60 Forum Posts by "EvilEgbert"
At 4/27/03 02:37 AM, stop_watch wrote: in the netherlands it is 21 to drive legally
in the netherlands it is 16 to get in a bar legally
peace
No, in the Netherlands it is 18 to drive legally. You HAVE to take lessons at a profesional driving school, when your mentor thinks you are a responsible driver he'll aply for your exam. The dutch exams are much more difficult then the american ones. When you pass your exam you'll get a 5 year 'test' license. If you screw up big time (not the small violations) three times in that 5 year period you'll lose your license, if you don't you'll get you're real license.
I think that's pretty good way of keeping most of the danger of the road.
Without the french you wouldn't have the Statue Of Liberty
Veggiemeal... check your callender, what's today? I read on the teletext (or texttv whatever) today that Washington and New York were being bombed, and that was national television! Sick joke. This one is funny though.
At 3/31/03 11:57 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: Alright, we'll just make total lawless, borderless anarchy. Sorry if it sounded sarcastic. Mwahaha.
I was being sarcastic too. All though I do think the world would be better off without borders, religion and leaders you can't get rid of them anymore. In a perfect world anarchy would work.
And while we are at it, why not get rid of country borders, a lot of wars are border conflicts. And how about the world leaders, some wars are fought because they just can't get along.
No, It's probably not because their just being nice. If you've watched the news lately you'd know that they think there is still room for a diplomatic solution.
Okay, I'll defend my answer for you as it seems you didn't get it the first time.
First you start telling us about how France and Germany are must be supporting Iraq without giving us any information that could proof it, then you tell us to get informed. I don't think you have the right to tell anyone to get informed when you show no indication at all that you are informed yourself.
At 3/7/03 03:26 PM, panik wrote: I've been thinking about this and why would France and Germany be so against going to war with Iraq. If you think about it they must have some connection with Iraq .I think that they gave weapons to Iraq and now they are just Stalling for time in the UN so that they can clean up the evidence before the US and Great Britain get in there. Think about it why would these two relativly small political and military powers be so against taking out a dictator with bio and chemical weapons.I dont think the French are against the war beacuse they are peace loving or that they are ungrateful, limp wristed, don't hurt me please take my country pussies (which they are), they are just stalling so they dont get caught. Why eles would they turn their back on the US who saved their asses. And Germany doesn't want anything to do with war since there last two failures WWI and WWII that and they don't want to get caught either.
That must be one of the dumbest things I have read EVER on the newgrounds bbs, including the general forum!!
Tell me have you actualy woken up and smelled the coffee, exactly how informed are you?
Nintendo is gonna make a new console and it will be released around the same time as the PS3 and the Ybox (?), that's not a fact but that's what I think will be most likely. Then gamers will have a choice, now there were allready millions of playstations sold when the GC and theXbox came out.
At 3/1/03 11:42 AM, Dr_Natch_Kilder wrote:
They are not going to waste all the money they are spending in this troop movement, that's clear. Once they are here, why not go and kill a few arabs?
Iraqis are not Arabs.
At 2/15/03 06:53 PM, Sirterox wrote: i favor the opinion that people should all have guns in their homes. Guns are not deadly.
Okay, where did it say this topic was about gun control in the US. Sirterox' opinion is that people should all have guns (or the right to have them), I take it that with people he ment all people including Europeans. I oppose his opinion and by comparing the US with Europe I'm trying to make my point about why I'm for gun control. That's called discussion.
However I do understand that it would be very difficult if not impossible for the US to abandon the right to have guns.
At 2/27/03 10:11 AM, TheEvilOne wrote:
But still, don't you think that other nations would be reluctant to invade a country where everyone and their dog carried a weapon?
'Other' nations are reluctant to invade Europe too.
At 2/27/03 12:46 AM, kittie_cross wrote: Oh seriously, assmunch! Like a crimal wannabe actually conciders getting a decent job! Mu god, don't you leave the house? Do you know what reality is?
We fought for this damn counrty against the British.. and WON! You think we fought off the Red Coats with pitchforks? No... This country was won with guns, and that's how it should stay. Besides, gun control will only make the "gun problem" (like there even is one!) much worse than all of you think it already is now!
MY GOD!!! Did you fight for your country agianst the British? How old are you?
Just because your great great grantfather shot a Brit doesn't automaticly mean you should have the right to carry a gun. If that was the case than every Brit should have the right to carry a sword and a battleaxe because the Normans fought off the Saxons with them. (If I'm wrong about the Normans kicking out the Saxon please correct me but my point stays)
At 2/25/03 11:50 PM, TheEvilOne wrote: Well, I concede that gun control laws may deter some people from buying guns, but they won't deter everybody. With gun control laws, there may be someone willing to get a gun off the black market to knock over Mr. Wong's Noodle Shop. Without gun control laws, sure, someone could go to any gun shop to get a gun to knock over Mr. Wong's Noodle Shop, except--whoops!--Mr. Wong has a gun too!
