349 Forum Posts by "FadePuff"
At 2/18/08 01:42 AM, Gustavos wrote: Hey people check it out. It's a new anti KK. Notice the real-life relations towards kitties and puppies and see the resemblance with this new crew. Or Platoon apparently:
http://vinegarpuppy.newgrounds.com/
I can't be the only person that finds that rather amusing.
I've seen lots of girls that are not on that list. You don't even have MoriChax?
I'm going to go with girl 2, she's cute.
At 2/13/08 10:03 PM, Lagatag wrote: Computer generated girls
You can do better than that.
what the fuck
The first one is an ugly emo bitch, whereas the second one is drop-dead gorgeous. Not a hard choice at all.
I would like to see them get ahold of an old De Lorean and disprove the possibility of time travel. Knowing them, it would be as about as valid as any of their other proofs.
At 2/13/08 08:20 AM, BatDan wrote: I would like to see them prove/disprove the 5 Second Rule. Meaning if food has been on the floor for less then five seconds it is safe to eat. I'm pretty sure this isn't true.
Ugh, no.
I'd also like to see that myth that killed Brandon Lee. I don't remember all the details but it involved a real bullet escaping a plastic bullet.
How can you disprove an actual event?
At 2/13/08 09:31 PM, OsAmARaMa wrote: I am not a 'terrorist'.
But that's what a terrorist would say!
At 2/13/08 02:53 PM, ESKentertainment wrote: sex = more views & lower score
no sex = less views & higher score
Yeah that's bullshit. Some hentai galleries always get like 3.6 or 3.7, when if they were on any other subject, would only get like a 2.3. The score gets ridiculously high only because they have sex.
At 2/13/08 03:38 PM, Brian wrote: Mods aren't unfair. There are the few, BBR is an example, who does little help is image if he is dealing with an idiot. He always has an original good reason to lock the thread, but some users don't get that, and in all honesty how can you blame someone for treating an idiot like an idiot.
I have seen BBR create threads that he would ban anyone else for making. He's a douchebag.
The BBS should just be shut down. It is just a giant shithole. Or at least, they should switch the "Forums" link with the "Blogs" link at the top of the site to marginalize it while giving the blogs a boost.
The only way I can get my file size down to something decent is to make it a video
At 2/13/08 05:55 AM, RjWise wrote: "Hey Jesus! You're a cunt!"
Careful. You might get your chance some day.
I find it ironic that people are criticizing YouTube for that when Newgrounds has Numa Numa. The fact of the matter is that was the shit. Newgrounds has nothing on that.
About fucking time. I can't wait to see Heroes again.
PM's / blogs are relatively recent. So no. And most of the people here aren't worth socializing with anyways.
Newgrounds is 97% assholes. I'm not sure why you decided to share your problems with a community like that. In fact, half of them are probably getting off to your misery right now.
Actually, now that I think of it, human society at large is like that. Oh well.
My understanding is that story threads are not allowed.
At 2/12/08 09:43 PM, FadePuff wrote:At 2/12/08 09:38 PM, whatty wrote: they obviously exist. you jerk.Obviously.
Odd. It works when you click on it from Google, but not from here. I'll just paste the important part.
Aug. 30, 2005 - Bisexual men aren't fully bisexual, a controversial study suggests.
In the study, bisexual men reported being sexually aroused by erotic videos of both men and women. But a device attached to their genitals told another story.
Gerulf Rieger, a PhD candidate at Northwestern University, conducted the study with psychology professor J. Michael Bailey, PhD.
"We used measures of sexual arousal to explain true sexual feeling," Rieger tells WebMD. "In men, there is no good evidence that something like a true bisexual attraction is out there."
That conclusion doesn't fit with the experience of San Francisco psychologist Geri Weitzman, PhD, who runs a web site listing bisexual-friendly professional services.
"I have seen in my practice very, very, very many men who are bisexual," Weitzman tells WebMD. "Really, there are so many bisexual men out there. There are so many men who say -- and demonstrate -- that they love men and love women and are happy with it."
Rieger and Bailey are looking in the wrong place for men's sexual identities, says Sheeri Kritzer, a Bisexual Resource Center board member. Identity, she says, comes from above the ears, not below the belt.
"The whole point of sexual identity is it is a validation of who you are," Kritzer tells WebMD. "This study perpetuates the idea that men are studs, that they go with whatever turns them on. It goes on the old stereotype that men think with their [penises]."
Sexologist Paula Rodriguez Rust, PhD, is the editor of the 1999 book Bisexuality in the United States. She says a person's sexual orientation is not determined merely by genital arousal.
"Sexual response is not everything we think of when we think of sexual orientation," Rodriguez Rust tells WebMD. "Bisexuality clearly exists."
Women From Venus and Mars, Men From Venus or Mars
Bailey's sexuality research tends to draw fire. His 2003 book on male-to-female transsexuals, The Man Who Would Be Queen, is still under attack from some in the transgendered community.
Last year, Bailey, Rieger, and others published a study in which they measured female sexual arousal. They concluded that women -- whether they identify themselves as homosexual or heterosexual -- have bisexual arousal patterns. That's because the genitals of women participating in the study became aroused when they watched porn, regardless of whether it featured men or women.
Men, they say, are different. The current study, reported in the current issue of Psychological Science, enrolled 30 heterosexual men, 33 bisexual men, and 38 homosexual men. Nine of the heterosexual men, 11 of the bisexual men, and 13 of the homosexual men did not become genitally aroused by the videos and were dropped from the final analysis.
The men viewed an 11-minute nonsexual film, followed by several two-minute sexual films and another neutral film. The sex films depicted either men having sex with men or women having sex with women.
The men indicated how aroused they felt by moving a lever up or back. Their genital arousal was measured by an elastic device attached to their penises.
Homosexual men said they were aroused by the male/male porn but not the female/female porn. So did their genital measurements. Heterosexual men said they were aroused by the female/female porn - and their genital measurements agreed.
Bisexual men said they were turned on by both sets of videos -- but their genitals responded to one or the other, not to both.
"The majority of bisexual men got aroused to men and only to men," Rieger says. "All those who didn't look like gay men looked like heterosexual men: They got aroused to women. This study fits the picture that ... men are very target specific. They have an object of their sexual desire and go for that. ... The pattern is that they have this object specificity -- it does not change."
At 2/12/08 09:38 PM, whatty wrote: they obviously exist. you jerk.
Blogs are the new BBS now. Just click that little "Blogs" link at the top of the screen, and you'll be in a much better place.
At 2/12/08 03:48 PM, MRat wrote: The Animator's Survival Kit by Richard Williams. Every animator should own it and should have done all the exercises in it a number of times.
I agree with that.
woman/perv is basically a contradiction.
man/perv is basically redundant.
There are a few on this one. Current page has "blam it" and another one on the next page says "you suck." Might want to look around a bit on it.
