrounds got spammed with outwar links but that stopped when they started hitting the spammers where they hurt, outwar. Now we have a different and much worse spam problem. Instead of just one line they fill up a whole wall of text and now they just copy and paste the entire thing for each and every post. Worse yet is that if they can find someone gullible enough to believe that your death can come from not obeying instructions from some random guy on the internt, then can get them to spread more spam. Even worse yet is that if this is all coming from one source we don't know where.

I will be posting where we can find these spam posts from time to time, then we will go there and vote abusive on them until they are deleted by a mod (or whoever deletes reviews). If you find these reviews in places I haven't mentioned then please tell us about it so that we may try to get these spam posts taken off the portal.

Hopefully we can stop the spam from overflowing or at least make a large dent in the spam posts that already exist.

I don't remember what it was called.

A while ago I found this club where members would post links to abusive movie that just hit the portal so that anyone watching the thread could go there and blow the whistle on them (and I think they also ahd reviews). Now I can no longer find that club. Can someone help me out?

At 8/26/07 07:11 PM, seabassmm wrote: Most youngsters are liberal because their parents believe in all of the crap that the news media puts on TV. They take after their parents and carry on the political party. Then, as they grow up, they begin to realize the political events and finally figure out what's right and wrong, so that's why most older and wiser people are more conservative.

Yup because when the media started balming Columbine on video games every kid in the U.S. started blaming them too. And what if their parents watch fox news. Another thing is, if kids take after their parents, and parents supposedly become more conservative, wouldn't they in turn become conservative? Oh and older does not neccesarily mean wiser as much as you would like it to be.

Well let's see most of the conservative party is anti-gay, which is wrong. Young people are getting more tolerant of gay people and so they will mistrust the conservatives a bit more.

Also if a man says anything along the lines of "I want to return America to the glory days, our morals have gotten rotten over the years and I will restore them back to the good times" do you think he is either conservative or liberal? (I'm not saying all conservatives are like this).

This might've been said before but I don't have time to read through all 19 pages.

If we could wave a wand and start a magic spell that would make EVERY gun in the entire world (except for those owned by cops) disappear, then we would probably have less crime in the world.

BUT, we can't and doing so would be very unfeasible and wouldn't work. Even if we got rid of the 2nd amendment and started a nationwide banned that still wouldn't remove guns from the nation. For evidence I give you the very unpopular movement sweeping the nation in the 1920s, prohibition. In January 1920, all alcoholic beverages were banned, but did that stop people from obtaining booze? Of course not. People found tons of ways to brew their own booze, buy them from speakeasies or find other ways around the system. This led to organized crime to feed everyone's booze addiction, which in turn led to more crime and more booze. 13 years later prohibition is repealed after becoming a dismal failure and we still have booze today.

The point is that no matter what the government says, people will still find ways to get guns even if you make an outright ban on them.

At 8/19/07 04:49 AM, Reignspike wrote:

How can you say for sure you've never been affected? Where is your control group? Did you meet an alternate dimensional version of yourself where you had not played any of those games and tested both versions of you for aggression?

If you could, I believe strongly that you'd find that the real you was more aggressive. By how much? Who knows? But by some.

I find it absolutely amazing that you can come to this conclusion without ever actually meeting the guy in person. Just absolutely amazing.

At 8/7/07 03:09 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: I'd like to just cut in hear for a moment; everyone claiming "Well, it was my ancestors, i shouldnt have 2 make up 4 da indans lol" are completely illogical. If my dad was to walk up to your dad, kill him, your mom, and the rest of your family, then move my family into your house, the police would (obviously) show up. Now, imagine if my dad had shot himself immediately after the fact. Would me saying, "Hey, I didn't take your house, my dad took your dad's house!" somehow entitle me to keep said house? Of course not. That's as illogical as saying "Sure, your the legal owner of this plot of land, but my great grandfather killed your great grandfather for it, so it's mine".

That's a stupid argument, would you be forced to move out of the house? Yes. Would you be arrested and charges with the murders that your dead father commited? Of course not. To furher your analogy, you were out of the country on a foreign exchange trip, and due to a power outage had no way of contacting your family, could you even remotely be held responsible for the killigns? No. Now one step further in your analogy. Say that my parents were selling the house because we were moving, i thought they sold the house so i didn't force you to leave, now let's say you raise a generation of kids in that house, then we both pass on, now 50 years later, my son realises the mistake and comes to your ancestors asking them to leave. Would it be fair to your descendents to suddenly have to leave? No it would not (in the hypothetical situtation my son would probably get the house anyway, but it is still unfair to your descendants who had no part in the killings).

it would be great if you even attempted an argument instead of just posting a link to a stupid picture.

To all the pro-lifers out there,

you say life is precious which is why we shouldn't abort babies. Ok fine life is precious, but if that be the case then abortion is the least of your worries.

For instance did you know that soap is known to kill bacteria, lots and lots of bacteria. Bacteria is life and life is precious so that means that we should ban soap now.