But the broke guy will shoot first if he sees mr Wong go for his gun because he's allready aiming.
At 2/25/03 03:25 PM, Digital_Chameleon wrote:
This topic would have been more useful if you actually TOLD US WHAT THIS PRODUCT IS CALLED AND WHERE WE CAN FIND IT! fool ass bitch.
Yeah cuz dammit... WE WANT IT uhm, I mean; why would you want to drink more alcohol, is something troubling you son?
Has anyone, anyone at all considered the fact that it's a bigger step to buy a gun on the black market then in a legal shop on the corner. Especialy for a beginning criminal (someone who isn't a criminal yet but he's considering it) who doesn't own a gun yet.
here are two situations:
(without gun control)
Broke guy: thinking "damn I'm broke, I really need to get me some money, now were can I find some easy money? I know, I'll go to Billy Bob's gun Boutique, buy myself a nice Smith & Wesson and hold up ol' mister Wongs Noodle Shop.
(with gun control)
Same broke guy: thinking "damn I'm broke, I really need to get myself some money, now where can I find some easy money? If only I could get a gun somewhere without having to contact criminals. Nah, I'd better get a decent job.
^^^^^^I'm sure that happens^^^^^^
At 2/24/03 09:27 AM, ArcticMajinAli wrote:
unless the others just slam on the Cube because they 'think' it's kiddy and such.
That's exactly what's happening. Nintendo is kiddy is all they can say, does anyone know how freakishly difficult monkeyball is?
.....does a movie have to score to be blammed. I was reading through the obituaries (english sucks) and there were movies there with a score of over two at death. So, exactly how low?
I'm sure there has been a topic about this before but I didn't read or see it so I don't think I'm spamming.
PS2 and XBox are for 13 y/o boy who still have to prove their manhood.
pff, stupid level 15 person... I'm not afraid of you...
But seriously, I need help.
WTF, why is this happening to me? After every movie I vote on the 'thanks for voting screen' says vote one 4 more movies to deposit your experience points. I've allready voted on over 10 movies but it just doesn't work. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? If so please help!!!!!!!
ps. Yes, I am logged in, I'm not stupid.
At 2/19/03 07:43 AM, TheEvilOne wrote: What if gun control laws mean defending yourself against a gun WITHOUT a gun? As I said before, even if you ban guns, people determined to commit crimes will find ways to obtain them. Law-abiding citizens wouldn't be able to defend themselves, unless they also illegaly obtained a gun, and then they wouldn't be law-abiding citizens anymore, would they?
I'm sure there are people out there that would threaten someone with a gun if only it was easier to get one. Now it's so difficult (or dangerous) to get one they just don't bother, and use other ways to make their statement.
EvilEgbert is just my nerdy wanna be cool computer alter ego. I'm not a computer freak but I figured that a computer freak named Egbert would call himself Evil Egbert when he plays online games.
My name's not really Egbert, don't make fun of me!
At 2/18/03 10:29 PM, swayside wrote: i'll answer your question. the reason europe has less gun related crime/accidents is because of their own gun restrictions. the same logic applies here: take cars away, and accidents will decrease. do you want to do that, too? it would certainly make high speed police chases easier. why all the focus on guns? how about knife control? people kill people with knives. do you want to take those away, too?
you make it sound like guns are made for crime. they're not. i don't know what gave you that idea. guns are made for hunting, self-defense, ect. crime is a misuse of a gun like spraying an aerosol can in someone's eyes.
The main function for a gun is killing which is good if it's done for hunting (for food not fun). The secundary function of a gun is self defense against other people with a gun. I don't know about you but I prefer not having to defend myself against a gun over defending myself against a gun WITH a gun.
As for your knife/car examples, those were not designed to kill. A car brings you to work everyday and a knife cuts your bread. My point: You can kill anyone with everything but a gun makes it to easy, you can run away from a knife but there's no running away from a gun.
At 2/18/03 05:32 PM, Keyser_Soze wrote:
Hmmm... Yes, bring back the fifties... I wonder why you might want those to make a comeback...
RACIAL SEGREGATION?!?!
Nah, I'm sure you like the 50's for the same reason why I do; women would suck cock and make dinner. And that was it.
Purely musical I mean. And the cars.
Simple question: Why is there much more dommestics gun related crime (and accidents) in the US then in Europe.
Now answer this question for yourself and you'll see my point.
Being dutch, I don't understand the principle of knock knock jokes. I hear them on tv all the time and they never make me laugh. Could someone please explain and fill this emptyness in my soul. (or do I just lack a sense of humour)
I'm going to bed now, I won't reply.
'Peter and the Gloves' or something like that..
Bring back the fifties DAMMIT.
(btw way, my name is not egbert nor is it peter it's even more stupid. I won't tell you)
If you want fun games you gotta have a Gamecube, if you want blood and gore you gotta have a Xbox of a PS2.
The world wants blood and gore-..
..the world sucks...