Don't care about bacteria? Ok how about insects, they are alive no one is debating that they are alive but look we have insect spray, and we have exterminators, or people who are told to come into our house and MURDER insects. I'm sure that if you think life is so precious you wouldn't kill a helpless insect would you? We all know that insects have life and life is precious (tm), so let's try to make exterminator an illegal proffession.

What's that you don't care about insects either? Well how about cows, they're a lot bigger and more complex than an unborn fetus. We kill them for food and yet we have thousands of square miles of farmland and so much food made out of unnatural chemicals and junk. It's clear that we don't NEED to eat cows (if we were stranded on an island, or if we were plagued by famine it would be a different story), but yet we still eat cows. Cows have life, and life is precious, so let's all become vegetarians, so we don't have to resort to murdering cows.

But let's try to take this down a peg, we have the great sport of hunting which involves the killing of animals. We all know animals have life and life is precious, so think about that next time you grab a gun and go through a stroll in the woods.

i think you miss the point,

He was a good LEADER because he did those things for germany
He was a horrible PERSON because he blamed everything on jews and started the holocaust (which led to WWII).

Does his leadership skills make up for the attrocities he commited? Of course not.

At 7/23/07 05:21 PM, morefngdbs wrote:

At 7/23/07 04:55 PM, FatherTime89 wrote:

, and it is reverse discrimination no matter how you look at it.

Sorry Father Time, just a point of order.
There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination"

There is only discrimination. Unfortunately it goes on all the time & effects everyone of all races .

by that I mean stuff that favors black over whites as a way to pay back discriminaiton against blacks, I thought that was the name for it.

At 7/23/07 04:09 PM, Begoner wrote:

At 7/23/07 02:32 PM, Korriken wrote: I want MY check Because I'm irish and the irish were discriminated against during the potato famine.

The discrimination was not sponsored by the state (except in preventing Irish migration); thus, you should not expect the state's support in dealing with its extant effects. However, the US government did support slavery and thus owes something to those who were affected by it.

Really? I thought they just allowed slavery, not actually benefited from it (yes i know individual plantations obviously benefited but not the governemtn itself)

The Japanese were put in interment camps during WW2, but you don't hear THEM bitching now do you?

Actually, they were compensated for their suffering, albeit much later on -- in 1988, a law was passed granting all those who were subjected to internment $20,000 dollars. Something similar should be provided for those who were victims of slavery or the Native American genocide.

http://www.internmentarchives.com/showdo c.php?docid=00055&search_id=19269

well, you shouldn't give someone something for something they didn't suffer.

Yes, you should. It's the next best thing to do. You can't simply sweep slavery under the rug and pretend it didn't happen -- the government must pay for condoning it.

We're not pretending it didn't happen, we're jsut saying that we should not pay money to people who were not slaves, if you can find me a 200 something year old black man who was a slave and is still alive then sure let's give him a check, everyone else who only has dead ancestors who were slaves won't get anything. If we really wanted to pretend slavery did not exist we would get rid of black history month (which we should anyway for other reasons I don't want to get into), but evne if, if we wanted to delete slavery from our history books, we would've done so by now, and evne if we still wanted to not giving reperations won't do it.

If nothing else, with Affirmative action, blacks get priority over whites!

No, they most certainly do not. There is subtle discrimination targeted against blacks everywhere -- sometimes it's even quite overt. Only the extremely ignorant and cloistered can actually believe that blacks are favored over whites -- it's absurd.

It's different on a school to school basis, some blacks receive 'subtle discriminaton' and in other places where affirmitice action exist, blacks have an advantage over whites. The very nature of affirmitive action is giving black people an advantage over whites in certain places, it has been here long enough, and it is reverse discrimination no matter how you look at it.

At 7/23/07 03:39 PM, Korriken wrote: United Negro College Fund (there are no whites only college funds, I have looked. well there is one that awarded to a single person for $50, whoopy. also it is considered racist and some colleges won't accept it, ironic.)
Racial quotas in college

hey wait a minute wasn't there a supreme court case that made those quotas unconstituional? I thought it was califrnia vs. bakke or something like that, i demand a likn for college quotas.

At 7/23/07 11:27 AM, Begoner wrote: That's a whole different point. The question here is whether the US government should pay indemnities for its past "mistakes" (genocide and slavery, to mention two).

Genocide? What are you talking about? The only thing that comes to mind is internment in WWII, however this doesn't count because

a. It was not genocide
b. It was directed entirely at Japanese people (aka asians)
c. they already paid reparations for it

At 7/20/07 03:16 AM, Chorkles wrote:

At 6/19/07 07:12 PM, Altarus wrote:

At 6/19/07 07:09 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: Do you think the British didn't look at the U.S revolutionaries in the same way we look at the 9/11 bombers

The Revolution was an organized, civillized and proper revolt. What happened on 9/11 was a bloodthirsty rampage against innocent civillians. No comparison.

Actually, those innocents in the towers had it coming. They worked for the World Trade Center, one of the most powerful, exploiting economic forces in the world. When the planes crashed, the took one of the most corrupt symbols of the American hegemony with them. As the towers came crashing down, it heralded the destruction, or at least the realixation of the destruction, of the american empire. The deaths of those lost in 9/11 is something to be mourned, but so are the deaths of thousands of Iraqis who die every day.

You do realise that there were tourists in the twin towers on that day (just like every day in new york city), oh and do you really think that janitors security guards and guys like that had their death coming?

At 7/19/07 04:35 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote:

At 7/19/07 07:33 AM, Denta wrote:

No, just no. To the Talibans the martyrs were heroes, and to the western world they were villians. The talibans think of themselves as soldiers of freedom and the US as scum that wants to control the world and ofcourse, vice versa.

...ummmm... the Taliban weren't involved in 9/11.

Yes they were, I believe they even admitted being involved, or are you one of those idiots who believes the government was responsible.

anyone else think this makes newgrounds seem cartoony and cluttered? I think it kinds makes it lose some of its undergroundish feeling.

everything seems kinda cluttered and cartoonish now, I don't if I'm gonna like this change.

At 4/13/07 10:56 PM, afliXion wrote: -Separation of Church and State (even though these words are not found in the Constitution.)

Congress should make no law respecting any religion or something like that, anyway there is a law about seperation of church and state, although ironically it was written out of fear the government would get too involved with the church.

At 4/13/07 12:27 AM, packow wrote:

They deserved to be congraduated, but Don Imus was a total fucking asshole and made completely inappropriate and bigoted comments in a tasteless, mean spirited manner.

Did you even listen to his quote WITH CONTEXT? He was not saying it in a mean-spirited or bigoted manne, rather he said it in a very jokingly and humorous tone. Yes they are tastless but there's a big difference between tasteless and mean-spirited

He was fired because he was a fucking cunt, not because he was racist.

Actually he was fired because the advertisers kept pulling out because a small army of easilty offended people complained and the media made it seemed like it was a very large group of people.

In ancient Greece there were no lawyers, since they were not needed. Why? Because one of the things they taught at schools was how to defend yourself in a court of law. If you are poor and can't afford a lawyer yet your opponent is rich and can you are at a great disadvantage. I think we should try to fix this by taking a page from ye olde greece and teach defense for criminal and civil suits in public schools (yes I do realise how complicated this could be but you have to admit it would be a lot more useful in the real world then say a study on Shakespearen literature.) Anyone agree?

At 4/12/07 03:45 PM, SEXY-FETUS wrote: I'll just throw in my personal experience. My ex was physically abusive. Because I called her a fucking bitch after she hit me I was considered mentally abusive and setting a bad example of how to treat women to my son. So of course she was granted custody. BTW it was a female judge. Up to all of you to decide if that's considered fair.

That's quite a story. If i were you I'd file a complaint with the state bar.

At 4/12/07 02:55 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Isn't it obvious? Feminism is going way too far and this backwards sexism is becoming more and more prevelant. Double standerds are not equality.

And I'll write whoever says "but men have double standers too" a list of the double standerds for both sexes.

"men have double standards too" Sorry but i really want to see the list you come up with. I have no doubt you will come up with a great list, I just want to see it.

Oh and on topic please see the discussion on Imus and reverse racism, it seems as if the minorities of yesterday will become the unfair oppressors of tommorow.

In theory Communism is a good idea (the economic part), in practice however it rarely works. You do get greed at the top just like capitalism, and if communism has control of the press all they have to do is tell everyone that the total of every communists money is less thne before. (example Cuba collects everyones money after a month, it is $800,00 total and there are 20,000 people. They tell everyone they have collected $600,000 and give everyone $30 instead of $40 and pocket the rest.) Also trying to stifle free speech should not be done.

Why is everyone fauning over the balck bars, they were not that good. They looked almost the same and it did not fit with NG AT ALL!!!! You only think it's cool because it is different and you are used to the old ones. Believe me ina wekk or two (maybe a month) it will lose it's newness and you'll all realise how stupid the header is and how it seems completely different then what newgrounds is like.

The reason why people liked the black navbar was because it was very different than what we are used to everyday on newgrounds. Just like the current navbar and logo they were infinitely cooler when they were first released than they are now because we grow used to it in time. Everyone was also complaining about the new slogan but i think we are all used to it by now. Please don't change it to black navbars it reminds me too much of an amlost abandoned website tht i used to go to.

At 4/1/07 01:55 PM, Lord-Bob wrote: Thats It? I expected Epicness, not sadness. THIS IS MADNESS

MADNESS?!!! NO, THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!
(kicks down well)

Hey is i-mockery going to get a redesign since you aquired it a year ago? Also isn't the site called numagrounds. I hope you talked to mcdonalds about the redesign because they are real control freaks. By the way what is this april fools i keep hearing about every year when something huge happens?

I just hit level 16 today. Oh yeah.